Overview 29 matches · 3 in Waratek scope · 3 protected · 11 CISA KEV · 20 public PoC · 15 EPSS ≥ 0.5
29matches
3in Waratek scope10.3%
3protected10.3%
11CISA KEV37.9%
20public PoC69.0%
15EPSS ≥ 0.551.7%
Protected by Waratek
3
10.3%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
0
0.0%
Not applicable
26
89.7%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
3
10.3%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
26
89.7%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
29
100.0%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
0
0.0%
split by
peak 6 / year
20012
Not applicable2
High2
not blocked2
Exploited2
20021
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
Exploited1
20032
Not applicable2
High2
not blocked2
Exploited2
20040
20050
20060
20071
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
Exploited1
20080
20090
20100
20110
20120
20130
20145
Not applicable5
Critical2
Medium3
not blocked5
Exploited5
20150
20162
Protected by Waratek1
Not applicable1
Critical1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked1
Exploited2
20173
Protected by Waratek1
Not applicable2
Critical1
High2
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked2
Exploited3
20180
20193
Not applicable3
Critical1
Medium2
not blocked3
Exploited3
20206
Protected by Waratek1
Not applicable5
Critical4
High1
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked5
Exploited6
20210
20220
20231
Not applicable1
Critical1
not blocked1
Exploited1
20242
Not applicable2
Critical2
not blocked2
Exploited2
20250
20261
Not applicable1
Critical1
not blocked1
Exploited1
200220052008201120142017202020232026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-123218 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | Exploited | IBM Aspera Faspex 5.0.0 through 5.0.19 could allow an authorized user to craft a specific message to bypass user authorization and gain full administrative privileges. |
| CVE-2024-22320 | Critical | 2024-02-02 | Not applicable | Exploited | IBM Operational Decision Manager 8.10.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system, caused by an unsafe deserialization. By sending specially crafted request, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of SYSTEM. IBM X-Force ID: 279146. |
| CVE-2024-22319 | Critical | 2024-02-02 | Not applicable | Exploited | IBM Operational Decision Manager 8.10.3, 8.10.4, 8.10.5.1, 8.11, 8.11.0.1, 8.11.1 and 8.12.0.1 is susceptible to remote code execution attack via JNDI injection when passing an unchecked argument to a certain API. IBM X-Force ID: 279145. |
| CVE-2022-47986 | Critical | 2023-02-17 | Not applicable | Exploited | IBM Aspera Faspex 4.4.2 Patch Level 1 and earlier could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system, caused by a YAML deserialization flaw. By sending a specially crafted obsolete API call, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code on the system. The obsolete API call was removed in Faspex 4.4.2 PL2. IBM X-Force ID: 243512. |
| CVE-2020-4463 | High | 2020-07-29 | Not applicable | Exploited | IBM Maximo Asset Management 7.6.0.1 and 7.6.0.2 is vulnerable to an XML External Entity Injection (XXE) attack when processing XML data. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to expose sensitive information or consume memory resources. IBM X-Force ID: 181484. |
| CVE-2020-4450 | Critical | 2020-06-05 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.5 and 9.0 traditional could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system with a specially-crafted sequence of serialized objects. IBM X-Force ID: 181231. |
| CVE-2020-4430 | Medium | 2020-05-07 | Not applicable | Exploited | IBM Data Risk Manager 2.0.1, 2.0.2, 2.0.3, and 2.0.4 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to traverse directories on the system. An attacker could send a specially-crafted URL request to download arbitrary files from the system. IBM X-Force ID: 180535. |
| CVE-2020-4429 | Critical | 2020-05-07 | Not applicable | Exploited | IBM Data Risk Manager 2.0.1, 2.0.2, 2.0.3, 2.0.4, 2.0.5, and 2.0.6 contains a default password for an IDRM administrative account. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to login and execute arbitrary code on the system with root privileges. IBM X-Force ID: 180534. |
| CVE-2020-4428 | Critical | 2020-05-07 | Not applicable | Exploited | IBM Data Risk Manager 2.0.1, 2.0.2, 2.0.3, and 2.0.4 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the system. IBM X-Force ID: 180533. |
| CVE-2020-4427 | Critical | 2020-05-07 | Not applicable | Exploited | IBM Data Risk Manager 2.0.1, 2.0.2, 2.0.3, 2.0.4, 2.0.5, and 2.0.6 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions when configured with SAML authentication. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to bypass the authentication process and gain full administrative access to the system. IBM X-Force ID: 180532. |
| CVE-2019-4716 | Critical | 2019-12-18 | Not applicable | Exploited | IBM Planning Analytics 2.0.0 through 2.0.8 is vulnerable to a configuration overwrite that allows an unauthenticated user to login as "admin", and then execute code as root or SYSTEM via TM1 scripting. IBM X-Force ID: 172094. |
| CVE-2019-4061 | Medium | 2019-02-27 | Not applicable | Exploited | IBM BigFix Platform 9.2 and 9.5 could allow an attacker to query the relay remotely and gather information about the updates and fixlets deployed to the associated sites due to not enabling authenticated access. IBM X-Force ID: 156869. |
| CVE-2018-1932 | Medium | 2019-01-08 | Not applicable | Exploited | IBM API Connect 5.0.0.0 through 5.0.8.4 is affected by a vulnerability in the role-based access control in the management server that could allow an authenticated user to obtain highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 153175. |
