WaratekVRT Sign in
Reset
More filters (1)
Columns
Including CVEs outside Waratek scope✕Product api gateway✕
Overview 13 matches · 6 in Waratek scope · 3 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 0 public PoC · 0 EPSS ≥ 0.5
13matches 6in Waratek scope46.2% 3protected23.1% 0exploited0.0% 0CISA KEV0.0% 0public PoC0.0% 0EPSS ≥ 0.50.0%
Protected by Waratek 3 23.1% Rule in development 0 0.0% Mitigation candidate 0 0.0% No exploit published 3 23.1% Outside Waratek scope 4 30.8% Not applicable 3 23.1% Withdrawn CVE 0 0.0%
Critical 2 15.4% High 5 38.5% Medium 6 46.2% Low 0 0.0% None 0 0.0% Unknown 0 0.0%
blocked by ARMR today 3 23.1% partly blocked 0 0.0% not blocked 10 76.9% not established 0 0.0% unrecorded 0 0.0%
Exploited 0 0.0% Working exploit published 0 0.0% Proof of concept only 0 0.0% Forecast only 0 0.0% No public exploit 13 100.0%
split by peak 4 / year
Not applicable: 3Outside Waratek scope: 4No exploit published: 3Protected by Waratek: 3 Medium: 6High: 5Critical: 2 not blocked: 10blocked by ARMR today: 3 No public exploit: 13
20151 Outside Waratek scope1 Medium1 not blocked1 No public exploit1 20161 Not applicable1 Medium1 not blocked1 No public exploit1 20171 No exploit published1 High1 not blocked1 No public exploit1 20184 Protected by Waratek1 No exploit published1 Outside Waratek scope2 Critical1 High1 Medium2 blocked by ARMR today1 not blocked3 No public exploit4 20193 Protected by Waratek1 Outside Waratek scope1 Not applicable1 Critical1 High1 Medium1 blocked by ARMR today1 not blocked2 No public exploit3 20202 Protected by Waratek1 No exploit published1 High2 blocked by ARMR today1 not blocked1 No public exploit2 20210 20220 20230 20240 20250 20261 Not applicable1 Medium1 not blocked1 No public exploit1
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
13 matches Sign in to download these CVEs as CSV or JSON, or to follow them in a feed.
CVE Severity Published▾ Status Exploitation Description
CVE-2026-2606 Medium 2026-03-03 Not applicable No public exploit IBM webMethods API Gateway (on-prem) 10.11 through 10.11_Fix3210.15 to 10.15_Fix2711.1 to 11.1_Fix7 IBM webMethods API Management (on-prem) fails to properly validate user-supplied input passed to the url parameter on the /createapi endpoint. An attacker can modify this parameter to use a file:// URI schema instead of the expected https:// schema, enabling unauthorized arbitrary file read access on the underlying server file system.
CVE-2019-17566 High 2020-11-12 Protected by Waratek No public exploit Apache Batik is vulnerable to server-side request forgery, caused by improper input validation by the "xlink:href" attributes. By using a specially-crafted argument, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause the underlying server to make arbitrary GET requests.
CVE-2020-11979 High 2020-10-01 No exploit published No public exploit As mitigation for CVE-2020-1945 Apache Ant 1.10.8 changed the permissions of temporary files it created so that only the current user was allowed to access them. Unfortunately the fixcrlf task deleted the temporary file and created a new one without said protection, effectively nullifying the effort. This would still allow an attacker to inject modified source files into the build process.
CVE-2019-15631 Critical 2019-12-02 Not applicable No public exploit Remote Code Execution vulnerability in MuleSoft Mule CE/EE 3.x and API Gateway 2.x released before October 31, 2019 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code.
CVE-2019-15630 High 2019-08-30 Protected by Waratek No public exploit Directory Traversal in APIkit, HTTP connector, and OAuth2 Provider components in MuleSoft Mule Runtime 3.2.0 and higher released before August 1 2019, MuleSoft Mule Runtime 4.1.0 and higher released before August 1 2019, and all versions of MuleSoft API Gateway released before August 1 2019 allow remote attackers to read files accessible to the Mule process.
CVE-2019-1559 Medium 2019-02-27 Outside Waratek scope No public exploit If an application encounters a fatal protocol error and then calls SSL_shutdown() twice (once to send a close_notify, and once to receive one) then OpenSSL can respond differently to the calling application if a 0 byte record is received with invalid padding compared to if a 0 byte record is received with an invalid MAC. If the application then behaves differently based on that in a way that is detectable to the remote peer, then this amounts to a padding oracle that could be used to decrypt data. In order for this to be exploitable "non-stitched" ciphersuites must be in use. Stitched ciphersuites are optimised implementations of certain commonly used ciphersuites. Also the application must call SSL_shutdown() twice even if a protocol error has occurred (applications should not do this but some do anyway). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2r (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2q).
CVE-2018-0734 Medium 2018-10-30 Outside Waratek scope No public exploit The OpenSSL DSA signature algorithm has been shown to be vulnerable to a timing side channel attack. An attacker could use variations in the signing algorithm to recover the private key. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1a (Affected 1.1.1). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0j (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0i). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2q (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2p).
CVE-2018-0735 Medium 2018-10-29 Outside Waratek scope No public exploit The OpenSSL ECDSA signature algorithm has been shown to be vulnerable to a timing side channel attack. An attacker could use variations in the signing algorithm to recover the private key. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0j (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0i). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1a (Affected 1.1.1).
CVE-2018-1000613 Critical 2018-07-09 Protected by Waratek No public exploit Legion of the Bouncy Castle Legion of the Bouncy Castle Java Cryptography APIs 1.58 up to but not including 1.60 contains a CWE-470: Use of Externally-Controlled Input to Select Classes or Code ('Unsafe Reflection') vulnerability in XMSS/XMSS^MT private key deserialization that can result in Deserializing an XMSS/XMSS^MT private key can result in the execution of unexpected code. This attack appear to be exploitable via A handcrafted private key can include references to unexpected classes which will be picked up from the class path for the executing application. This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in 1.60 and later.
CVE-2018-1000180 High 2018-06-05 No exploit published No public exploit Bouncy Castle BC 1.54 - 1.59, BC-FJA 1.0.0, BC-FJA 1.0.1 and earlier have a flaw in the Low-level interface to RSA key pair generator, specifically RSA Key Pairs generated in low-level API with added certainty may have less M-R tests than expected. This appears to be fixed in versions BC 1.60 beta 4 and later, BC-FJA 1.0.2 and later.
CVE-2017-3601 High 2017-04-24 No exploit published No public exploit Vulnerability in the Oracle API Gateway component of Oracle Fusion Middleware (subcomponent: Oracle API Gateway). The supported version that is affected is 11.1.2.4.0. Easily "exploitable" vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle API Gateway. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle API Gateway accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle API Gateway accessible data. CVSS 3.0 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N).
CVE-2016-3118 Medium 2016-04-06 Not applicable No public exploit CRLF injection vulnerability in CA API Gateway (formerly Layer7 API Gateway) 7.1 before 7.1.04, 8.0 through 8.3 before 8.3.01, and 8.4 before 8.4.01 allows remote attackers to have an unspecified impact via unknown vectors.
CVE-2015-3195 Medium 2015-12-06 Outside Waratek scope No public exploit The ASN1_TFLG_COMBINE implementation in crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zh, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0t, 1.0.1 before 1.0.1q, and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2e mishandles errors caused by malformed X509_ATTRIBUTE data, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by triggering a decoding failure in a PKCS#7 or CMS application.