Overview 277 matches · 254 in Waratek scope · 34 protected · 11 exploited · 7 CISA KEV · 62 public PoC · 39 EPSS ≥ 0.5
277matches
254in Waratek scope91.7%
34protected12.3%
11exploited4.0%
7CISA KEV2.5%
62public PoC22.4%
39EPSS ≥ 0.514.1%
Protected by Waratek
36
13.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
41
14.8%
No exploit published
177
63.9%
Outside Waratek scope
22
7.9%
Not applicable
1
0.4%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
34
12.3%
partly blocked
2
0.7%
not blocked
241
87.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 40 / year
20003
Mitigation candidate2
No exploit published1
Medium3
not blocked3
Working exploit published2
No public exploit1
20014
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published2
Outside Waratek scope1
High1
Medium3
not blocked4
Working exploit published1
No public exploit3
200212
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate6
No exploit published5
High3
Medium9
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked11
Working exploit published6
No public exploit6
20037
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate2
No exploit published4
High1
Medium6
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked6
Working exploit published3
No public exploit4
20040
20057
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published6
High1
Medium5
Low1
not blocked7
Working exploit published1
No public exploit6
20061
Mitigation candidate1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
200717
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate5
No exploit published9
Outside Waratek scope2
High1
Medium12
Low4
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked16
Working exploit published7
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit9
20089
Protected by Waratek2
Mitigation candidate2
No exploit published5
Medium9
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked7
Working exploit published4
No public exploit5
20099
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate2
No exploit published4
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable1
Critical1
High1
Medium5
Low2
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked8
Exploited1
Working exploit published2
No public exploit6
20108
Protected by Waratek2
Mitigation candidate2
No exploit published4
Medium7
Low1
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked6
Working exploit published2
Forecast only1
No public exploit5
201115
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published13
High1
Medium12
Low2
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked14
Working exploit published1
No public exploit14
201215
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published14
Medium14
Low1
not blocked15
Working exploit published1
No public exploit14
20134
Mitigation candidate1
Outside Waratek scope3
Medium3
Low1
not blocked4
Working exploit published1
No public exploit3
201413
Protected by Waratek4
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published6
Outside Waratek scope2
High2
Medium10
Low1
blocked by ARMR today4
not blocked9
Working exploit published1
No public exploit12
20153
No exploit published2
Outside Waratek scope1
High1
Medium2
not blocked3
No public exploit3
201612
Protected by Waratek2
Mitigation candidate2
No exploit published6
Outside Waratek scope2
High8
Medium4
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked10
Working exploit published2
Forecast only1
No public exploit9
201722
Protected by Waratek5
No exploit published15
Outside Waratek scope2
Critical4
High15
Medium3
blocked by ARMR today3
partly blocked2
not blocked17
Exploited3
Working exploit published1
Forecast only1
No public exploit17
20188
No exploit published3
Outside Waratek scope5
Critical1
High2
Medium5
not blocked8
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit6
20197
Protected by Waratek3
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published3
High5
Medium2
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked4
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
Forecast only2
No public exploit3
202010
Protected by Waratek2
Mitigation candidate2
No exploit published5
Outside Waratek scope1
Critical1
High6
Medium3
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked8
Exploited1
Working exploit published2
Proof of concept only1
Forecast only2
No public exploit4
20218
Protected by Waratek3
No exploit published5
High5
Medium3
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked5
Forecast only1
No public exploit7
20226
Protected by Waratek2
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published3
High4
Medium1
Low1
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked4
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
No public exploit4
202311
Mitigation candidate3
No exploit published8
High6
Medium5
not blocked11
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit8
202411
Mitigation candidate4
No exploit published7
Critical3
High3
Medium5
not blocked11
Exploited1
Proof of concept only3
No public exploit7
202515
Protected by Waratek4
No exploit published9
Outside Waratek scope2
Critical3
High10
Medium2
blocked by ARMR today4
not blocked11
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit12
202640
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published38
Critical13
High18
Medium8
Low1
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked38
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
No public exploit38
200220052008201120142017202020232026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2010-4312 | Medium | 2010-11-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The default configuration of Apache Tomcat 6.x does not include the HTTPOnly flag in a Set-Cookie header, which makes it easier for remote attackers to hijack a session via script access to a cookie. |
| CVE-2010-4172 | Medium | 2010-11-26 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the Manager application in Apache Tomcat 6.0.12 through 6.0.29 and 7.0.0 through 7.0.4 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) orderBy or (2) sort parameter to sessionsList.jsp, or unspecified input to (3) sessionDetail.jsp or (4) java/org/apache/catalina/manager/JspHelper.java, related to use of untrusted web applications. |
| CVE-2009-2696 | Medium | 2010-08-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in jsp/cal/cal2.jsp in the calendar application in the examples web application in Apache Tomcat on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5, Desktop Workstation 5, and Linux Desktop 5 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the time parameter, related to "invalid HTML." NOTE: this is due to a missing fix for CVE-2009-0781. |
| CVE-2010-2227 | Medium | 2010-07-13 | No exploit published | Forecast only | Apache Tomcat 5.5.0 through 5.5.29, 6.0.0 through 6.0.27, and 7.0.0 beta does not properly handle an invalid Transfer-Encoding header, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application outage) or obtain sensitive information via a crafted header that interferes with "recycling of a buffer." |
| CVE-2010-1157 | Low | 2010-04-23 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Apache Tomcat 5.5.0 through 5.5.29 and 6.0.0 through 6.0.26 might allow remote attackers to discover the server's hostname or IP address by sending a request for a resource that requires (1) BASIC or (2) DIGEST authentication, and then reading the realm field in the WWW-Authenticate header in the reply. |
| CVE-2009-2902 | Medium | 2010-01-28 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Directory traversal vulnerability in Apache Tomcat 5.5.0 through 5.5.28 and 6.0.0 through 6.0.20 allows remote attackers to delete work-directory files via directory traversal sequences in a WAR filename, as demonstrated by the ...war filename. |
| CVE-2009-2901 | Medium | 2010-01-28 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The autodeployment process in Apache Tomcat 5.5.0 through 5.5.28 and 6.0.0 through 6.0.20, when autoDeploy is enabled, deploys appBase files that remain from a failed undeploy, which might allow remote attackers to bypass intended authentication requirements via HTTP requests. |
| CVE-2009-2693 | Medium | 2010-01-28 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Directory traversal vulnerability in Apache Tomcat 5.5.0 through 5.5.28 and 6.0.0 through 6.0.20 allows remote attackers to create or overwrite arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) in an entry in a WAR file, as demonstrated by a ../../bin/catalina.bat entry. |
| CVE-2009-3548 | High | 2009-11-12 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | The Windows installer for Apache Tomcat 6.0.0 through 6.0.20, 5.5.0 through 5.5.28, and possibly earlier versions uses a blank default password for the administrative user, which allows remote attackers to gain privileges. |
| CVE-2009-3555 | Critical | 2009-11-09 | Not applicable | Exploited | The TLS protocol, and the SSL protocol 3.0 and possibly earlier, as used in Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.0, mod_ssl in the Apache HTTP Server 2.2.14 and earlier, OpenSSL before 0.9.8l, GnuTLS 2.8.5 and earlier, Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) 3.12.4 and earlier, multiple Cisco products, and other products, does not properly associate renegotiation handshakes with an existing connection, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to insert data into HTTPS sessions, and possibly other types of sessions protected by TLS or SSL, by sending an unauthenticated request that is processed retroactively by a server in a post-renegotiation context, related to a "plaintext injection" attack, aka the "Project Mogul" issue. |
| CVE-2008-5515 | Medium | 2009-06-16 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Apache Tomcat 4.1.0 through 4.1.39, 5.5.0 through 5.5.27, 6.0.0 through 6.0.18, and possibly earlier versions normalizes the target pathname before filtering the query string when using the RequestDispatcher method, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions and conduct directory traversal attacks via .. (dot dot) sequences and the WEB-INF directory in a Request. |
| CVE-2009-0783 | Medium | 2009-06-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Tomcat 4.1.0 through 4.1.39, 5.5.0 through 5.5.27, and 6.0.0 through 6.0.18 permits web applications to replace an XML parser used for other web applications, which allows local users to read or modify the (1) web.xml, (2) context.xml, or (3) tld files of arbitrary web applications via a crafted application that is loaded earlier than the target application. |
| CVE-2009-0580 | Medium | 2009-06-05 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Apache Tomcat 4.1.0 through 4.1.39, 5.5.0 through 5.5.27, and 6.0.0 through 6.0.18, when FORM authentication is used, allows remote attackers to enumerate valid usernames via requests to /j_security_check with malformed URL encoding of passwords, related to improper error checking in the (1) MemoryRealm, (2) DataSourceRealm, and (3) JDBCRealm authentication realms, as demonstrated by a % (percent) value for the j_password parameter. |
| CVE-2009-0033 | Medium | 2009-06-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Tomcat 4.1.0 through 4.1.39, 5.5.0 through 5.5.27, and 6.0.0 through 6.0.18, when the Java AJP connector and mod_jk load balancing are used, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application outage) via a crafted request with invalid headers, related to temporary blocking of connectors that have encountered errors, as demonstrated by an error involving a malformed HTTP Host header. |
| CVE-2008-5519 | Low | 2009-04-09 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | The JK Connector (aka mod_jk) 1.2.0 through 1.2.26 in Apache Tomcat allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via an arbitrary request from an HTTP client, in opportunistic circumstances involving (1) a request from a different client that included a Content-Length header but no POST data or (2) a rapid series of requests, related to noncompliance with the AJP protocol's requirements for requests containing Content-Length headers. |
| CVE-2009-0781 | Medium | 2009-03-09 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in jsp/cal/cal2.jsp in the calendar application in the examples web application in Apache Tomcat 4.1.0 through 4.1.39, 5.5.0 through 5.5.27, and 6.0.0 through 6.0.18 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the time parameter, related to "invalid HTML." |
