Overview 1,343 matches · 0 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 275 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
2
0.1%
Not applicable
1,341
99.9%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
1,343
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
1,343
100.0%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
0
0.0%
split by
peak 153 / year
19951
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
19961
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
19978
Not applicable8
High2
Medium6
not blocked8
Working exploit published8
19985
Not applicable5
High2
Medium2
Low1
not blocked5
Working exploit published5
199956
Not applicable56
High16
Medium33
Low7
not blocked56
Working exploit published56
200051
Not applicable51
High11
Medium33
Low7
not blocked51
Working exploit published51
200146
Not applicable46
High15
Medium24
Low7
not blocked46
Working exploit published46
200254
Not applicable54
High29
Medium23
Low2
not blocked54
Working exploit published54
200341
Not applicable41
High27
Medium14
not blocked41
Working exploit published41
200443
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable42
High22
Medium19
Low2
not blocked43
Working exploit published43
200549
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable48
High24
Medium23
Low2
not blocked49
Working exploit published49
200697
Not applicable97
High39
Medium46
Low12
not blocked97
Working exploit published97
200770
Not applicable70
High44
Medium26
not blocked70
Working exploit published70
200861
Not applicable61
High35
Medium26
not blocked61
Working exploit published61
200932
Not applicable32
High18
Medium14
not blocked32
Working exploit published32
201075
Not applicable75
High60
Medium15
not blocked75
Working exploit published75
201125
Not applicable25
Critical1
High20
Medium4
not blocked25
Working exploit published25
201210
Not applicable10
High7
Medium3
not blocked10
Working exploit published10
201337
Not applicable37
High29
Medium8
not blocked37
Working exploit published37
201469
Not applicable69
High65
Medium4
not blocked69
Working exploit published69
201585
Not applicable85
High65
Medium11
Low9
not blocked85
Working exploit published85
201676
Not applicable76
Critical1
High55
Medium18
Low2
not blocked76
Working exploit published76
2017153
Not applicable153
High67
Medium86
not blocked153
Working exploit published153
201891
Not applicable91
High65
Medium23
Low3
not blocked91
Working exploit published91
201956
Not applicable56
High41
Medium15
not blocked56
Working exploit published56
20205
Not applicable5
Critical1
High4
not blocked5
Working exploit published5
20214
Not applicable4
Critical1
High3
not blocked4
Working exploit published4
20222
Not applicable2
High2
not blocked2
Working exploit published2
202314
Not applicable14
High12
Medium2
not blocked14
Working exploit published14
20244
Not applicable4
Critical1
High2
Medium1
not blocked4
Working exploit published4
202517
Not applicable17
Critical1
High14
Medium2
not blocked17
Working exploit published17
20265
Not applicable5
Critical1
High3
Medium1
not blocked5
Working exploit published5
19961999200220052008201120142017202020232026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-58289 | Critical | 2026-07-03 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Access of resource using incompatible type ('type confusion') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. |
| CVE-2026-33829 | Medium | 2026-04-14 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor in Windows Snipping Tool allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network. |
| CVE-2026-21250 | High | 2026-02-10 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Untrusted pointer dereference in Windows HTTP.sys allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| CVE-2026-21248 | High | 2026-02-10 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Hyper-V allows an authorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| CVE-2026-21244 | High | 2026-02-10 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Hyper-V allows an authorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| CVE-2025-59254 | High | 2025-10-14 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows DWM Core Library allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| CVE-2025-55315 | Critical | 2025-10-14 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Inconsistent interpretation of http requests ('http request/response smuggling') in ASP.NET Core allows an authorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network. |
| CVE-2025-50154 | Medium | 2025-08-12 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor in Windows File Explorer allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network. |
| CVE-2025-49744 | High | 2025-07-08 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Graphics Component allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| CVE-2025-49730 | High | 2025-07-08 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Time-of-check time-of-use (toctou) race condition in Microsoft Windows QoS scheduler allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| CVE-2025-49683 | High | 2025-07-08 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Integer overflow or wraparound in Virtual Hard Disk (VHDX) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| CVE-2025-49677 | High | 2025-07-08 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Use after free in Microsoft Brokering File System allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| CVE-2025-47987 | High | 2025-07-08 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Cred SSProvider Protocol allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| CVE-2025-49741 | High | 2025-07-01 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | No cwe for this issue in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network. |
