Overview 9,143 matches · 8 in Waratek scope · 2 protected · 47 exploited · 35 CISA KEV · 149 public PoC · 14 EPSS ≥ 0.5
9,143matches
8in Waratek scope0.1%
2protected0.0%
47exploited0.5%
35CISA KEV0.4%
149public PoC1.6%
14EPSS ≥ 0.50.2%
Protected by Waratek
2
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
6
0.1%
Outside Waratek scope
7
0.1%
Not applicable
9,128
99.8%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
2
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
9,141
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 1,583 / year
20082
Not applicable2
High1
Medium1
not blocked2
Working exploit published2
20098
Not applicable8
High3
Medium5
not blocked8
No public exploit8
20101
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
Exploited1
201112
Not applicable12
High3
Medium7
Low2
not blocked12
Exploited1
Working exploit published3
No public exploit8
201244
Not applicable44
High30
Medium14
not blocked44
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit42
201317
Not applicable17
High10
Medium5
Low2
not blocked17
Exploited1
Working exploit published2
No public exploit14
201434
Not applicable34
High14
Medium17
Low3
not blocked34
Exploited3
Working exploit published4
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit26
2015125
Not applicable125
High91
Medium33
Low1
not blocked125
Exploited3
Working exploit published5
Proof of concept only4
Forecast only6
No public exploit107
2016526
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable525
Critical47
High329
Medium145
Low5
not blocked526
Exploited2
Working exploit published11
Proof of concept only6
Forecast only1
No public exploit506
2017847
Protected by Waratek1
Not applicable846
Critical109
High543
Medium190
Low5
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked846
Exploited1
Working exploit published9
Proof of concept only6
No public exploit831
2018618
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published1
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable615
Critical73
High453
Medium88
Low4
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked617
Exploited1
Working exploit published11
Proof of concept only2
No public exploit604
2019494
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable493
Critical16
High251
Medium217
Low10
not blocked494
Exploited1
Working exploit published6
Proof of concept only2
No public exploit485
2020919
No exploit published1
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable917
Critical163
High331
Medium394
Low31
not blocked919
Exploited2
Working exploit published3
Proof of concept only11
No public exploit903
2021660
No exploit published1
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable658
Critical28
High252
Medium356
Low24
not blocked660
Exploited11
Proof of concept only2
No public exploit647
20221,241
No exploit published2
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable1,237
Critical76
High428
Medium656
Low81
not blocked1,241
Exploited2
Proof of concept only10
No public exploit1,229
20231,583
Not applicable1,583
Critical53
High439
Medium1,066
Low25
not blocked1,583
Exploited5
Proof of concept only10
No public exploit1,568
2024739
Not applicable739
Critical42
High337
Medium346
Low14
not blocked739
Exploited6
Proof of concept only7
No public exploit726
2025568
Not applicable568
Critical25
High282
Medium254
Low7
not blocked568
Exploited5
Proof of concept only10
No public exploit553
2026705
No exploit published1
Not applicable704
Critical45
High377
Medium258
Low25
not blocked705
Exploited2
Proof of concept only12
No public exploit691
2008201020122014201620182020202220242026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-58826 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In ksys_unshare of fork.c, there is a possible memory corruption due to a use after free. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58825 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple functions of fork.c, there is a possible use after free due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58824 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In __pkvm_load_tracing of trace.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58821 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple functions of SearchRequestDatabaseUtil.java, there is a possible way to access protected data due to SQL injection. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58817 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In parseKnownActivityEmbeddingCerts of ParsingUtils.java, there is a possible permanent denial of service due to improper input validation. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58814 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In parseContentType of PduParser.java, there is a possible denial of service due to an integer overflow. This could lead to remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55292 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In rw_ci_data_cback of rw_ci.cc, there is a possible memory safety issue due to integer underflow. This could lead to remote information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55289 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple functions in multiple locations, there is a possible execution of sensitive USSD codes due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55288 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In validEfCfis of SIMRecords.java, there is a possible way to cause a denial of service due to an uncaught exception. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55287 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In onCreate of GrantCredentialsPermissionActivity.java, there is a possible way to trick the user into granting account credentials due to misleading or insufficient UI. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55283 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible memory safety issue due to a use-after-free. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55275 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible use-after-free due to a race condition. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55272 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In loadDescription of DeviceAdminAdd.java, there is a possible denial of service due to improper input validation. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55271 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In forwardToPreferredActionPickHandler of ContactsPickerActivity.kt, there is a possible intent redirection due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55264 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In checkWhetherCallingAppHasAccess of DownloadProvider.java, there is a possible information leak due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55263 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple functions of AllowBindAppWidgetActivity.java, there is a possible misunderstanding of reject/consent actions due to misleading or insufficient UI. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55262 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In setNotificationListenerAccessGrantedForUserInternal of NotificationManagerService.java, there is a possible policy desynchronization due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55261 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In nfa_t4tnfcee_store_rx_buf of nfa_nfcee_act.cc, there is a possible way to achieve code execution due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55257 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In UsbDialogHelper of UsbDialogHelper.java, there is a possible UI confusion due to misleading or insufficient UI. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-49935 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In getXmlFileNameForUser of LocaleManagerService.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a confusable path traversal. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-49934 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple functions of MmiUtils.java, there is a possible risk of USSD/MMI code execution due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-49931 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In onActivityResult in multiple locations, there is a possible contact leak from protected profile due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-49924 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In ShortcutInfo of ShortcutInfo.java, there is a possible way to crash the launcher via unauthorized shortcuts due to resource exhaustion. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-49923 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In onResult of AccountManagerService.java, there is a possible untrusted/misleading UI issue due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-49922 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In queryRemoteConnectionServices of ConnectionServiceWrapper.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-49912 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple functions of MediaCarouselController.kt, there is a possible way for media to show up after disablement due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-49906 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An unprivileged application can bypass the `android.car.permission.CAR_DISPLAY_IN_CLUSTER` permission by registering an activity with the `android.car.cluster.NAVIGATION` category and requesting navigation app focus. The privileged `ClusterHomeSample` application, acting as a confused deputy, resolves and launches this arbitrary third-party activity on the safety-critical instrument cluster display without enforcing the necessary permission check, allowing for persistent display of potentially misleading or distracting content. |
| CVE-2026-49903 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The `ClusterRenderingService.dump()` method, accessible to processes holding `android.permission.DUMP` and `android.permission.PACKAGE_USAGE_STATS`, acts as a confused deputy. It allows attackers to write arbitrary values to `Settings.Global.OVERLAY_DISPLAY_DEVICES`, an operation normally requiring `android.permission.WRITE_SECURE_SETTINGS`, enabling persistent creation of system overlay displays and injection of key events into the cluster UI. |
| CVE-2026-45514 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple functions of SaveUi.java, there is a possible bypass of package installation requirements due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-28665 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In onCreate of SettingsApplication.java, there is a possible cross-profile consent dialog label injection due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-28645 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In onStrongAuthRequiredChanged of UsbService.java, there is a possible unauthenticated enabling of USB data due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to physical escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-28643 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible denial of service due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-28632 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible way to share files across profiles due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-28621 | Medium | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In getRingtone of RingtoneFactory.java, there is a possible unprivileged access risk due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-28597 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In writeGrantedUriPermissions of UriGrantsManagerService.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-28588 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In shouldBlockDirectoryFromTree of ExternalStorageProvider.java, there is a possible way to access protected data due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-0053 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible method for a primary user to disable secure nfc on other full users due to insufficient isolation between Android users. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2025-26433 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible way to trick a user into accepting a permission due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2025-22436 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible way to trick a user into disclosing Autofill contents due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-111765 | High | 2026-10-20 | No exploit published | Proof of concept only | A2A Java SDK is the official Java SDK for the Agent2Agent (A2A) Protocol. Starting in version 1.3.0.Final and prior to version 1.3.2.Final, the AndroidA2AHttpClient synchronous POST path overrides the disabled-redirect setting in AndroidA2AHttpClient.createConnection() with the PostBuilder default followRedirects value of true, leaving a residual of the earlier credential-redirect fix. JSONRPCTransport and RestTransport add interceptor-produced authentication headers and call synchronous post() without disabling redirects. AuthInterceptor permits X-API-Key, API-Key, X-Auth-Token, and X-Authentication headers; Android's repackaged OkHttp strips Authorization on cross-authority redirects but retains these nonstandard headers, disclosing a complete configured API key or token to another authority. The additional exposure applies when redirect or front-door behavior is compromised separately from the credential-handling component, or those components operate in different trust domains; a completely malicious initial origin already receives the credential on the first request. Autonomous clients require no human action, while user-invoked workflows can require interaction. Explicit followRedirects(false) prevents the redirected request. The demonstrated impact is credential disclosure, not subsequent credential use, integrity or availability impact, code execution, or host compromise. This issue is fixed in version 1.3.2.Final. |
| CVE-2026-58880 | High | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In handle_app_val_response of btif_rc.cc, there is a possible way to achieve code execution due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58865 | High | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple functions of PduParser.java, there is a possible persistent denial of service due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58859 | High | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple places, there is a possible denial of service due to an uncaught exception. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58856 | Low | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In returnOutputBufferLocked of DeprecatedCamera3StreamSplitter.cpp, there is a possible out-of-bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58854 | High | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible memory corruption due to type confusion. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58841 | High | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple functions of VirtualAudioControllerTest.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58835 | High | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In cfg2prop of btif_storage.cc, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58834 | Medium | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In setPermissionGrantState of DevicePolicyManagerService.java, there is a possible persistent denial of service due to improper input validation. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58815 | High | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55286 | High | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In stpropnci_process of stpropnci.cc, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55280 | High | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to uninitialized data. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55270 | High | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In dialInternal in multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55269 | High | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In FilterCapturedPacket of snoop_logger.cc, there is a possible memory safety issue due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55266 | High | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In qsort of libufdt_sysdeps_vendor.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to resource exhaustion. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55265 | Medium | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple functions of PduParser.java, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to a remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-49937 | High | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple functions of MessageQueueBase.h, there is a possible out of bounds read due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-49933 | High | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In handle_le_monitor_device_event of msft.cc, there is a possible control-flow hijack in the privileged bluetooth process due to an uninitialized pointer dereference. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-49885 | High | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In rw_t4t_update_file of rw_t4t.cc, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-49880 | High | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple functions of nfa_nfcee_act.cc, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-49878 | High | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In wpas_handle_robust_av_scs_recv_action of robust_av.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to remote code execution with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-45524 | High | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In isSystem of WifiPermissionsUtil.java, there is a possible sandbox escape due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-28667 | Medium | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple functions of rw_t5t.cc, there is a possible out-of-bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-28648 | High | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Settings, there is a possible permission bypass due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-28647 | High | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In updateState of DeviceAdminAppsPreferenceController.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-28641 | High | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In shouldDisableUninstallButton of ApplicationActionButtonsPreferenceController.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-28640 | High | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In checkCallerIsCertInstallerOrSelfInProfile of CredentialStorageActivity.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-28625 | High | 2026-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58773 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In link_load_gnss_image of link_device.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58767 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple functions of arm-smmu-v3.c, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58766 | High | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple functions of arm-smmu-v3.c, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58765 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In GPU, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58755 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In smmu_install_nested_ste of arm-smmu-v3.c, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58751 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple functions of arm-smmu-v3.c, there is a possible use-after-free due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58747 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In smmu_detach_dev of arm-smmu-v3.c, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58744 | High | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58739 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In platform_msg_handler_init of default_msg_handlers.c, there is a possible confused deputy due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58734 | High | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In google_mba_recv_msg of google_mba_poll.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58731 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple functions of physmem_extmem_linux.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds read due to uninitialized data. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58728 | High | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In ARM64_TLBI of mmu.h, there is a possible memory corruption due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58726 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In FsmReleaseKey of fsm.c, there is a possible permission bypass due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58724 | High | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible use-after-free due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58721 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible information disclosure due to uninitialized memory use. This could lead to local information disclosure with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58718 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In smmu_detach_dev_nested of arm-smmu-v3.c, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58716 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible time-of-check to time-of-use due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58710 | High | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In DecodeFilmGrainParams of film_grain_dec.cc, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58704 | High | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | Exploited | In Cellular Modem, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to remote (proximal/adjacent) escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58701 | High | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In trusty_dputc of generic-arm64-smcall.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58699 | High | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Vp9DecEndOfStream of vp9hwd_output.cc, there is a possible out-of-bounds read due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58698 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In ap_pmic_poll_msg_handler of ap_pmic_ipc.c, there is a possible permission bypass due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58695 | High | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In gmc_phy_lp3_exit_restore_registers of phy_power.c, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58691 | High | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In FsmReleaseKey of fsm.c, there is a possible permission bypass due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58683 | High | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In IP Multimedia Subsystem, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to improper input validation. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58679 | High | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In gf_ta_test_set_config of gf_ta_test.c, there is a possible heap buffer overflow due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58678 | High | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Bootloader, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-57042 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple functions of DreamPickerReceiver.kt, there is a possible permission bypass due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-57035 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In multiple locations, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-57014 | High | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In phNxpNciHal_ext_process_nfc_init_rsp of phNxpNciHal_ext.cc, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-57012 | High | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In the Setup Wizard, there is a possible remote package install due to a missing permission check. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-57008 | High | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Modem, there is a possible information disclosure due to improper input validation. This could lead to remote information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-57006 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In acfw_ffa.c, there is a possible secret read due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local information disclosure with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |