Overview 8 matches · 0 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 0 public PoC
8matches
0in Waratek scope0.0%
0protected0.0%
0exploited0.0%
0CISA KEV0.0%
0public PoC0.0%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
7
87.5%
Not applicable
1
12.5%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
8
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
8
100.0%
No public exploit
0
0.0%
split by
peak 5 / quarter
Q1 161
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
Forecast only1
Q2 160
Q3 160
Q4 160
Q1 170
Q2 170
Q3 170
Q4 170
Q1 180
Q2 180
Q3 180
Q4 180
Q1 190
Q2 190
Q3 195
Outside Waratek scope5
High4
Medium1
not blocked5
Forecast only5
Q4 190
Q1 201
Outside Waratek scope1
Critical1
not blocked1
Forecast only1
Q2 200
Q3 201
Outside Waratek scope1
High1
not blocked1
Forecast only1
Q1 16Q3 16Q1 17Q3 17Q1 18Q3 18Q1 19Q3 19Q1 20Q3 20
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-9490 | High | 2020-08-07 | Outside Waratek scope | Forecast only | Apache HTTP Server versions 2.4.20 to 2.4.43. A specially crafted value for the 'Cache-Digest' header in a HTTP/2 request would result in a crash when the server actually tries to HTTP/2 PUSH a resource afterwards. Configuring the HTTP/2 feature via "H2Push off" will mitigate this vulnerability for unpatched servers. |
| CVE-2019-15605 | Critical | 2020-02-07 | Outside Waratek scope | Forecast only | HTTP request smuggling in Node.js 10, 12, and 13 causes malicious payload delivery when transfer-encoding is malformed |
| CVE-2019-9516 | Medium | 2019-08-13 | Outside Waratek scope | Forecast only | Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a header leak, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of headers with a 0-length header name and 0-length header value, optionally Huffman encoded into 1-byte or greater headers. Some implementations allocate memory for these headers and keep the allocation alive until the session dies. This can consume excess memory. |
| CVE-2019-9515 | High | 2019-08-13 | Outside Waratek scope | Forecast only | Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one acknowledgement per SETTINGS frame, an empty SETTINGS frame is almost equivalent in behavior to a ping. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. |
| CVE-2019-9514 | High | 2019-08-13 | Outside Waratek scope | Forecast only | Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens a number of streams and sends an invalid request over each stream that should solicit a stream of RST_STREAM frames from the peer. Depending on how the peer queues the RST_STREAM frames, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both. |
| CVE-2019-9513 | High | 2019-08-13 | Outside Waratek scope | Forecast only | Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to resource loops, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker creates multiple request streams and continually shuffles the priority of the streams in a way that causes substantial churn to the priority tree. This can consume excess CPU. |
| CVE-2019-9511 | High | 2019-08-13 | Outside Waratek scope | Forecast only | Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to window size manipulation and stream prioritization manipulation, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker requests a large amount of data from a specified resource over multiple streams. They manipulate window size and stream priority to force the server to queue the data in 1-byte chunks. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. |
| CVE-2016-0742 | High | 2016-02-15 | Not applicable | Forecast only | The resolver in nginx before 1.8.1 and 1.9.x before 1.9.10 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (invalid pointer dereference and worker process crash) via a crafted UDP DNS response. |