Overview 140 matches · 20 protected · 7 exploited · 5 CISA KEV · 22 public PoC · 19 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
21
15.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
13
9.3%
No exploit published
106
75.7%
blocked by ARMR today
20
14.3%
partly blocked
1
0.7%
not blocked
119
85.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 31 / year
20114
No exploit published4
High1
Medium2
Low1
not blocked4
No public exploit4
201212
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published11
Medium12
not blocked12
Working exploit published1
No public exploit11
20130
201410
Protected by Waratek4
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published5
High2
Medium8
blocked by ARMR today4
not blocked6
Working exploit published1
No public exploit9
20152
No exploit published2
High1
Medium1
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20166
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published4
High2
Medium4
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked4
Forecast only1
No public exploit5
201717
Protected by Waratek4
No exploit published13
Critical4
High11
Medium2
blocked by ARMR today3
partly blocked1
not blocked13
Exploited2
Working exploit published1
Forecast only1
No public exploit13
20181
No exploit published1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20192
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published1
High1
Medium1
not blocked2
Working exploit published1
Forecast only1
20208
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate2
No exploit published5
High6
Medium2
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked7
Working exploit published2
Proof of concept only1
Forecast only2
No public exploit3
20216
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published4
High4
Medium2
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked4
Forecast only1
No public exploit5
20226
Protected by Waratek2
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published3
High4
Medium1
Low1
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked4
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
No public exploit4
202311
Mitigation candidate3
No exploit published8
High6
Medium5
not blocked11
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit8
202411
Mitigation candidate4
No exploit published7
Critical3
High3
Medium5
not blocked11
Exploited1
Proof of concept only3
No public exploit7
202513
Protected by Waratek4
No exploit published9
Critical1
High10
Medium2
blocked by ARMR today4
not blocked9
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit10
202631
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published29
Critical11
High12
Medium7
Low1
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked29
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
No public exploit29
20122014201620182020202220242026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-5650 | High | 2017-04-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M18 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.12, the handling of an HTTP/2 GOAWAY frame for a connection did not close streams associated with that connection that were currently waiting for a WINDOW_UPDATE before allowing the application to write more data. These waiting streams each consumed a thread. A malicious client could therefore construct a series of HTTP/2 requests that would consume all available processing threads. |
| CVE-2017-5648 | Critical | 2017-04-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | While investigating bug 60718, it was noticed that some calls to application listeners in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M17, 8.5.0 to 8.5.11, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.41, and 7.0.0 to 7.0.75 did not use the appropriate facade object. When running an untrusted application under a SecurityManager, it was therefore possible for that untrusted application to retain a reference to the request or response object and thereby access and/or modify information associated with another web application. |
| CVE-2017-5647 | High | 2017-04-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A bug in the handling of the pipelined requests in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M18, 8.5.0 to 8.5.12, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.42, 7.0.0 to 7.0.76, and 6.0.0 to 6.0.52, when send file was used, results in the pipelined request being lost when send file processing of the previous request completed. This could result in responses appearing to be sent for the wrong request. For example, a user agent that sent requests A, B and C could see the correct response for request A, the response for request C for request B and no response for request C. |
| CVE-2016-8735 | Critical | 2017-04-06 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Remote code execution is possible with Apache Tomcat before 6.0.48, 7.x before 7.0.73, 8.x before 8.0.39, 8.5.x before 8.5.7, and 9.x before 9.0.0.M12 if JmxRemoteLifecycleListener is used and an attacker can reach JMX ports. The issue exists because this listener wasn't updated for consistency with the CVE-2016-3427 Oracle patch that affected credential types. |
