WaratekVRT Sign in
Reset
More filters (1)
Columns
Including CVEs outside Waratek scope✕Vendor checkpoint✕
Overview 134 matches · 0 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 7 exploited · 7 CISA KEV · 22 public PoC · 7 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek 0 0.0% Rule in development 0 0.0% Mitigation candidate 0 0.0% No exploit published 0 0.0% Outside Waratek scope 1 0.7% Not applicable 133 99.3% Withdrawn CVE 0 0.0%
blocked by ARMR today 0 0.0% partly blocked 0 0.0% not blocked 134 100.0% not established 0 0.0% unrecorded 0 0.0%
split by peak 15 / year
Not applicable: 133Outside Waratek scope: 1 Low: 6Medium: 50High: 70Critical: 8 not blocked: 134 No public exploit: 110Proof of concept only: 3Working exploit published: 14Exploited: 7
19981 Not applicable1 High1 not blocked1 No public exploit1 19993 Not applicable3 High1 Medium1 Low1 not blocked3 Working exploit published1 No public exploit2 200015 Not applicable15 High8 Medium7 not blocked15 Working exploit published4 No public exploit11 200112 Not applicable12 High4 Medium8 not blocked12 Working exploit published2 No public exploit10 20024 Not applicable4 High2 Medium2 not blocked4 No public exploit4 20031 Not applicable1 Medium1 not blocked1 Working exploit published1 20048 Not applicable8 High6 Medium2 not blocked8 No public exploit8 20055 Not applicable5 High3 Medium1 Low1 not blocked5 Working exploit published1 No public exploit4 20062 Not applicable2 High1 Medium1 not blocked2 No public exploit2 20076 Not applicable6 High6 not blocked6 No public exploit6 20083 Not applicable3 High1 Medium2 not blocked3 Working exploit published1 No public exploit2 20095 Not applicable5 High1 Medium4 not blocked5 Working exploit published3 No public exploit2 20100 20112 Not applicable2 High1 Low1 not blocked2 No public exploit2 20122 Not applicable2 Medium2 not blocked2 No public exploit2 20132 Not applicable2 Low2 not blocked2 No public exploit2 201410 Not applicable10 Critical2 High4 Medium4 not blocked10 Exploited2 No public exploit8 20150 20160 20170 20180 201911 Not applicable11 Critical1 High7 Medium3 not blocked11 Working exploit published1 No public exploit10 20208 Not applicable8 High4 Medium4 not blocked8 No public exploit8 20216 Outside Waratek scope1 Not applicable5 High4 Medium2 not blocked6 Proof of concept only2 No public exploit4 20228 Not applicable8 High6 Medium1 Low1 not blocked8 No public exploit8 20233 Not applicable3 High3 not blocked3 Proof of concept only1 No public exploit2 20245 Not applicable5 High4 Medium1 not blocked5 Exploited1 No public exploit4 20258 Not applicable8 Critical1 High3 Medium4 not blocked8 No public exploit8 20264 Not applicable4 Critical4 not blocked4 Exploited4
1999200220052008201120142017202020232026
134 matches Sign in to download these CVEs as CSV or JSON, or to follow them in a feed. ‹ prev page 2 of 2 next ›
CVE Severity Published▾ Status Exploitation Description
CVE-2002-1623 Medium 2002-12-31 Not applicable No public exploit The design of the Internet Key Exchange (IKE) protocol, when using Aggressive Mode for shared secret authentication, does not encrypt initiator or responder identities during negotiation, which may allow remote attackers to determine valid usernames by (1) monitoring responses before the password is supplied or (2) sniffing, as originally reported for FireWall-1 SecuRemote.
CVE-2002-0428 High 2002-08-12 Not applicable No public exploit Check Point FireWall-1 SecuRemote/SecuClient 4.0 and 4.1 allows clients to bypass the "authentication timeout" by modifying the to_expire or expire values in the client's users.C configuration file.
CVE-2001-1171 High 2002-04-01 Not applicable No public exploit Check Point Firewall-1 3.0b through 4.0 SP1 follows symlinks and creates a world-writable temporary .cpp file when compiling Policy rules, which could allow local users to gain privileges or modify the firewall policy.
CVE-2001-1499 Medium 2001-12-31 Not applicable No public exploit Check Point VPN-1 4.1SP4 using SecuRemote returns different error messages for valid and invalid users, with prompts that vary depending on the authentication method being used, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct brute force attacks.
CVE-2001-1431 Medium 2001-10-08 Not applicable No public exploit Nokia Firewall Appliances running IPSO 3.3 and VPN-1/FireWall-1 4.1 Service Pack 3, IPSO 3.4 and VPN-1/FireWall-1 4.1 Service Pack 4, and IPSO 3.4 or IPSO 3.4.1 and VPN-1/FireWall-1 4.1 Service Pack 5, when SYN Defender is configured in Active Gateway mode, does not properly rewrite the third packet of a TCP three-way handshake to use the NAT IP address, which allows remote attackers to gain sensitive information.
CVE-2001-0940 High 2001-09-21 Not applicable No public exploit Buffer overflow in the GUI authentication code of Check Point VPN-1/FireWall-1 Management Server 4.0 and 4.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long user name.
CVE-2001-1102 Medium 2001-09-08 Not applicable No public exploit Check Point FireWall-1 3.0b through 4.1 for Solaris allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack on temporary policy files that end in a .cpp extension, which are set world-writable.
CVE-2001-1101 Medium 2001-09-08 Not applicable No public exploit The Log Viewer function in the Check Point FireWall-1 GUI for Solaris 3.0b through 4.1 SP2 does not check for the existence of '.log' files when saving files, which allows (1) remote authenticated users to overwrite arbitrary files ending in '.log', or (2) local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack.
CVE-2000-1201 Medium 2001-08-31 Not applicable No public exploit Check Point FireWall-1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (high CPU) via a flood of packets to port 264.
CVE-2001-0682 Medium 2001-08-29 Not applicable No public exploit ZoneAlarm and ZoneAlarm Pro allows a local attacker to cause a denial of service by running a trojan to initialize a ZoneAlarm mutex object which prevents ZoneAlarm from starting.
CVE-2001-1303 Medium 2001-07-18 Not applicable Working exploit published The default configuration of SecuRemote for Check Point Firewall-1 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive configuration information for the protected network without authentication.
CVE-2001-1176 High 2001-07-12 Not applicable No public exploit Format string vulnerability in Check Point VPN-1/FireWall-1 4.1 allows a remote authenticated firewall administrator to execute arbitrary code via format strings in the control connection.
CVE-2001-1158 High 2001-07-09 Not applicable No public exploit Check Point VPN-1/FireWall-1 4.1 base.def contains a default macro, accept_fw1_rdp, which can allow remote attackers to bypass intended restrictions with forged RDP (internal protocol) headers to UDP port 259 of arbitrary hosts.
CVE-2001-0182 Medium 2001-03-26 Not applicable No public exploit FireWall-1 4.1 with a limited-IP license allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service by sending a large number of spoofed IP packets with various source addresses to the inside interface, which floods the console with warning messages and consumes CPU resources.
CVE-2001-0082 High 2001-02-12 Not applicable Working exploit published Check Point VPN-1/FireWall-1 4.1 SP2 with Fastmode enabled allows remote attackers to bypass access restrictions via malformed, fragmented packets.
CVE-2000-1037 High 2000-12-11 Not applicable Working exploit published Check Point Firewall-1 session agent 3.0 through 4.1 generates different error messages for invalid user names versus invalid passwords, which allows remote attackers to determine valid usernames and guess a password via a brute force attack.
CVE-2000-1032 Medium 2000-12-11 Not applicable No public exploit The client authentication interface for Check Point Firewall-1 4.0 and earlier generates different error messages for invalid usernames versus invalid passwords, which allows remote attackers to identify valid usernames on the firewall.
