Overview 5,079 matches · 318 in Waratek scope · 46 protected · 89 exploited · 57 CISA KEV · 319 public PoC · 120 EPSS ≥ 0.5
5,079matches
318in Waratek scope6.3%
46protected0.9%
89exploited1.8%
57CISA KEV1.1%
319public PoC6.3%
120EPSS ≥ 0.52.4%
Protected by Waratek
46
0.9%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
15
0.3%
No exploit published
257
5.1%
Outside Waratek scope
225
4.4%
Not applicable
4,536
89.3%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
46
0.9%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
5,033
99.1%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 465 / year
19992
Not applicable2
High1
Low1
not blocked2
No public exploit2
200011
Not applicable11
High4
Medium6
Low1
not blocked11
Working exploit published2
No public exploit9
20015
Not applicable5
High4
Low1
not blocked5
No public exploit5
200216
Not applicable16
High6
Medium8
Low2
not blocked16
Working exploit published1
No public exploit15
20038
Not applicable8
High4
Medium4
not blocked8
Working exploit published3
No public exploit5
200432
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable31
High13
Medium16
Low3
not blocked32
Working exploit published8
No public exploit24
200550
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable48
High24
Medium21
Low5
not blocked50
Working exploit published6
No public exploit44
200658
Not applicable58
High19
Medium38
Low1
not blocked58
Working exploit published20
No public exploit38
2007101
Not applicable101
Critical2
High54
Medium39
Low6
not blocked101
Exploited1
Working exploit published20
Proof of concept only1
Forecast only1
No public exploit78
200859
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable58
Critical1
High40
Medium18
not blocked59
Working exploit published9
No public exploit50
200985
Not applicable85
High44
Medium39
Low2
not blocked85
Exploited2
Working exploit published22
Forecast only1
No public exploit60
201039
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published1
Not applicable37
High20
Medium17
Low2
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked38
Working exploit published7
No public exploit32
201150
Protected by Waratek1
Not applicable49
High36
Medium13
Low1
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked49
Working exploit published3
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit46
2012137
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published2
Not applicable134
Critical1
High32
Medium97
Low7
not blocked137
Working exploit published11
Forecast only11
No public exploit115
2013104
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published1
Not applicable101
High34
Medium57
Low13
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked102
Working exploit published4
No public exploit100
2014180
No exploit published3
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable175
Critical2
High46
Medium121
Low11
not blocked180
Exploited5
Working exploit published10
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit164
2015132
No exploit published2
Outside Waratek scope3
Not applicable127
Critical1
High45
Medium79
Low7
not blocked132
Working exploit published11
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit120
2016164
No exploit published2
Outside Waratek scope4
Not applicable158
Critical9
High86
Medium62
Low7
not blocked164
Exploited4
Working exploit published11
Proof of concept only1
Forecast only1
No public exploit147
2017315
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published10
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable301
Critical31
High141
Medium133
Low10
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked314
Exploited2
Working exploit published35
Proof of concept only1
Forecast only1
No public exploit276
2018352
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published12
Outside Waratek scope13
Not applicable326
Critical27
High167
Medium151
Low7
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked351
Exploited8
Working exploit published18
Forecast only1
No public exploit325
2019416
Protected by Waratek7
Mitigation candidate5
No exploit published18
Outside Waratek scope20
Not applicable366
Critical48
High180
Medium182
Low6
blocked by ARMR today7
not blocked409
Exploited4
Working exploit published7
Proof of concept only2
Forecast only3
No public exploit400
2020453
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published11
Outside Waratek scope41
Not applicable399
Critical37
High190
Medium211
Low15
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked452
Exploited9
Working exploit published5
Proof of concept only2
Forecast only7
No public exploit430
2021465
Protected by Waratek8
Mitigation candidate2
No exploit published7
Outside Waratek scope31
Not applicable417
Critical36
High200
Medium217
Low12
blocked by ARMR today8
not blocked457
Exploited16
Working exploit published3
Proof of concept only8
Forecast only5
No public exploit433
2022429
Protected by Waratek7
Mitigation candidate3
No exploit published24
Outside Waratek scope20
Not applicable375
Critical71
High186
Medium162
Low10
blocked by ARMR today7
not blocked422
Exploited8
Working exploit published5
Proof of concept only57
No public exploit359
2023373
Protected by Waratek10
Mitigation candidate2
No exploit published16
Outside Waratek scope22
Not applicable323
Critical38
High175
Medium149
Low11
blocked by ARMR today10
not blocked363
Exploited10
Working exploit published5
Proof of concept only47
Forecast only3
No public exploit308
2024391
Protected by Waratek3
No exploit published23
Outside Waratek scope27
Not applicable338
Critical55
High166
Medium152
Low18
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked388
Exploited7
Working exploit published5
Proof of concept only59
No public exploit320
2025263
No exploit published21
Outside Waratek scope6
Not applicable236
Critical26
High115
Medium102
Low20
not blocked263
Exploited5
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only62
No public exploit195
2026389
Protected by Waratek4
No exploit published104
Outside Waratek scope30
Not applicable251
Critical46
High197
Medium129
Low17
blocked by ARMR today4
not blocked385
Exploited8
Working exploit published3
Proof of concept only39
No public exploit339
1999200220052008201120142017202020232026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-76390 | Medium | 2026-08-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Cisco Talos Intelligence for Enterprise Security Cloud versions below 1.0.3, an unauthenticated user could access the add-on OpenAPI specification through Splunk Web static file paths. The exposed specification could allow for reconnaissance of the add-on Representational State Transfer (REST) API endpoints and authentication model. The vulnerability is possible because the generated OpenAPI specification is packaged in a static file path that Splunk Web serves without authentication. For more information see Deploy Cisco Talos Intelligence for Splunk Enterprise Security (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise-security-8/user-guide/8.0/introduction/deploy-cisco-talos-intelligence-for-splunk-enterprise-security-cloud-only) in the Splunk documentation. |
