Overview 183 matches · 0 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 5 public PoC · 2 EPSS ≥ 0.5
183matches
0in Waratek scope0.0%
0protected0.0%
0exploited0.0%
0CISA KEV0.0%
5public PoC2.7%
2EPSS ≥ 0.51.1%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
6
3.3%
Not applicable
177
96.7%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
183
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 37 / year
20052
Not applicable2
Low2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20060
20070
20083
Not applicable3
High1
Medium1
Low1
not blocked3
No public exploit3
20093
Not applicable3
High1
Medium2
not blocked3
No public exploit3
20100
20110
20121
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20130
20140
20151
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20165
Not applicable5
High2
Medium3
not blocked5
No public exploit5
20177
Not applicable7
Critical1
High1
Medium2
Low3
not blocked7
No public exploit7
20182
Not applicable2
High1
Medium1
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20191
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
202032
Outside Waratek scope5
Not applicable27
Critical1
High9
Medium21
Low1
not blocked32
Working exploit published2
No public exploit30
202122
Not applicable22
Critical1
High7
Medium13
Low1
not blocked22
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only1
Forecast only1
No public exploit19
202237
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable36
High22
Medium15
not blocked37
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit36
202318
Not applicable18
Critical1
High14
Medium3
not blocked18
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit16
202414
Not applicable14
Critical8
High1
Medium2
Low3
not blocked14
Proof of concept only4
No public exploit10
202530
Not applicable30
Critical30
not blocked30
Proof of concept only8
No public exploit22
20265
Not applicable5
Critical1
High4
not blocked5
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit4
20062008201020122014201620182020202220242026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-0092 | Medium | 2022-02-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper access control in the firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable a denial of service via local access. |
| CVE-2021-0091 | High | 2022-02-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper access control in the firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow an unauthenticated user to potentially enable an escalation of privilege via local access. |
| CVE-2021-0060 | Medium | 2022-02-09 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Insufficient compartmentalization in HECI subsystem for the Intel(R) SPS before versions SPS_E5_04.01.04.516.0, SPS_E5_04.04.04.033.0, SPS_E5_04.04.03.281.0, SPS_E5_03.01.03.116.0, SPS_E3_05.01.04.309.0, SPS_02.04.00.101.0, SPS_SoC-A_05.00.03.114.0, SPS_SoC-X_04.00.04.326.0, SPS_SoC-X_03.00.03.117.0, IGN_E5_91.00.00.167.0, SPS_PHI_03.01.03.078.0 may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via physical access. |
| CVE-2021-33625 | High | 2022-02-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in Kernel 5.x in Insyde InsydeH2O, affecting HddPassword. Software SMI services that use the Communicate() function of the EFI_SMM_COMMUNICATION_PROTOCOL do not check whether the address of the buffer is valid, which allows use of SMRAM, MMIO, or OS kernel addresses. |
| CVE-2021-41289 | High | 2021-11-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | ASUS P453UJ contains the Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer vulnerability. With a general user’s permission, local attackers can modify the BIOS by replacing or filling in the content of the designated Memory DataBuffer, which causing a failure of integrity verification and further resulting in a failure to boot. |
| CVE-2020-5955 | Critical | 2021-11-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in Int15MicrocodeSmm in Insyde InsydeH2O before 2021-10-14 on Intel client chipsets. A caller may be able to escalate privileges. |
| CVE-2021-3452 | Medium | 2021-07-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A potential vulnerability in the system shutdown SMI callback function in some ThinkPad models may allow an attacker with local access and elevated privileges to execute arbitrary code. |
| CVE-2021-0113 | Medium | 2021-06-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Out of bounds write in the BMC firmware for Intel(R) Server Board M10JNP2SB before version EFI BIOS 7215, BMC 8100.01.08 may allow an unauthenticated user to potentially enable a denial of service via adjacent access. |
| CVE-2021-0101 | High | 2021-06-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Buffer overflow in the BMC firmware for Intel(R) Server BoardM10JNP2SB before version EFI BIOS 7215, BMC 8100.01.08 may allow an unauthenticated user to potentially enable an escalation of privilege via adjacent access. |
| CVE-2021-0097 | Medium | 2021-06-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Path traversal in the BMC firmware for Intel(R) Server Board M10JNP2SB before version EFI BIOS 7215, BMC 8100.01.08 may allow an unauthenticated user to potentially enable a denial of service via adjacent access. |
| CVE-2021-0095 | Medium | 2021-06-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper initialization in the firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable a denial of service via local access. |