| CVE-2025-47957 | High | 2025-06-10 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Use after free in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| CVE-2025-47175 | High | 2025-06-10 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Use after free in Microsoft Office PowerPoint allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| CVE-2025-47171 | Medium | 2025-06-10 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Improper input validation in Microsoft Office Outlook allows an authorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| CVE-2025-47166 | High | 2025-06-10 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Deserialization of untrusted data in Microsoft Office SharePoint allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network. |
| CVE-2025-47161 | High | 2025-05-15 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Improper access control in Microsoft Defender for Endpoint allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| CVE-2025-27751 | High | 2025-04-08 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Use after free in Microsoft Office Excel allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| CVE-2025-24076 | High | 2025-03-11 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Improper access control in Windows Cross Device Service allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| CVE-2025-21293 | High | 2025-01-14 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Active Directory Domain Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability |
| CVE-2024-38200 | Critical | 2024-08-12 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Microsoft Office Spoofing Vulnerability |
| CVE-2024-30085 | High | 2024-06-11 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Windows Cloud Files Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability |
| CVE-2024-30038 | High | 2024-05-14 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability |
| CVE-2024-21320 | Medium | 2024-01-09 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Windows Themes Spoofing Vulnerability |
| CVE-2023-38146 | High | 2023-09-12 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Windows Themes Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| CVE-2023-33148 | High | 2023-07-11 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Microsoft Office Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability |
| CVE-2023-33145 | Medium | 2023-06-14 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) Information Disclosure Vulnerability |
| CVE-2023-33137 | High | 2023-06-14 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| CVE-2023-33131 | High | 2023-06-14 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Microsoft Outlook Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| CVE-2023-28311 | High | 2023-04-11 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Microsoft Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| CVE-2023-28293 | High | 2023-04-11 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability |
| CVE-2023-28288 | High | 2023-04-11 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing Vulnerability |
| CVE-2023-28285 | High | 2023-04-11 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| CVE-2023-24892 | High | 2023-03-14 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) Webview2 Spoofing Vulnerability |
| CVE-2023-23408 | Medium | 2023-03-14 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Azure Apache Ambari Spoofing Vulnerability |
| CVE-2023-23399 | High | 2023-03-14 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| CVE-2022-4510 | High | 2023-01-26 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | A path traversal vulnerability was identified in ReFirm Labs binwalk from version 2.1.2b through 2.3.3 included. By crafting a malicious PFS filesystem file, an attacker can get binwalk's PFS extractor to extract files at arbitrary locations when binwalk is run in extraction mode (-e option). Remote code execution can be achieved by building a PFS filesystem that, upon extraction, would extract a malicious binwalk module into the folder .config/binwalk/plugins. This vulnerability is associated with program files src/binwalk/plugins/unpfs.py. This issue affects binwalk from 2.1.2b through 2.3.3 included. |
| CVE-2023-21752 | High | 2023-01-10 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Windows Backup Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability |
| CVE-2022-41034 | High | 2022-10-11 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Visual Studio Code Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| CVE-2022-23277 | High | 2022-03-09 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Microsoft Exchange Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| CVE-2021-31950 | High | 2021-06-08 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing Vulnerability |
| CVE-2021-31195 | High | 2021-05-11 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Microsoft Exchange Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| CVE-2021-31181 | High | 2021-05-11 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Microsoft SharePoint Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| CVE-2021-28480 | Critical | 2021-04-13 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Microsoft Exchange Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| CVE-2020-17136 | High | 2020-12-10 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Windows Cloud Files Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability |
| CVE-2020-17132 | Critical | 2020-12-10 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Microsoft Exchange Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| CVE-2020-16952 | High | 2020-10-16 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | <p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Microsoft SharePoint when the software fails to check the source markup of an application package. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could run arbitrary code in the context of the SharePoint application pool and the SharePoint server farm account.</p> <p>Exploitation of this vulnerability requires that a user uploads a specially crafted SharePoint application package to an affected version of SharePoint.</p> <p>The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how SharePoint checks the source markup of application packages.</p> |
