Overview 1,483 matches · 99 in Waratek scope · 44 protected · 26 exploited · 18 CISA KEV · 77 public PoC · 32 EPSS ≥ 0.5
1,483matches
99in Waratek scope6.7%
44protected3.0%
26exploited1.8%
18CISA KEV1.2%
77public PoC5.2%
32EPSS ≥ 0.52.2%
Protected by Waratek
44
3.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
3
0.2%
No exploit published
52
3.5%
Outside Waratek scope
39
2.6%
Not applicable
1,345
90.7%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
44
3.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
1,439
97.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 196 / year
19983
Not applicable3
High2
Medium1
not blocked3
No public exploit3
19998
Not applicable8
High4
Medium4
not blocked8
Working exploit published2
No public exploit6
20002
Not applicable2
High2
not blocked2
Working exploit published1
No public exploit1
20016
Not applicable6
High4
Medium2
not blocked6
No public exploit6
20025
Not applicable5
High2
Medium3
not blocked5
Working exploit published1
No public exploit4
20033
Not applicable3
High2
Medium1
not blocked3
No public exploit3
20049
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable7
High5
Medium4
not blocked9
Working exploit published2
No public exploit7
200518
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable17
High7
Medium9
Low2
not blocked18
Exploited1
Working exploit published6
No public exploit11
200616
Not applicable16
High7
Medium7
Low2
not blocked16
Working exploit published3
No public exploit13
200717
Not applicable17
High12
Medium4
Low1
not blocked17
Working exploit published3
No public exploit14
200817
Mitigation candidate1
Not applicable16
High7
Medium9
Low1
not blocked17
Working exploit published6
No public exploit11
200911
Not applicable11
High9
Medium2
not blocked11
Working exploit published1
No public exploit10
201026
Not applicable26
High13
Medium13
not blocked26
Working exploit published1
No public exploit25
20119
Not applicable9
High6
Medium2
Low1
not blocked9
Working exploit published4
No public exploit5
201215
Not applicable15
High6
Medium8
Low1
not blocked15
Working exploit published3
No public exploit12
201317
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate1
Not applicable15
High2
Medium12
Low3
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked16
Working exploit published2
No public exploit15
201416
Not applicable16
High4
Medium11
Low1
not blocked16
Working exploit published3
No public exploit13
201526
Not applicable26
Critical1
High3
Medium21
Low1
not blocked26
Exploited4
Working exploit published1
No public exploit21
201619
No exploit published1
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable17
Critical5
High11
Medium3
not blocked19
Working exploit published2
No public exploit17
201727
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable26
Critical7
High11
Medium8
Low1
not blocked27
Working exploit published3
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit23
201835
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published1
Not applicable33
Critical3
High21
Medium11
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked34
Exploited1
No public exploit34
2019182
No exploit published3
Outside Waratek scope3
Not applicable176
Critical15
High70
Medium96
Low1
not blocked182
Exploited1
Working exploit published2
No public exploit179
2020113
Protected by Waratek10
No exploit published1
Outside Waratek scope6
Not applicable96
Critical21
High44
Medium36
Low12
blocked by ARMR today10
not blocked103
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
No public exploit111
2021118
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published1
Not applicable115
Critical29
High48
Medium39
Low2
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked116
Exploited7
Forecast only1
No public exploit110
2022158
Protected by Waratek18
No exploit published22
Outside Waratek scope8
Not applicable110
Critical24
High57
Medium66
Low11
blocked by ARMR today18
not blocked140
Exploited2
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only6
Forecast only1
No public exploit148
2023153
Protected by Waratek7
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published6
Outside Waratek scope9
Not applicable130
Critical14
High73
Medium57
Low9
blocked by ARMR today7
not blocked146
Exploited2
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only10
Forecast only1
No public exploit139
2024142
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published10
Outside Waratek scope8
Not applicable122
Critical12
High62
Medium49
Low19
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked140
Exploited1
Proof of concept only9
No public exploit132
2025116
No exploit published2
Not applicable114
Critical13
High53
Medium41
Low9
not blocked116
Exploited2
Proof of concept only17
No public exploit97
2026196
Protected by Waratek3
No exploit published5
Not applicable188
Critical30
High87
Medium70
Low9
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked193
Exploited4
Proof of concept only30
Forecast only1
No public exploit161
1999200220052008201120142017202020232026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-34647 | High | 2026-05-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-beta1, 2.4.8-p4, 2.4.7-p9, 2.4.6-p14, 2.4.5-p16, 2.4.4-p17 and earlier are affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a maliciously crafted URL or interact with a compromised web page. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-34646 | High | 2026-05-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-beta1, 2.4.8-p4, 2.4.7-p9, 2.4.6-p14, 2.4.5-p16, 2.4.4-p17 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized write access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-34645 | High | 2026-05-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-beta1, 2.4.8-p4, 2.4.7-p9, 2.4.6-p14, 2.4.5-p16, 2.4.4-p17 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized write access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-32204 | High | 2026-05-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | External control of file name or path in Azure Monitor Agent allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| CVE-2026-44339 | High | 2026-05-08 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to praisonai version 4.6.37 and praisonaiagents version 1.6.37, praisonaiagents resolves unresolved tool names against module globals and __main__ after it fails to match the declared tool list and the registry. With the default agent configuration, _perm_allow is None, so undeclared non-dangerous tool names are not rejected by the permission gate. An attacker who can influence tool-call names can therefore invoke unintended application callables that were never declared as tools. This issue has been patched in praisonai version 4.6.37 and praisonaiagents version 1.6.37. |