| CVE-2026-76389 | High | 2026-08-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Cisco Talos Intelligence for Enterprise Security Cloud versions below 1.0.3, a user that holds a role with the get_talos_enrichment capability could send a crafted request to the Talos intelligence enrichment Representational State Transfer (REST) API endpoint and cause the instance to make an outbound request to an attacker-controlled server. The request could expose tokens that compromise all relevant data and system integrity in the Splunk instance. The vulnerability is possible because the Talos intelligence enrichment REST endpoint accepts the destination for authenticated Splunk management requests from request data. For more information see Deploy Cisco Talos Intelligence for Splunk Enterprise Security (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise-security-8/user-guide/8.0/introduction/deploy-cisco-talos-intelligence-for-splunk-enterprise-security-cloud-only) in the Splunk documentation. |
| CVE-2026-76388 | High | 2026-08-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Splunk Enterprise Security versions below 8.6.1, a user who holds the ess_analyst Splunk Enterprise Security role could change User and Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) search macros that scheduled searches run with administrator permissions, allowing for access to all relevant data and system integrity through those searches. The vulnerability is possible because the UEBA app metadata grants analyst roles write access to search macros that should be writable only by administrator roles. For more information see Users and roles for Splunk Enterprise Security (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise-security-8/install/8.4/installation/users-and-roles-for-splunk-enterprise-security) and Roles and knowledge objects in UEBA for Splunk Enterprise Security (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise-security-8/administer/8.5/user-and-entity-behavior-analytics/roles-and-knowledge-objects-in-ueba-for-splunk-enterprise-security) in the Splunk documentation. |
| CVE-2026-76387 | High | 2026-08-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Splunk Enterprise Security versions below 8.6.1, a user who holds a Splunk Enterprise Security role that contains the mc_investigation_read capability could inject Search Processing Language (SPL) through Analyst Queue search filters, allowing for access to all relevant data and system integrity available to the scheduled searches that run for that user. The vulnerability is possible because the Analyst Queue search filter handling does not validate filter field names before the fields are included in SPL searches. For more information see Users and roles for Splunk Enterprise Security (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise-security-8/install/8.4/installation/users-and-roles-for-splunk-enterprise-security), Manage analyst workflows using the analyst queue in Splunk Enterprise Security (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise-security-8/administer/8.4/mission-control/manage-analyst-workflows-using-the-analyst-queue-in-splunk-enterprise-security), and Overview of Mission Control in Splunk Enterprise Security (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise-security-8/user-guide/8.5/mission-control/overview-of-mission-control-in-splunk-enterprise-security) in the Splunk documentation. |
| CVE-2026-70830 | High | 2026-08-18 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Process Manufacturing Systems product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Process Manufacturing Systems. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Process Manufacturing Systems accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Process Manufacturing Systems accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-70829 | High | 2026-08-18 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Process Manufacturing Systems product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Process Manufacturing Systems. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Process Manufacturing Systems. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.5 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2026-70827 | High | 2026-08-18 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle MES for Process Manufacturing product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle MES for Process Manufacturing. While the vulnerability is in Oracle MES for Process Manufacturing, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle MES for Process Manufacturing accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.7 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-70801 | High | 2026-08-18 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Flow Manufacturing product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Flow Manufacturing. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Flow Manufacturing accessible data as well as unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Flow Manufacturing accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-62450 | High | 2026-08-18 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Flow Manufacturing product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Flow Manufacturing. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Flow Manufacturing. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2026-61340 | High | 2026-08-18 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle MES for Process Manufacturing product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle MES for Process Manufacturing. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle MES for Process Manufacturing, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle MES for Process Manufacturing accessible data as well as unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle MES for Process Manufacturing accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-19682 | Critical | 2026-08-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A command injection vulnerability exists in Security Center where a remote, unauthenticated attacker could exploit this issue to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system with the privileges of the service account. |
| CVE-2026-19681 | Critical | 2026-08-14 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | An authenticated command injection vulnerability exists in Security Center related to file upload processing. An attacker could exploit this issue by uploading a specially crafted file, potentially resulting in arbitrary command execution on the underlying operating system. |
| CVE-2026-19680 | High | 2026-08-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A SQL injection vulnerability exists in Security Center that could allow an attacker to access unauthorized data from the application's database. |
| CVE-2026-19679 | High | 2026-08-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An input validation vulnerability exists in Security Center's file upload handling, where insufficient sanitization of uploaded filenames could contribute to a downstream command injection issue. |
| CVE-2026-19639 | Medium | 2026-08-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An improper access control vulnerability exists where an authenticated non-administrative application user could potentially view settings outside of their assigned scope. |
| CVE-2026-19636 | Medium | 2026-08-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was identified in which CSRF tokens were generated using a predictable method, potentially reducing their effectiveness as a security control. This has been addressed by improving the randomness and entropy of token generation. |
| CVE-2026-19635 | High | 2026-08-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A local privilege escalation vulnerability exists in Security Center. An attacker with write access to a specific configuration file could achieve arbitrary code execution with elevated privileges, without requiring further user or victim interaction. |
| CVE-2026-19631 | Medium | 2026-08-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A SQL injection vulnerability exists in Security Center that could allow an authenticated administrator to execute arbitrary SQL queries, potentially resulting in unauthorized access to sensitive data, including credentials. |
| CVE-2026-19629 | High | 2026-08-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in Tenable Security Center that allows a user with "Security Manager" role and "manage user" permission on a single group to modify users belonging to other groups. This bypasses the intended access control restrictions and enables unauthorized cross-group user management. |
| CVE-2026-19628 | High | 2026-08-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A command injection vulnerability exists in Tenable Security Center. An authenticated administrator could modify application configuration values to achieve arbitrary command execution on the underlying operating system when specific backend operations are triggered. |
| CVE-2026-19626 | Critical | 2026-08-14 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Tenable Security Center's report generation functionality. An authenticated, non-administrative user could exploit this issue by supplying specially crafted input that is later processed unsafely during server-side report rendering, resulting in arbitrary code execution with the privileges of the service account. |
| CVE-2026-17616 | Critical | 2026-08-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 and IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.3 Reverse Proxy in certain configurations may provide weaker than expected cryptographic validation of user supplied data. |
| CVE-2026-13267 | High | 2026-08-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 and IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.3 could allow an authenticated user to gain privileges of another user via a specially crafted request. |
| CVE-2026-12618 | High | 2026-08-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 and IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.3 could allow an administrator to execute additional commands they are not entitled to due to improper validation of user supplied input. |
| CVE-2026-12359 | High | 2026-08-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 and IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.3 could allow a remote attacker to access sensitive information due to an inconsistent interpretation of an HTTP request by a reverse proxy. |
| CVE-2026-12005 | High | 2026-08-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 and IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.3 contains a input validation vulnerability in the management interface that allows already privileged attackers to execute additional operations by crafting a malicious HTTP request. |
| CVE-2026-12004 | High | 2026-08-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 and IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.3 contains a format string injection vulnerability in the management interface that allows attackers to cause denial of service and information disclosure by crafting a malicious HTTP request. |
| CVE-2026-11937 | Low | 2026-08-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 and IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.3 and IBM Security Verify Access Container 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 Reverse Proxy in certain configurations is vulnerable to a denial of service attack. |
| CVE-2026-11932 | High | 2026-08-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 and IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.3 is vulnerable to a denial of service attack. |
| CVE-2026-11923 | High | 2026-08-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 and IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.3 Reverse Proxy in certain configurations may provide weaker than expected cryptographic validation of user supplied data. |
| CVE-2026-20349 | High | 2026-08-11 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | A vulnerability in the Remote Access SSL VPN service for Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause the device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. This vulnerability is due to insufficient error checking when processing HTTP requests. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to the Remote Access SSL VPN service on an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the affected device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition. |
| CVE-2026-13477 | High | 2026-08-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM QRadar 7.6.0.0 through 7.6.0.1, and 7.5.0 through 7.5.0 UP 15 Interim Fix 005 could allow an authenticated privileged user to execute arbitrary commands with normal user privileges on the system due to improper validation of user supplied input. |
| CVE-2026-10025 | Critical | 2026-08-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM QRadar 7.6.0.0 through 7.6.0.1, and 7.5.0 through 7.5.0 UP 15 Interim Fix 005 has an XML External Entity (XXE) injection vulnerability. The vulnerability resides in the parseXmlPayload() function within the event processing pipeline ( q1labs_core.jar ). When at least one log source type is configured to use XML-format property autodetection, the system processes XML-formatted syslog events sent to port 514 (UDP/TCP) without authentication. |