| CVE-2021-0070 | High | 2021-06-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper input validation in the BMC firmware for Intel(R) Server Board M10JNP2SB before version EFI BIOS 7215, BMC 8100.01.08 may allow an unauthenticated user to potentially enable an escalation of privilege via adjacent access. |
| CVE-2020-8700 | Medium | 2021-06-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper input validation in the firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. |
| CVE-2020-8670 | Medium | 2021-06-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Race condition in the firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. |
| CVE-2020-24512 | Low | 2021-06-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Observable timing discrepancy in some Intel(R) Processors may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access. |
| CVE-2020-24511 | Medium | 2021-06-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper isolation of shared resources in some Intel(R) Processors may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access. |
| CVE-2020-24486 | Medium | 2021-06-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper input validation in the firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable denial of service via local access. |
| CVE-2020-12360 | High | 2021-06-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Out of bounds read in the firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. |
| CVE-2020-12359 | Medium | 2021-06-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Insufficient control flow management in the firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow an unauthenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via physical access. |
| CVE-2020-12358 | Medium | 2021-06-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Out of bounds write in the firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable denial of service via local access. |
| CVE-2020-12357 | Medium | 2021-06-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper initialization in the firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. |
| CVE-2021-31643 | Medium | 2021-06-01 | Not applicable | Forecast only | An XSS vulnerability exists in several IoT devices from CHIYU Technology, including SEMAC, Biosense, BF-630, BF-631, and Webpass due to a lack of sanitization on the component if.cgi - username parameter. |
| CVE-2021-31642 | Medium | 2021-06-01 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | A denial of service condition exists after an integer overflow in several IoT devices from CHIYU Technology, including BIOSENSE, Webpass, and BF-630, BF-631, and SEMAC. The vulnerability can be explored by sending an unexpected integer (> 32 bits) on the page parameter that will crash the web portal and making it unavailable until a reboot of the device. |
| CVE-2021-26943 | High | 2021-03-31 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | The UX360CA BIOS through 303 on ASUS laptops allow an attacker (with the ring 0 privilege) to overwrite nearly arbitrary physical memory locations, including SMRAM, and execute arbitrary code in the SMM (issue 3 of 3). |
| CVE-2020-8672 | High | 2021-02-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Out of bound read in BIOS firmware for 8th, 9th Generation Intel(R) Core(TM), Intel(R) Celeron(R) Processor 4000 Series Processors may allow an unauthenticated user to potentially enable elevation of privilege or denial of service via local access. |
| CVE-2020-5361 | High | 2021-01-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Select Dell Client Commercial and Consumer platforms support a BIOS password reset capability that is designed to assist authorized customers who forget their passwords. Dell is aware of unauthorized password generation tools that can generate BIOS recovery passwords. The tools, which are not authorized by Dell, can be used by a physically present attacker to reset BIOS passwords and BIOS-managed Hard Disk Drive (HDD) passwords. An unauthenticated attacker with physical access to the system could potentially exploit this vulnerability to bypass security restrictions for BIOS Setup configuration, HDD access and BIOS pre-boot authentication. |
| CVE-2020-29569 | High | 2020-12-15 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in the Linux kernel through 5.10.1, as used with Xen through 4.14.x. The Linux kernel PV block backend expects the kernel thread handler to reset ring->xenblkd to NULL when stopped. However, the handler may not have time to run if the frontend quickly toggles between the states connect and disconnect. As a consequence, the block backend may re-use a pointer after it was freed. A misbehaving guest can trigger a dom0 crash by continuously connecting / disconnecting a block frontend. Privilege escalation and information leaks cannot be ruled out. This only affects systems with a Linux blkback. |
| CVE-2020-29374 | Low | 2020-11-28 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in the Linux kernel before 5.7.3, related to mm/gup.c and mm/huge_memory.c. The get_user_pages (aka gup) implementation, when used for a copy-on-write page, does not properly consider the semantics of read operations and therefore can grant unintended write access, aka CID-17839856fd58. |
| CVE-2020-8764 | Medium | 2020-11-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper access control in BIOS firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. |
| CVE-2020-8740 | Medium | 2020-11-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Out of bounds write in Intel BIOS platform sample code for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. |
