Overview 381 matches · 126 in Waratek scope · 38 protected · 13 exploited · 4 CISA KEV · 43 public PoC · 22 EPSS ≥ 0.5
381matches
126in Waratek scope33.1%
38protected10.0%
13exploited3.4%
4CISA KEV1.0%
43public PoC11.3%
22EPSS ≥ 0.55.8%
Protected by Waratek
38
10.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
12
3.1%
No exploit published
76
19.9%
Outside Waratek scope
28
7.3%
Not applicable
227
59.6%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
38
10.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
343
90.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 67 / year
19972
Not applicable2
Medium2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
19984
Not applicable4
High1
Medium2
Low1
not blocked4
Working exploit published2
No public exploit2
19994
Not applicable4
High2
Medium2
not blocked4
Working exploit published1
No public exploit3
20005
Not applicable5
High3
Medium2
not blocked5
Working exploit published2
No public exploit3
20015
Not applicable5
High4
Medium1
not blocked5
Working exploit published1
No public exploit4
200210
Not applicable10
High4
Medium6
not blocked10
Working exploit published1
No public exploit9
20031
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20040
20052
Not applicable2
Medium2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20065
Not applicable5
High2
Medium3
not blocked5
Forecast only1
No public exploit4
20076
Not applicable6
High2
Medium4
not blocked6
Working exploit published2
No public exploit4
20083
Not applicable3
High2
Medium1
not blocked3
Working exploit published1
No public exploit2
20094
Not applicable4
High1
Medium2
Low1
not blocked4
Exploited1
No public exploit3
201010
Not applicable10
High2
Medium7
Low1
not blocked10
No public exploit10
20116
Not applicable6
High1
Medium4
Low1
not blocked6
No public exploit6
20128
Not applicable8
High5
Medium3
not blocked8
No public exploit8
20135
Not applicable5
High4
Medium1
not blocked5
Exploited1
No public exploit4
20146
Not applicable6
High1
Medium4
Low1
not blocked6
Forecast only1
No public exploit5
20158
Not applicable8
High6
Medium2
not blocked8
Exploited1
Forecast only1
No public exploit6
201611
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable10
High5
Medium6
not blocked11
Exploited1
Forecast only3
No public exploit7
20175
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable4
Critical1
High4
not blocked5
Working exploit published1
No public exploit4
20186
Protected by Waratek5
No exploit published1
Critical4
High1
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today5
not blocked1
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit5
201954
Protected by Waratek18
No exploit published5
Outside Waratek scope3
Not applicable28
Critical15
High25
Medium14
blocked by ARMR today18
not blocked36
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only5
Forecast only1
No public exploit47
202042
Protected by Waratek4
Mitigation candidate6
No exploit published20
Outside Waratek scope5
Not applicable7
Critical7
High26
Medium9
blocked by ARMR today4
not blocked38
Exploited2
Working exploit published2
Proof of concept only3
No public exploit35
202167
Protected by Waratek5
Mitigation candidate5
No exploit published22
Outside Waratek scope10
Not applicable25
Critical4
High44
Medium15
Low4
blocked by ARMR today5
not blocked62
Exploited4
Working exploit published2
Proof of concept only7
Forecast only3
No public exploit51
202241
Protected by Waratek3
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published6
Outside Waratek scope3
Not applicable28
Critical5
High22
Medium14
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked38
Exploited3
Proof of concept only3
No public exploit35
202314
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published4
Not applicable9
High11
Medium3
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked13
No public exploit14
20248
No exploit published1
Outside Waratek scope5
Not applicable2
Critical1
High6
Medium1
not blocked8
Proof of concept only2
No public exploit6
20251
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
202638
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published16
Not applicable20
Critical1
High19
Medium18
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked36
Proof of concept only6
No public exploit32
1999200220052008201120142017202020232026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-23219 | Critical | 2022-01-14 | Outside Waratek scope | Proof of concept only | The deprecated compatibility function clnt_create in the sunrpc module of the GNU C Library (aka glibc) through 2.34 copies its hostname argument on the stack without validating its length, which may result in a buffer overflow, potentially resulting in a denial of service or (if an application is not built with a stack protector enabled) arbitrary code execution. |
| CVE-2022-20616 | Medium | 2022-01-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Credentials Binding Plugin 1.27 and earlier does not perform a permission check in a method implementing form validation, allowing attackers with Overall/Read access to validate if a credential ID refers to a secret file credential and whether it's a zip file. |
| CVE-2019-25055 | High | 2021-12-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in the libpulse-binding crate before 2.6.0 for Rust. It mishandles a panic that crosses a Foreign Function Interface (FFI) boundary. |
| CVE-2018-25028 | High | 2021-12-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in the libpulse-binding crate before 1.2.1 for Rust. get_context can cause a use-after-free. |
| CVE-2018-25027 | High | 2021-12-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in the libpulse-binding crate before 1.2.1 for Rust. get_format_info can cause a use-after-free. |
| CVE-2021-45486 | Low | 2021-12-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In the IPv4 implementation in the Linux kernel before 5.12.4, net/ipv4/route.c has an information leak because the hash table is very small. |
| CVE-2021-45485 | High | 2021-12-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In the IPv6 implementation in the Linux kernel before 5.13.3, net/ipv6/output_core.c has an information leak because of certain use of a hash table which, although big, doesn't properly consider that IPv6-based attackers can typically choose among many IPv6 source addresses. |