| CVE-2020-1313 | High | 2020-06-09 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Update Orchestrator Service improperly handles file operations, aka 'Windows Update Orchestrator Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. |
| CVE-2020-0668 | High | 2020-02-11 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the Windows Kernel handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-0669, CVE-2020-0670, CVE-2020-0671, CVE-2020-0672. |
| CVE-2019-1476 | High | 2019-12-10 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Windows AppX Deployment Service (AppXSVC) improperly handles hard links, aka 'Windows Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-1483. |
| CVE-2019-1364 | High | 2019-10-10 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Windows kernel-mode driver fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka 'Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-1362. |
| CVE-2019-1347 | Medium | 2019-10-10 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | A denial of service vulnerability exists when Windows improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Denial of Service Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-1343, CVE-2019-1346. |
| CVE-2019-1346 | Medium | 2019-10-10 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | A denial of service vulnerability exists when Windows improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Denial of Service Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-1343, CVE-2019-1347. |
| CVE-2019-1345 | Medium | 2019-10-10 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the Windows kernel improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-1334. |
| CVE-2019-1344 | Medium | 2019-10-10 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the way that the Windows Code Integrity Module handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Code Integrity Module Information Disclosure Vulnerability'. |
| CVE-2019-1343 | Medium | 2019-10-10 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | A denial of service vulnerability exists when Windows improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Denial of Service Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-1346, CVE-2019-1347. |
| CVE-2019-1262 | Medium | 2019-09-11 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | A cross-site-scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists when Microsoft SharePoint Server does not properly sanitize a specially crafted web request to an affected SharePoint server, aka 'Microsoft Office SharePoint XSS Vulnerability'. |
| CVE-2019-1245 | Medium | 2019-09-11 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | An information disclosure vulnerability exists when DirectWrite improperly discloses the contents of its memory, aka 'DirectWrite Information Disclosure Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-1244, CVE-2019-1251. |
| CVE-2019-1244 | Medium | 2019-09-11 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | An information disclosure vulnerability exists when DirectWrite improperly discloses the contents of its memory, aka 'DirectWrite Information Disclosure Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-1245, CVE-2019-1251. |
| CVE-2019-1125 | Medium | 2019-09-03 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | An information disclosure vulnerability exists when certain central processing units (CPU) speculatively access memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could read privileged data across trust boundaries. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would have to log on to an affected system and run a specially crafted application. The vulnerability would not allow an attacker to elevate user rights directly, but it could be used to obtain information that could be used to try to compromise the affected system further. On January 3, 2018, Microsoft released an advisory and security updates related to a newly-discovered class of hardware vulnerabilities (known as Spectre) involving speculative execution side channels that affect AMD, ARM, and Intel CPUs to varying degrees. This vulnerability, released on August 6, 2019, is a variant of the Spectre Variant 1 speculative execution side channel vulnerability and has been assigned CVE-2019-1125. Microsoft released a security update on July 9, 2019 that addresses the vulnerability through a software change that mitigates how the CPU speculatively accesses memory. Note that this vulnerability does not require a microcode update from your device OEM. |
| CVE-2019-1184 | Medium | 2019-08-14 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Windows Core Shell COM Server Registrar improperly handles COM calls. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could potentially set certain items to run at a higher level and thereby elevate permissions. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to log on to the system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application that could exploit the vulnerability and take control of an affected system. The update addresses this vulnerability by correcting unprotected COM calls. |
| CVE-2019-1170 | High | 2019-08-14 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when reparse points are created by sandboxed processes allowing sandbox escape. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could use the sandbox escape to elevate privileges on an affected system. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker would first have to log on to the system, and then run a specially crafted application to take control over the affected system. The security update addresses the vulnerability by preventing sandboxed processes from creating reparse points targeting inaccessible files. |
| CVE-2019-1153 | Medium | 2019-08-14 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the Microsoft Windows Graphics Component improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could obtain information to further compromise the user’s system. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would have to log on to an affected system and run a specially crafted application. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting the way in which the Windows Graphics Component handles objects in memory. |
