Overview 19 matches · 0 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 0 public PoC · 0 EPSS ≥ 0.5
19matches
0protected0.0%
0exploited0.0%
0CISA KEV0.0%
0public PoC0.0%
0EPSS ≥ 0.50.0%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
19
100.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
19
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
19
100.0%
split by
peak 5 / year
20111
No exploit published1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20120
20130
20140
20150
20160
20170
20181
No exploit published1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20192
No exploit published2
Critical1
High1
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20203
No exploit published3
Critical1
High1
Medium1
not blocked3
No public exploit3
20215
No exploit published5
High4
Medium1
not blocked5
No public exploit5
20221
No exploit published1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20231
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20240
20255
No exploit published5
Medium5
not blocked5
No public exploit5
20112013201520172019202120232025
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-62244 | Medium | 2025-10-13 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Insecure direct object reference (IDOR) vulnerability in Publications in Liferay Portal 7.3.1 through 7.4.3.111, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.5, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.8, and 7.4 GA through update 92, and 7.3 GA through update 36 allows remote authenticated attackers to view the edit page of a publication via the _com_liferay_change_tracking_web_portlet_PublicationsPortlet_ctCollectionId parameter. |
| CVE-2025-62243 | Medium | 2025-10-13 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Insecure direct object reference (IDOR) vulnerability in Publications in Liferay Portal 7.4.1 through 7.4.3.112, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.5, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.8, and 7.4 GA through update 92 allows remote authenticated attackers to view publication comments via the _com_liferay_change_tracking_web_portlet_PublicationsPortlet_value parameter. Publications comments in Liferay Portal 7.4.1 through 7.4.3.112, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.5, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.8, and 7.4 GA through update 92 does not properly check user permissions, which allows remote authenticated users to edit publication comments via crafted URLs. |
| CVE-2025-62242 | Medium | 2025-10-13 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability with account addresses in Liferay Portal 7.4.3.4 through 7.4.3.111, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.5, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.8, and 7.4 GA through update 92 allows remote authenticated users to from one account to view addresses from a different account via the _com_liferay_account_admin_web_internal_portlet_AccountEntriesAdminPortlet_addressId parameter. |
| CVE-2025-62245 | Medium | 2025-10-10 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Liferay Portal 7.4.1 through 7.4.3.112, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.5, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.10, and 7.4 GA through update 92 allows remote attackers to add and edit publication comments. |
| CVE-2025-43807 | Medium | 2025-09-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the notifications widget in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.112, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.8, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.10, and 7.4 GA through update 92 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted payload injected into a publication’s “Name” text field. |
| CVE-2023-50730 | High | 2023-12-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Grackle is a GraphQL server written in functional Scala, built on the Typelevel stack. The GraphQL specification requires that GraphQL fragments must not form cycles, either directly or indirectly. Prior to Grackle version 0.18.0, that requirement wasn't checked, and queries with cyclic fragments would have been accepted for type checking and compilation. The attempted compilation of such fragments would result in a JVM `StackOverflowError` being thrown. Some knowledge of an applications GraphQL schema would be required to construct such a query, however no knowledge of any application-specific performance or other behavioural characteristics would be needed. Grackle uses the cats-parse library for parsing GraphQL queries. Prior to version 0.18.0, Grackle made use of the cats-parse `recursive` operator. However, `recursive` is not currently stack safe. `recursive` was used in three places in the parser: nested selection sets, nested input values (lists and objects), and nested list type declarations. Consequently, queries with deeply nested selection sets, input values or list types could be constructed which exploited this, causing a JVM `StackOverflowException` to be thrown during parsing. Because this happens very early in query processing, no specific knowledge of an applications GraphQL schema would be required to construct such a query. The possibility of small queries resulting in stack overflow is a potential denial of service vulnerability. This potentially affects all applications using Grackle which have untrusted users. Both stack overflow issues have been resolved in the v0.18.0 release of Grackle. As a workaround, users could interpose a sanitizing layer in between untrusted input and Grackle query processing. |