| CVE-2016-6816 | High | 2017-03-20 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | The code in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M11, 8.5.0 to 8.5.6, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.38, 7.0.0 to 7.0.72, and 6.0.0 to 6.0.47 that parsed the HTTP request line permitted invalid characters. This could be exploited, in conjunction with a proxy that also permitted the invalid characters but with a different interpretation, to inject data into the HTTP response. By manipulating the HTTP response the attacker could poison a web-cache, perform an XSS attack and/or obtain sensitive information from requests other then their own. |
| CVE-2016-8747 | High | 2017-03-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An information disclosure issue was discovered in Apache Tomcat 8.5.7 to 8.5.9 and 9.0.0.M11 to 9.0.0.M15 in reverse-proxy configurations. Http11InputBuffer.java allows remote attackers to read data that was intended to be associated with a different request. |
| CVE-2016-5388 | High | 2016-07-19 | No exploit published | Forecast only | Apache Tomcat 7.x through 7.0.70 and 8.x through 8.5.4, when the CGI Servlet is enabled, follows RFC 3875 section 4.1.18 and therefore does not protect applications from the presence of untrusted client data in the HTTP_PROXY environment variable, which might allow remote attackers to redirect an application's outbound HTTP traffic to an arbitrary proxy server via a crafted Proxy header in an HTTP request, aka an "httpoxy" issue. NOTE: the vendor states "A mitigation is planned for future releases of Tomcat, tracked as CVE-2016-5388"; in other words, this is not a CVE ID for a vulnerability. |
| CVE-2016-0763 | Medium | 2016-02-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The setGlobalContext method in org/apache/naming/factory/ResourceLinkFactory.java in Apache Tomcat 7.x before 7.0.68, 8.x before 8.0.31, and 9.x before 9.0.0.M3 does not consider whether ResourceLinkFactory.setGlobalContext callers are authorized, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended SecurityManager restrictions and read or write to arbitrary application data, or cause a denial of service (application disruption), via a web application that sets a crafted global context. |
| CVE-2016-0706 | Medium | 2016-02-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Tomcat 6.x before 6.0.45, 7.x before 7.0.68, 8.x before 8.0.31, and 9.x before 9.0.0.M2 does not place org.apache.catalina.manager.StatusManagerServlet on the org/apache/catalina/core/RestrictedServlets.properties list, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended SecurityManager restrictions and read arbitrary HTTP requests, and consequently discover session ID values, via a crafted web application. |
| CVE-2015-5351 | High | 2016-02-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The (1) Manager and (2) Host Manager applications in Apache Tomcat 7.x before 7.0.68, 8.x before 8.0.31, and 9.x before 9.0.0.M2 establish sessions and send CSRF tokens for arbitrary new requests, which allows remote attackers to bypass a CSRF protection mechanism by using a token. |
| CVE-2015-5345 | Medium | 2016-02-25 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | The Mapper component in Apache Tomcat 6.x before 6.0.45, 7.x before 7.0.68, 8.x before 8.0.30, and 9.x before 9.0.0.M2 processes redirects before considering security constraints and Filters, which allows remote attackers to determine the existence of a directory via a URL that lacks a trailing / (slash) character. |
| CVE-2015-5174 | Medium | 2016-02-25 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Directory traversal vulnerability in RequestUtil.java in Apache Tomcat 6.x before 6.0.45, 7.x before 7.0.65, and 8.x before 8.0.27 allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended SecurityManager restrictions and list a parent directory via a /.. (slash dot dot) in a pathname used by a web application in a getResource, getResourceAsStream, or getResourcePaths call, as demonstrated by the $CATALINA_BASE/webapps directory. |
| CVE-2014-7810 | Medium | 2015-06-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The Expression Language (EL) implementation in Apache Tomcat 6.x before 6.0.44, 7.x before 7.0.58, and 8.x before 8.0.16 does not properly consider the possibility of an accessible interface implemented by an inaccessible class, which allows attackers to bypass a SecurityManager protection mechanism via a web application that leverages use of incorrect privileges during EL evaluation. |
| CVE-2014-0230 | High | 2015-06-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Tomcat 6.x before 6.0.44, 7.x before 7.0.55, and 8.x before 8.0.9 does not properly handle cases where an HTTP response occurs before finishing the reading of an entire request body, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (thread consumption) via a series of aborted upload attempts. |
| CVE-2013-4444 | Medium | 2014-09-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unrestricted file upload vulnerability in Apache Tomcat 7.x before 7.0.40, in certain situations involving outdated java.io.File code and a custom JMX configuration, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by uploading and accessing a JSP file. |
| CVE-2014-0119 | Medium | 2014-05-31 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Apache Tomcat before 6.0.40, 7.x before 7.0.54, and 8.x before 8.0.6 does not properly constrain the class loader that accesses the XML parser used with an XSLT stylesheet, which allows remote attackers to (1) read arbitrary files via a crafted web application that provides an XML external entity declaration in conjunction with an entity reference, related to an XML External Entity (XXE) issue, or (2) read files associated with different web applications on a single Tomcat instance via a crafted web application. |