| CVE-2021-43818 | High | 2021-12-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | lxml is a library for processing XML and HTML in the Python language. Prior to version 4.6.5, the HTML Cleaner in lxml.html lets certain crafted script content pass through, as well as script content in SVG files embedded using data URIs. Users that employ the HTML cleaner in a security relevant context should upgrade to lxml 4.6.5 to receive a patch. There are no known workarounds available. |
| CVE-2021-43797 | Medium | 2021-12-09 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Netty is an asynchronous event-driven network application framework for rapid development of maintainable high performance protocol servers & clients. Netty prior to version 4.1.71.Final skips control chars when they are present at the beginning / end of the header name. It should instead fail fast as these are not allowed by the spec and could lead to HTTP request smuggling. Failing to do the validation might cause netty to "sanitize" header names before it forward these to another remote system when used as proxy. This remote system can't see the invalid usage anymore, and therefore does not do the validation itself. Users should upgrade to version 4.1.71.Final. |
| CVE-2021-43527 | Critical | 2021-12-08 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | NSS (Network Security Services) versions prior to 3.73 or 3.68.1 ESR are vulnerable to a heap overflow when handling DER-encoded DSA or RSA-PSS signatures. Applications using NSS for handling signatures encoded within CMS, S/MIME, PKCS \#7, or PKCS \#12 are likely to be impacted. Applications using NSS for certificate validation or other TLS, X.509, OCSP or CRL functionality may be impacted, depending on how they configure NSS. *Note: This vulnerability does NOT impact Mozilla Firefox.* However, email clients and PDF viewers that use NSS for signature verification, such as Thunderbird, LibreOffice, Evolution and Evince are believed to be impacted. This vulnerability affects NSS < 3.73 and NSS < 3.68.1. |
| CVE-2021-43976 | Medium | 2021-11-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In the Linux kernel through 5.15.2, mwifiex_usb_recv in drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/usb.c allows an attacker (who can connect a crafted USB device) to cause a denial of service (skb_over_panic). |
| CVE-2021-43396 | High | 2021-11-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In iconvdata/iso-2022-jp-3.c in the GNU C Library (aka glibc) 2.34, remote attackers can force iconv() to emit a spurious '\0' character via crafted ISO-2022-JP-3 data that is accompanied by an internal state reset. This may affect data integrity in certain iconv() use cases. NOTE: the vendor states "the bug cannot be invoked through user input and requires iconv to be invoked with a NULL inbuf, which ought to require a separate application bug to do so unintentionally. Hence there's no security impact to the bug. |
| CVE-2021-43389 | Medium | 2021-11-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in the Linux kernel before 5.14.15. There is an array-index-out-of-bounds flaw in the detach_capi_ctr function in drivers/isdn/capi/kcapi.c. |
| CVE-2020-27820 | Medium | 2021-11-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability was found in Linux kernel, where a use-after-frees in nouveau's postclose() handler could happen if removing device (that is not common to remove video card physically without power-off, but same happens if "unbind" the driver). |
| CVE-2021-25219 | Medium | 2021-10-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In BIND 9.3.0 -> 9.11.35, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.21, and versions 9.9.3-S1 -> 9.11.35-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.21-S1 of BIND Supported Preview Edition, as well as release versions 9.17.0 -> 9.17.18 of the BIND 9.17 development branch, exploitation of broken authoritative servers using a flaw in response processing can cause degradation in BIND resolver performance. The way the lame cache is currently designed makes it possible for its internal data structures to grow almost infinitely, which may cause significant delays in client query processing. |
| CVE-2021-42739 | Medium | 2021-10-20 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | The firewire subsystem in the Linux kernel through 5.14.13 has a buffer overflow related to drivers/media/firewire/firedtv-avc.c and drivers/media/firewire/firedtv-ci.c, because avc_ca_pmt mishandles bounds checking. |
| CVE-2021-37137 | High | 2021-10-19 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | The Snappy frame decoder function doesn't restrict the chunk length which may lead to excessive memory usage. Beside this it also may buffer reserved skippable chunks until the whole chunk was received which may lead to excessive memory usage as well. This vulnerability can be triggered by supplying malicious input that decompresses to a very big size (via a network stream or a file) or by sending a huge skippable chunk. |
| CVE-2021-37136 | High | 2021-10-19 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | The Bzip2 decompression decoder function doesn't allow setting size restrictions on the decompressed output data (which affects the allocation size used during decompression). All users of Bzip2Decoder are affected. The malicious input can trigger an OOME and so a DoS attack |
| CVE-2021-22947 | Medium | 2021-09-29 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | When curl >= 7.20.0 and <= 7.78.0 connects to an IMAP or POP3 server to retrieve data using STARTTLS to upgrade to TLS security, the server can respond and send back multiple responses at once that curl caches. curl would then upgrade to TLS but not flush the in-queue of cached responses but instead continue using and trustingthe responses it got *before* the TLS handshake as if they were authenticated.Using this flaw, it allows a Man-In-The-Middle attacker to first inject the fake responses, then pass-through the TLS traffic from the legitimate server and trick curl into sending data back to the user thinking the attacker's injected data comes from the TLS-protected server. |