| CVE-2026-10050 | High | 2026-08-04 | No exploit published | Proof of concept only | In Eclipse Jetty, the Digest authentication server-side component uses ISO-8859-1 to encode the password as bytes. This was done because the initial specification for HTTP did not specify explicitly a charset, and it was assumed to be ISO-8859-1 for historical reasons. If the password contains characters that cannot be represented in ISO-8859-1, they are silently replaced by `?`. This happens with passwords that contain Chinese, Cyrillic or Greek characters, for example: `αβ123` converts to `??123`. An attacker can send a request with a digest `Authorization` header crafted with a password made of only `?` characters; the server would match any password of the same length that contains non-ISO-8859-1 characters. Recent HTTP Digest [RFC-7616](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7616) supports a `charset` parameters that defaults to UTF-8 that allows for correct encoding/decoding of passwords. |
| CVE-2026-18446 | High | 2026-07-31 | Not applicable | No public exploit | fast-uri before 4.1.2, 3.1.5, and 2.4.4 requires a literal double forward slash to recognize a URI authority, so a reference that uses a backslash based introducer in place of it (backslash backslash, forward slash backslash, or backslash forward slash) is parsed with no authority and folds into the path. Node's native WHATWG URL parser instead treats a backslash as interchangeable with a forward slash for special schemes, so the two parsers extract different hosts from the same input. Applications that use fast-uri to enforce host based policy such as allowlists, SSRF filtering, or redirect validation before passing the same URL into Node's URL or fetch consumers can be steered to an unintended host. Upgrade to fast-uri 4.1.2, 3.1.5, or 2.4.4. |
| CVE-2026-66010 | Medium | 2026-07-24 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | DOMPurify before 3.4.12 fails to execute afterSanitizeElements hook for custom elements allowed via CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING.tagNameCheck, allowing attributes to bypass application security policies. Attackers can preserve sensitive attributes on custom elements that later re-inject them into innerHTML sinks, creating second-order XSS gadgets. |
| CVE-2026-65914 | Medium | 2026-07-23 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | DOMPurify before 3.3.2 contains a mutation-XSS vulnerability when sanitized HTML is reinserted into special parsing contexts using innerHTML with wrappers like script, xmp, iframe, noembed, noframes, or noscript. Attackers can craft payloads with closing sequences that break out of the wrapper context during reparsing, reactivating dangerous markup with event handlers to execute JavaScript. |
| CVE-2026-65913 | Medium | 2026-07-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | DOMPurify before 3.3.2 contains a prototype pollution vulnerability in USE_PROFILES mode that allows attackers to bypass attribute filtering by polluting Array.prototype properties. Attackers can set Array.prototype properties like onclick to true, causing DOMPurify to accept event handlers as allowlisted attributes and resulting in DOM-based XSS when sanitized markup is rendered. |
| CVE-2026-65912 | Medium | 2026-07-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | DOMPurify before 3.3.2 contains a URI validation bypass vulnerability when ADD_ATTR is provided as a predicate function via EXTRA_ELEMENT_HANDLING.attributeCheck. Attackers can supply a predicate that accepts specific attribute and tag combinations to bypass URI-safe validation, allowing unsafe protocols like javascript: to survive sanitization and execute as DOM-based XSS when the link is activated. |
| CVE-2026-65911 | Medium | 2026-07-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In DOMPurify through 3.3.3, function predicates supplied via ADD_ATTR or ADD_TAGS to DOMPurify.sanitize() persist in internal state (EXTRA_ELEMENT_HANDLING) across subsequent sanitize() calls on the same instance. If a later call on the same instance provides ADD_ATTR or ADD_TAGS as an array rather than a function, the previously set function handler is neither cleared nor overwritten, so it continues to approve attacker-controlled attributes or tags. This can allow dangerous event-handler attributes or forbidden tags (bypassing FORBID_TAGS) to survive sanitization, resulting in cross-site scripting. The vendor (Cure53) considers this an edge case outside DOMPurify's threat model; the referenced advisory lists 3.4.0 as the patched version. |
| CVE-2026-65904 | Low | 2026-07-23 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | DOMPurify through 3.3.3 fails to sanitize DOM elements passed via IN_PLACE mode when the element originates from a different window/realm (e.g., an iframe's contentDocument). A cross-realm instanceof check in the private _isNode() function returns false for foreign-realm nodes, causing DOMPurify to stringify the element (yielding '[object HTMLDivElement]'), silently reset IN_PLACE to false, and return the unsanitized element unchanged with any XSS payloads intact. |
| CVE-2026-65903 | Medium | 2026-07-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | DOMPurify before 3.4.0 contains a logic error in the ADD_TAGS function where short-circuit evaluation allows forbidden tags to bypass FORBID_TAGS restrictions. Attackers can craft input containing tags listed in FORBID_TAGS that are also added via ADD_TAGS function, causing them to be retained in sanitized output. |
| CVE-2026-65902 | Medium | 2026-07-23 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | DOMPurify before 3.4.7 passes direct references to the module-level DEFAULT_ALLOWED_TAGS and DEFAULT_ALLOWED_ATTR sets to the uponSanitizeElement and uponSanitizeAttribute hooks via data.allowedTags / data.allowedAttributes when sanitize is called without an explicit cfg.ALLOWED_TAGS / cfg.ALLOWED_ATTR array. A hook that mutates these fields permanently widens the default allow-lists for the lifetime of the DOMPurify instance, so all subsequent default-config sanitize calls inherit the widened defaults and attacker payloads using the poisoned tag/attribute name survive sanitization. removeAllHooks(), clearConfig(), and passing a fresh cfg do not recover the state; only constructing a new DOMPurify instance does. |
| CVE-2026-65901 | Medium | 2026-07-23 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | DOMPurify through 3.4.6 contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability in IN_PLACE mode that trusts attacker-controlled nodeName on live non-form nodes. Attackers can supply hostile live DOM objects with real script children whose observable nodeName is clobbered to appear as allowed elements, causing scripts to execute when the sanitized tree is inserted into a live document. |
