Overview 3 matches · 1 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 0 public PoC · 0 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
1
33.3%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
2
66.7%
blocked by ARMR today
1
33.3%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
2
66.7%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
3
100.0%
split by
peak 1 / quarter
Q4 14Q2 15Q4 15Q2 16Q4 16Q2 17Q4 17
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2015-0226 | High | 2017-10-30 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Apache WSS4J before 1.6.17 and 2.0.x before 2.0.2 improperly leaks information about decryption failures when decrypting an encrypted key or message data, which makes it easier for remote attackers to recover the plaintext form of a symmetric key via a series of crafted messages. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2011-2487. |
| CVE-2015-0227 | Medium | 2015-02-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache WSS4J before 1.6.17 and 2.x before 2.0.2 allows remote attackers to bypass the requireSignedEncryptedDataElements configuration via a vectors related to "wrapping attacks." |
| CVE-2014-3623 | Medium | 2014-10-30 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache WSS4J before 1.6.17 and 2.x before 2.0.2, as used in Apache CXF 2.7.x before 2.7.13 and 3.0.x before 3.0.2, when using TransportBinding, does not properly enforce the SAML SubjectConfirmation method security semantics, which allows remote attackers to conduct spoofing attacks via unspecified vectors. |