Overview 105 matches · 16 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 26 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
16
15.2%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
89
84.8%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
16
15.2%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
89
84.8%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
105
100.0%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
0
0.0%
split by
peak 16 / year
20006
Mitigation candidate6
High2
Medium4
not blocked6
Working exploit published6
20012
Mitigation candidate2
Medium2
not blocked2
Working exploit published2
20028
Mitigation candidate8
High2
Medium6
not blocked8
Working exploit published8
20038
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate7
High2
Medium5
Low1
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked7
Working exploit published8
20041
Mitigation candidate1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20055
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate4
Medium5
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked4
Working exploit published5
20065
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate4
Medium5
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked4
Working exploit published5
200711
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate10
High1
Medium9
Low1
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked10
Working exploit published11
200812
Protected by Waratek3
Mitigation candidate9
High1
Medium11
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked9
Working exploit published12
200916
Protected by Waratek4
Mitigation candidate12
High4
Medium11
Low1
blocked by ARMR today4
not blocked12
Working exploit published16
201014
Protected by Waratek3
Mitigation candidate11
High1
Medium11
Low2
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked11
Working exploit published14
201111
Protected by Waratek2
Mitigation candidate9
High5
Medium4
Low2
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked9
Working exploit published11
20126
Mitigation candidate6
Medium6
not blocked6
Working exploit published6
2000200220042006200820102012
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2000-0759 | Medium | 2000-10-20 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Jakarta Tomcat 3.1 under Apache reveals physical path information when a remote attacker requests a URL that does not exist, which generates an error message that includes the physical path. |
| CVE-2000-0685 | High | 2000-10-20 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | BEA WebLogic 5.1.x does not properly restrict access to the PageCompileServlet, which could allow remote attackers to compile and execute Java JHTML code by directly invoking the servlet on any source file. |
| CVE-2000-0684 | High | 2000-10-20 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | BEA WebLogic 5.1.x does not properly restrict access to the JSPServlet, which could allow remote attackers to compile and execute Java JSP code by directly invoking the servlet on any source file. |
| CVE-2000-0652 | Medium | 2000-07-24 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | IBM WebSphere allows remote attackers to read source code for executable web files by directly calling the default InvokerServlet using a URL which contains the "/servlet/file" string. |
| CVE-2000-0500 | Medium | 2000-06-21 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | The default configuration of BEA WebLogic 5.1.0 allows a remote attacker to view source code of programs by requesting a URL beginning with /file/, which causes the default servlet to display the file without further processing. |