Medium Dingding CVEs with no public exploit
3 CVEs
Overview 3 matches · 0 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 0 public PoC · 0 EPSS ≥ 0.5
3matches
0protected0.0%
0exploited0.0%
0CISA KEV0.0%
0public PoC0.0%
0EPSS ≥ 0.50.0%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
3
100.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
3
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
3
100.0%
split by
peak 2 / month
Jan 24Mar 24May 24Jul 24Sep 24Nov 24Jan 25Mar 25May 25
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-47888 | Medium | 2025-05-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins DingTalk Plugin 2.7.3 and earlier unconditionally disables SSL/TLS certificate and hostname validation for connections to the configured DingTalk webhooks. |
| CVE-2023-50773 | Medium | 2023-12-13 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Dingding JSON Pusher Plugin 2.0 and earlier does not mask access tokens displayed on the job configuration form, increasing the potential for attackers to observe and capture them. |
| CVE-2023-50772 | Medium | 2023-12-13 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Dingding JSON Pusher Plugin 2.0 and earlier stores access tokens unencrypted in job config.xml files on the Jenkins controller where they can be viewed by users with Item/Extended Read permission or access to the Jenkins controller file system. |