| CVE-2022-34192 | Medium | 2022-06-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins ontrack Jenkins Plugin 4.0.0 and earlier does not escape the name of Ontrack: Multi Parameter choice, Ontrack: Parameter choice, and Ontrack: SingleParameter parameters on views displaying parameters, resulting in a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exploitable by attackers with Item/Configure permission. |
| CVE-2021-2351 | High | 2021-07-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Advanced Networking Option component of Oracle Database Server. Supported versions that are affected are 12.1.0.2, 12.2.0.1 and 19c. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via Oracle Net to compromise Advanced Networking Option. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Advanced Networking Option, attacks may significantly impact additional products. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Advanced Networking Option. Note: The July 2021 Critical Patch Update introduces a number of Native Network Encryption changes to deal with vulnerability CVE-2021-2351 and prevent the use of weaker ciphers. Customers should review: "Changes in Native Network Encryption with the July 2021 Critical Patch Update" (Doc ID 2791571.1). CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.3 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2021-22222 | High | 2021-06-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Infinite loop in DVB-S2-BB dissector in Wireshark 3.4.0 to 3.4.5 allows denial of service via packet injection or crafted capture file |
| CVE-2021-21633 | High | 2021-03-30 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins OWASP Dependency-Track Plugin 3.1.0 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL, capturing credentials stored in Jenkins. |
| CVE-2021-21632 | Medium | 2021-03-30 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A missing permission check in Jenkins OWASP Dependency-Track Plugin 3.1.0 and earlier allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to connect to an attacker-specified URL, capturing credentials stored in Jenkins. |
| CVE-2020-11987 | High | 2021-02-24 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Batik 1.13 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery, caused by improper input validation by the NodePickerPanel. By using a specially-crafted argument, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause the underlying server to make arbitrary GET requests. |
| CVE-2020-17527 | High | 2020-12-03 | No exploit published | No public exploit | While investigating bug 64830 it was discovered that Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M9, 9.0.0-M1 to 9.0.39 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.59 could re-use an HTTP request header value from the previous stream received on an HTTP/2 connection for the request associated with the subsequent stream. While this would most likely lead to an error and the closure of the HTTP/2 connection, it is possible that information could leak between requests. |
| CVE-2020-1935 | Medium | 2020-02-24 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.30, 8.5.0 to 8.5.50 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.99 the HTTP header parsing code used an approach to end-of-line parsing that allowed some invalid HTTP headers to be parsed as valid. This led to a possibility of HTTP Request Smuggling if Tomcat was located behind a reverse proxy that incorrectly handled the invalid Transfer-Encoding header in a particular manner. Such a reverse proxy is considered unlikely. |
| CVE-2019-0219 | Critical | 2020-01-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A website running in the InAppBrowser webview on Android could execute arbitrary JavaScript in the main application's webview using a specially crafted gap-iab: URI. |
| CVE-2019-10306 | Critical | 2019-04-18 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A sandbox bypass vulnerability in Jenkins ontrack Plugin 3.4 and earlier allowed attackers with control over ontrack DSL definitions to execute arbitrary code on the Jenkins master JVM. |
| CVE-2019-10287 | High | 2019-04-04 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins youtrack-plugin Plugin 0.7.1 and older stored credentials unencrypted in its global configuration file on the Jenkins master where they could be viewed by users with access to the master file system. |
| CVE-2018-8032 | Medium | 2018-08-02 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Axis 1.x up to and including 1.4 is vulnerable to a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack in the default servlet/services. |
| CVE-2011-5036 | Medium | 2011-12-30 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Rack before 1.1.3, 1.2.x before 1.2.5, and 1.3.x before 1.3.6 computes hash values for form parameters without restricting the ability to trigger hash collisions predictably, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) by sending many crafted parameters. |