| CVE-2021-22946 | High | 2021-09-29 | Outside Waratek scope | Proof of concept only | A user can tell curl >= 7.20.0 and <= 7.78.0 to require a successful upgrade to TLS when speaking to an IMAP, POP3 or FTP server (`--ssl-reqd` on the command line or`CURLOPT_USE_SSL` set to `CURLUSESSL_CONTROL` or `CURLUSESSL_ALL` withlibcurl). This requirement could be bypassed if the server would return a properly crafted but perfectly legitimate response.This flaw would then make curl silently continue its operations **withoutTLS** contrary to the instructions and expectations, exposing possibly sensitive data in clear text over the network. |
| CVE-2021-39159 | Critical | 2021-08-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | BinderHub is a kubernetes-based cloud service that allows users to share reproducible interactive computing environments from code repositories. In affected versions a remote code execution vulnerability has been identified in BinderHub, where providing BinderHub with maliciously crafted input could execute code in the BinderHub context, with the potential to egress credentials of the BinderHub deployment, including JupyterHub API tokens, kubernetes service accounts, and docker registry credentials. This may provide the ability to manipulate images and other user created pods in the deployment, with the potential to escalate to the host depending on the underlying kubernetes configuration. Users are advised to update to version 0.2.0-n653. If users are unable to update they may disable the git repo provider by specifying the `BinderHub.repo_providers` as a workaround. |
| CVE-2021-39154 | High | 2021-08-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | XStream is a simple library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In affected versions this vulnerability may allow a remote attacker to load and execute arbitrary code from a remote host only by manipulating the processed input stream. No user is affected, who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's security framework with a whitelist limited to the minimal required types. XStream 1.4.18 uses no longer a blacklist by default, since it cannot be secured for general purpose. |
| CVE-2021-39153 | High | 2021-08-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | XStream is a simple library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In affected versions this vulnerability may allow a remote attacker to load and execute arbitrary code from a remote host only by manipulating the processed input stream, if using the version out of the box with Java runtime version 14 to 8 or with JavaFX installed. No user is affected, who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's security framework with a whitelist limited to the minimal required types. XStream 1.4.18 uses no longer a blacklist by default, since it cannot be secured for general purpose. |
| CVE-2021-39152 | High | 2021-08-23 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | XStream is a simple library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In affected versions this vulnerability may allow a remote attacker to request data from internal resources that are not publicly available only by manipulating the processed input stream with a Java runtime version 14 to 8. No user is affected, who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's security framework with a whitelist limited to the minimal required types. If you rely on XStream's default blacklist of the [Security Framework](https://x-stream.github.io/security.html#framework), you will have to use at least version 1.4.18. |
| CVE-2021-39151 | High | 2021-08-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | XStream is a simple library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In affected versions this vulnerability may allow a remote attacker to load and execute arbitrary code from a remote host only by manipulating the processed input stream. No user is affected, who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's security framework with a whitelist limited to the minimal required types. XStream 1.4.18 uses no longer a blacklist by default, since it cannot be secured for general purpose. |
| CVE-2021-39150 | High | 2021-08-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | XStream is a simple library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In affected versions this vulnerability may allow a remote attacker to request data from internal resources that are not publicly available only by manipulating the processed input stream with a Java runtime version 14 to 8. No user is affected, who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's security framework with a whitelist limited to the minimal required types. If you rely on XStream's default blacklist of the [Security Framework](https://x-stream.github.io/security.html#framework), you will have to use at least version 1.4.18. |
| CVE-2021-39149 | High | 2021-08-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | XStream is a simple library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In affected versions this vulnerability may allow a remote attacker to load and execute arbitrary code from a remote host only by manipulating the processed input stream. No user is affected, who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's security framework with a whitelist limited to the minimal required types. XStream 1.4.18 uses no longer a blacklist by default, since it cannot be secured for general purpose. |
| CVE-2021-39148 | High | 2021-08-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | XStream is a simple library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In affected versions this vulnerability may allow a remote attacker to load and execute arbitrary code from a remote host only by manipulating the processed input stream. No user is affected, who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's security framework with a whitelist limited to the minimal required types. XStream 1.4.18 uses no longer a blacklist by default, since it cannot be secured for general purpose. |
