Overview 117 matches · 2 in Waratek scope · 1 protected · 5 exploited · 1 CISA KEV · 18 public PoC · 4 EPSS ≥ 0.5
117matches
2in Waratek scope1.7%
1protected0.9%
5exploited4.3%
1CISA KEV0.9%
18public PoC15.4%
4EPSS ≥ 0.53.4%
Protected by Waratek
1
0.9%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
1
0.9%
Outside Waratek scope
0
0.0%
Not applicable
115
98.3%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
1
0.9%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
116
99.1%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 17 / year
19981
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
19991
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20003
Not applicable3
High1
Medium2
not blocked3
Working exploit published1
No public exploit2
20014
Not applicable4
High3
Medium1
not blocked4
Working exploit published1
No public exploit3
20023
Not applicable3
High2
Medium1
not blocked3
No public exploit3
20031
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20045
Not applicable5
High2
Medium2
Low1
not blocked5
Working exploit published1
No public exploit4
20057
Not applicable7
High6
Medium1
not blocked7
Working exploit published4
No public exploit3
20068
Not applicable8
High6
Medium2
not blocked8
Working exploit published2
No public exploit6
20072
Not applicable2
High2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20085
Not applicable5
High1
Medium2
Low2
not blocked5
Working exploit published1
No public exploit4
20091
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20103
Not applicable3
Medium2
Low1
not blocked3
Working exploit published1
No public exploit2
20110
20120
20130
20141
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20150
20160
20174
Not applicable4
Critical1
High1
Medium2
not blocked4
No public exploit4
20180
20194
Not applicable4
Critical1
Medium3
not blocked4
Working exploit published1
No public exploit3
20206
Not applicable6
Critical2
High3
Medium1
not blocked6
Exploited2
Working exploit published2
No public exploit2
20212
Not applicable2
Medium2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
202213
Not applicable13
Critical1
High3
Medium9
not blocked13
Exploited1
Proof of concept only2
No public exploit10
202316
Not applicable16
Critical1
High6
Medium9
not blocked16
Exploited1
Proof of concept only4
No public exploit11
202417
Not applicable17
Critical3
High8
Medium5
Low1
not blocked17
Exploited1
Proof of concept only3
No public exploit13
202510
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published1
Not applicable8
High6
Medium4
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked9
Proof of concept only2
No public exploit8
1998200120042007201020132016201920222025
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2004-2677 | High | 2004-12-31 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Format string vulnerability in qwik-smtpd.c in QwikMail SMTP (qwik-smtpd) 0.3 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via format specifiers in the (1) clientRcptTo array, and the (2) Received and (3) messageID variables, possibly involving HELO and hostname arguments. |
| CVE-2004-2417 | High | 2004-12-31 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Format string vulnerability in smtp.c for smtp.proxy 1.1.3 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via format string specifiers in the (1) client hostname or (2) message-id, which are injected into a syslog message. |
| CVE-2004-0423 | Low | 2004-07-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The log_event function in ssmtp 2.50.6 and earlier allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack on the ssmtp.log temporary log file. |
| CVE-2004-0156 | Medium | 2004-06-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Format string vulnerabilities in the (1) die or (2) log_event functions for ssmtp before 2.50.6 allow remote mail relays to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code. |
| CVE-2003-1477 | High | 2003-12-31 | Not applicable | No public exploit | MAILsweeper for SMTP 4.3.6 and 4.3.7 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via a PowerPoint attachment that either (1) is corrupt or (2) contains "embedded objects." |
| CVE-2002-1985 | Medium | 2002-12-31 | Not applicable | No public exploit | iSMTP 5.0.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a long "MAIL FROM" command, possibly triggering a buffer overflow. |
| CVE-2002-1090 | High | 2002-10-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Buffer overflow in read_smtp_response of protocol.c in libesmtp before 0.8.11 allows a remote SMTP server to (1) execute arbitrary code via a certain response or (2) cause a denial of service via long server responses. |
| CVE-2002-1121 | High | 2002-09-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | SMTP content filter engines, including (1) GFI MailSecurity for Exchange/SMTP before 7.2, (2) InterScan VirusWall before 3.52 build 1494, (3) the default configuration of MIMEDefang before 2.21, and possibly other products, do not detect fragmented emails as defined in RFC2046 ("Message Fragmentation and Reassembly") and supported in such products as Outlook Express, which allows remote attackers to bypass content filtering, including virus checking, via fragmented emails of the message/partial content type. |
| CVE-2001-1542 | High | 2001-12-31 | Not applicable | No public exploit | NAI WebShield SMTP 4.5 and possibly 4.5 MR1a does not filter improperly MIME encoded email attachments, which could allow remote attackers to bypass filtering and possibly execute arbitrary code in email clients that process the invalid attachments. |
| CVE-2001-1456 | High | 2001-09-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Buffer overflow in the (1) smap/smapd and (2) CSMAP daemons for Gauntlet Firewall 5.0 through 6.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted mail message. |
| CVE-2000-1130 | High | 2001-01-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | McAfee WebShield SMTP 4.5 allows remote attackers to bypass email content filtering rules by including Extended ASCII characters in name of the attachment. |
| CVE-2000-1129 | Medium | 2001-01-09 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | McAfee WebShield SMTP 4.5 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a malformed recipient field. |
| CVE-2000-0932 | Medium | 2000-12-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | MAILsweeper for SMTP 3.x does not properly handle corrupt CDA documents in a ZIP file and hangs, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service. |
| CVE-2000-0833 | High | 2000-11-14 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Buffer overflow in WinSMTP 1.06f and 2.X allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a long (1) USER or (2) HELO command. |
| CVE-2000-0738 | Medium | 2000-10-20 | Not applicable | No public exploit | WebShield SMTP 4.5 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service by sending e-mail with a From: address that has a . (period) at the end, which causes WebShield to continuously send itself copies of the e-mail. |
| CVE-1999-1516 | High | 1999-09-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A buffer overflow in TenFour TFS Gateway SMTP mail server 3.2 allows an attacker to crash the mail server and possibly execute arbitrary code by offering more than 128 bytes in a MAIL FROM string. |
| CVE-1999-1200 | Medium | 1998-07-20 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Vintra SMTP MailServer allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a malformed "EXPN *@" command. |