Overview 3,104 matches · 135 in Waratek scope · 18 protected · 81 exploited · 50 CISA KEV · 130 public PoC · 64 EPSS ≥ 0.5
3,104matches
135in Waratek scope4.3%
18protected0.6%
81exploited2.6%
50CISA KEV1.6%
130public PoC4.2%
64EPSS ≥ 0.52.1%
Protected by Waratek
18
0.6%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
2
0.1%
No exploit published
115
3.7%
Outside Waratek scope
159
5.1%
Not applicable
2,810
90.5%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
18
0.6%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
3,086
99.4%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 694 / year
20001
Not applicable1
Low1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20011
Not applicable1
Low1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20024
Outside Waratek scope3
Not applicable1
High2
Medium2
not blocked4
Working exploit published2
No public exploit2
20032
Not applicable2
Medium2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
200415
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable13
High8
Medium4
Low3
not blocked15
Working exploit published2
No public exploit13
200510
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable9
High7
Medium3
not blocked10
Working exploit published5
No public exploit5
200610
Not applicable10
High2
Medium8
not blocked10
Working exploit published4
No public exploit6
200723
Not applicable23
High15
Medium7
Low1
not blocked23
Working exploit published9
No public exploit14
200822
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable21
High13
Medium6
Low3
not blocked22
Working exploit published5
No public exploit17
20099
Not applicable9
High3
Medium6
not blocked9
Working exploit published4
No public exploit5
201023
Not applicable23
High4
Medium18
Low1
not blocked23
Working exploit published3
No public exploit20
201117
Not applicable17
High9
Medium7
Low1
not blocked17
Working exploit published2
No public exploit15
201222
Outside Waratek scope4
Not applicable18
High8
Medium13
Low1
not blocked22
Working exploit published2
No public exploit20
201341
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable39
High15
Medium23
Low3
not blocked41
Working exploit published2
No public exploit39
201425
Outside Waratek scope6
Not applicable19
High6
Medium18
Low1
not blocked25
Working exploit published1
No public exploit24
201547
Outside Waratek scope10
Not applicable37
Critical1
High16
Medium29
Low1
not blocked47
Exploited1
Working exploit published2
No public exploit44
201660
Outside Waratek scope5
Not applicable55
Critical2
High13
Medium39
Low6
not blocked60
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only2
No public exploit57
201778
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published3
Outside Waratek scope4
Not applicable70
Critical7
High27
Medium41
Low3
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked77
Working exploit published6
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit71
2018108
No exploit published7
Outside Waratek scope19
Not applicable82
Critical17
High39
Medium51
Low1
not blocked108
Exploited5
Working exploit published2
No public exploit101
2019113
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published5
Outside Waratek scope13
Not applicable94
Critical20
High36
Medium55
Low2
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked112
Exploited5
Working exploit published4
Proof of concept only1
Forecast only2
No public exploit101
2020135
Protected by Waratek5
No exploit published6
Outside Waratek scope14
Not applicable110
Critical16
High44
Medium67
Low8
blocked by ARMR today5
not blocked130
Exploited8
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only5
No public exploit121
2021215
Protected by Waratek3
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published11
Outside Waratek scope14
Not applicable186
Critical31
High88
Medium92
Low4
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked212
Exploited10
Working exploit published2
Proof of concept only5
Forecast only5
No public exploit193
2022283
Protected by Waratek3
No exploit published9
Outside Waratek scope12
Not applicable259
Critical42
High150
Medium86
Low5
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked280
Exploited8
Working exploit published6
Proof of concept only20
Forecast only2
No public exploit247
2023313
Protected by Waratek3
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published7
Outside Waratek scope3
Not applicable299
Critical52
High168
Medium92
Low1
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked310
Exploited7
Working exploit published2
Proof of concept only26
No public exploit278
2024457
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published5
Outside Waratek scope4
Not applicable447
Critical59
High297
Medium101
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked456
Exploited16
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only5
No public exploit435
2025376
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published4
Outside Waratek scope8
Not applicable363
Critical24
High234
Medium111
Low7
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked375
Exploited11
Proof of concept only20
No public exploit345
2026694
No exploit published58
Outside Waratek scope34
Not applicable602
Critical101
High332
Medium236
Low25
not blocked694
Exploited10
No public exploit684
200220052008201120142017202020232026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-91212 | High | 2026-10-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Identity Manager Connector product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Generic REST). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.1.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Identity Manager Connector. While the vulnerability is in Oracle Identity Manager Connector, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Identity Manager Connector accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.6 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-91211 | High | 2026-10-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Identity Manager Connector product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Connectors and Connector Server). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.1.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with network access via SOAP to compromise Oracle Identity Manager Connector. While the vulnerability is in Oracle Identity Manager Connector, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Identity Manager Connector accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Identity Manager Connector accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.7 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-111357 | High | 2026-10-15 | Not applicable | Exploited | Ivanti Connect Secure 22.8R2.4 mishandles the manner in which the dsinvoked broker trusts DSCache configuration data, leading to privilege escalation to root, as exploited in the wild in October 2026. |
