Overview 104 matches · 8 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 0 public PoC · 0 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
8
7.7%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
96
92.3%
blocked by ARMR today
8
7.7%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
96
92.3%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
11
10.6%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
93
89.4%
split by
peak 37 / month
Sep 251
Protected by Waratek1
Critical1
blocked by ARMR today1
No public exploit1
Oct 250
Nov 253
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published2
High3
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked2
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit2
Dec 254
No exploit published4
High2
Medium2
not blocked4
No public exploit4
Jan 260
Feb 262
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published1
Critical1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked1
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit1
Mar 263
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published1
Critical2
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked1
No public exploit3
Apr 261
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
May 263
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published2
Critical2
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked2
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit2
Jun 261
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Jul 2619
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published18
Critical4
High14
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked18
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit18
Aug 2637
No exploit published37
Critical4
High22
Medium10
Low1
not blocked37
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit36
Sep 268
No exploit published8
Critical3
High3
Medium1
Low1
not blocked8
No public exploit8
Oct 2622
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published21
High7
Medium13
Low2
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked21
Proof of concept only6
No public exploit16
Oct 25Dec 25Feb 26Apr 26Jun 26Aug 26Oct 26
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-12183 | High | 2025-11-28 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Out-of-bounds memory operations in org.lz4:lz4-java 1.8.0 and earlier allow remote attackers to cause denial of service and read adjacent memory via untrusted compressed input. |
| CVE-2025-66021 | High | 2025-11-26 | No exploit published | Proof of concept only | OWASP Java HTML Sanitizer is a configureable HTML Sanitizer written in Java, allowing inclusion of HTML authored by third-parties in web applications while protecting against XSS. In version 20240325.1, OWASP java html sanitizer is vulnerable to XSS if HtmlPolicyBuilder allows noscript and style tags with allowTextIn inside the style tag. This could lead to XSS if the payload is crafted in such a way that it does not sanitise the CSS and allows tags which is not mentioned in HTML policy. At time of publication no known patch is available. |
| CVE-2025-64518 | High | 2025-11-10 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | The CycloneDX core module provides a model representation of the SBOM along with utilities to assist in creating, validating, and parsing SBOMs. Starting in version 2.1.0 and prior to version 11.0.1, the XML `Validator` used by cyclonedx-core-java was not configured securely, making the library vulnerable to XML External Entity (XXE) injection. The fix for GHSA-683x-4444-jxh8 / CVE-2024-38374 was incomplete in that it only fixed parsing of XML BOMs, but not validation. The vulnerability has been fixed in cyclonedx-core-java version 11.0.1. As a workaround, applications can reject XML documents before handing them to cyclonedx-core-java for validation. This may be an option if incoming CycloneDX BOMs are known to be in JSON format. |
| CVE-2025-59340 | Critical | 2025-09-17 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | jinjava is a Java-based template engine based on django template syntax, adapted to render jinja templates. Priori to 2.8.1, by using mapper.getTypeFactory().constructFromCanonical(), it is possible to instruct the underlying ObjectMapper to deserialize attacker-controlled input into arbitrary classes. This enables the creation of semi-arbitrary class instances without directly invoking restricted methods or class literals. As a result, an attacker can escape the sandbox and instantiate classes such as java.net.URL, opening up the ability to access local files and URLs(e.g., file:///etc/passwd). With further chaining, this primitive can potentially lead to remote code execution (RCE). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.8.1. |