| CVE-2021-39147 | High | 2021-08-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | XStream is a simple library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In affected versions this vulnerability may allow a remote attacker to load and execute arbitrary code from a remote host only by manipulating the processed input stream. No user is affected, who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's security framework with a whitelist limited to the minimal required types. XStream 1.4.18 uses no longer a blacklist by default, since it cannot be secured for general purpose. |
| CVE-2021-39146 | High | 2021-08-23 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | XStream is a simple library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In affected versions this vulnerability may allow a remote attacker to load and execute arbitrary code from a remote host only by manipulating the processed input stream. No user is affected, who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's security framework with a whitelist limited to the minimal required types. XStream 1.4.18 uses no longer a blacklist by default, since it cannot be secured for general purpose. |
| CVE-2021-39145 | High | 2021-08-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | XStream is a simple library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In affected versions this vulnerability may allow a remote attacker to load and execute arbitrary code from a remote host only by manipulating the processed input stream. No user is affected, who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's security framework with a whitelist limited to the minimal required types. XStream 1.4.18 uses no longer a blacklist by default, since it cannot be secured for general purpose. |
| CVE-2021-39144 | High | 2021-08-23 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | XStream is a simple library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In affected versions this vulnerability may allow a remote attacker has sufficient rights to execute commands of the host only by manipulating the processed input stream. No user is affected, who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's security framework with a whitelist limited to the minimal required types. XStream 1.4.18 uses no longer a blacklist by default, since it cannot be secured for general purpose. |
| CVE-2021-39141 | High | 2021-08-23 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | XStream is a simple library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In affected versions this vulnerability may allow a remote attacker to load and execute arbitrary code from a remote host only by manipulating the processed input stream. No user is affected, who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's security framework with a whitelist limited to the minimal required types. XStream 1.4.18 uses no longer a blacklist by default, since it cannot be secured for general purpose. |
| CVE-2021-39140 | Medium | 2021-08-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | XStream is a simple library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In affected versions this vulnerability may allow a remote attacker to allocate 100% CPU time on the target system depending on CPU type or parallel execution of such a payload resulting in a denial of service only by manipulating the processed input stream. No user is affected, who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's security framework with a whitelist limited to the minimal required types. XStream 1.4.18 uses no longer a blacklist by default, since it cannot be secured for general purpose. |
| CVE-2021-39139 | High | 2021-08-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | XStream is a simple library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In affected versions this vulnerability may allow a remote attacker to load and execute arbitrary code from a remote host only by manipulating the processed input stream. A user is only affected if using the version out of the box with JDK 1.7u21 or below. However, this scenario can be adjusted easily to an external Xalan that works regardless of the version of the Java runtime. No user is affected, who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's security framework with a whitelist limited to the minimal required types. XStream 1.4.18 uses no longer a blacklist by default, since it cannot be secured for general purpose. |
| CVE-2021-25218 | High | 2021-08-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In BIND 9.16.19, 9.17.16. Also, version 9.16.19-S1 of BIND Supported Preview Edition When a vulnerable version of named receives a query under the circumstances described above, the named process will terminate due to a failed assertion check. The vulnerability affects only BIND 9 releases 9.16.19, 9.17.16, and release 9.16.19-S1 of the BIND Supported Preview Edition. |
| CVE-2021-21781 | Low | 2021-08-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the ARM SIGPAGE functionality of Linux Kernel v5.4.66 and v5.4.54. The latest version (5.11-rc4) seems to still be vulnerable. A userland application can read the contents of the sigpage, which can leak kernel memory contents. An attacker can read a process’s memory at a specific offset to trigger this vulnerability. This was fixed in kernel releases: 4.14.222 4.19.177 5.4.99 5.10.17 5.11 |
| CVE-2021-38604 | High | 2021-08-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In librt in the GNU C Library (aka glibc) through 2.34, sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mq_notify.c mishandles certain NOTIFY_REMOVED data, leading to a NULL pointer dereference. NOTE: this vulnerability was introduced as a side effect of the CVE-2021-33574 fix. |
| CVE-2021-37159 | Medium | 2021-07-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | hso_free_net_device in drivers/net/usb/hso.c in the Linux kernel through 5.13.4 calls unregister_netdev without checking for the NETREG_REGISTERED state, leading to a use-after-free and a double free. |
| CVE-2021-34429 | Medium | 2021-07-15 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | For Eclipse Jetty versions 9.4.37-9.4.42, 10.0.1-10.0.5 & 11.0.1-11.0.5, URIs can be crafted using some encoded characters to access the content of the WEB-INF directory and/or bypass some security constraints. This is a variation of the vulnerability reported in CVE-2021-28164/GHSA-v7ff-8wcx-gmc5. |