| CVE-2026-44335 | High | 2026-05-08 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.6.32, the URL checking logic in PraisonAI has a logical flaw that could be bypassed by attackers, leading to SSRF attacks. This issue has been patched in version 1.6.32. |
| CVE-2026-41496 | High | 2026-05-08 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to praisonai version 4.6.9 and praisonaiagents version 1.6.9, the fix for CVE-2026-40315 added input validation to SQLiteConversationStore only. Nine sibling backends — MySQL, PostgreSQL, async SQLite/MySQL/PostgreSQL, Turso, SingleStore, Supabase, SurrealDB — pass table_prefix straight into f-string SQL. Same root cause, same code pattern, same exploitation. 52 unvalidated injection points across the codebase. postgres.py additionally accepts an unvalidated schema parameter used directly in DDL. This issue has been patched in praisonai version 4.6.9 and praisonaiagents version 1.6.9. |
| CVE-2026-6788 | High | 2026-05-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Uncontrolled Search Path Element vulnerability in WatchGuard Agent on Windows allows Using Malicious Files. |
| CVE-2026-6787 | High | 2026-05-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Use of Hard-coded Cryptographic Key vulnerability in WatchGuard Agent on Windows allows Inclusion of Code in Existing Process. |
| CVE-2026-41288 | High | 2026-05-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Incorrect permission assignment for a resource in the patch management component of the WatchGuard Agent on Windows allows an authenticated local user to elevate their privileges to NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM. |
| CVE-2026-41287 | High | 2026-05-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Stack-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability in the WatchGuard Agent discovery service on Windows allows Overflow Buffers. An unauthenticated attacker on the same local network could exploit this vulnerability to crash the agent service. |
| CVE-2026-41286 | High | 2026-05-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Stack-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability in the WatchGuard Agent discovery service on Windows allows Overflow Buffers. An unauthenticated attacker on the same local network could exploit this vulnerability to crash the agent service. |
| CVE-2026-43003 | High | 2026-05-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in OpenStack ironic-python-agent 1.0.0 through 11.5.0. Ironic Python Agent (IPA) sometimes executes grub-install from within a chroot of the deployed partition image, leading to code execution in the case of a malicious image. |
| CVE-2026-7461 | High | 2026-04-30 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper neutralization of inputs used in an OS command in the FSx Windows File Server volume mounting component in Amazon ECS Agent on Windows before version 1.103.0 might allow a remote authenticated threat actor to execute shell commands with SYSTEM privileges on the underlying host via a specially crafted username field in an ECS task definition. This issue requires permissions to register ECS task definitions or write to the Secrets Manager or SSM Parameter Store credentials used by the FSx volume configuration. To remediate this issue, users should upgrade to version 1.103.0. |
| CVE-2026-6389 | High | 2026-04-30 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Turbonomic prometurbo agent 8.16.0 through 8.17.6 IBM Turbonomic Application Resource Management grants excessive cluster‑wide permissions, including unrestricted read access to all secrets. An attacker that compromises the operator or its service account can exfiltrate sensitive credentials, escalate privileges, and potentially achieve full cluster compromise. |
| CVE-2026-33694 | High | 2026-04-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | This vulnerability allows an attacker to create a junction, enabling the deletion of arbitrary files with SYSTEM privileges. As a result, this condition potentially facilitates arbitrary code execution, whereby an attacker may exploit the vulnerability to execute malicious code with elevated SYSTEM privileges. |
| CVE-2025-1241 | Medium | 2026-04-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Encrypted values in Fortra's GoAnywhere MFT prior to version 7.10.0 and GoAnywhere Agents prior to version 2.2.0 utilize a static IV which allows admin users to brute-force decryption of data. |
| CVE-2026-40488 | High | 2026-04-20 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Magento Long Term Support (LTS) is an unofficial, community-driven project provides an alternative to the Magento Community Edition e-commerce platform with a high level of backward compatibility. Prior to version 20.17.0, the product custom option file upload in OpenMage LTS uses an incomplete blocklist (`forbidden_extensions = php,exe`) to prevent dangerous file uploads. This blocklist can be trivially bypassed by using alternative PHP-executable extensions such as `.phtml`, `.phar`, `.php3`, `.php4`, `.php5`, `.php7`, and `.pht`. Files are stored in the publicly accessible `media/custom_options/quote/` directory, which lacks server-side execution restrictions for some configurations, enabling Remote Code Execution if this directory is not explicitly denied script execution. Version 20.17.0 patches the issue. |
| CVE-2026-40098 | Medium | 2026-04-20 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Magento Long Term Support (LTS) is an unofficial, community-driven project provides an alternative to the Magento Community Edition e-commerce platform with a high level of backward compatibility. Prior to version 20.17.0, the shared wishlist add-to-cart endpoint authorizes access with a public `sharing_code`, but loads the acted-on wishlist item by a separate global `wishlist_item_id` and never verifies that the item belongs to the shared wishlist referenced by that code. This lets an attacker use a valid shared wishlist code for wishlist A and a wishlist item ID belonging to victim wishlist B to import victim item B into the attacker's cart through the shared wishlist flow for wishlist A. Because the victim item's stored `buyRequest` is reused during cart import, the victim's private custom-option data is copied into the attacker's quote. If the product uses a file custom option, this can be elevated to cross-user file disclosure because the imported file metadata is preserved and the download endpoint is not ownership-bound. Version 20.17.0 patches the issue. |