| CVE-2020-8739 | High | 2020-11-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Use of potentially dangerous function in Intel BIOS platform sample code for some Intel(R) Processors may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. |
| CVE-2020-8738 | Medium | 2020-11-12 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Improper conditions check in Intel BIOS platform sample code for some Intel(R) Processors before may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. |
| CVE-2020-8698 | Medium | 2020-11-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper isolation of shared resources in some Intel(R) Processors may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access. |
| CVE-2020-8696 | Medium | 2020-11-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper removal of sensitive information before storage or transfer in some Intel(R) Processors may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access. |
| CVE-2020-12927 | High | 2020-11-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A potential vulnerability in a dynamically loaded AMD driver in AMD VBIOS Flash Tool SDK may allow any authenticated user to escalate privileges to NT authority system. |
| CVE-2020-0593 | Medium | 2020-11-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper buffer restrictions in BIOS firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. |
| CVE-2020-0592 | Medium | 2020-11-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Out of bounds write in BIOS firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege and/or denial of service via local access. |
| CVE-2020-0591 | Medium | 2020-11-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper buffer restrictions in BIOS firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. |
| CVE-2020-0590 | High | 2020-11-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper input validation in BIOS firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. |
| CVE-2020-0588 | Medium | 2020-11-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper conditions check in BIOS firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. |
| CVE-2020-0587 | Medium | 2020-11-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper conditions check in BIOS firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. |
| CVE-2020-25645 | High | 2020-10-13 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A flaw was found in the Linux kernel in versions before 5.9-rc7. Traffic between two Geneve endpoints may be unencrypted when IPsec is configured to encrypt traffic for the specific UDP port used by the GENEVE tunnel allowing anyone between the two endpoints to read the traffic unencrypted. The main threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality. |
| CVE-2020-8671 | Medium | 2020-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Insufficient control flow management in BIOS firmware 8th, 9th Generation Intel(R) Core(TM) Processors and Intel(R) Celeron(R) Processor 4000 Series may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access. |
| CVE-2020-0571 | Medium | 2020-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper conditions check in BIOS firmware for 8th Generation Intel(R) Core(TM) Processors and Intel(R) Pentium(R) Silver Processor Series may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access. |
| CVE-2019-14558 | Medium | 2020-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Insufficient control flow management in BIOS firmware for 8th, 9th, 10th Generation Intel(R) Core(TM), Intel(R) Celeron(R) Processor 4000 & 5000 Series Processors may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable denial of service via adjacent access. |
| CVE-2019-14557 | High | 2020-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Buffer overflow in BIOS firmware for 8th, 9th, 10th Generation Intel(R) Core(TM), Intel(R) Celeron(R) Processor 4000 & 5000 Series Processors may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable elevation of privilege or denial of service via adjacent access. |
| CVE-2019-14556 | Medium | 2020-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper initialization in BIOS firmware for 8th, 9th, 10th Generation Intel(R) Core(TM), Intel(R) Celeron(R) Processor 4000 & 5000 Series Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable denial of service via local access. |
| CVE-2019-1736 | Medium | 2020-09-23 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the firmware of the Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers could allow an authenticated, physical attacker to bypass Unified Extensible Firmware Interface (UEFI) Secure Boot validation checks and load a compromised software image on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to improper validation of the server firmware upgrade images. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by installing a server firmware version that would allow the attacker to disable UEFI Secure Boot. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass the signature validation checks that are done by UEFI Secure Boot technology and load a compromised software image on the affected device. A compromised software image is any software image that has not been digitally signed by Cisco. |
| CVE-2020-5379 | Medium | 2020-09-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Inspiron 7352 BIOS versions prior to A12 contain a UEFI BIOS Boot Services overwrite vulnerability. A local attacker with access to system memory may exploit this vulnerability by overwriting the EFI_BOOT_SERVICES structure to execute arbitrary code in System Management Mode (SMM). |