| CVE-2026-65900 | Medium | 2026-07-23 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | DOMPurify versions >=3.0.0 and before 3.4.8, when configured with SAFE_FOR_TEMPLATES together with a DOM output mode (RETURN_DOM, RETURN_DOM_FRAGMENT, or IN_PLACE), fail to strip template expressions (e.g. ${evil}, {{evil}}, <%evil%>) inside <template> element content. The final normalization/scrub pass (_scrubTemplateExpressions) uses a NodeIterator and node.normalize() that do not descend into template.content, so expressions that only form after adjacent text nodes merge survive sanitization. This bypasses SAFE_FOR_TEMPLATES and can allow a downstream template engine to evaluate attacker-supplied expressions. The string output path is not affected. |
| CVE-2026-65899 | Medium | 2026-07-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | DOMPurify 3.0.0 before 3.4.9 does not reset the retained Trusted Types policy when clearConfig() is called, so a DOMPurify instance reused across trust boundaries stays bound to a previously supplied TRUSTED_TYPES_POLICY. A later caller that requests RETURN_TRUSTED_TYPE output receives a TrustedHTML object created by the old (potentially unsafe) policy rather than a clean default, which can lead to script execution at a Trusted Types sink. Passing TRUSTED_TYPES_POLICY: null on the later call also does not clear the retained policy. |
| CVE-2026-65898 | Medium | 2026-07-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | DOMPurify before 3.4.11 fails to clone the ALLOWED_ATTR allowlist when setConfig() is used with an uponSanitizeAttribute hook, allowing the hook to permanently mutate the shared allowlist. Attackers can register a hook that conditionally allows dangerous attributes like onerror for trusted elements, then submit untrusted content that inherits the polluted allowlist and executes event handlers as stored XSS. |
| CVE-2026-61246 | High | 2026-07-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Platform Security for Java product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Centralized Thirdparty Jars). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Platform Security for Java. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Platform Security for Java. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2026-60455 | High | 2026-07-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Platform Security for Java product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Centralized Thirdparty Jars). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Platform Security for Java. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Platform Security for Java. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2026-60439 | High | 2026-07-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Platform Security for Java product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Centralized Thirdparty Jars). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Platform Security for Java. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Platform Security for Java. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2026-60373 | High | 2026-07-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Platform Security for Java product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Centralized Thirdparty Jars). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Platform Security for Java. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Platform Security for Java. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2026-60372 | Critical | 2026-07-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Platform Security for Java product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Centralized Thirdparty Jars). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Platform Security for Java. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Platform Security for Java. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 9.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2026-60371 | High | 2026-07-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Platform Security for Java product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Centralized Thirdparty Jars). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with access to the physical communication segment attached to the hardware where the Oracle Platform Security for Java executes to compromise Oracle Platform Security for Java. While the vulnerability is in Oracle Platform Security for Java, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Platform Security for Java. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.0 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2026-60370 | High | 2026-07-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Platform Security for Java product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Centralized Thirdparty Jars). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Platform Security for Java. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Platform Security for Java. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.5 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2026-60369 | Critical | 2026-07-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Platform Security for Java product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Centralized Thirdparty Jars). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Platform Security for Java. While the vulnerability is in Oracle Platform Security for Java, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Platform Security for Java. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 9.9 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2026-60368 | High | 2026-07-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Platform Security for Java product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Centralized Thirdparty Jars). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via SOAP to compromise Oracle Platform Security for Java. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Platform Security for Java. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2026-60367 | Critical | 2026-07-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Platform Security for Java product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Centralized Thirdparty Jars). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Platform Security for Java. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Platform Security for Java. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 9.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2026-60366 | Critical | 2026-07-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Platform Security for Java product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Centralized Thirdparty Jars). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Platform Security for Java. While the vulnerability is in Oracle Platform Security for Java, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Platform Security for Java. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 10.0 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2026-16232 | Critical | 2026-07-22 | Not applicable | Exploited | An authentication bypass vulnerability in the Check Point SmartConsole login process allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to obtain an application login token and use it to authenticate with full administrative privileges. Successful exploitation allows the attacker to modify security policies and security configurations. Remote exploitation requires internet access to the Management Server IP address and a configuration that does not restrict Trusted Clients. Check Point is aware that this vulnerability is being exploited and has affected a very small number of customers. |