| CVE-2019-1152 | High | 2019-08-14 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows font library improperly handles specially crafted embedded fonts. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of the affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. Users whose accounts are configured to have fewer user rights on the system could be less impacted than users who operate with administrative user rights. There are multiple ways an attacker could exploit the vulnerability: In a web-based attack scenario, an attacker could host a specially crafted website that is designed to exploit the vulnerability and then convince users to view the website. An attacker would have no way to force users to view the attacker-controlled content. Instead, an attacker would have to convince users to take action, typically by getting them to click a link in an email or instant message that takes users to the attacker's website, or by opening an attachment sent through email. In a file-sharing attack scenario, an attacker could provide a specially crafted document file designed to exploit the vulnerability and then convince users to open the document file. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows font library handles embedded fonts. |
| CVE-2019-1151 | High | 2019-08-14 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows font library improperly handles specially crafted embedded fonts. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of the affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. Users whose accounts are configured to have fewer user rights on the system could be less impacted than users who operate with administrative user rights. There are multiple ways an attacker could exploit the vulnerability: In a web-based attack scenario, an attacker could host a specially crafted website that is designed to exploit the vulnerability and then convince users to view the website. An attacker would have no way to force users to view the attacker-controlled content. Instead, an attacker would have to convince users to take action, typically by getting them to click a link in an email or instant message that takes users to the attacker's website, or by opening an attachment sent through email. In a file-sharing attack scenario, an attacker could provide a specially crafted document file designed to exploit the vulnerability and then convince users to open the document file. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows font library handles embedded fonts. |
| CVE-2019-1150 | High | 2019-08-14 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows font library improperly handles specially crafted embedded fonts. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of the affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. Users whose accounts are configured to have fewer user rights on the system could be less impacted than users who operate with administrative user rights. There are multiple ways an attacker could exploit the vulnerability: In a web-based attack scenario, an attacker could host a specially crafted website that is designed to exploit the vulnerability and then convince users to view the website. An attacker would have no way to force users to view the attacker-controlled content. Instead, an attacker would have to convince users to take action, typically by getting them to click a link in an email or instant message that takes users to the attacker's website, or by opening an attachment sent through email. In a file-sharing attack scenario, an attacker could provide a specially crafted document file designed to exploit the vulnerability and then convince users to open the document file. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows font library handles embedded fonts. |
| CVE-2019-1149 | High | 2019-08-14 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows font library improperly handles specially crafted embedded fonts. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of the affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. Users whose accounts are configured to have fewer user rights on the system could be less impacted than users who operate with administrative user rights. There are multiple ways an attacker could exploit the vulnerability: In a web-based attack scenario, an attacker could host a specially crafted website that is designed to exploit the vulnerability and then convince users to view the website. An attacker would have no way to force users to view the attacker-controlled content. Instead, an attacker would have to convince users to take action, typically by getting them to click a link in an email or instant message that takes users to the attacker's website, or by opening an attachment sent through email. In a file-sharing attack scenario, an attacker could provide a specially crafted document file designed to exploit the vulnerability and then convince users to open the document file. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows font library handles embedded fonts. |
| CVE-2019-1148 | Medium | 2019-08-14 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the Microsoft Windows Graphics Component improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could obtain information to further compromise the user’s system. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would have to log on to an affected system and run a specially crafted application. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting the way in which the Windows Graphics Component handles objects in memory. |