CVE-2000-0813 Medium 2000-11-14 Not applicable No public exploit Check Point VPN-1/FireWall-1 4.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to redirect FTP connections to other servers ("FTP Bounce") via invalid FTP commands that are processed improperly by FireWall-1, aka "FTP Connection Enforcement Bypass."
CVE-2000-0809 Medium 2000-11-14 Not applicable No public exploit Buffer overflow in Getkey in the protocol checker in the inter-module communication mechanism in Check Point VPN-1/FireWall-1 4.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service.
CVE-2000-0808 High 2000-11-14 Not applicable No public exploit The seed generation mechanism in the inter-module S/Key authentication mechanism in Check Point VPN-1/FireWall-1 4.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to bypass authentication via a brute force attack, aka "One-time (s/key) Password Authentication."
CVE-2000-0807 High 2000-11-14 Not applicable No public exploit The OPSEC communications authentication mechanism (fwn1) in Check Point VPN-1/FireWall-1 4.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to spoof connections, aka the "OPSEC Authentication Vulnerability."
CVE-2000-0806 Medium 2000-11-14 Not applicable No public exploit The inter-module authentication mechanism (fwa1) in Check Point VPN-1/FireWall-1 4.1 and earlier may allow remote attackers to conduct a denial of service, aka "Inter-module Communications Bypass."
CVE-2000-0805 High 2000-11-14 Not applicable No public exploit Check Point VPN-1/FireWall-1 4.1 and earlier improperly retransmits encapsulated FWS packets, even if they do not come from a valid FWZ client, aka "Retransmission of Encapsulated Packets."
CVE-2000-0804 High 2000-11-14 Not applicable No public exploit Check Point VPN-1/FireWall-1 4.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to bypass the directionality check via fragmented TCP connection requests or reopening closed TCP connection requests, aka "One-way Connection Enforcement Bypass."
CVE-2000-0779 High 2000-10-20 Not applicable No public exploit Checkpoint Firewall-1 with the RSH/REXEC setting enabled allows remote attackers to bypass access restrictions and connect to a RSH/REXEC client via malformed connection requests.
CVE-2000-0582 Medium 2000-06-30 Not applicable Working exploit published Check Point FireWall-1 4.0 and 4.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service by sending a stream of invalid commands (such as binary zeros) to the SMTP Security Server proxy.
CVE-2000-0482 Medium 2000-06-06 Not applicable Working exploit published Check Point Firewall-1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service by sending a large number of malformed fragmented IP packets.
CVE-2000-0181 Medium 2000-03-11 Not applicable No public exploit Firewall-1 3.0 and 4.0 leaks packets with private IP address information, which could allow remote attackers to determine the real IP address of the host that is making the connection.
CVE-2000-0150 High 2000-02-12 Not applicable No public exploit Check Point Firewall-1 allows remote attackers to bypass port access restrictions on an FTP server by forcing it to send malicious packets that Firewall-1 misinterprets as a valid 227 response to a client's PASV attempt.
CVE-2000-0116 High 2000-01-29 Not applicable Working exploit published Firewall-1 does not properly filter script tags, which allows remote attackers to bypass the "Strip Script Tags" restriction by including an extra < in front of the SCRIPT tag.
CVE-1999-0895 High 1999-10-20 Not applicable No public exploit Firewall-1 does not properly restrict access to LDAP attributes.
CVE-1999-0675 Medium 1999-08-09 Not applicable No public exploit Check Point FireWall-1 can be subjected to a denial of service via UDP packets that are sent through VPN-1 to port 0 of a host.
CVE-1999-0770 Low 1999-07-29 Not applicable Working exploit published Firewall-1 sets a long timeout for connections that begin with ACK or other packets except SYN, allowing an attacker to conduct a denial of service via a large number of connection attempts to unresponsive systems.
CVE-1999-1204 High 1998-05-11 Not applicable No public exploit Check Point Firewall-1 does not properly handle certain restricted keywords (e.g., Mail, auth, time) in user-defined objects, which could produce a rule with a default "ANY" address and result in access to more systems than intended by the administrator.
‹ prev page 2 of 2 next ›