| CVE-2017-1182 | High | 2017-07-17 | Not applicable | Exploited | IBM Tivoli Monitoring Portal v6 could allow a local (network adjacent) attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the system, when default client-server default communications, HTTP, are being used. IBM X-Force ID: 123493. |
| CVE-2017-1274 | High | 2017-04-25 | Not applicable | Exploited | IBM Domino 8.5.3, and 9.0 is vulnerable to a stack based overflow in the IMAP service that could allow an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code by specifying a large mailbox name. IBM X-Force ID: 124749. |
| CVE-2017-5638 | Critical | 2017-03-11 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | The Jakarta Multipart parser in Apache Struts 2 2.3.x before 2.3.32 and 2.5.x before 2.5.10.1 has incorrect exception handling and error-message generation during file-upload attempts, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted Content-Type, Content-Disposition, or Content-Length HTTP header, as exploited in the wild in March 2017 with a Content-Type header containing a #cmd= string. |
| CVE-2015-7465 | High | 2016-01-10 | Not applicable | Exploited | Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Lifecycle Query Engine (LQE) in IBM Jazz Reporting Service (JRS) 6.0 before 6.0.0-Rational-CLM-ifix005 allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that insert XSS sequences. |
| CVE-2015-7450 | Critical | 2016-01-02 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Serialized-object interfaces in certain IBM analytics, business solutions, cognitive, IT infrastructure, and mobile and social products allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted serialized Java object, related to the InvokerTransformer class in the Apache Commons Collections library. |
| CVE-2014-7169 | Critical | 2014-09-25 | Not applicable | Exploited | GNU Bash through 4.3 bash43-025 processes trailing strings after certain malformed function definitions in the values of environment variables, which allows remote attackers to write to files or possibly have unknown other impact via a crafted environment, as demonstrated by vectors involving the ForceCommand feature in OpenSSH sshd, the mod_cgi and mod_cgid modules in the Apache HTTP Server, scripts executed by unspecified DHCP clients, and other situations in which setting the environment occurs across a privilege boundary from Bash execution. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2014-6271. |
| CVE-2014-6271 | Critical | 2014-09-24 | Not applicable | Exploited | GNU Bash through 4.3 processes trailing strings after function definitions in the values of environment variables, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted environment, as demonstrated by vectors involving the ForceCommand feature in OpenSSH sshd, the mod_cgi and mod_cgid modules in the Apache HTTP Server, scripts executed by unspecified DHCP clients, and other situations in which setting the environment occurs across a privilege boundary from Bash execution, aka "ShellShock." NOTE: the original fix for this issue was incorrect; CVE-2014-7169 has been assigned to cover the vulnerability that is still present after the incorrect fix. |
| CVE-2013-3993 | Medium | 2014-07-07 | Not applicable | Exploited | IBM InfoSphere BigInsights before 2.1.0.3 allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended file and directory restrictions, or access untrusted data or code, via crafted parameters in unspecified API calls. |
| CVE-2013-6720 | Medium | 2014-03-06 | Not applicable | Exploited | Directory traversal vulnerability in download.php in the Passive Capture Application (PCA) web console in IBM Tealeaf CX 7.x, 8.x through 8.6, 8.7 before FP2, and 8.8 before FP2 allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended access restrictions via a .. (dot dot) in the log parameter, as demonstrated using a crafted request for a customer-support file, as demonstrated by a log file. |
| CVE-2013-6719 | Medium | 2014-03-06 | Not applicable | Exploited | delivery.php in the Passive Capture Application (PCA) web console in IBM Tealeaf CX 7.x, 8.x through 8.6, 8.7 before FP2, and 8.8 before FP2 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in the testconn_host parameter. |
| CVE-2007-1675 | High | 2007-03-28 | Not applicable | Exploited | Buffer overflow in the CRAM-MD5 authentication mechanism in the IMAP server (nimap.exe) in IBM Lotus Domino before 6.5.6 and 7.x before 7.0.2 FP1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a long username. |
| CVE-2003-0694 | High | 2003-10-06 | Not applicable | Exploited | The prescan function in Sendmail 8.12.9 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via buffer overflow attacks, as demonstrated using the parseaddr function in parseaddr.c. |
| CVE-2003-0681 | High | 2003-10-06 | Not applicable | Exploited | A "potential buffer overflow in ruleset parsing" for Sendmail 8.12.9, when using the nonstandard rulesets (1) recipient (2), final, or (3) mailer-specific envelope recipients, has unknown consequences. |
| CVE-2002-1689 | High | 2002-12-31 | Not applicable | Exploited | Unknown vulnerability in the login program on AIX before 4.0 could allow remote users to specify 100 or more environment variables when logging on, which exceeds the length of a certain string, possibly triggering a buffer overflow. |
| CVE-2001-0797 | High | 2001-12-12 | Not applicable | Exploited | Buffer overflow in login in various System V based operating systems allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a large number of arguments through services such as telnet and rlogin. |
| CVE-2001-0554 | High | 2001-08-14 | Not applicable | Exploited | Buffer overflow in BSD-based telnetd telnet daemon on various operating systems allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a set of options including AYT (Are You There), which is not properly handled by the telrcv function. |