Overview 114 matches · 2 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 10 exploited · 1 CISA KEV · 21 public PoC · 5 EPSS ≥ 0.5
114matches
2in Waratek scope1.8%
0protected0.0%
10exploited8.8%
1CISA KEV0.9%
21public PoC18.4%
5EPSS ≥ 0.54.4%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
2
1.8%
Outside Waratek scope
0
0.0%
Not applicable
112
98.2%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
114
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 21 / quarter
Q1 221
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q2 220
Q3 220
Q4 220
Q1 234
Not applicable4
Critical2
High1
Low1
not blocked4
Exploited1
Proof of concept only2
No public exploit1
Q2 234
Not applicable4
Critical1
High3
not blocked4
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
No public exploit2
Q3 233
Not applicable3
Critical1
High1
Medium1
not blocked3
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit1
Q4 2314
Not applicable14
Critical4
High9
Medium1
not blocked14
Exploited1
Working exploit published5
Proof of concept only3
No public exploit5
Q1 245
Not applicable5
Critical2
High2
Low1
not blocked5
Proof of concept only5
Q2 2421
Not applicable21
Critical1
High18
Medium2
not blocked21
Exploited1
Working exploit published2
Proof of concept only11
No public exploit7
Q3 240
Q4 241
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q1 255
Not applicable5
High3
Medium2
not blocked5
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only4
Q2 251
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q3 250
Q4 259
Not applicable9
Critical3
High2
Medium4
not blocked9
Exploited2
No public exploit7
Q1 2621
No exploit published1
Not applicable20
Critical3
High15
Medium3
not blocked21
Proof of concept only8
No public exploit13
Q2 2620
No exploit published1
Not applicable19
Critical3
High8
Medium6
Low3
not blocked20
Exploited3
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only12
No public exploit4
Q3 265
Not applicable5
Critical1
High4
not blocked5
Exploited1
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit3
Q1 22Q3 22Q1 23Q3 23Q1 24Q3 24Q1 25Q3 25Q1 26Q3 26
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-6015 | High | 2023-11-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | MLflow allowed arbitrary files to be PUT onto the server. |
| CVE-2023-6014 | Critical | 2023-11-16 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | An attacker is able to arbitrarily create an account in MLflow bypassing any authentication requirment. |
| CVE-2023-4033 | High | 2023-08-01 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | OS Command Injection in GitHub repository mlflow/mlflow prior to 2.6.0. |
| CVE-2023-38496 | Medium | 2023-07-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Apptainer is an open source container platform. Version 1.2.0-rc.2 introduced an ineffective privilege drop when requesting container network setup, therefore subsequent functions are called with root privileges, the attack surface is rather limited for users but an attacker could possibly craft a starter config to delete any directory on the host filesystems. A security fix has been included in Apptainer 1.2.1. There is no known workaround outside of upgrading to Apptainer 1.2.1. |
| CVE-2023-3765 | Critical | 2023-07-19 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Absolute Path Traversal in GitHub repository mlflow/mlflow prior to 2.5.0. |
| CVE-2023-2780 | Critical | 2023-05-17 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Path Traversal: '\..\filename' in GitHub repository mlflow/mlflow prior to 2.3.1. |
| CVE-2023-30172 | High | 2023-05-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A directory traversal vulnerability in the /get-artifact API method of the mlflow platform up to v2.0.1 allows attackers to read arbitrary files on the server via the path parameter. |
| CVE-2023-2356 | High | 2023-04-28 | Not applicable | Exploited | Relative Path Traversal in GitHub repository mlflow/mlflow prior to 2.3.1. |
| CVE-2023-30549 | High | 2023-04-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Apptainer is an open source container platform for Linux. There is an ext4 use-after-free flaw that is exploitable through versions of Apptainer < 1.1.0 and installations that include apptainer-suid < 1.1.8 on older operating systems where that CVE has not been patched. That includes Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7, Debian 10 buster (unless the linux-5.10 package is installed), Ubuntu 18.04 bionic and Ubuntu 20.04 focal. Use-after-free flaws in the kernel can be used to attack the kernel for denial of service and potentially for privilege escalation. Apptainer 1.1.8 includes a patch that by default disables mounting of extfs filesystem types in setuid-root mode, while continuing to allow mounting of extfs filesystems in non-setuid "rootless" mode using fuse2fs. Some workarounds are possible. Either do not install apptainer-suid (for versions 1.1.0 through 1.1.7) or set `allow setuid = no` in apptainer.conf. This requires having unprivileged user namespaces enabled and except for apptainer 1.1.x versions will disallow mounting of sif files, extfs files, and squashfs files in addition to other, less significant impacts. (Encrypted sif files are also not supported unprivileged in apptainer 1.1.x.). Alternatively, use the `limit containers` options in apptainer.conf/singularity.conf to limit sif files to trusted users, groups, and/or paths, and set `allow container extfs = no` to disallow mounting of extfs overlay files. The latter option by itself does not disallow mounting of extfs overlay partitions inside SIF files, so that's why the former options are also needed. |
| CVE-2022-46397 | High | 2023-03-28 | Not applicable | No public exploit | FP.io VPP (Vector Packet Processor) 22.10, 22.06, 22.02, 21.10, 21.06, 21.01, 20.09, 20.05, 20.01, 19.08, and 19.04 Generates a Predictable IV with CBC Mode. |
| CVE-2023-1177 | Critical | 2023-03-24 | Not applicable | Exploited | Path Traversal: '\..\filename' in GitHub repository mlflow/mlflow prior to 2.2.1. |
| CVE-2023-1176 | Low | 2023-03-24 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Absolute Path Traversal in GitHub repository mlflow/mlflow prior to 2.2.2. |
| CVE-2023-23619 | Critical | 2023-01-26 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Modelina is a library for generating data models based on inputs such as AsyncAPI, OpenAPI, or JSON Schema documents. Versions prior to 1.0.0 are vulnerable to Code injection. This issue affects anyone who is using the default presets and/or does not handle the functionality themself. This issue has been partially mitigated in version 1.0.0, with the maintainer's GitHub Security Advisory (GHSA) noting "It is impossible to fully guard against this, because users have access to the original raw information. However, as of version 1, if you only access the constrained models, you will not encounter this issue. Further similar situations are NOT seen as a security issue, but intended behavior." The suggested workaround from the maintainers is "Fully custom presets that change the entire rendering process which can then escape the user input." |
| CVE-2022-0736 | High | 2022-02-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Insecure Temporary File in GitHub repository mlflow/mlflow prior to 1.23.1. |