| CVE-2021-36374 | Medium | 2021-07-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | When reading a specially crafted ZIP archive, or a derived formats, an Apache Ant build can be made to allocate large amounts of memory that leads to an out of memory error, even for small inputs. This can be used to disrupt builds using Apache Ant. Commonly used derived formats from ZIP archives are for instance JAR files and many office files. Apache Ant prior to 1.9.16 and 1.10.11 were affected. |
| CVE-2021-36373 | Medium | 2021-07-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | When reading a specially crafted TAR archive an Apache Ant build can be made to allocate large amounts of memory that finally leads to an out of memory error, even for small inputs. This can be used to disrupt builds using Apache Ant. Apache Ant prior to 1.9.16 and 1.10.11 were affected. |
| CVE-2021-3612 | High | 2021-07-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An out-of-bounds memory write flaw was found in the Linux kernel's joystick devices subsystem in versions before 5.9-rc1, in the way the user calls ioctl JSIOCSBTNMAP. This flaw allows a local user to crash the system or possibly escalate their privileges on the system. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality, integrity, as well as system availability. |
| CVE-2021-22545 | High | 2021-06-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An attacker can craft a specific IdaPro *.i64 file that will cause the BinDiff plugin to load an invalid memory offset. This can allow the attacker to control the instruction pointer and execute arbitrary code. It is recommended to upgrade BinDiff 7 |
| CVE-2021-32823 | Low | 2021-06-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In the bindata RubyGem before version 2.4.10 there is a potential denial-of-service vulnerability. In affected versions it is very slow for certain classes in BinData to be created. For example BinData::Bit100000, BinData::Bit100001, BinData::Bit100002, BinData::Bit<N>. In combination with <user_input>.constantize there is a potential for a CPU-based DoS. In version 2.4.10 bindata improved the creation time of Bits and Integers. |
| CVE-2021-22901 | High | 2021-06-11 | Outside Waratek scope | Forecast only | curl 7.75.0 through 7.76.1 suffers from a use-after-free vulnerability resulting in already freed memory being used when a TLS 1.3 session ticket arrives over a connection. A malicious server can use this in rare unfortunate circumstances to potentially reach remote code execution in the client. When libcurl at run-time sets up support for TLS 1.3 session tickets on a connection using OpenSSL, it stores pointers to the transfer in-memory object for later retrieval when a session ticket arrives. If the connection is used by multiple transfers (like with a reused HTTP/1.1 connection or multiplexed HTTP/2 connection) that first transfer object might be freed before the new session is established on that connection and then the function will access a memory buffer that might be freed. When using that memory, libcurl might even call a function pointer in the object, making it possible for a remote code execution if the server could somehow manage to get crafted memory content into the correct place in memory. |
| CVE-2021-22898 | Low | 2021-06-11 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | curl 7.7 through 7.76.1 suffers from an information disclosure when the `-t` command line option, known as `CURLOPT_TELNETOPTIONS` in libcurl, is used to send variable=content pairs to TELNET servers. Due to a flaw in the option parser for sending NEW_ENV variables, libcurl could be made to pass on uninitialized data from a stack based buffer to the server, resulting in potentially revealing sensitive internal information to the server using a clear-text network protocol. |
| CVE-2021-22897 | Medium | 2021-06-11 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | curl 7.61.0 through 7.76.1 suffers from exposure of data element to wrong session due to a mistake in the code for CURLOPT_SSL_CIPHER_LIST when libcurl is built to use the Schannel TLS library. The selected cipher set was stored in a single "static" variable in the library, which has the surprising side-effect that if an application sets up multiple concurrent transfers, the last one that sets the ciphers will accidentally control the set used by all transfers. In a worst-case scenario, this weakens transport security significantly. |
| CVE-2021-33560 | High | 2021-06-08 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Libgcrypt before 1.8.8 and 1.9.x before 1.9.3 mishandles ElGamal encryption because it lacks exponent blinding to address a side-channel attack against mpi_powm, and the window size is not chosen appropriately. This, for example, affects use of ElGamal in OpenPGP. |
| CVE-2021-22118 | High | 2021-05-27 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | In Spring Framework, versions 5.2.x prior to 5.2.15 and versions 5.3.x prior to 5.3.7, a WebFlux application is vulnerable to a privilege escalation: by (re)creating the temporary storage directory, a locally authenticated malicious user can read or modify files that have been uploaded to the WebFlux application, or overwrite arbitrary files with multipart request data. |
| CVE-2021-3426 | Medium | 2021-05-20 | Not applicable | No public exploit | There's a flaw in Python 3's pydoc. A local or adjacent attacker who discovers or is able to convince another local or adjacent user to start a pydoc server could access the server and use it to disclose sensitive information belonging to the other user that they would not normally be able to access. The highest risk of this flaw is to data confidentiality. This flaw affects Python versions before 3.8.9, Python versions before 3.9.3 and Python versions before 3.10.0a7. |
| CVE-2021-29921 | Critical | 2021-05-06 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | In Python before 3,9,5, the ipaddress library mishandles leading zero characters in the octets of an IP address string. This (in some situations) allows attackers to bypass access control that is based on IP addresses. |