| CVE-2014-0099 | Medium | 2014-05-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Integer overflow in java/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf/Ascii.java in Apache Tomcat before 6.0.40, 7.x before 7.0.53, and 8.x before 8.0.4, when operated behind a reverse proxy, allows remote attackers to conduct HTTP request smuggling attacks via a crafted Content-Length HTTP header. |
| CVE-2014-0096 | Medium | 2014-05-31 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | java/org/apache/catalina/servlets/DefaultServlet.java in the default servlet in Apache Tomcat before 6.0.40, 7.x before 7.0.53, and 8.x before 8.0.4 does not properly restrict XSLT stylesheets, which allows remote attackers to bypass security-manager restrictions and read arbitrary files via a crafted web application that provides an XML external entity declaration in conjunction with an entity reference, related to an XML External Entity (XXE) issue. |
| CVE-2014-0095 | Medium | 2014-05-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | java/org/apache/coyote/ajp/AbstractAjpProcessor.java in Apache Tomcat 8.x before 8.0.4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (thread consumption) by using a "Content-Length: 0" AJP request to trigger a hang in request processing. |
| CVE-2014-0075 | Medium | 2014-05-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Integer overflow in the parseChunkHeader function in java/org/apache/coyote/http11/filters/ChunkedInputFilter.java in Apache Tomcat before 6.0.40, 7.x before 7.0.53, and 8.x before 8.0.4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (resource consumption) via a malformed chunk size in chunked transfer coding of a request during the streaming of data. |
| CVE-2014-0050 | High | 2014-04-01 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | MultipartStream.java in Apache Commons FileUpload before 1.3.1, as used in Apache Tomcat, JBoss Web, and other products, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop and CPU consumption) via a crafted Content-Type header that bypasses a loop's intended exit conditions. |
| CVE-2013-4590 | Medium | 2014-02-26 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Apache Tomcat before 6.0.39, 7.x before 7.0.50, and 8.x before 8.0.0-RC10 allows attackers to obtain "Tomcat internals" information by leveraging the presence of an untrusted web application with a context.xml, web.xml, *.jspx, *.tagx, or *.tld XML document containing an external entity declaration in conjunction with an entity reference, related to an XML External Entity (XXE) issue. |
| CVE-2013-4322 | Medium | 2014-02-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Tomcat before 6.0.39, 7.x before 7.0.50, and 8.x before 8.0.0-RC10 processes chunked transfer coding without properly handling (1) a large total amount of chunked data or (2) whitespace characters in an HTTP header value within a trailer field, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service by streaming data. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2012-3544. |
| CVE-2013-2185 | High | 2014-01-19 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | The readObject method in the DiskFileItem class in Apache Tomcat and JBoss Web, as used in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6.1.0 and Red Hat JBoss Portal 6.0.0, allows remote attackers to write to arbitrary files via a NULL byte in a file name in a serialized instance, a similar issue to CVE-2013-2186. NOTE: this issue is reportedly disputed by the Apache Tomcat team, although Red Hat considers it a vulnerability. The dispute appears to regard whether it is the responsibility of applications to avoid providing untrusted data to be deserialized, or whether this class should inherently protect against this issue |
| CVE-2012-4431 | Medium | 2012-12-19 | No exploit published | No public exploit | org/apache/catalina/filters/CsrfPreventionFilter.java in Apache Tomcat 6.x before 6.0.36 and 7.x before 7.0.32 allows remote attackers to bypass the cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protection mechanism via a request that lacks a session identifier. |
| CVE-2012-3546 | Medium | 2012-12-19 | No exploit published | No public exploit | org/apache/catalina/realm/RealmBase.java in Apache Tomcat 6.x before 6.0.36 and 7.x before 7.0.30, when FORM authentication is used, allows remote attackers to bypass security-constraint checks by leveraging a previous setUserPrincipal call and then placing /j_security_check at the end of a URI. |
| CVE-2012-5887 | Medium | 2012-11-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The HTTP Digest Access Authentication implementation in Apache Tomcat 5.5.x before 5.5.36, 6.x before 6.0.36, and 7.x before 7.0.30 does not properly check for stale nonce values in conjunction with enforcement of proper credentials, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions by sniffing the network for valid requests. |
| CVE-2012-5886 | Medium | 2012-11-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The HTTP Digest Access Authentication implementation in Apache Tomcat 5.5.x before 5.5.36, 6.x before 6.0.36, and 7.x before 7.0.30 caches information about the authenticated user within the session state, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass authentication via vectors related to the session ID. |