| CVE-2026-25525 | Medium | 2026-04-20 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Magento Long Term Support (LTS) is an unofficial, community-driven project provides an alternative to the Magento Community Edition e-commerce platform with a high level of backward compatibility. Prior to version 20.17.0, the Dataflow module in OpenMage LTS uses a weak blacklist filter (`str_replace('../', '', $input)`) to prevent path traversal attacks. This filter can be bypassed using patterns like `..././` or `....//`, which after the replacement still result in `../`. An authenticated administrator can exploit this to read arbitrary files from the server filesystem. Version 20.17.0 patches the issue. |
| CVE-2026-25524 | High | 2026-04-20 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Magento Long Term Support (LTS) is an unofficial, community-driven project provides an alternative to the Magento Community Edition e-commerce platform with a high level of backward compatibility. Prior to version 20.17.0, PHP functions such as `getimagesize()`, `file_exists()`, and `is_readable()` can trigger deserialization when processing `phar://` stream wrapper paths. OpenMage LTS uses these functions with potentially controllable file paths during image validation and media handling. An attacker who can upload a malicious phar file (disguised as an image) and trigger one of these functions with a `phar://` path can achieve arbitrary code execution. Version 20.17.0 patches the issue. |
| CVE-2026-6482 | High | 2026-04-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Rapid7 Insight Agent (versions > 4.1.0.2) is vulnerable to a local privilege escalation attack that allows users to gain SYSTEM level control of a Windows host. Upon startup the agent service attempts to load an OpenSSL configuration file from a non-existent directory that is writable by standard users. By planting a crafted openssl.cnf file an attacker can trick the high-privilege service into executing arbitrary commands. This effectively permits an unprivileged user to bypass security controls and achieve a full host compromise under the agent’s SYSTEM level access. |
| CVE-2026-30624 | High | 2026-04-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Agent Zero 0.9.8 contains a remote code execution vulnerability in its External MCP Servers configuration feature. The application allows users to define MCP servers using a JSON configuration containing arbitrary command and args values. These values are executed by the application when the configuration is applied without sufficient validation or restriction. An attacker may supply a malicious MCP configuration to execute arbitrary operating system commands, potentially resulting in remote code execution with the privileges of the Agent Zero process. |
| CVE-2026-40289 | Critical | 2026-04-14 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. In versions below 4.5.139 of PraisonAI and 1.5.140 of praisonaiagents, the browser bridge (praisonai browser start) is vulnerable to unauthenticated remote session hijacking due to missing authentication and a bypassable origin check on its /ws WebSocket endpoint. The server binds to 0.0.0.0 by default and only validates the Origin header when one is present, meaning any non-browser client that omits the header is accepted without restriction. An unauthenticated network attacker can connect, send a start_session message, and the server will route it to the first idle browser-extension WebSocket (effectively hijacking that session) and then broadcast all resulting automation actions and outputs back to the attacker. This enables unauthorized remote control of connected browser automation sessions, leakage of sensitive page context and automation results, and misuse of model-backed browser actions in any environment where the bridge is network-reachable. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.5.139 of PraisonAI and 1.5.140 of praisonaiagents. |
| CVE-2026-40288 | Critical | 2026-04-14 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. In versions below 4.5.139 of PraisonAI and 1.5.140 of praisonaiagents, the workflow engine is vulnerable to arbitrary command and code execution through untrusted YAML files. When praisonai workflow run <file.yaml> loads a YAML file with type: job, the JobWorkflowExecutor in job_workflow.py processes steps that support run: (shell commands via subprocess.run()), script: (inline Python via exec()), and python: (arbitrary Python script execution)—all without any validation, sandboxing, or user confirmation. The affected code paths include action_run() in workflow.py and _exec_shell(), _exec_inline_python(), and _exec_python_script() in job_workflow.py. An attacker who can supply or influence a workflow YAML file (particularly in CI pipelines, shared repositories, or multi-tenant deployment environments) can achieve full arbitrary command execution on the host system, compromising the machine and any accessible data or credentials. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.5.139 of PraisonAI and 1.5.140 of praisonaiagents. |
| CVE-2026-40287 | High | 2026-04-14 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Versions 4.5.138 and below are vulnerable to arbitrary code execution through automatic, unsanitized import of a tools.py file from the current working directory. Components including call.py (import_tools_from_file()), tool_resolver.py (_load_local_tools()), and CLI tool-loading paths blindly import ./tools.py at startup without any validation, sandboxing, or user confirmation. An attacker who can place a malicious tools.py in the directory where PraisonAI is launched (such as through a shared project, cloned repository, or writable workspace) achieves immediate arbitrary Python code execution in the host environment. This compromises the full PraisonAI process, the host system, and any connected data or credentials. This issue has been fixed in version 4.5.139. |
