Overview 13 matches · 0 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 0 EPSS ≥ 0.5
13matches
0in Waratek scope0.0%
0protected0.0%
0exploited0.0%
0CISA KEV0.0%
0EPSS ≥ 0.50.0%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
1
7.7%
Not applicable
12
92.3%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
13
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
13
100.0%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
0
0.0%
split by
peak 3 / year
20061
Not applicable1
Low1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20073
Not applicable3
High1
Medium2
not blocked3
Working exploit published3
20082
Not applicable2
High2
not blocked2
Working exploit published2
20090
20101
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20110
20121
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20130
20141
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20150
20161
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20170
20180
20190
20202
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable1
Critical1
Medium1
not blocked2
Working exploit published2
20210
20220
20230
20240
20250
20261
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20062008201020122014201620182020202220242026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-24486 | High | 2026-01-27 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Python-Multipart is a streaming multipart parser for Python. Prior to version 0.0.22, a Path Traversal vulnerability exists when using non-default configuration options `UPLOAD_DIR` and `UPLOAD_KEEP_FILENAME=True`. An attacker can write uploaded files to arbitrary locations on the filesystem by crafting a malicious filename. Users should upgrade to version 0.0.22 to receive a patch or, as a workaround, avoid using `UPLOAD_KEEP_FILENAME=True` in project configurations. |
| CVE-2020-13258 | Medium | 2020-05-21 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Contentful through 2020-05-21 for Python allows reflected XSS, as demonstrated by the api parameter to the-example-app.py. |
| CVE-2014-4650 | Critical | 2020-02-20 | Outside Waratek scope | Working exploit published | The CGIHTTPServer module in Python 2.7.5 and 3.3.4 does not properly handle URLs in which URL encoding is used for path separators, which allows remote attackers to read script source code or conduct directory traversal attacks and execute unintended code via a crafted character sequence, as demonstrated by a %2f separator. |
| CVE-2016-0772 | Medium | 2016-09-02 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | The smtplib library in CPython (aka Python) before 2.7.12, 3.x before 3.4.5, and 3.5.x before 3.5.2 does not return an error when StartTLS fails, which might allow man-in-the-middle attackers to bypass the TLS protections by leveraging a network position between the client and the registry to block the StartTLS command, aka a "StartTLS stripping attack." |
| CVE-2014-1912 | High | 2014-03-01 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Buffer overflow in the socket.recvfrom_into function in Modules/socketmodule.c in Python 2.5 before 2.7.7, 3.x before 3.3.4, and 3.4.x before 3.4rc1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted string. |
| CVE-2012-5379 | High | 2012-10-11 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Untrusted search path vulnerability in the installation functionality in ActivePython 3.2.2.3, when installed in the top-level C:\ directory, might allow local users to gain privileges via a Trojan horse DLL in the C:\Python27 or C:\Python27\Scripts directory, which may be added to the PATH system environment variable by an administrator, as demonstrated by a Trojan horse wlbsctrl.dll file used by the "IKE and AuthIP IPsec Keying Modules" system service in Windows Vista SP1, Windows Server 2008 SP2, Windows 7 SP1, and Windows 8 Release Preview. NOTE: CVE disputes this issue because the unsafe PATH is established only by a separate administrative action that is not a default part of the ActivePython installation |
| CVE-2010-2089 | Medium | 2010-05-27 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | The audioop module in Python 2.7 and 3.2 does not verify the relationships between size arguments and byte string lengths, which allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) via crafted arguments, as demonstrated by a call to audioop.reverse with a one-byte string, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-1634. |
| CVE-2008-4864 | High | 2008-11-01 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Multiple integer overflows in imageop.c in the imageop module in Python 1.5.2 through 2.5.1 allow context-dependent attackers to break out of the Python VM and execute arbitrary code via large integer values in certain arguments to the crop function, leading to a buffer overflow, a different vulnerability than CVE-2007-4965 and CVE-2008-1679. |
| CVE-2008-1721 | High | 2008-04-10 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Integer signedness error in the zlib extension module in Python 2.5.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a negative signed integer, which triggers insufficient memory allocation and a buffer overflow. |
| CVE-2007-4965 | Medium | 2007-09-18 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Multiple integer overflows in the imageop module in Python 2.5.1 and earlier allow context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) and possibly obtain sensitive information (memory contents) via crafted arguments to (1) the tovideo method, and unspecified other vectors related to (2) imageop.c, (3) rbgimgmodule.c, and other files, which trigger heap-based buffer overflows. |
| CVE-2007-2052 | Medium | 2007-04-16 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Off-by-one error in the PyLocale_strxfrm function in Modules/_localemodule.c for Python 2.4 and 2.5 causes an incorrect buffer size to be used for the strxfrm function, which allows context-dependent attackers to read portions of memory via unknown manipulations that trigger a buffer over-read due to missing null termination. |
| CVE-2007-1657 | High | 2007-03-24 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Stack-based buffer overflow in the file_compress function in minigzip (Modules/zlib) in Python 2.5 allows context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long file argument. |
| CVE-2006-1542 | Low | 2006-03-30 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Stack-based buffer overflow in Python 2.4.2 and earlier, running on Linux 2.6.12.5 under gcc 4.0.3 with libc 2.3.5, allows local users to cause a "stack overflow," and possibly gain privileges, by running a script from a current working directory that has a long name, related to the realpath function. NOTE: this might not be a vulnerability. However, the fact that it appears in a programming language interpreter could mean that some applications are affected, although attack scenarios might be limited because the attacker might already need to cross privilege boundaries to cause an exploitable program to be placed in a directory with a long name; or, depending on the method that Python uses to determine the current working directory, setuid applications might be affected. |