Overview 7 matches · 1 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 0 public PoC
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
1
14.3%
Outside Waratek scope
1
14.3%
Not applicable
5
71.4%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
7
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
7
100.0%
No public exploit
0
0.0%
split by
peak 2 / year
19972
Not applicable2
Low2
not blocked2
Forecast only2
19980
19990
20000
20010
20022
No exploit published1
Not applicable1
Low2
not blocked2
Forecast only2
20030
20040
20050
20060
20070
20080
20090
20100
20110
20120
20130
20140
20151
Outside Waratek scope1
Low1
not blocked1
Forecast only1
20162
Not applicable2
Low2
not blocked2
Forecast only2
1998200020022004200620082010201220142016
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-3251 | Low | 2016-07-13 | Not applicable | Forecast only | The GDI component in the kernel-mode drivers in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, and Windows 10 Gold and 1511 allows local users to obtain sensitive kernel-address information via a crafted application, aka "Win32k Information Disclosure Vulnerability." |
| CVE-2016-0701 | Low | 2016-02-15 | Not applicable | Forecast only | The DH_check_pub_key function in crypto/dh/dh_check.c in OpenSSL 1.0.2 before 1.0.2f does not ensure that prime numbers are appropriate for Diffie-Hellman (DH) key exchange, which makes it easier for remote attackers to discover a private DH exponent by making multiple handshakes with a peer that chose an inappropriate number, as demonstrated by a number in an X9.42 file. |
| CVE-2015-2808 | Low | 2015-04-01 | Outside Waratek scope | Forecast only | The RC4 algorithm, as used in the TLS protocol and SSL protocol, does not properly combine state data with key data during the initialization phase, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct plaintext-recovery attacks against the initial bytes of a stream by sniffing network traffic that occasionally relies on keys affected by the Invariance Weakness, and then using a brute-force approach involving LSB values, aka the "Bar Mitzvah" issue. |
| CVE-2002-0422 | Low | 2002-08-12 | Not applicable | Forecast only | IIS 5 and 5.1 supporting WebDAV methods allows remote attackers to determine the internal IP address of the system (which may be obscured by NAT) via (1) a PROPFIND HTTP request with a blank Host header, which leaks the address in an HREF property in a 207 Multi-Status response, or (2) via the WRITE or MKCOL method, which leaks the IP in the Location server header. |
| CVE-2002-0568 | Low | 2002-07-03 | No exploit published | Forecast only | Oracle 9i Application Server stores XSQL and SOAP configuration files insecurely, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information including usernames and passwords by requesting (1) XSQLConfig.xml or (2) soapConfig.xml through a virtual directory. |
| CVE-1999-0532 | Low | 1997-07-01 | Not applicable | Forecast only | A DNS server allows zone transfers. |
| CVE-1999-0612 | Low | 1997-03-01 | Not applicable | Forecast only | A version of finger is running that exposes valid user information to any entity on the network. |