| CVE-2026-32192 | High | 2026-04-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Deserialization of untrusted data in Azure Monitor Agent allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| CVE-2026-32168 | High | 2026-04-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper input validation in Azure Monitor Agent allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| CVE-2026-0232 | Medium | 2026-04-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A problem with a protection mechanism in the Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR agent on Windows allows a local Windows administrator to disable the agent. This issue may be leveraged by malware to perform malicious activity without detection. |
| CVE-2026-4482 | Medium | 2026-04-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The installer certificate files in the …/bootstrap/common/ssl folder do not seem to have restricted permissions on Windows systems (users have read and execute access). For the client.key file in particular, this could potentially lead to exploits, as this exposes agent identity material to any locally authenticated standard user. |
| CVE-2026-40160 | High | 2026-04-10 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | PraisonAIAgents is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to 1.5.128, web_crawl's httpx fallback path passes user-supplied URLs directly to httpx.AsyncClient.get() with follow_redirects=True and no host validation. An LLM agent tricked into crawling an internal URL can reach cloud metadata endpoints (169.254.169.254), internal services, and localhost. The response content is returned to the agent and may appear in output visible to the attacker. This fallback is the default crawl path on a fresh PraisonAI installation (no Tavily key, no Crawl4AI installed). This vulnerability is fixed in 1.5.128. |
| CVE-2026-40153 | High | 2026-04-09 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | PraisonAIAgents is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to 1.5.128, the execute_command function in shell_tools.py calls os.path.expandvars() on every command argument at line 64, manually re-implementing shell-level environment variable expansion despite using shell=False (line 88) for security. This allows exfiltration of secrets stored in environment variables (database credentials, API keys, cloud access keys). The approval system displays the unexpanded $VAR references to human reviewers, creating a deceptive approval where the displayed command differs from what actually executes. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.5.128. |
| CVE-2026-40152 | Medium | 2026-04-09 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | PraisonAIAgents is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to 1.5.128, he list_files() tool in FileTools validates the directory parameter against workspace boundaries via _validate_path(), but passes the pattern parameter directly to Path.glob() without any validation. Since Python's Path.glob() supports .. path segments, an attacker can use relative path traversal in the glob pattern to enumerate arbitrary files outside the workspace, obtaining file metadata (existence, name, size, timestamps) for any path on the filesystem. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.5.128. |
| CVE-2026-40150 | High | 2026-04-09 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | PraisonAIAgents is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to 1.5.128, the web_crawl() function in praisonaiagents/tools/web_crawl_tools.py accepts arbitrary URLs from AI agents with zero validation. No scheme allowlisting, hostname/IP blocklisting, or private network checks are applied before fetching. This allows an attacker (or prompt injection in crawled content) to force the agent to fetch cloud metadata endpoints, internal services, or local files via file:// URLs. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.5.128. |
| CVE-2026-40117 | High | 2026-04-09 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | PraisonAIAgents is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to 1.5.128, read_skill_file() in skill_tools.py allows reading arbitrary files from the filesystem by accepting an unrestricted skill_path parameter. Unlike file_tools.read_file which enforces workspace boundary confinement, and unlike run_skill_script which requires critical-level approval, read_skill_file has neither protection. An agent influenced by prompt injection can exfiltrate sensitive files without triggering any approval prompt. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.5.128. |
| CVE-2026-40111 | Critical | 2026-04-09 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | PraisonAIAgents is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to 1.5.128, he memory hooks executor in praisonaiagents passes a user-controlled command string directly to subprocess.run() with shell=True at src/praisonai-agents/praisonaiagents/memory/hooks.py. No sanitization is performed and shell metacharacters are interpreted by /bin/sh before the intended command executes. Two independent attack surfaces exist. The first is via pre_run_command and post_run_command hook event types registered through the hooks configuration. The second and more severe surface is the .praisonai/hooks.json lifecycle configuration, where hooks registered for events such as BEFORE_TOOL and AFTER_TOOL fire automatically during agent operation. An agent that gains file-write access through prompt injection can overwrite .praisonai/hooks.json and have its payload execute silently at every subsequent lifecycle event without further user interaction. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.5.128. |
| CVE-2026-4837 | High | 2026-04-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An eval() injection vulnerability in the Rapid7 Insight Agent beaconing logic for Linux versions could theoretically allow an attacker to achieve remote code execution as root via a crafted beacon response. Because the Agent uses mutual TLS (mTLS) to verify commands from the Rapid7 Platform, it is unlikely that the eval() function could be exploited remotely without prior, highly privileged access to the backend platform. |