| CVE-2020-5378 | Medium | 2020-09-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell G7 17 7790 BIOS versions prior to 1.13.2 contain a UEFI BIOS Boot Services overwrite vulnerability. A local attacker with access to system memory may exploit this vulnerability by overwriting the EFI_BOOT_SERVICES structure to execute arbitrary code in System Management Mode (SMM). |
| CVE-2020-5376 | Medium | 2020-09-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Inspiron 7347 BIOS versions prior to A13 contain a UEFI BIOS Boot Services overwrite vulnerability. A local attacker with access to system memory may exploit this vulnerability by overwriting the EFI_BOOT_SERVICES structure to execute arbitrary code in System Management Mode (SMM). |
| CVE-2020-17474 | Critical | 2020-08-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A token-reuse vulnerability in ZKTeco FaceDepot 7B 1.0.213 and ZKBiosecurity Server 1.0.0_20190723 allows an attacker to create arbitrary new users, elevate users to administrators, delete users, and download user faces from the database. |
| CVE-2020-17473 | Medium | 2020-08-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Lack of mutual authentication in ZKTeco FaceDepot 7B 1.0.213 and ZKBiosecurity Server 1.0.0_20190723 allows an attacker to obtain a long-lasting token by impersonating the server. |
| CVE-2020-15050 | High | 2020-07-13 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | An issue was discovered in the Video Extension in Suprema BioStar 2 before 2.8.2. Remote attackers can read arbitrary files from the server via Directory Traversal. |
| CVE-2020-15046 | High | 2020-06-24 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | The web interface on Supermicro X10DRH-iT motherboards with BIOS 2.0a and IPMI firmware 03.40 allows remote attackers to exploit a cgi/config_user.cgi CSRF issue to add new admin users. The fixed versions are BIOS 3.2 and firmware 03.88. |
| CVE-2020-6973 | Medium | 2020-02-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Digi International ConnectPort LTS 32 MEI, Firmware Version 1.4.3 (82002228_K 08/09/2018), bios Version 1.2. Multiple cross-site scripting vulnerabilities exist that could allow an attacker to cause a denial-of-service condition. |
| CVE-2020-6975 | Medium | 2020-02-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Digi International ConnectPort LTS 32 MEI, Firmware Version 1.4.3 (82002228_K 08/09/2018), bios Version 1.2. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to upload a malicious file to the application. |
| CVE-2014-3979 | High | 2020-01-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Bytemark Symbiosis allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted username, which triggers the firewall to blacklist the IP. |
| CVE-2019-19642 | High | 2019-12-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | On SuperMicro X8STi-F motherboards with IPMI firmware 2.06 and BIOS 02.68, the Virtual Media feature allows OS Command Injection by authenticated attackers who can send HTTP requests to the IPMI IP address. This requires a POST to /rpc/setvmdrive.asp with shell metacharacters in ShareHost or ShareName. The attacker can achieve a persistent backdoor. |
| CVE-2018-3612 | High | 2018-05-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Intel NUC kits with insufficient input validation in system firmware, potentially allows a local attacker to elevate privileges to System Management Mode (SMM). |
| CVE-2017-3775 | Medium | 2018-05-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Some Lenovo System x server BIOS/UEFI versions, when Secure Boot mode is enabled by a system administrator, do not properly authenticate signed code before booting it. As a result, an attacker with physical access to the system could boot unsigned code. |
| CVE-2017-3756 | High | 2017-08-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A privilege escalation vulnerability was identified in Lenovo Active Protection System for ThinkPad systems versions earlier than 1.82.0.17. An attacker with local privileges could execute code with administrative privileges via an unquoted service path. |
| CVE-2017-5691 | Critical | 2017-07-26 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Incorrect check in Intel processors from 6th and 7th Generation Intel Core Processor Families, Intel Xeon E3-1500M v5 and v6 Product Families, and Intel Xeon E3-1200 v5 and v6 Product Families allows compromised system firmware to impact SGX security via incorrect early system state. |
| CVE-2017-3754 | Medium | 2017-07-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Some Lenovo brand notebook systems do not have write protections properly configured in the system BIOS. This could enable an attacker with physical or administrative access to a system to be able to flash the BIOS with an arbitrary image and potentially run malicious BIOS code. |
| CVE-2017-5686 | Low | 2017-04-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The BIOS in Intel NUC systems based on 6th Gen Intel Core processors prior to version SY0059 may allow may allow an attacker with physical access to the system to gain access to personal information. |
| CVE-2017-5685 | Low | 2017-04-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The BIOS in Intel NUC systems based on 6th Gen Intel Core processors prior to version KY0045 may allow may allow an attacker with physical access to the system to gain access to personal information. |
| CVE-2017-5684 | Low | 2017-04-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The BIOS in Intel Compute Stick systems based on 6th Gen Intel Core processors prior to version CC047 may allow an attacker with physical access to the system to gain access to personal information. |