| CVE-2019-1145 | High | 2019-08-14 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows font library improperly handles specially crafted embedded fonts. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of the affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. Users whose accounts are configured to have fewer user rights on the system could be less impacted than users who operate with administrative user rights. There are multiple ways an attacker could exploit the vulnerability: In a web-based attack scenario, an attacker could host a specially crafted website that is designed to exploit the vulnerability and then convince users to view the website. An attacker would have no way to force users to view the attacker-controlled content. Instead, an attacker would have to convince users to take action, typically by getting them to click a link in an email or instant message that takes users to the attacker's website, or by opening an attachment sent through email. In a file-sharing attack scenario, an attacker could provide a specially crafted document file designed to exploit the vulnerability and then convince users to open the document file. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows font library handles embedded fonts. |
| CVE-2019-1144 | High | 2019-08-14 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows font library improperly handles specially crafted embedded fonts. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of the affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. Users whose accounts are configured to have fewer user rights on the system could be less impacted than users who operate with administrative user rights. There are multiple ways an attacker could exploit the vulnerability: In a web-based attack scenario, an attacker could host a specially crafted website that is designed to exploit the vulnerability and then convince users to view the website. An attacker would have no way to force users to view the attacker-controlled content. Instead, an attacker would have to convince users to take action, typically by getting them to click a link in an email or instant message that takes users to the attacker's website, or by opening an attachment sent through email. In a file-sharing attack scenario, an attacker could provide a specially crafted document file designed to exploit the vulnerability and then convince users to open the document file. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows font library handles embedded fonts. |
| CVE-2019-1128 | High | 2019-07-15 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that DirectWrite handles objects in memory, aka 'DirectWrite Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-1117, CVE-2019-1118, CVE-2019-1119, CVE-2019-1120, CVE-2019-1121, CVE-2019-1122, CVE-2019-1123, CVE-2019-1124, CVE-2019-1127. |
| CVE-2019-1127 | High | 2019-07-15 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that DirectWrite handles objects in memory, aka 'DirectWrite Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-1117, CVE-2019-1118, CVE-2019-1119, CVE-2019-1120, CVE-2019-1121, CVE-2019-1122, CVE-2019-1123, CVE-2019-1124, CVE-2019-1128. |
| CVE-2019-1124 | High | 2019-07-15 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that DirectWrite handles objects in memory, aka 'DirectWrite Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-1117, CVE-2019-1118, CVE-2019-1119, CVE-2019-1120, CVE-2019-1121, CVE-2019-1122, CVE-2019-1123, CVE-2019-1127, CVE-2019-1128. |
| CVE-2019-1123 | High | 2019-07-15 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that DirectWrite handles objects in memory, aka 'DirectWrite Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-1117, CVE-2019-1118, CVE-2019-1119, CVE-2019-1120, CVE-2019-1121, CVE-2019-1122, CVE-2019-1124, CVE-2019-1127, CVE-2019-1128. |
| CVE-2019-1122 | High | 2019-07-15 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that DirectWrite handles objects in memory, aka 'DirectWrite Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-1117, CVE-2019-1118, CVE-2019-1119, CVE-2019-1120, CVE-2019-1121, CVE-2019-1123, CVE-2019-1124, CVE-2019-1127, CVE-2019-1128. |
| CVE-2019-1121 | High | 2019-07-15 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that DirectWrite handles objects in memory, aka 'DirectWrite Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-1117, CVE-2019-1118, CVE-2019-1119, CVE-2019-1120, CVE-2019-1122, CVE-2019-1123, CVE-2019-1124, CVE-2019-1127, CVE-2019-1128. |
| CVE-2019-1120 | High | 2019-07-15 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that DirectWrite handles objects in memory, aka 'DirectWrite Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-1117, CVE-2019-1118, CVE-2019-1119, CVE-2019-1121, CVE-2019-1122, CVE-2019-1123, CVE-2019-1124, CVE-2019-1127, CVE-2019-1128. |
| CVE-2019-1119 | High | 2019-07-15 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that DirectWrite handles objects in memory, aka 'DirectWrite Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-1117, CVE-2019-1118, CVE-2019-1120, CVE-2019-1121, CVE-2019-1122, CVE-2019-1123, CVE-2019-1124, CVE-2019-1127, CVE-2019-1128. |
| CVE-2019-1118 | High | 2019-07-15 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that DirectWrite handles objects in memory, aka 'DirectWrite Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-1117, CVE-2019-1119, CVE-2019-1120, CVE-2019-1121, CVE-2019-1122, CVE-2019-1123, CVE-2019-1124, CVE-2019-1127, CVE-2019-1128. |
| CVE-2019-1117 | High | 2019-07-15 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that DirectWrite handles objects in memory, aka 'DirectWrite Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-1118, CVE-2019-1119, CVE-2019-1120, CVE-2019-1121, CVE-2019-1122, CVE-2019-1123, CVE-2019-1124, CVE-2019-1127, CVE-2019-1128. |
| CVE-2019-1089 | High | 2019-07-15 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in rpcss.dll when the RPC service Activation Kernel improperly handles an RPC request. To exploit this vulnerability, a low level authenticated attacker could run a specially crafted application. The security update addresses this vulnerability by correcting how rpcss.dll handles these requests., aka 'Windows RPCSS Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. |