| CVE-2026-104935 | High | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | Exploited | Authentication bypass by spoofing in ICS before version 25.1.3.0 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands. This does not impact ICS version 22.7R2.14 or prior. |
| CVE-2026-78341 | High | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges and Unauthorized access. |
| CVE-2026-78340 | Medium | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Code execution and Filesystem access for attacker. |
| CVE-2026-78339 | High | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure, Protection mechanism bypass, and Unauthorized access. |
| CVE-2026-78027 | Medium | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure and Server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-78026 | High | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges. |
| CVE-2026-78025 | High | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains a Missing Authentication for Critical Function vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure, Protection mechanism bypass, and Unauthorized access. |
| CVE-2026-78024 | High | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure, Protection mechanism bypass, Server-side request forgery, and Unauthorized access. |
| CVE-2026-78023 | High | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges. |
| CVE-2026-78022 | High | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains a Not Failing Securely ('Failing Open') vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Protection mechanism bypass. |
| CVE-2026-78021 | Medium | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains a Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive Information vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure and Information exposure. |
| CVE-2026-78020 | High | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Denial of service, Information disclosure, and Remote execution. |
| CVE-2026-78019 | High | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges, Filesystem access for attacker, and Remote execution. |
| CVE-2026-78018 | High | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Initialization of a Resource with an Insecure Default vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure. |
| CVE-2026-78017 | Low | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information tampering and Protection mechanism bypass. |
| CVE-2026-78016 | Medium | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Improper Validation of Specified Type of Input vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information exposure and Information tampering. |
| CVE-2026-78015 | Medium | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Use of Less Trusted Source vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information tampering. |
| CVE-2026-78013 | Medium | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Initialization of a Resource with an Insecure Default vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Denial of service, Information disclosure, and Protection mechanism bypass. |
| CVE-2026-76779 | Critical | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges, Protection mechanism bypass, and Unauthorized access. |
| CVE-2026-76769 | High | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains a Missing Authorization vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges. |
| CVE-2026-87428 | High | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Brocade ASCG before 3.5.0, a local unauthorized user on the ASCG VM who can issue a request to the SANnav host network namespace can extract stored management credentials for onboarded SANnav instances and compromise connected Brocade SANnav servers or managed Brocade Fibre Channel switches. |
| CVE-2026-87426 | Medium | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An unauthenticated network-based attacker can query specific internal management endpoints on Brocade ASCG versions before 3.5.0 to enumerate the configuration details and state of managed Brocade Fabric OS (FOS) switches. This results in the unauthorized disclosure of the customer's SAN fabric management topology and switch connectivity attributes. |
| CVE-2026-87425 | High | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An unauthenticated remote attacker can modify the TLS client trust store in Brocade ASCG versions before 3.5.0. By supplying an unauthorized Certificate Authority (CA) certificate to an unauthenticated management interface, the attacker can cause the system to trust unauthorized certificates, potentially enabling Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attacks against outbound communications with managed switches and peer nodes. |
| CVE-2026-87424 | High | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the SupportLink API authentication component of Brocade ASCG versions prior to 3.5.0 allows an attacker to bypass authentication across deployments due to the use of a hard coded cryptographic key. |
| CVE-2026-85490 | High | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When Brocade ASCG before 3.5.0 processes support bundle archives ingested from remote compromised endpoints, the application fails to sanitize path traversal sequences contained within archive entries prior to extraction. An unauthenticated remote attacker capable of sending or intercepting ingested archive files can leverage this flaw to write arbitrary files to restricted locations on the underlying host, potentially leading to remote code execution. |
| CVE-2026-85489 | High | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An authentication flaw exists in the Brocade ASCG administrative management service component. An unauthenticated network user can issue direct API requests to perform privileged actions, including accessing sensitive system configuration mapping data, modifying managed device inventories, and altering operational settings. This vulnerability affects all versions of Brocade ASCG before 3.5.0. |
| CVE-2026-85488 | High | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Brocade ASCG before 3.5.0 has a well-known Brocade default password embedded in a script distributed to every customer. Any local authenticated user with read access to the installation path can discover this credential and perform privilege escalation on affected Open Virtual Appliance (OVA) deployments, where default configuration settings remain in place. |
| CVE-2026-85487 | High | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A path traversal vulnerability exists in the HTTP service component of Brocade ASCG versions before 3.5.0. An unauthenticated attacker on the local network could send a manipulated API request to the service endpoint bypassing path restrictions to arbitrary file read, file write, or file deletion operations. |
| CVE-2026-85486 | High | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Brocade ASCG before 3.5.0 improperly processes user input by evaluating form data prior to validation. When an authenticated user submits a configuration form, the submitted text could immediately be processed. A malicious actor with basic access can supply crafted input to execute arbitrary code on the server and take control of the application. |
| CVE-2026-85423 | High | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability has been identified in the data collection service of Brocade ASCG versions before 3.5.0. An API endpoint within the data collector service fails to perform authentication or authorization checks on incoming requests. An attacker with network access to the service can instruct the application to establish SSH connections to arbitrary hosts and execute arbitrary system commands, effectively turning the appliance into an unauthenticated proxy or execution vector. |
| CVE-2026-85422 | High | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability in Brocade ASCG version before 3.5.0 could allow an attacker to obtain a static cryptographic key hardcoded into the software binaries to secure sensitive data at rest and to protect inter-node communication protocols. An attacker who extracts this key can decrypt stored management credentials or craft forged administrative synchronization messages. |
| CVE-2026-85421 | High | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A critical security vulnerability has been identified in Brocade ASCG versions before 3.5.0. The HTTPS service fails to properly enforce authentication or access control checks on incoming requests. An unauthenticated attacker with network access can issue control commands, alter cluster states, and modify system configurations, leading to a complete compromise of the streaming service control plane. |
| CVE-2023-5649 | Medium | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An Improper Input Validation vulnerability for the registered case credentials in Brocade ASCG before v3.0 could allow a local authenticated user to provide invalid inputs like special characters leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) when collecting “supportsave” from a Brocade Switch. |
| CVE-2023-5648 | Medium | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Brocade ASCG before Brocade ASCG v3.0, several security-related HTTP Headers were missing in various Brocade ASCG URL paths, aiding unauthenticated attackers to perform attacks such as Cross-Site Scripting, Clickjacking, Information disclosure, and more. |
| CVE-2026-57559 | High | 2026-10-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Memory corruption while processing service requests. |
| CVE-2026-57555 | High | 2026-10-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Memory Corruption when executing system service routines due to improper handling of user input buffers. |
| CVE-2026-57554 | High | 2026-10-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Memory Corruption when asynchronous threads access shared performance counter data simultaneously during FastRPC invocations. |
| CVE-2026-57546 | High | 2026-10-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Transient DOS when processing a continuous receive command with a zero-sized global configuration override. |
| CVE-2026-57545 | High | 2026-10-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Memory corruption when processing draw objects of incorrect type during graphics command list execution. |
| CVE-2026-57537 | High | 2026-10-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Memory Corruption when accessing and modifying geographic mapping data concurrently without proper synchronization. |
| CVE-2026-25302 | High | 2026-10-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cryptographic Issue when processing non-ELF partitions, authentication and signature checks are bypassed, allowing unsigned or corrupted images to be mounted and processed. |
| CVE-2026-25291 | High | 2026-10-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Memory corruption when performing concurrent operations on shared memory page lists due to lack of proper synchronization mechanisms. |
| CVE-2026-25274 | Medium | 2026-10-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Memory Corruption when processing concurrent DMA buffer allocation and deallocation commands without proper synchronization. |
| CVE-2026-25273 | Medium | 2026-10-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Memory Corruption when processing camera operations due to out-of-bounds write during driver updates. |
| CVE-2026-25272 | Medium | 2026-10-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Memory Corruption when processing camera CRE driver operations with improper handling of buffer limits during hardware update preparation. |
| CVE-2026-25270 | Medium | 2026-10-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Memory corruption when processing command buffer requests with invalid length parameters in the Android Camera driver. |
| CVE-2026-25269 | Medium | 2026-10-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Memory corruption when processing camera requests with excessive batch and IO buffer configurations exceeds allocated memory size. |
| CVE-2026-25267 | High | 2026-10-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Memory corruption when non-secure loader rewrites page tables before secure memory initialization. |
| CVE-2026-25263 | Medium | 2026-10-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Memory corruption while processing IOCTL command called from user space to the kernel with invalid parameters. |
| CVE-2026-76114 | Medium | 2026-09-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains a Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure. |
| CVE-2026-73599 | Medium | 2026-09-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect') vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-73598 | High | 2026-09-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges. |
| CVE-2026-73597 | High | 2026-09-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure, Information tampering, Launch of phishing attacks, and Protection mechanism bypass. |
| CVE-2026-73596 | Medium | 2026-09-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Initialization of a Resource with an Insecure Default vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges, Information tampering, Protection mechanism bypass, and Unauthorized access. |