| CVE-2026-5584 | Medium | 2026-04-05 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A vulnerability has been found in Fosowl agenticSeek 0.1.0. Impacted is the function PyInterpreter.execute of the file sources/tools/PyInterpreter.py of the component query Endpoint. Such manipulation leads to code injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| CVE-2026-34954 | High | 2026-04-03 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95. |
| CVE-2026-34938 | Critical | 2026-04-03 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.90, execute_code() in praisonai-agents runs attacker-controlled Python inside a three-layer sandbox that can be fully bypassed by passing a str subclass with an overridden startswith() method to the _safe_getattr wrapper, achieving arbitrary OS command execution on the host. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.90. |
| CVE-2026-34937 | Critical | 2026-04-03 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.90, run_python() in praisonai constructs a shell command string by interpolating user-controlled code into python3 -c "<code>" and passing it to subprocess.run(..., shell=True). The escaping logic only handles \ and ", leaving $() and backtick substitutions unescaped, allowing arbitrary OS command execution before Python is invoked. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.90. |
| CVE-2026-32173 | High | 2026-04-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper authentication in Azure SRE Agent allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network. |
| CVE-2026-34172 | High | 2026-03-31 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Giskard is an open-source Python library for testing and evaluating agentic systems. Prior to versions 0.3.4 and 1.0.2b1, ChatWorkflow.chat(message) passes its string argument directly as a Jinja2 template source to a non-sandboxed Environment. A developer who passes user input to this method enables full remote code execution via Jinja2 class traversal. The method name chat and parameter name message naturally invite passing user input directly, but the string is silently parsed as a Jinja2 template, not treated as plain text. This issue has been patched in versions 0.3.4 and 1.0.2b1. |
| CVE-2026-2123 | High | 2026-03-31 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A security audit identified a privilege escalation vulnerability in Operations Agent(<=OA 12.29) on Windows. Under specific conditions Operations Agent may run executables from specific writeable locations.Thanks to Manuel Rickli & Philippe Leiser of Oneconsult AG for reporting this vulnerability |
| CVE-2026-4963 | Low | 2026-03-27 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A weakness has been identified in huggingface smolagents 1.25.0.dev0. This affects the function evaluate_augassign/evaluate_call/evaluate_with of the file src/smolagents/local_python_executor.py of the component Incomplete Fix CVE-2025-9959. This manipulation causes code injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| CVE-2026-4959 | Medium | 2026-03-27 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A vulnerability was found in OpenBMB XAgent 1.0.0. This impacts the function check_user of the file XAgentServer/application/websockets/share.py of the component ShareServer WebSocket Endpoint. Performing a manipulation of the argument interaction_id results in missing authentication. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| CVE-2026-4958 | Low | 2026-03-27 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A vulnerability has been found in OpenBMB XAgent 1.0.0. This affects the function ReplayServer.on_connect/ReplayServer.send_data of the file XAgentServer/application/websockets/replayer.py of the component WebSocket Endpoint. Such manipulation of the argument interaction_id leads to authorization bypass. The attack may be launched remotely. Attacks of this nature are highly complex. The exploitability is reported as difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| CVE-2026-4957 | Low | 2026-03-27 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A flaw has been found in OpenBMB XAgent 1.0.0. The impacted element is the function FunctionHandler.handle_tool_call of the file XAgent/function_handler.py of the component API Key Handler. This manipulation of the argument api_key causes sensitive information in log files. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| CVE-2026-33728 | Critical | 2026-03-27 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | dd-trace-java is a Datadog APM client for Java. In versions of dd-trace-java 0.40.0 through prior to 1.60.2, the RMI instrumentation registered a custom endpoint that deserialized incoming data without applying serialization filters. On JDK version 16 and earlier, an attacker with network access to a JMX or RMI port on an instrumented JVM could exploit this to potentially achieve remote code execution. All three of the following conditions must be true to exploit this vulnerability: First, dd-trace-java is attached as a Java agent (`-javaagent`) on Java 16 or earlier. Second, a JMX/RMI port has been explicitly configured via `-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.port` and is network-reachable, Third, a gadget-chain-compatible library is present on the classpath. For JDK >= 17, no action is required, but upgrading is strongly encouraged. For JDK >= 8u121 < JDK 17, upgrade to dd-trace-java version 1.60.3 or later. For JDK < 8u121 and earlier where serialization filters are not available, apply the workaround. The workaround is to set the following environment variable to disable the RMI integration: `DD_INTEGRATION_RMI_ENABLED=false`. |
| CVE-2026-33701 | Critical | 2026-03-27 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | OpenTelemetry Java Instrumentation provides OpenTelemetry auto-instrumentation and instrumentation libraries for Java. In versions prior to 2.26.1, the RMI instrumentation registered a custom endpoint that deserialized incoming data without applying serialization filters. On JDK version 16 and earlier, an attacker with network access to a JMX or RMI port on an instrumented JVM could exploit this to potentially achieve remote code execution. All three of the following conditions must be true to exploit this vulnerability: First, OpenTelemetry Java instrumentation is attached as a Java agent (`-javaagent`) on Java 16 or earlier. Second, JMX/RMI port has been explicitly configured via `-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.port` and is network-reachable. Third, gadget-chain-compatible library is present on the classpath. This results in arbitrary remote code execution with the privileges of the user running the instrumented JVM. For JDK >= 17, no action is required, but upgrading is strongly encouraged. For JDK < 17, upgrade to version 2.26.1 or later. As a workaround, set the system property `-Dotel.instrumentation.rmi.enabled=false` to disable the RMI integration. |
