Overview 101 matches · 9 in Waratek scope · 3 protected · 18 exploited · 14 CISA KEV · 19 public PoC · 14 EPSS ≥ 0.5
101matches
9in Waratek scope8.9%
3protected3.0%
18exploited17.8%
14CISA KEV13.9%
19public PoC18.8%
14EPSS ≥ 0.513.9%
Protected by Waratek
3
3.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
6
5.9%
Outside Waratek scope
0
0.0%
Not applicable
92
91.1%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
3
3.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
98
97.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 32 / year
20093
Not applicable3
High1
Medium2
not blocked3
Exploited1
No public exploit2
20100
20111
Not applicable1
Low1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20122
Not applicable2
Medium2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20137
Not applicable7
High5
Medium2
not blocked7
No public exploit7
20147
No exploit published1
Not applicable6
Critical2
High1
Medium4
not blocked7
Exploited2
No public exploit5
20153
Not applicable3
High1
Medium2
not blocked3
Working exploit published1
No public exploit2
20165
Not applicable5
High2
Medium3
not blocked5
No public exploit5
20178
Not applicable8
Critical2
High4
Medium2
not blocked8
No public exploit8
20180
20196
Not applicable6
High3
Medium3
not blocked6
No public exploit6
20203
Not applicable3
Critical1
High1
Medium1
not blocked3
Exploited1
No public exploit2
202132
Protected by Waratek3
No exploit published3
Not applicable26
Critical6
High12
Medium12
Low2
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked29
Exploited7
Working exploit published2
Forecast only1
No public exploit22
20227
No exploit published2
Not applicable5
Critical1
High2
Medium3
Low1
not blocked7
Exploited1
No public exploit6
20237
Not applicable7
Critical5
High1
Medium1
not blocked7
Exploited1
Proof of concept only5
No public exploit1
20248
Not applicable8
Critical4
High2
Medium2
not blocked8
Exploited3
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only2
No public exploit2
20250
20262
Not applicable2
Critical2
not blocked2
Exploited2
201020122014201620182020202220242026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2009-1072 | Medium | 2009-03-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | nfsd in the Linux kernel before 2.6.28.9 does not drop the CAP_MKNOD capability before handling a user request in a thread, which allows local users to create device nodes, as demonstrated on a filesystem that has been exported with the root_squash option. |