| CVE-2012-5885 | Medium | 2012-11-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The replay-countermeasure functionality in the HTTP Digest Access Authentication implementation in Apache Tomcat 5.5.x before 5.5.36, 6.x before 6.0.36, and 7.x before 7.0.30 tracks cnonce (aka client nonce) values instead of nonce (aka server nonce) and nc (aka nonce-count) values, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions by sniffing the network for valid requests, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-1184. |
| CVE-2012-0022 | Medium | 2012-01-19 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Tomcat 5.5.x before 5.5.35, 6.x before 6.0.34, and 7.x before 7.0.23 uses an inefficient approach for handling parameters, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via a request that contains many parameters and parameter values, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-4858. |
| CVE-2011-3375 | Medium | 2012-01-19 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Tomcat 6.0.30 through 6.0.33 and 7.x before 7.0.22 does not properly perform certain caching and recycling operations involving request objects, which allows remote attackers to obtain unintended read access to IP address and HTTP header information in opportunistic circumstances by reading TCP data. |
| CVE-2011-5064 | Medium | 2012-01-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | DigestAuthenticator.java in the HTTP Digest Access Authentication implementation in Apache Tomcat 5.5.x before 5.5.34, 6.x before 6.0.33, and 7.x before 7.0.12 uses Catalina as the hard-coded server secret (aka private key), which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass cryptographic protection mechanisms by leveraging knowledge of this string, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-1184. |
| CVE-2011-5063 | Medium | 2012-01-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The HTTP Digest Access Authentication implementation in Apache Tomcat 5.5.x before 5.5.34, 6.x before 6.0.33, and 7.x before 7.0.12 does not check realm values, which might allow remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions by leveraging the availability of a protection space with weaker authentication or authorization requirements, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-1184. |
| CVE-2011-5062 | Medium | 2012-01-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The HTTP Digest Access Authentication implementation in Apache Tomcat 5.5.x before 5.5.34, 6.x before 6.0.33, and 7.x before 7.0.12 does not check qop values, which might allow remote attackers to bypass intended integrity-protection requirements via a qop=auth value, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-1184. |
| CVE-2011-1184 | Medium | 2012-01-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The HTTP Digest Access Authentication implementation in Apache Tomcat 5.5.x before 5.5.34, 6.x before 6.0.33, and 7.x before 7.0.12 does not have the expected countermeasures against replay attacks, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions by sniffing the network for valid requests, related to lack of checking of nonce (aka server nonce) and nc (aka nonce-count or client nonce count) values. |
| CVE-2011-4858 | Medium | 2012-01-05 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Apache Tomcat before 5.5.35, 6.x before 6.0.35, and 7.x before 7.0.23 computes hash values for form parameters without restricting the ability to trigger hash collisions predictably, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) by sending many crafted parameters. |
| CVE-2011-3190 | High | 2011-08-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Certain AJP protocol connector implementations in Apache Tomcat 7.0.0 through 7.0.20, 6.0.0 through 6.0.33, 5.5.0 through 5.5.33, and possibly other versions allow remote attackers to spoof AJP requests, bypass authentication, and obtain sensitive information by causing the connector to interpret a request body as a new request. |
| CVE-2011-2481 | Medium | 2011-08-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Tomcat 7.0.x before 7.0.17 permits web applications to replace an XML parser used for other web applications, which allows local users to read or modify the (1) web.xml, (2) context.xml, or (3) tld files of arbitrary web applications via a crafted application that is loaded earlier than the target application. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of a CVE-2009-0783 regression. |
| CVE-2011-2526 | Medium | 2011-07-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Tomcat 5.5.x before 5.5.34, 6.x before 6.0.33, and 7.x before 7.0.19, when sendfile is enabled for the HTTP APR or HTTP NIO connector, does not validate certain request attributes, which allows local users to bypass intended file access restrictions or cause a denial of service (infinite loop or JVM crash) by leveraging an untrusted web application. |
| CVE-2011-2204 | Low | 2011-06-29 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Tomcat 5.5.x before 5.5.34, 6.x before 6.0.33, and 7.x before 7.0.17, when the MemoryUserDatabase is used, creates log entries containing passwords upon encountering errors in JMX user creation, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading a log file. |