| CVE-2026-64881 | High | 2026-07-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The audit file upload handler does not sanitize filenames, allowing shell metacharacters to flow into system command execution. This input validation failure enables command injection when chained with a related vulnerability. |
| CVE-2026-64880 | High | 2026-07-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Unsanitized user-supplied input in report filtering parameters is concatenated directly into SQL queries without proper escaping or parameterized queries, enabling blind SQL injection and unauthorized database read access. |
| CVE-2026-64879 | Critical | 2026-07-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A filename supplied during file upload is not properly sanitized before being used in system command execution, allowing an attacker to inject shell metacharacters and achieve command injection via the audit file upload functionality. |
| CVE-2026-64878 | Critical | 2026-07-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Unvalidated input in asset filter parameters allows shell metacharacters to escape command argument handling, resulting in remote code execution as a low-privileged OS user via the Analysis REST endpoint. |
| CVE-2026-64877 | Critical | 2026-07-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An authenticated non-admin user can exploit a SQL injection flaw in the ticketing REST API to access sensitive data stored in the appliance database. |
| CVE-2026-62498 | High | 2026-07-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Flow Manufacturing product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.7-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Flow Manufacturing. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Flow Manufacturing. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2026-62497 | High | 2026-07-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Flow Manufacturing product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.13-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Flow Manufacturing. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Flow Manufacturing accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Flow Manufacturing accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-61301 | High | 2026-07-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Process Manufacturing Financials product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Process Manufacturing Financials. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Process Manufacturing Financials accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Process Manufacturing Financials accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-61289 | High | 2026-07-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Process Manufacturing Product Development product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Quality Management Specs). The supported version that is affected is 12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Process Manufacturing Product Development. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Process Manufacturing Product Development. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2026-61287 | High | 2026-07-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Process Manufacturing Systems product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Process Manufacturing Systems. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Process Manufacturing Systems accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Process Manufacturing Systems accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-61285 | High | 2026-07-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Process Manufacturing Systems product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.11-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Process Manufacturing Systems. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Process Manufacturing Systems. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2026-61245 | Critical | 2026-07-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the PeopleSoft Enterprise FIN Manufacturing Brazil product of Oracle PeopleSoft (component: Integration). The supported version that is affected is 9.1. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTPS to compromise PeopleSoft Enterprise FIN Manufacturing Brazil. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of PeopleSoft Enterprise FIN Manufacturing Brazil. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 9.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2026-61244 | Critical | 2026-07-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the PeopleSoft Enterprise FIN Manufacturing Argentina product of Oracle PeopleSoft (component: Manufacturing). The supported version that is affected is 9.1. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise PeopleSoft Enterprise FIN Manufacturing Argentina. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all PeopleSoft Enterprise FIN Manufacturing Argentina accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all PeopleSoft Enterprise FIN Manufacturing Argentina accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 9.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-61217 | Medium | 2026-07-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Security Service product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Oracle SSL API). The supported version that is affected is 12.2.1.4.0. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via TLS to compromise Oracle Security Service. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Security Service accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Security Service accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.4 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-61210 | High | 2026-07-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the PeopleSoft Enterprise SCM Manufacturing product of Oracle PeopleSoft (component: Security). The supported version that is affected is 9.2. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTPS to compromise PeopleSoft Enterprise SCM Manufacturing. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all PeopleSoft Enterprise SCM Manufacturing accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all PeopleSoft Enterprise SCM Manufacturing accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.4 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-61088 | High | 2026-07-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the PeopleSoft Enterprise SCM Manufacturing product of Oracle PeopleSoft (component: Security). The supported version that is affected is 9.2. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise PeopleSoft Enterprise SCM Manufacturing. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all PeopleSoft Enterprise SCM Manufacturing accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.5 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-61030 | High | 2026-07-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Process Manufacturing Product Development product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Process Manufacturing Product Development. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Process Manufacturing Product Development accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Process Manufacturing Product Development accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-61010 | High | 2026-07-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Process Manufacturing Systems product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Process Manufacturing Systems. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Process Manufacturing Systems. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2026-61000 | High | 2026-07-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Process Manufacturing Systems product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Process Manufacturing Systems. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Process Manufacturing Systems accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Process Manufacturing Systems accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-60962 | Medium | 2026-07-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Flow Manufacturing product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Flow Manufacturing. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Flow Manufacturing, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Flow Manufacturing accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Flow Manufacturing accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.4 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-60339 | Low | 2026-07-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Project Manufacturing product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: PJM Command Center). The supported version that is affected is V16. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Project Manufacturing. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Project Manufacturing accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 3.1 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-60338 | Low | 2026-07-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Project Manufacturing product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: PJM Command Center). The supported version that is affected is V16. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle Project Manufacturing executes to compromise Oracle Project Manufacturing. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Project Manufacturing accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle Project Manufacturing. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 3.6 (Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L). |
| CVE-2026-60337 | Medium | 2026-07-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Project Manufacturing product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: PJM Command Center). The supported version that is affected is V16. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle Project Manufacturing executes to compromise Oracle Project Manufacturing. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Project Manufacturing accessible data as well as unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Project Manufacturing accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 4.7 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-60336 | Medium | 2026-07-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Project Manufacturing product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: PJM Command Center). The supported version that is affected is V16. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle Project Manufacturing executes to compromise Oracle Project Manufacturing. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Project Manufacturing accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Project Manufacturing accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.7 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-60321 | Medium | 2026-07-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Project Manufacturing product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: PJM Command Center). The supported version that is affected is V16. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle Project Manufacturing executes to compromise Oracle Project Manufacturing. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Project Manufacturing accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Project Manufacturing accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.7 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-16221 | High | 2026-07-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Impact: fast-uri versions from 2.3.1 through 4.1.0 (including the 3.x line up to 3.1.3 and the 2.x line up to 2.4.2) do not treat a literal backslash character (U+005C) as an authority delimiter. Node's native WHATWG URL parser, used by fetch, undici, and Node's http and https clients, normalizes the backslash to a forward slash for special schemes such as http, https, ws, wss, ftp, and file. As a result, the two parsers extract different hosts from the same input string. Applications that use fast-uri to enforce host-based policy such as allowlists, denylists, loopback or SSRF filtering, redirect validation, or outbound proxy routing before passing the same URL into Node's URL or fetch consumers can be steered to an unintended destination, including cloud metadata endpoints, loopback, or internal hosts. Patches: upgrade to fast-uri 4.1.1, 3.1.4, or 2.4.3. Workarounds: none. |
| CVE-2026-8861 | Medium | 2026-07-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information when a detailed technical error message is returned in the browser. This information could be used in further attacks against the system. |
| CVE-2026-7364 | Medium | 2026-07-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 and IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access Container 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 could allow a remote attacker to conduct phishing attacks, caused by an open redirect vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability using a specially crafted request to redirect a victim to arbitrary Web sites. |