| CVE-2026-73595 | Critical | 2026-09-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, Versions prior to 5.36, contains a Download of Code Without Integrity Check vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Code execution, Information disclosure, Information tampering, and Protection mechanism bypass. |
| CVE-2026-73594 | High | 2026-09-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, Versions prior to 5.36, contains an Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with adjacent network access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure, Information tampering, and Protection mechanism bypass. |
| CVE-2026-73593 | Medium | 2026-09-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Active Debug Code vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure, Information tampering, Protection mechanism bypass, and Unauthorized access. |
| CVE-2026-73591 | High | 2026-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Inclusion of Sensitive Information in Source Code vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information exposure. |
| CVE-2026-73589 | Medium | 2026-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, Versions prior to 5.36, contains a Weak Encoding for Password vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure, Information tampering, Protection mechanism bypass, and Unauthorized access. |
| CVE-2026-73588 | High | 2026-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains a Missing Authentication for Critical Function vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Unauthorized access. |
| CVE-2026-73587 | Medium | 2026-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with adjacent network access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure, Information tampering, and Protection mechanism bypass. |
| CVE-2026-73586 | Medium | 2026-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Insufficient Session Expiration vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with adjacent network access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges, Protection mechanism bypass, and Unauthorized access. |
| CVE-2026-71178 | Low | 2026-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Use of Non-Canonical URL Paths for Authorization Decisions vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Unauthorized access. |
| CVE-2026-71177 | Medium | 2026-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers or Frames vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges and Session theft. |
| CVE-2026-61413 | Medium | 2026-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Improper Privilege Management vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Unauthorized access. |
| CVE-2026-83964 | High | 2026-09-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Connect is affected by an Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability that could lead to disclosure of sensitive memory. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to disclose sensitive information. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-75698 | Critical | 2026-09-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Connect is affected by a reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to inject malicious scripts into a web page, potentially gaining elevated access or control over the victim's account or session. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a maliciously crafted URL or interact with a compromised web page. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-75697 | Critical | 2026-09-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Connect is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by an attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field, potentially gaining elevated access or control over the victim's account or session. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-75689 | Critical | 2026-09-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Connect is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by an attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field, potentially gaining elevated access or control over the victim's account or session. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-75686 | Critical | 2026-09-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Connect is affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a maliciously crafted URL or interact with a compromised web page. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-75684 | Critical | 2026-09-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Connect is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by an attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field, potentially gaining elevated access or control over the victim's account or session. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-75682 | Critical | 2026-09-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Connect is affected by an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary SQL commands, potentially gaining elevated access or control over the victim's account or session. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-48361 | Medium | 2026-09-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Connect is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by an attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-34689 | High | 2026-09-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Connect is affected by an Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability that could lead to arbitrary file system read. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to access sensitive files and directories outside the intended access scope. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-25294 | High | 2026-09-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Transient DOS while parsing frame during channel usage. |
| CVE-2026-25290 | High | 2026-09-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Memory Corruption when validating large data buffers from external sources using addition to check buffer length. |
| CVE-2026-25284 | High | 2026-09-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Information Disclosure when a pointer is reused after being deallocated. |
| CVE-2026-25283 | High | 2026-09-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Memory Corruption when copying unverified data from an external source exceeds the allocated buffer size. |
| CVE-2026-25282 | High | 2026-09-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Transient DOS when processing unverified data from a neighboring system causes out of bound memory access. |
| CVE-2026-25281 | High | 2026-09-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Transient DOS when processing large or numerous request buffers without sufficient memory allocation validation. |
| CVE-2026-25280 | High | 2026-09-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Memory corruption when processing escape handling flow with insufficient user buffer sizes. |
| CVE-2026-25275 | High | 2026-09-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Transient DOS when processing authentication frames with invalid FILS information element header lengths. |
| CVE-2026-25261 | High | 2026-09-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Memory corruption while processing rear sensor IOCTL calls. |
| CVE-2026-24081 | High | 2026-09-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Transient DOS when processing a channel map with insufficient used channels and adaptive frequency hopping is fully enabled. |
| CVE-2026-24075 | High | 2026-09-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Memory Corruption when multiple threads issue concurrent IOCTL requests to the device control handler due to improper synchronization and race conditions. |
| CVE-2026-24074 | High | 2026-09-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Memory Corruption when processing data with large offset and length values exceeds buffer limits during data copy operations. |
| CVE-2026-24073 | High | 2026-09-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Memory corruption when processing decode statistics due to insufficient validation of offset against structure size. |
| CVE-2025-59607 | High | 2026-09-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Memory Corruption when copying large input data exceeds normal allocation limits. |
| CVE-2026-76460 | Critical | 2026-09-16 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | A vulnerability in an API of Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass authentication. This vulnerability is due to insufficient authentication control on an API endpoint. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted request to an affected API endpoint. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to gain unauthorized access to the affected device by bypassing the web-based management interface. |
| CVE-2026-76451 | Medium | 2026-09-16 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) and Cisco ISE Passive Identity Connector (ISE-PIC) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct an SQL or HQL injection attack on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input to the affected APIs before it is used to build database queries. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary SQL or HQL queries against the underlying database, which could allow the attacker to view or modify data that they are not authorized to access. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid administrative credentials. |
| CVE-2026-76450 | Medium | 2026-09-16 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) and Cisco ISE Passive Identity Connector (ISE-PIC) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct an SQL or HQL injection attack on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input to the affected APIs before it is used to build database queries. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary SQL or HQL queries against the underlying database, which could allow the attacker to view or modify data that they are not authorized to access. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid administrative credentials. |
| CVE-2026-76449 | Medium | 2026-09-16 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) and Cisco ISE Passive Identity Connector (ISE-PIC) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct an SQL or HQL injection attack on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input to the affected APIs before it is used to build database queries. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary SQL or HQL queries against the underlying database, which could allow the attacker to view or modify data that they are not authorized to access. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid administrative credentials. |
| CVE-2026-76448 | Medium | 2026-09-16 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) and Cisco ISE Passive Identity Connector (ISE-PIC) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct an SQL or HQL injection attack on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input to the affected APIs before it is used to build database queries. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary SQL or HQL queries against the underlying database, which could allow the attacker to view or modify data that they are not authorized to access. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid administrative credentials. |
| CVE-2026-76447 | Medium | 2026-09-16 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) responder of Cisco ISE and Cisco ISE-PIC could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause an administrative reload of the OCSP responder certificate and key material. This vulnerability is due to missing authentication on a function of the OCSP responder. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the OCSP responder to reload certificate and key material on demand. |
| CVE-2026-76446 | Medium | 2026-09-16 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in an API of Cisco ISE and Cisco ISE-PIC could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to read specific files on the underlying operating system of an affected device. This vulnerability is due to improper restriction of XML external entity references. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to read specific files on the affected system that the underlying process has permission to access. |
| CVE-2026-76444 | Medium | 2026-09-16 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in an internal service of Cisco ISE and Cisco ISE-PIC could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to retrieve sensitive configuration information from an affected device. This vulnerability is due to missing authentication on the Policy Runtime Repository Table (PRRT) service. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to obtain sensitive configuration information from the affected device. |
| CVE-2026-76439 | Medium | 2026-09-16 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the endpoint posture status reporting functionality of the guest portal web application of Cisco ISE could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to submit forged posture status events into the endpoint posture pipeline. This vulnerability is due to insufficient authentication on an internal interface that is exposed through the guest portal. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted request to an affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to manipulate the posture status on the affected system. |