| CVE-2019-1019 | High | 2019-06-12 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | A security feature bypass vulnerability exists where a NETLOGON message is able to obtain the session key and sign messages. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker could send a specially crafted authentication request. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could access another machine using the original user privileges. The issue has been addressed by changing how NTLM validates network authentication messages. |
| CVE-2019-0959 | High | 2019-06-12 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Common Log File System (CLFS) driver improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run processes in an elevated context. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker would first have to log on to the system, and then run a specially crafted application to take control over the affected system. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how CLFS handles objects in memory. |
| CVE-2019-0943 | High | 2019-06-12 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Windows improperly handles calls to Advanced Local Procedure Call (ALPC). An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code in the security context of the local system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to log on to the system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application that could exploit the vulnerability and take control over an affected system. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Windows handles calls to ALPC. |
| CVE-2019-0881 | High | 2019-05-16 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Kernel improperly handles key enumeration, aka 'Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. |
| CVE-2019-0836 | High | 2019-04-09 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Windows improperly handles calls to the LUAFV driver (luafv.sys), aka 'Windows Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0730, CVE-2019-0731, CVE-2019-0796, CVE-2019-0805, CVE-2019-0841. |
| CVE-2019-0805 | High | 2019-04-09 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Windows improperly handles calls to the LUAFV driver (luafv.sys), aka 'Windows Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0730, CVE-2019-0731, CVE-2019-0796, CVE-2019-0836, CVE-2019-0841. |
| CVE-2019-0796 | Medium | 2019-04-09 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Windows improperly handles calls to the LUAFV driver (luafv.sys), aka 'Windows Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0730, CVE-2019-0731, CVE-2019-0805, CVE-2019-0836, CVE-2019-0841. |
| CVE-2019-0768 | Medium | 2019-04-09 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | A security feature bypass vulnerability exists when Internet Explorer VBScript execution policy does not properly restrict VBScript under specific conditions, and to allow requests that should otherwise be ignored, aka 'Internet Explorer Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0761. |
| CVE-2019-0735 | High | 2019-04-09 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Client Server Run-Time Subsystem (CSRSS) fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka 'Windows CSRSS Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. |
| CVE-2019-0732 | High | 2019-04-09 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | A security feature bypass vulnerability exists in Windows which could allow an attacker to bypass Device Guard when Windows improperly handles calls to the LUAFV driver (luafv.sys), aka 'Windows Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability'. |
| CVE-2019-0731 | High | 2019-04-09 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Windows improperly handles calls to the LUAFV driver (luafv.sys), aka 'Windows Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0730, CVE-2019-0796, CVE-2019-0805, CVE-2019-0836, CVE-2019-0841. |
| CVE-2019-0730 | High | 2019-04-09 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Windows improperly handles calls to the LUAFV driver (luafv.sys), aka 'Windows Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0731, CVE-2019-0796, CVE-2019-0805, CVE-2019-0836, CVE-2019-0841. |
| CVE-2019-0612 | Medium | 2019-04-08 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | A security feature bypass vulnerability exists when Click2Play protection in Microsoft Edge improperly handles flash objects. By itself, this bypass vulnerability does not allow arbitrary code execution, aka 'Microsoft Edge Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability'. |
| CVE-2019-0574 | High | 2019-01-08 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Data Sharing Service improperly handles file operations, aka "Windows Data Sharing Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability." This affects Windows Server 2016, Windows 10, Windows Server 2019, Windows 10 Servers. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0571, CVE-2019-0572, CVE-2019-0573. |
| CVE-2019-0573 | High | 2019-01-08 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Data Sharing Service improperly handles file operations, aka "Windows Data Sharing Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability." This affects Windows Server 2016, Windows 10, Windows Server 2019, Windows 10 Servers. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0571, CVE-2019-0572, CVE-2019-0574. |
| CVE-2019-0572 | High | 2019-01-08 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Data Sharing Service improperly handles file operations, aka "Windows Data Sharing Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability." This affects Windows Server 2016, Windows 10, Windows Server 2019, Windows 10 Servers. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0571, CVE-2019-0573, CVE-2019-0574. |
| CVE-2019-0571 | High | 2019-01-08 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Data Sharing Service improperly handles file operations, aka "Windows Data Sharing Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability." This affects Windows Server 2016, Windows 10, Windows Server 2019, Windows 10 Servers. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0572, CVE-2019-0573, CVE-2019-0574. |