| CVE-2021-25216 | Critical | 2021-04-29 | Not applicable | Forecast only | In BIND 9.5.0 -> 9.11.29, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.13, and versions BIND 9.11.3-S1 -> 9.11.29-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.13-S1 of BIND Supported Preview Edition, as well as release versions 9.17.0 -> 9.17.1 of the BIND 9.17 development branch, BIND servers are vulnerable if they are running an affected version and are configured to use GSS-TSIG features. In a configuration which uses BIND's default settings the vulnerable code path is not exposed, but a server can be rendered vulnerable by explicitly setting values for the tkey-gssapi-keytab or tkey-gssapi-credential configuration options. Although the default configuration is not vulnerable, GSS-TSIG is frequently used in networks where BIND is integrated with Samba, as well as in mixed-server environments that combine BIND servers with Active Directory domain controllers. For servers that meet these conditions, the ISC SPNEGO implementation is vulnerable to various attacks, depending on the CPU architecture for which BIND was built: For named binaries compiled for 64-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a buffer over-read, leading to a server crash. For named binaries compiled for 32-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a server crash due to a buffer overflow and possibly also to achieve remote code execution. We have determined that standard SPNEGO implementations are available in the MIT and Heimdal Kerberos libraries, which support a broad range of operating systems, rendering the ISC implementation unnecessary and obsolete. Therefore, to reduce the attack surface for BIND users, we will be removing the ISC SPNEGO implementation in the April releases of BIND 9.11 and 9.16 (it had already been dropped from BIND 9.17). We would not normally remove something from a stable ESV (Extended Support Version) of BIND, but since system libraries can replace the ISC SPNEGO implementation, we have made an exception in this case for reasons of stability and security. |
| CVE-2021-25215 | High | 2021-04-29 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | In BIND 9.0.0 -> 9.11.29, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.13, and versions BIND 9.9.3-S1 -> 9.11.29-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.13-S1 of BIND Supported Preview Edition, as well as release versions 9.17.0 -> 9.17.11 of the BIND 9.17 development branch, when a vulnerable version of named receives a query for a record triggering the flaw described above, the named process will terminate due to a failed assertion check. The vulnerability affects all currently maintained BIND 9 branches (9.11, 9.11-S, 9.16, 9.16-S, 9.17) as well as all other versions of BIND 9. |
| CVE-2021-25214 | Medium | 2021-04-29 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | In BIND 9.8.5 -> 9.8.8, 9.9.3 -> 9.11.29, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.13, and versions BIND 9.9.3-S1 -> 9.11.29-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.13-S1 of BIND 9 Supported Preview Edition, as well as release versions 9.17.0 -> 9.17.11 of the BIND 9.17 development branch, when a vulnerable version of named receives a malformed IXFR triggering the flaw described above, the named process will terminate due to a failed assertion the next time the transferred secondary zone is refreshed. |
| CVE-2020-8625 | High | 2021-02-17 | Outside Waratek scope | Forecast only | BIND servers are vulnerable if they are running an affected version and are configured to use GSS-TSIG features. In a configuration which uses BIND's default settings the vulnerable code path is not exposed, but a server can be rendered vulnerable by explicitly setting valid values for the tkey-gssapi-keytab or tkey-gssapi-credentialconfiguration options. Although the default configuration is not vulnerable, GSS-TSIG is frequently used in networks where BIND is integrated with Samba, as well as in mixed-server environments that combine BIND servers with Active Directory domain controllers. The most likely outcome of a successful exploitation of the vulnerability is a crash of the named process. However, remote code execution, while unproven, is theoretically possible. Affects: BIND 9.5.0 -> 9.11.27, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.11, and versions BIND 9.11.3-S1 -> 9.11.27-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.11-S1 of BIND Supported Preview Edition. Also release versions 9.17.0 -> 9.17.1 of the BIND 9.17 development branch |
| CVE-2021-23337 | High | 2021-02-15 | Not applicable | Exploited | Lodash versions prior to 4.17.21 are vulnerable to Command Injection via the template function. |
| CVE-2021-20190 | High | 2021-01-19 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in jackson-databind before 2.9.10.7. FasterXML mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability. |
| CVE-2020-36183 | High | 2021-01-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.8 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to org.docx4j.org.apache.xalan.lib.sql.JNDIConnectionPool. |
| CVE-2020-36182 | High | 2021-01-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.8 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp2.cpdsadapter.DriverAdapterCPDS. |
| CVE-2020-36180 | High | 2021-01-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.8 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to org.apache.commons.dbcp2.cpdsadapter.DriverAdapterCPDS. |
| CVE-2020-36179 | High | 2021-01-07 | Mitigation candidate | Proof of concept only | FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.8 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to oadd.org.apache.commons.dbcp.cpdsadapter.DriverAdapterCPDS. |
| CVE-2020-36189 | High | 2021-01-06 | No exploit published | No public exploit | FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.8 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to com.newrelic.agent.deps.ch.qos.logback.core.db.DriverManagerConnectionSource. |
| CVE-2020-36188 | High | 2021-01-06 | Protected by Waratek | Proof of concept only | FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.8 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to com.newrelic.agent.deps.ch.qos.logback.core.db.JNDIConnectionSource. |
