WaratekVRT Sign in
Reset
More filters (1)
Columns
Including CVEs outside Waratek scope✕Product spring✕
Overview 15 matches · 14 in Waratek scope · 7 protected · 6 CISA KEV · 9 EPSS ≥ 0.5
15matches 14in Waratek scope93.3% 7protected46.7% 6CISA KEV40.0% 9EPSS ≥ 0.560.0%
Protected by Waratek 7 46.7% Rule in development 0 0.0% Mitigation candidate 7 46.7% No exploit published 0 0.0% Outside Waratek scope 0 0.0% Not applicable 1 6.7% Withdrawn CVE 0 0.0%
Critical 8 53.3% High 6 40.0% Medium 1 6.7% Low 0 0.0% None 0 0.0% Unknown 0 0.0%
blocked by ARMR today 7 46.7% partly blocked 0 0.0% not blocked 8 53.3% not established 0 0.0% unrecorded 0 0.0%
Exploited 15 100.0% Working exploit published 0 0.0% Proof of concept only 0 0.0% Forecast only 0 0.0% No public exploit 0 0.0%
split by peak 3 / year
Not applicable: 1Mitigation candidate: 7Protected by Waratek: 7 Medium: 1High: 6Critical: 8 not blocked: 8blocked by ARMR today: 7 Exploited: 15
20171 Mitigation candidate1 High1 not blocked1 Exploited1 20182 Protected by Waratek2 Critical2 blocked by ARMR today2 Exploited2 20190 20203 Protected by Waratek1 Mitigation candidate1 Not applicable1 Critical1 High1 Medium1 blocked by ARMR today1 not blocked2 Exploited3 20213 Protected by Waratek1 Mitigation candidate2 Critical1 High2 blocked by ARMR today1 not blocked2 Exploited3 20223 Protected by Waratek2 Mitigation candidate1 Critical3 blocked by ARMR today2 not blocked1 Exploited3 20231 Mitigation candidate1 High1 not blocked1 Exploited1 20241 Protected by Waratek1 High1 blocked by ARMR today1 Exploited1 20251 Mitigation candidate1 Critical1 not blocked1 Exploited1
201720182019202020212022202320242025
15 matches Sign in to download these CVEs as CSV or JSON, or to follow them in a feed.
CVE Severity Published▾ Status Exploitation Description
CVE-2025-41243 Critical 2025-09-16 Mitigation candidate Exploited Spring Cloud Gateway Server Webflux may be vulnerable to Spring Environment property modification. An application should be considered vulnerable when all the following are true: * The application is using Spring Cloud Gateway Server Webflux (Spring Cloud Gateway Server WebMVC is not vulnerable). * Spring Boot actuator is a dependency. * The Spring Cloud Gateway Server Webflux actuator web endpoint is enabled via management.endpoints.web.exposure.include=gateway. * The actuator endpoints are available to attackers. * The actuator endpoints are unsecured.
CVE-2024-38816 High 2024-09-13 Protected by Waratek Exploited Applications serving static resources through the functional web frameworks WebMvc.fn or WebFlux.fn are vulnerable to path traversal attacks. An attacker can craft malicious HTTP requests and obtain any file on the file system that is also accessible to the process in which the Spring application is running. Specifically, an application is vulnerable when both of the following are true: * the web application uses RouterFunctions to serve static resources * resource handling is explicitly configured with a FileSystemResource location However, malicious requests are blocked and rejected when any of the following is true: * the Spring Security HTTP Firewall https://docs.spring.io/spring-security/reference/servlet/exploits/firewall.html  is in use * the application runs on Tomcat or Jetty
CVE-2023-44487 High 2023-10-10 Mitigation candidate Exploited The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023.
CVE-2022-22965 Critical 2022-04-01 Protected by Waratek Exploited A Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux application running on JDK 9+ may be vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) via data binding. The specific exploit requires the application to run on Tomcat as a WAR deployment. If the application is deployed as a Spring Boot executable jar, i.e. the default, it is not vulnerable to the exploit. However, the nature of the vulnerability is more general, and there may be other ways to exploit it.
CVE-2022-22963 Critical 2022-04-01 Protected by Waratek Exploited In Spring Cloud Function versions 3.1.6, 3.2.2 and older unsupported versions, when using routing functionality it is possible for a user to provide a specially crafted SpEL as a routing-expression that may result in remote code execution and access to local resources.