| CVE-2026-4269 | Medium | 2026-03-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A missing S3 ownership verification in the Bedrock AgentCore Starter Toolkit before version v0.1.13 may allow a remote actor to inject code during the build process, leading to code execution in the AgentCore Runtime. This issue only affects users of the Bedrock AgentCore Starter Toolkit before version v0.1.13 who build or have built the Toolkit after September 24, 2025. Any users on a version >=v0.1.13, and any users on previous versions who built the toolkit before September 24, 2025 are not affected. To remediate this issue, customers should upgrade to version v0.1.13. |
| CVE-2026-21361 | High | 2026-03-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha3, 2.4.8-p3, 2.4.7-p8, 2.4.6-p13, 2.4.5-p15, 2.4.4-p16 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vvulnerability that could be abused by a high-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. A successful attacker can abuse this to achieve session takeover, increasing the confidentiality, and integrity impact to high. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. |
| CVE-2026-21360 | Medium | 2026-03-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha3, 2.4.8-p3, 2.4.7-p8, 2.4.6-p13, 2.4.5-p15, 2.4.4-p16 and earlier are affected by an Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability that could result in a security feature bypass. A high-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to access unauthorized files or directories outside the intended restricted path. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-21359 | Medium | 2026-03-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha3, 2.4.8-p3, 2.4.7-p8, 2.4.6-p13, 2.4.5-p15, 2.4.4-p16 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and have limited impact to the integrity and availability of data. The exploit depends on conditions beyond the attacker's control. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-21311 | High | 2026-03-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha3, 2.4.8-p3, 2.4.7-p8, 2.4.6-p13, 2.4.5-p15, 2.4.4-p16 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a high-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. A successful attacker can abuse this to achieve session takeover, increasing the confidentiality, and integrity impact to high. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. |
| CVE-2026-21310 | Medium | 2026-03-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha3, 2.4.8-p3, 2.4.7-p8, 2.4.6-p13, 2.4.5-p15, 2.4.4-p16 and earlier are affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability that could result in a security feature bypass, with limited impact to integrity. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-21309 | High | 2026-03-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha3, 2.4.8-p3, 2.4.7-p8, 2.4.6-p13, 2.4.5-p15, 2.4.4-p16 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized view access of data. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-21297 | Medium | 2026-03-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha3, 2.4.8-p3, 2.4.7-p8, 2.4.6-p13, 2.4.5-p15, 2.4.4-p16 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. A low-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain limited unauthorized access to a feature. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-21296 | Medium | 2026-03-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha3, 2.4.8-p3, 2.4.7-p8, 2.4.6-p13, 2.4.5-p15, 2.4.4-p16 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. A low-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain limited unauthorized view access of data. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-21295 | Low | 2026-03-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha3, 2.4.8-p3, 2.4.7-p8, 2.4.6-p13, 2.4.5-p15, 2.4.4-p16 and earlier are affected by a URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect') vulnerability. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to redirect users to malicious websites. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-21294 | Medium | 2026-03-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha3, 2.4.8-p3, 2.4.7-p8, 2.4.6-p13, 2.4.5-p15, 2.4.4-p16 and earlier are affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. A high-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to manipulate server-side requests and bypass security controls. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-21293 | Medium | 2026-03-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha3, 2.4.8-p3, 2.4.7-p8, 2.4.6-p13, 2.4.5-p15, 2.4.4-p16 and earlier are affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. A high-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to manipulate server-side requests and access unauthorized resources. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-21292 | Medium | 2026-03-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha3, 2.4.8-p3, 2.4.7-p8, 2.4.6-p13, 2.4.5-p15, 2.4.4-p16 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. |
| CVE-2026-21291 | Medium | 2026-03-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha3, 2.4.8-p3, 2.4.7-p8, 2.4.6-p13, 2.4.5-p15, 2.4.4-p16 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a high-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. |
| CVE-2026-21290 | High | 2026-03-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha3, 2.4.8-p3, 2.4.7-p8, 2.4.6-p13, 2.4.5-p15, 2.4.4-p16 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. A successful attacker can abuse this to achieve session takeover, increasing the confidentiality, and integrity impact to high. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. |