| CVE-2020-36187 | High | 2021-01-06 | No exploit published | No public exploit | FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.8 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp.datasources.SharedPoolDataSource. |
| CVE-2020-36186 | High | 2021-01-06 | No exploit published | No public exploit | FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.8 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp.datasources.PerUserPoolDataSource. |
| CVE-2020-36185 | High | 2021-01-06 | No exploit published | No public exploit | FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.8 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp2.datasources.SharedPoolDataSource. |
| CVE-2020-36184 | High | 2021-01-06 | Mitigation candidate | Proof of concept only | FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.8 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp2.datasources.PerUserPoolDataSource. |
| CVE-2020-36181 | High | 2021-01-06 | No exploit published | No public exploit | FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.8 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp.cpdsadapter.DriverAdapterCPDS. |
| CVE-2018-25001 | Medium | 2020-12-31 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in the libpulse-binding crate before 2.5.0 for Rust. proplist::Iterator can cause a use-after-free. |
| CVE-2020-35728 | High | 2020-12-27 | Mitigation candidate | Proof of concept only | FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.8 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to com.oracle.wls.shaded.org.apache.xalan.lib.sql.JNDIConnectionPool (aka embedded Xalan in org.glassfish.web/javax.servlet.jsp.jstl). |
| CVE-2020-35491 | High | 2020-12-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.8 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to org.apache.commons.dbcp2.datasources.SharedPoolDataSource. |
| CVE-2020-35490 | High | 2020-12-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.8 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to org.apache.commons.dbcp2.datasources.PerUserPoolDataSource. |
| CVE-2020-25649 | High | 2020-12-03 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | A flaw was found in FasterXML Jackson Databind, where it did not have entity expansion secured properly. This flaw allows vulnerability to XML external entity (XXE) attacks. The highest threat from this vulnerability is data integrity. |
| CVE-2020-17527 | High | 2020-12-03 | No exploit published | No public exploit | While investigating bug 64830 it was discovered that Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M9, 9.0.0-M1 to 9.0.39 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.59 could re-use an HTTP request header value from the previous stream received on an HTTP/2 connection for the request associated with the subsequent stream. While this would most likely lead to an error and the closure of the HTTP/2 connection, it is possible that information could leak between requests. |
| CVE-2020-4788 | Medium | 2020-11-20 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Power9 (AIX 7.1, 7.2, and VIOS 3.1) processors could allow a local user to obtain sensitive information from the data in the L1 cache under extenuating circumstances. IBM X-Force ID: 189296. |
| CVE-2020-24750 | High | 2020-09-17 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.6 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to com.pastdev.httpcomponents.configuration.JndiConfiguration. |
| CVE-2020-0404 | Medium | 2020-09-17 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | In uvc_scan_chain_forward of uvc_driver.c, there is a possible linked list corruption due to an unusual root cause. This could lead to local escalation of privilege in the kernel with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android kernelAndroid ID: A-111893654References: Upstream kernel |
| CVE-2020-24616 | High | 2020-08-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.6 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to br.com.anteros.dbcp.AnterosDBCPDataSource (aka Anteros-DBCP). |
| CVE-2020-8624 | Medium | 2020-08-21 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | In BIND 9.9.12 -> 9.9.13, 9.10.7 -> 9.10.8, 9.11.3 -> 9.11.21, 9.12.1 -> 9.16.5, 9.17.0 -> 9.17.3, also affects 9.9.12-S1 -> 9.9.13-S1, 9.11.3-S1 -> 9.11.21-S1 of the BIND 9 Supported Preview Edition, An attacker who has been granted privileges to change a specific subset of the zone's content could abuse these unintended additional privileges to update other contents of the zone. |
| CVE-2020-8623 | High | 2020-08-21 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | In BIND 9.10.0 -> 9.11.21, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.5, 9.17.0 -> 9.17.3, also affects 9.10.5-S1 -> 9.11.21-S1 of the BIND 9 Supported Preview Edition, An attacker that can reach a vulnerable system with a specially crafted query packet can trigger a crash. To be vulnerable, the system must: * be running BIND that was built with "--enable-native-pkcs11" * be signing one or more zones with an RSA key * be able to receive queries from a possible attacker |
| CVE-2020-8622 | Medium | 2020-08-21 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | In BIND 9.0.0 -> 9.11.21, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.5, 9.17.0 -> 9.17.3, also affects 9.9.3-S1 -> 9.11.21-S1 of the BIND 9 Supported Preview Edition, An attacker on the network path for a TSIG-signed request, or operating the server receiving the TSIG-signed request, could send a truncated response to that request, triggering an assertion failure, causing the server to exit. Alternately, an off-path attacker would have to correctly guess when a TSIG-signed request was sent, along with other characteristics of the packet and message, and spoof a truncated response to trigger an assertion failure, causing the server to exit. |
| CVE-2020-8621 | High | 2020-08-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In BIND 9.14.0 -> 9.16.5, 9.17.0 -> 9.17.3, If a server is configured with both QNAME minimization and 'forward first' then an attacker who can send queries to it may be able to trigger the condition that will cause the server to crash. Servers that 'forward only' are not affected. |