| CVE-2016-8226 | Medium | 2017-01-26 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The BIOS in Lenovo System X M5, M6, and X6 systems allows administrators to cause a denial of service via updating a UEFI data structure. |
| CVE-2016-8103 | Medium | 2016-12-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | SMM call out in all Intel Branded NUC Kits allows a local privileged user to access the System Management Mode and take full control of the platform. |
| CVE-2016-8222 | Medium | 2016-11-30 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability has been identified in a signed kernel driver for the BIOS of some ThinkPad systems that can allow an attacker with Windows administrator-level privileges to call System Management Mode (SMM) services. This could lead to a denial of service attack or allow certain BIOS variables or settings to be altered (such as boot sequence). The setting or changing of BIOS passwords is not affected by this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2016-8224 | Medium | 2016-11-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability has been identified in some Lenovo Notebook and ThinkServer systems where an attacker with administrative privileges on a system could install a program that circumvents Intel Management Engine (ME) protections. This could result in a denial of service or privilege escalation attack on the system. |
| CVE-2016-5247 | High | 2016-09-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The BIOS for Lenovo ThinkCentre E93, M6500t/s, M6600, M6600q, M6600t/s, M73p, M800, M83, M8500t/s, M8600t/s, M900, M93, and M93P devices; ThinkServer RQ940, RS140, TS140, TS240, TS440, and TS540 devices; and ThinkStation E32, P300, and P310 devices might allow local users or physically proximate attackers to bypass the Secure Boot protection mechanism by leveraging an AMI test key. |
| CVE-2016-5729 | High | 2016-06-30 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Lenovo BIOS EFI Driver allows local administrators to execute arbitrary code with System Management Mode (SMM) privileges via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2015-2890 | Medium | 2015-08-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The BIOS implementation on Dell Latitude, OptiPlex, Precision Mobile Workstation, and Precision Workstation Client Solutions (CS) devices with model-dependent firmware before A21 does not enforce a BIOS_CNTL locking protection mechanism upon being woken from sleep, which allows local users to conduct EFI flash attacks by leveraging console access, a similar issue to CVE-2015-3692. |
| CVE-2012-2368 | Medium | 2012-08-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Bytemark Symbiosis before Revision 1322 does not properly validate passwords, which allows remote attackers to gain access to email accounts via an arbitrary password. |
| CVE-2008-7096 | Medium | 2009-08-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Intel Desktop and Intel Mobile Boards with BIOS firmware DQ35JO, DQ35MP, DP35DP, DG33FB, DG33BU, DG33TL, MGM965TW, D945GCPE, and DX38BT allows local administrators with ring 0 privileges to gain additional privileges and modify code that is running in System Management Mode, or access hypervisory memory as demonstrated at Black Hat 2008 by accessing certain remapping registers in Xen 3.3. |
| CVE-2009-2887 | Medium | 2009-08-20 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in bios.php in PHP Scripts Now President Bios allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the rank parameter. |
| CVE-2009-2886 | High | 2009-08-20 | Not applicable | No public exploit | SQL injection vulnerability in bios.php in PHP Scripts Now President Bios allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the rank parameter. |
| CVE-2008-3900 | Low | 2008-09-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Intel firmware PE94510M.86A.0050.2007.0710.1559 stores pre-boot authentication passwords in the BIOS Keyboard buffer and does not clear this buffer after use, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading the physical memory locations associated with this buffer. |
| CVE-2008-0706 | High | 2008-03-31 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the BIOS F.26 and earlier for the HP Compaq Notebook PC allows physically proximate attackers to obtain privileged access via unspecified vectors, possibly involving an authentication bypass of the power-on password. |
| CVE-2008-0211 | Medium | 2008-03-31 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the BIOS F.04 through F.11 for the HP Compaq Business Notebook PC allows local users to cause a denial of service via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2005-4175 | Low | 2005-12-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Insyde BIOS V190 does not clear the keyboard buffer after reading the BIOS password during system startup, which allows local administrators or users to read the password directly from physical memory. |
| CVE-2005-0963 | Low | 2005-05-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An error in the Toshiba ACPI BIOS 1.6 causes the BIOS to only examine the first slot in the Master Boot Record (MBR) table for an active partition, which prevents the system from booting even though the MBR is not malformed. NOTE: it has been debated as to whether or not this issue poses a security vulnerability, since administrative privileges would be required, and other DoS attacks are possible with such privileges. |