| CVE-2026-21289 | High | 2026-03-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha3, 2.4.8-p3, 2.4.7-p8, 2.4.6-p13, 2.4.5-p15, 2.4.4-p16 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized view access of data. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-21286 | Medium | 2026-03-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha3, 2.4.8-p3, 2.4.7-p8, 2.4.6-p13, 2.4.5-p15, 2.4.4-p16 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain limited unauthorized view access of data. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-21285 | Medium | 2026-03-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha3, 2.4.8-p3, 2.4.7-p8, 2.4.6-p13, 2.4.5-p15, 2.4.4-p16 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. A low-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain limited unauthorized access to a feature. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-21284 | High | 2026-03-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha3, 2.4.8-p3, 2.4.7-p8, 2.4.6-p13, 2.4.5-p15, 2.4.4-p16 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a high-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. A successful attacker can abuse this to achieve session takeover, increasing the confidentiality, and integrity impact to high. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. |
| CVE-2026-21282 | Medium | 2026-03-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha3, 2.4.8-p3, 2.4.7-p8, 2.4.6-p13, 2.4.5-p15, 2.4.4-p16 and earlier are affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability that could lead to application denial-of-service. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by providing specially crafted input, causing limited impact to application availability. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-26117 | High | 2026-03-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Azure Windows Virtual Machine Agent allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| CVE-2025-54659 | High | 2026-03-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability [CWE-22] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSOAR Agent Communication Bridge 1.1.0, FortiSOAR Agent Communication Bridge 1.0 all versions may allow an unauthenticated attacker to read files accessible to the fortisoar user on a system where the agent is deployed, via sending a crafted request to the agent port. |
| CVE-2026-29791 | Medium | 2026-03-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Agentgateway is an open source data plane for agentic AI connectivity within or across any agent framework or environment. Prior to version 0.12.0, when converting MCP tools/call request to OpenAPI request, input path, query, and header values are not sanitized. This issue has been patched in version 0.12.0. |
| CVE-2026-28727 | High | 2026-03-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Local privilege escalation due to insecure Unix socket permissions. The following products are affected: Acronis Cyber Protect 17 (macOS) before build 41186, Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud Agent (macOS) before build 41124, Acronis True Image (macOS) before build 42902. |
| CVE-2026-28713 | High | 2026-03-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Default credentials set for local privileged user in Virtual Appliance. The following products are affected: Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud Agent (VMware) before build 36943, Acronis Cyber Protect 17 (VMware) before build 41186. |
| CVE-2025-30413 | Medium | 2026-03-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Credentials are not deleted from Acronis Agent after plan revocation. The following products are affected: Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud Agent (Linux, macOS, Windows) before build 40497, Acronis Cyber Protect 17 (Linux, macOS, Windows) before build 41186. |
| CVE-2025-11792 | High | 2026-03-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Local privilege escalation due to DLL hijacking vulnerability. The following products are affected: Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud Agent (Windows) before build 41124. |
| CVE-2025-11791 | High | 2026-03-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Sensitive information disclosure and manipulation due to insufficient authorization checks. The following products are affected: Acronis Cyber Protect 17 (Linux, macOS, Windows) before build 41186, Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud Agent (Linux, macOS, Windows) before build 41124. |
| CVE-2025-11790 | Medium | 2026-03-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Credentials are not deleted from Acronis Agent after plan revocation. The following products are affected: Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud Agent (Linux, macOS, Windows) before build 41124. |
| CVE-2026-26949 | High | 2026-03-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Device Management Agent (DDMA), versions prior to 26.02, contain an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of Privileges. |
| CVE-2026-22760 | Medium | 2026-03-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Device Management Agent (DDMA), versions prior to 26.02, contain an Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Denial of Service. |
| CVE-2026-22285 | Medium | 2026-03-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Device Management Agent (DDMA), versions prior to 26.02, contain a Plaintext Storage of Password vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Unauthorized Access. |
| CVE-2026-27961 | High | 2026-02-26 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Agenta is an open-source LLMOps platform. A Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI) vulnerability exists in versions prior to 0.86.8 in Agenta's API server evaluator template rendering. Although the vulnerable code lives in the SDK package, it is executed server-side within the API process when running evaluators. This does not affect standalone SDK usage — it only impacts self-hosted or managed Agenta platform deployments. Version 0.86.8 contains a fix for the issue. |