| CVE-2026-4938 | Medium | 2026-07-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 and IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access Container 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 could allow an attacker with read-only privileges to make unauthorized modifications and deployments outside of their assigned permissions. |
| CVE-2026-6851 | High | 2026-07-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An Improper link resolution before file access ('link following') vulnerability in the File Shredder module as used in Bitdefender Total Security and Internet Security on Windows allows a less-privileged local user to elevate rights by leveraging a race conditions via Symbolic Links. This issue affects Total Security: before 27.0.58.315; Internet Security: before 27.0.58.315. |
| CVE-2026-49978 | Medium | 2026-07-14 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | DOMPurify is a DOM-only cross-site scripting sanitizer for HTML, MathML, and SVG. Prior to 3.4.7, DOMPurify IN_PLACE sanitization could skip shadow contents attached to an element inside <template>.content, allowing attacker-controlled markup such as event handlers, JavaScript URLs, or scripts to survive and execute when an application cloned and inserted the sanitized template. This issue is fixed in version 3.4.7. |
| CVE-2026-49459 | Medium | 2026-07-14 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | DOMPurify is a DOM-only cross-site scripting sanitizer for HTML, MathML, and SVG. Prior to 3.4.6, DOMPurify.sanitize(root, { IN_PLACE: true }) could preserve event-handler attributes on an attacker-controlled <form> root when a descendant name clobbered properties checked by _isClobbered, because _forceRemove no-opped on the parent-less root and _sanitizeAttributes returned early. This issue is fixed in version 3.4.6. |
| CVE-2026-49458 | Medium | 2026-07-14 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | DOMPurify is a DOM-only cross-site scripting sanitizer for HTML, MathML, and SVG. Prior to 3.4.6, DOMPurify.sanitize(node, { IN_PLACE: true }) accepted same-origin foreign-realm DOM nodes while follow-on checks used parent-realm constructors, causing instanceof checks for forms, named node maps, document fragments, and elements to fail and skip clobber, template-content, and shadow-DOM sanitization branches so executable markup could survive. This issue is fixed in version 3.4.6. |
| CVE-2026-47423 | High | 2026-07-14 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | DOMPurify is a DOM-only cross-site scripting sanitizer for HTML, MathML, and SVG. In 3.4.4, DOMPurify allowed selectedcontent by default, allowing browsers to re-clone an XSS payload after sanitization so that unsanitized markup inside <selectedcontent> is returned. This issue is fixed in version 3.4.5. |
| CVE-2026-52761 | Medium | 2026-07-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | ModSecurity is an open source, cross platform web application firewall (WAF) engine for Apache, IIS and Nginx. From 3.0.0 through 3.0.15, the t:utf8toUnicode transformation in src/actions/transformations/utf8_to_unicode.cc produces wrong output on i386 architecture because snprintf uses sizeof on a char pointer rather than the length of the unicode buffer, allowing rules that use this transformation to be bypassed on i386 architecture. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.16. |
| CVE-2026-52747 | High | 2026-07-10 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | ModSecurity is an open source, cross platform web application firewall (WAF) engine for Apache, IIS and Nginx. Prior to 3.0.16, the multipart/form-data request body parser in libmodsecurity silently removes embedded line breaks from non-file form-field values before exporting them to ARGS and ARGS_POST because src/request_body_processor/multipart.cc overwrites reserved bytes in m_reserve instead of appending the current buffer. This creates a parser differential between ModSecurity and backend applications that preserve line breaks in form fields, allowing rules that inspect ARGS or ARGS_POST to miss payloads whose dangerous syntax depends on a line break. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.16. |
| CVE-2026-56152 | Medium | 2026-07-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to unauthorized information disclosure via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). Under certain conditions, a low-privileged authenticated user can access response action data that they are not authorized to view. |
| CVE-2026-13676 | High | 2026-06-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | fast-uri versions 2.3.1 through 3.1.2 and 4.0.0 fail to canonicalize Unicode (IDN) hostnames for HTTP-family URLs. The IDN conversion path calls a helper that does not exist on the global URL constructor, silently leaving the host in its original Unicode form while normalize() and equal() still return values that differ from a WHATWG-compatible URL parser. Applications that use fast-uri to enforce host-based policy (denylists, loopback filtering, redirect validation, outbound proxy routing) before passing the same URL to Node's URL or fetch can be bypassed when the two implementations resolve the same input to different hosts. Patches: upgrade to fast-uri 3.1.3 for the 3.x line or 4.0.1 for the 4.x line. Workarounds: enforce host policy using the same URL parser used for the actual request, or reject non-ASCII hosts before policy checks. |
| CVE-2026-12993 | Medium | 2026-06-26 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | A flaw was found in Apicurio Registry. The DocumentBuilderAccessor correctly blocks external DTD and schema access but does not disable DOCTYPE declarations or enable FEATURE_SECURE_PROCESSING. An attacker with artifact-write permission can upload XML documents with internal entity-expansion payloads (billion-laughs variant) that cause CPU and heap exhaustion, partially mitigated by the JAXP default 64,000 entity-expansion limit. |
| CVE-2026-12992 | High | 2026-06-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in Apicurio Registry. The WSDLReaderAccessor creates a wsdl4j WSDLReader without disabling the javax.wsdl.importDocuments feature. When the VALIDITY rule is set to FULL, an attacker with Developer-role access can upload a WSDL document containing attacker-controlled import locations, causing the registry to issue HTTP requests to arbitrary internal URLs (server-side request forgery). |
| CVE-2026-12975 | High | 2026-06-25 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | A flaw was found in Apicurio Registry. The ContentTypeUtil.isParsableXml() method creates a SAXParserFactory without enabling secure processing features or disabling external entity resolution. An attacker with artifact-write permission (or unauthenticated when the registry runs with default configuration) can upload a crafted XML document to trigger blind server-side request forgery (SSRF) via external DTD/entity fetch, or cause denial of service via entity expansion. |