CVE-2022-22947 Critical 2022-03-03 Mitigation candidate Exploited In spring cloud gateway versions prior to 3.1.1+ and 3.0.7+ , applications are vulnerable to a code injection attack when the Gateway Actuator endpoint is enabled, exposed and unsecured. A remote attacker could make a maliciously crafted request that could allow arbitrary remote execution on the remote host.
CVE-2021-22053 High 2021-11-19 Mitigation candidate Exploited Applications using both `spring-cloud-netflix-hystrix-dashboard` and `spring-boot-starter-thymeleaf` expose a way to execute code submitted within the request URI path during the resolution of view templates. When a request is made at `/hystrix/monitor;[user-provided data]`, the path elements following `hystrix/monitor` are being evaluated as SpringEL expressions, which can lead to code execution.
CVE-2020-17523 Critical 2021-02-03 Mitigation candidate Exploited Apache Shiro before 1.7.1, when using Apache Shiro with Spring, a specially crafted HTTP request may cause an authentication bypass.
CVE-2021-21234 High 2021-01-05 Protected by Waratek Exploited spring-boot-actuator-logview in a library that adds a simple logfile viewer as spring boot actuator endpoint. It is maven package "eu.hinsch:spring-boot-actuator-logview". In spring-boot-actuator-logview before version 0.2.13 there is a directory traversal vulnerability. The nature of this library is to expose a log file directory via admin (spring boot actuator) HTTP endpoints. Both the filename to view and a base folder (relative to the logging folder root) can be specified via request parameters. While the filename parameter was checked to prevent directory traversal exploits (so that `filename=../somefile` would not work), the base folder parameter was not sufficiently checked, so that `filename=somefile&base=../` could access a file outside the logging base directory). The vulnerability has been patched in release 0.2.13. Any users of 0.2.12 should be able to update without any issues as there are no other changes in that release. There is no workaround to fix the vulnerability other than updating or removing the dependency. However, removing read access of the user the application is run with to any directory not required for running the application can limit the impact. Additionally, access to the logview endpoint can be limited by deploying the application behind a reverse proxy.
CVE-2020-5412 Medium 2020-08-07 Mitigation candidate Exploited Spring Cloud Netflix, versions 2.2.x prior to 2.2.4, versions 2.1.x prior to 2.1.6, and older unsupported versions allow applications to use the Hystrix Dashboard proxy.stream endpoint to make requests to any server reachable by the server hosting the dashboard. A malicious user, or attacker, can send a request to other servers that should not be exposed publicly.
CVE-2020-5410 High 2020-06-02 Protected by Waratek Exploited Spring Cloud Config, versions 2.2.x prior to 2.2.3, versions 2.1.x prior to 2.1.9, and older unsupported versions allow applications to serve arbitrary configuration files through the spring-cloud-config-server module. A malicious user, or attacker, can send a request using a specially crafted URL that can lead to a directory traversal attack.
CVE-2020-10257 Critical 2020-03-10 Not applicable Exploited The ThemeREX Addons plugin before 2020-03-09 for WordPress lacks access control on the /trx_addons/v2/get/sc_layout REST API endpoint, allowing for PHP functions to be executed by any users, because includes/plugin.rest-api.php calls trx_addons_rest_get_sc_layout with an unsafe sc parameter.
CVE-2018-1273 Critical 2018-04-11 Protected by Waratek Exploited Spring Data Commons, versions prior to 1.13 to 1.13.10, 2.0 to 2.0.5, and older unsupported versions, contain a property binder vulnerability caused by improper neutralization of special elements. An unauthenticated remote malicious user (or attacker) can supply specially crafted request parameters against Spring Data REST backed HTTP resources or using Spring Data's projection-based request payload binding hat can lead to a remote code execution attack.
CVE-2017-8046 Critical 2018-01-04 Protected by Waratek Exploited Malicious PATCH requests submitted to servers using Spring Data REST versions prior to 2.6.9 (Ingalls SR9), versions prior to 3.0.1 (Kay SR1) and Spring Boot versions prior to 1.5.9, 2.0 M6 can use specially crafted JSON data to run arbitrary Java code.
CVE-2016-4977 High 2017-05-25 Mitigation candidate Exploited When processing authorization requests using the whitelabel views in Spring Security OAuth 2.0.0 to 2.0.9 and 1.0.0 to 1.0.5, the response_type parameter value was executed as Spring SpEL which enabled a malicious user to trigger remote code execution via the crafting of the value for response_type.