Overview 10 matches · 0 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 0 EPSS ≥ 0.5
10matches
0in Waratek scope0.0%
0protected0.0%
0exploited0.0%
0CISA KEV0.0%
0EPSS ≥ 0.50.0%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
1
10.0%
Not applicable
9
90.0%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
10
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
10
100.0%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
0
0.0%
split by
peak 2 / year
20061
Not applicable1
Low1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20072
Not applicable2
Medium2
not blocked2
Working exploit published2
20082
Not applicable2
High2
not blocked2
Working exploit published2
20090
20101
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20110
20120
20130
20141
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20150
20161
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20170
20180
20191
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20201
Outside Waratek scope1
Critical1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20062008201020122014201620182020
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2014-4650 | Critical | 2020-02-20 | Outside Waratek scope | Working exploit published | The CGIHTTPServer module in Python 2.7.5 and 3.3.4 does not properly handle URLs in which URL encoding is used for path separators, which allows remote attackers to read script source code or conduct directory traversal attacks and execute unintended code via a crafted character sequence, as demonstrated by a %2f separator. |
| CVE-2019-6802 | Medium | 2019-01-25 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | CRLF Injection in pypiserver 1.2.5 and below allows attackers to set arbitrary HTTP headers and possibly conduct XSS attacks via a %0d%0a in a URI. |
| CVE-2016-0772 | Medium | 2016-09-02 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | The smtplib library in CPython (aka Python) before 2.7.12, 3.x before 3.4.5, and 3.5.x before 3.5.2 does not return an error when StartTLS fails, which might allow man-in-the-middle attackers to bypass the TLS protections by leveraging a network position between the client and the registry to block the StartTLS command, aka a "StartTLS stripping attack." |
| CVE-2014-1912 | High | 2014-03-01 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Buffer overflow in the socket.recvfrom_into function in Modules/socketmodule.c in Python 2.5 before 2.7.7, 3.x before 3.3.4, and 3.4.x before 3.4rc1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted string. |
| CVE-2010-2089 | Medium | 2010-05-27 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | The audioop module in Python 2.7 and 3.2 does not verify the relationships between size arguments and byte string lengths, which allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) via crafted arguments, as demonstrated by a call to audioop.reverse with a one-byte string, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-1634. |
| CVE-2008-4864 | High | 2008-11-01 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Multiple integer overflows in imageop.c in the imageop module in Python 1.5.2 through 2.5.1 allow context-dependent attackers to break out of the Python VM and execute arbitrary code via large integer values in certain arguments to the crop function, leading to a buffer overflow, a different vulnerability than CVE-2007-4965 and CVE-2008-1679. |
| CVE-2008-1721 | High | 2008-04-10 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Integer signedness error in the zlib extension module in Python 2.5.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a negative signed integer, which triggers insufficient memory allocation and a buffer overflow. |
| CVE-2007-4965 | Medium | 2007-09-18 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Multiple integer overflows in the imageop module in Python 2.5.1 and earlier allow context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) and possibly obtain sensitive information (memory contents) via crafted arguments to (1) the tovideo method, and unspecified other vectors related to (2) imageop.c, (3) rbgimgmodule.c, and other files, which trigger heap-based buffer overflows. |
| CVE-2007-2052 | Medium | 2007-04-16 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Off-by-one error in the PyLocale_strxfrm function in Modules/_localemodule.c for Python 2.4 and 2.5 causes an incorrect buffer size to be used for the strxfrm function, which allows context-dependent attackers to read portions of memory via unknown manipulations that trigger a buffer over-read due to missing null termination. |
| CVE-2006-1542 | Low | 2006-03-30 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Stack-based buffer overflow in Python 2.4.2 and earlier, running on Linux 2.6.12.5 under gcc 4.0.3 with libc 2.3.5, allows local users to cause a "stack overflow," and possibly gain privileges, by running a script from a current working directory that has a long name, related to the realpath function. NOTE: this might not be a vulnerability. However, the fact that it appears in a programming language interpreter could mean that some applications are affected, although attack scenarios might be limited because the attacker might already need to cross privilege boundaries to cause an exploitable program to be placed in a directory with a long name; or, depending on the method that Python uses to determine the current working directory, setuid applications might be affected. |