| CVE-2020-8620 | High | 2020-08-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In BIND 9.15.6 -> 9.16.5, 9.17.0 -> 9.17.3, An attacker who can establish a TCP connection with the server and send data on that connection can exploit this to trigger the assertion failure, causing the server to exit. |
| CVE-2020-8619 | Medium | 2020-06-17 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | In ISC BIND9 versions BIND 9.11.14 -> 9.11.19, BIND 9.14.9 -> 9.14.12, BIND 9.16.0 -> 9.16.3, BIND Supported Preview Edition 9.11.14-S1 -> 9.11.19-S1: Unless a nameserver is providing authoritative service for one or more zones and at least one zone contains an empty non-terminal entry containing an asterisk ("*") character, this defect cannot be encountered. A would-be attacker who is allowed to change zone content could theoretically introduce such a record in order to exploit this condition to cause denial of service, though we consider the use of this vector unlikely because any such attack would require a significant privilege level and be easily traceable. |
| CVE-2020-8618 | Medium | 2020-06-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An attacker who is permitted to send zone data to a server via zone transfer can exploit this to intentionally trigger the assertion failure with a specially constructed zone, denying service to clients. |
| CVE-2020-14195 | High | 2020-06-16 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.5 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to org.jsecurity.realm.jndi.JndiRealmFactory (aka org.jsecurity). |
| CVE-2020-14062 | High | 2020-06-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.5 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.lib.sql.JNDIConnectionPool (aka xalan2). |
| CVE-2020-14061 | High | 2020-06-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.5 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to oracle.jms.AQjmsQueueConnectionFactory, oracle.jms.AQjmsXATopicConnectionFactory, oracle.jms.AQjmsTopicConnectionFactory, oracle.jms.AQjmsXAQueueConnectionFactory, and oracle.jms.AQjmsXAConnectionFactory (aka weblogic/oracle-aqjms). |
| CVE-2020-14060 | High | 2020-06-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.5 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to oadd.org.apache.xalan.lib.sql.JNDIConnectionPool (aka apache/drill). |
| CVE-2020-9484 | High | 2020-05-20 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | When using Apache Tomcat versions 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M4, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.34, 8.5.0 to 8.5.54 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.103 if a) an attacker is able to control the contents and name of a file on the server; and b) the server is configured to use the PersistenceManager with a FileStore; and c) the PersistenceManager is configured with sessionAttributeValueClassNameFilter="null" (the default unless a SecurityManager is used) or a sufficiently lax filter to allow the attacker provided object to be deserialized; and d) the attacker knows the relative file path from the storage location used by FileStore to the file the attacker has control over; then, using a specifically crafted request, the attacker will be able to trigger remote code execution via deserialization of the file under their control. Note that all of conditions a) to d) must be true for the attack to succeed. |
| CVE-2020-8617 | High | 2020-05-19 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Using a specially-crafted message, an attacker may potentially cause a BIND server to reach an inconsistent state if the attacker knows (or successfully guesses) the name of a TSIG key used by the server. Since BIND, by default, configures a local session key even on servers whose configuration does not otherwise make use of it, almost all current BIND servers are vulnerable. In releases of BIND dating from March 2018 and after, an assertion check in tsig.c detects this inconsistent state and deliberately exits. Prior to the introduction of the check the server would continue operating in an inconsistent state, with potentially harmful results. |
| CVE-2020-8616 | High | 2020-05-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A malicious actor who intentionally exploits this lack of effective limitation on the number of fetches performed when processing referrals can, through the use of specially crafted referrals, cause a recursing server to issue a very large number of fetches in an attempt to process the referral. This has at least two potential effects: The performance of the recursing server can potentially be degraded by the additional work required to perform these fetches, and The attacker can exploit this behavior to use the recursing server as a reflector in a reflection attack with a high amplification factor. |
| CVE-2020-2182 | Medium | 2020-05-06 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Credentials Binding Plugin 1.22 and earlier does not mask (i.e., replace with asterisks) secrets containing a `$` character in some circumstances. |
| CVE-2020-2181 | Medium | 2020-05-06 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Credentials Binding Plugin 1.22 and earlier does not mask (i.e., replace with asterisks) secrets in the build log when the build contains no build steps. |
| CVE-2020-11620 | High | 2020-04-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.4 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.Embedded (aka commons-jelly). |
| CVE-2020-11619 | High | 2020-04-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.4 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to org.springframework.aop.config.MethodLocatingFactoryBean (aka spring-aop). |
| CVE-2020-11113 | High | 2020-03-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.4 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to org.apache.openjpa.ee.WASRegistryManagedRuntime (aka openjpa). |
| CVE-2020-11112 | High | 2020-03-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.4 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to org.apache.commons.proxy.provider.remoting.RmiProvider (aka apache/commons-proxy). |
| CVE-2020-11111 | High | 2020-03-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.4 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to org.apache.activemq.* (aka activemq-jms, activemq-core, activemq-pool, and activemq-pool-jms). |