| CVE-2026-27952 | Critical | 2026-02-26 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Agenta is an open-source LLMOps platform. In Agenta-API prior to version 0.48.1, a Python sandbox escape vulnerability existed in Agenta's custom code evaluator. Agenta used RestrictedPython as a sandboxing mechanism for user-supplied evaluator code, but incorrectly whitelisted the `numpy` package as safe within the sandbox. This allowed authenticated users to bypass the sandbox and achieve arbitrary code execution on the API server. The escape path was through `numpy.ma.core.inspect`, which exposes Python's introspection utilities — including `sys.modules` — thereby providing access to unfiltered system-level functionality like `os.system`. This vulnerability affects the Agenta self-hosted platform (API server), not the SDK when used as a standalone Python library. The custom code evaluator runs server-side within the API process. The issue is fixed in v0.48.1 by removing `numpy` from the sandbox allowlist. In later versions (v0.60+), the RestrictedPython sandbox was removed entirely and replaced with a different execution model. |
| CVE-2026-2654 | Low | 2026-02-18 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A weakness has been identified in huggingface smolagents 1.24.0. Impacted is the function requests.get/requests.post of the component LocalPythonExecutor. Executing a manipulation can lead to server-side request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| CVE-2026-2026 | Medium | 2026-02-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability has been identified where weak file permissions in the Nessus Agent directory on Windows hosts could allow unauthorized access, potentially permitting Denial of Service (DoS) attacks. |
| CVE-2026-2099 | Medium | 2026-02-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | AgentFlow developed by Flowring has a Stored Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability, allowing authenticated remote attackers to inject persistent JavaScript codes that are executed in users' browsers upon page load. |
| CVE-2026-2098 | Medium | 2026-02-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | AgentFlow developed by Flowring has a Reflected Cross-site Scripting vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript codes in user's browser through phishing attacks. |
| CVE-2026-2097 | High | 2026-02-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Agentflow developed by Flowring has an Arbitrary File Upload vulnerability, allowing authenticated remote attackers to upload and execute web shell backdoors, thereby enabling arbitrary code execution on the server. |
| CVE-2026-2096 | Critical | 2026-02-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Agentflow developed by Flowring has a Missing Authentication vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to read, modify, and delete database contents by using a specific functionality. |
| CVE-2026-2095 | Critical | 2026-02-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Agentflow developed by Flowring has an Authentication Bypass vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to exploit a specific functionality to obtain arbitrary user authentication token and log into the system as any user. |
| CVE-2025-13818 | High | 2026-02-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Local privilege escalation vulnerability via insecure temporary batch file execution in ESET Management Agent |
| CVE-2026-25523 | Medium | 2026-02-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Magento-lts is a long-term support alternative to Magento Community Edition (CE). Prior to version 20.16.1, the admin url can be discovered without prior knowledge of it's location by exploiting the X-Original-Url header on some configurations. This issue has been patched in version 20.16.1. |
| CVE-2020-36928 | High | 2026-01-16 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Brother BRAgent 1.38 contains an unquoted service path vulnerability in the WBA_Agent_Client service running with LocalSystem privileges. Attackers can exploit the unquoted path in C:\Program Files (x86)\Brother\BRAgent\ to inject and execute malicious code with elevated system permissions. |
| CVE-2026-21224 | High | 2026-01-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Stack-based buffer overflow in Azure Connected Machine Agent allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| CVE-2025-12420 | Critical | 2026-01-12 | Not applicable | Forecast only | A vulnerability has been identified in the ServiceNow AI Platform that could enable an unauthenticated user to impersonate another user and perform the operations that the impersonated user is entitled to perform. ServiceNow has addressed this vulnerability by deploying a relevant security update to hosted instances in October 2025. Security updates have also been provided to ServiceNow self-hosted customers, partners, and hosted customers with unique configurations. Additionally, the vulnerability is addressed in the listed Store App versions. We recommend that customers promptly apply an appropriate security update or upgrade if they have not already done so. |
| CVE-2025-65176 | High | 2025-12-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in Dynatrace OneAgent before 1.325.47. When attempting to access a remote network share from a machine where OneAgent is installed and receiving a "STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE" error, the agent will retrieve every user token on the machine and repeatedly attempt to access the network share while impersonating them. The exploitation of this vulnerability can allow an unprivileged attacker with access to the affected system to perform NTLM relay attacks. |
| CVE-2025-62550 | High | 2025-12-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Out-of-bounds write in Azure Monitor Agent allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network. |
| CVE-2024-47856 | Critical | 2025-11-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In RSA Authentication Agent before 7.4.7, service paths and shortcut paths may be vulnerable to path interception if the path has one or more spaces and is not surrounded by quotation marks. An adversary can place an executable in a higher-level directory of the path, and Windows will resolve that executable instead of the intended executable. |
| CVE-2025-63408 | High | 2025-11-18 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Local Agent DVR versions thru 6.6.1.0 are vulnerable to directory traversal that allows an unauthenticated local attacker to gain access to sensitive information, cause a server-side forgery request (SSRF), or execute OS commands. |