| CVE-2008-4308 | Low | 2009-02-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The doRead method in Apache Tomcat 4.1.32 through 4.1.34 and 5.5.10 through 5.5.20 does not return a -1 to indicate when a certain error condition has occurred, which can cause Tomcat to send POST content from one request to a different request. |
| CVE-2008-3271 | Medium | 2008-10-13 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Tomcat 5.5.0 and 4.1.0 through 4.1.31 allows remote attackers to bypass an IP address restriction and obtain sensitive information via a request that is processed concurrently with another request but in a different thread, leading to an instance-variable overwrite associated with a "synchronization problem" and lack of thread safety, and related to RemoteFilterValve, RemoteAddrValve, and RemoteHostValve. |
| CVE-2008-2938 | Medium | 2008-08-13 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | Directory traversal vulnerability in Apache Tomcat 4.1.0 through 4.1.37, 5.5.0 through 5.5.26, and 6.0.0 through 6.0.16, when allowLinking and UTF-8 are enabled, allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via encoded directory traversal sequences in the URI, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-2370. NOTE: versions earlier than 6.0.18 were reported affected, but the vendor advisory lists 6.0.16 as the last affected version. |
| CVE-2008-2370 | Medium | 2008-08-04 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | Apache Tomcat 4.1.0 through 4.1.37, 5.5.0 through 5.5.26, and 6.0.0 through 6.0.16, when a RequestDispatcher is used, performs path normalization before removing the query string from the URI, which allows remote attackers to conduct directory traversal attacks and read arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) in a request parameter. |
| CVE-2008-1232 | Medium | 2008-08-04 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Apache Tomcat 4.1.0 through 4.1.37, 5.5.0 through 5.5.26, and 6.0.0 through 6.0.16 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted string that is used in the message argument to the HttpServletResponse.sendError method. |
| CVE-2008-1947 | Medium | 2008-06-04 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Apache Tomcat 5.5.9 through 5.5.26 and 6.0.0 through 6.0.16 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the name parameter (aka the hostname attribute) to host-manager/html/add. |
| CVE-2008-0002 | Medium | 2008-02-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Tomcat 6.0.0 through 6.0.15 processes parameters in the context of the wrong request when an exception occurs during parameter processing, which might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information, as demonstrated by disconnecting during this processing in order to trigger the exception. |
| CVE-2007-6286 | Medium | 2008-02-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Tomcat 5.5.11 through 5.5.25 and 6.0.0 through 6.0.15, when the native APR connector is used, does not properly handle an empty request to the SSL port, which allows remote attackers to trigger handling of "a duplicate copy of one of the recent requests," as demonstrated by using netcat to send the empty request. |
| CVE-2007-5333 | Medium | 2008-02-12 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Apache Tomcat 6.0.0 through 6.0.14, 5.5.0 through 5.5.25, and 4.1.0 through 4.1.36 does not properly handle (1) double quote (") characters or (2) %5C (encoded backslash) sequences in a cookie value, which might cause sensitive information such as session IDs to be leaked to remote attackers and enable session hijacking attacks. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2007-3385. |
| CVE-2008-0128 | Medium | 2008-01-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The SingleSignOn Valve (org.apache.catalina.authenticator.SingleSignOn) in Apache Tomcat before 5.5.21 does not set the secure flag for the JSESSIONIDSSO cookie in an https session, which can cause the cookie to be sent in http requests and make it easier for remote attackers to capture this cookie. |
| CVE-2007-5342 | Medium | 2007-12-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The default catalina.policy in the JULI logging component in Apache Tomcat 5.5.9 through 5.5.25 and 6.0.0 through 6.0.15 does not restrict certain permissions for web applications, which allows attackers to modify logging configuration options and overwrite arbitrary files, as demonstrated by changing the (1) level, (2) directory, and (3) prefix attributes in the org.apache.juli.FileHandler handler. |
| CVE-2007-5461 | Low | 2007-10-15 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | Absolute path traversal vulnerability in Apache Tomcat 4.0.0 through 4.0.6, 4.1.0, 5.0.0, 5.5.0 through 5.5.25, and 6.0.0 through 6.0.14, under certain configurations, allows remote authenticated users to read arbitrary files via a WebDAV write request that specifies an entity with a SYSTEM tag. |
| CVE-2007-4724 | Medium | 2007-09-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in cal2.jsp in the calendar examples application in Apache Tomcat 4.1.31 allows remote attackers to add events as arbitrary users via the time and description parameters. |
| CVE-2007-3386 | Medium | 2007-08-14 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Host Manager Servlet for Apache Tomcat 6.0.0 to 6.0.13 and 5.5.0 to 5.5.24 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTML and web script via crafted requests, as demonstrated using the aliases parameter to an html/add action. |
| CVE-2007-3385 | Medium | 2007-08-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Tomcat 6.0.0 to 6.0.13, 5.5.0 to 5.5.24, 5.0.0 to 5.0.30, 4.1.0 to 4.1.36, and 3.3 to 3.3.2 does not properly handle the \" character sequence in a cookie value, which might cause sensitive information such as session IDs to be leaked to remote attackers and enable session hijacking attacks. |
| CVE-2007-3382 | Medium | 2007-08-14 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Apache Tomcat 6.0.0 to 6.0.13, 5.5.0 to 5.5.24, 5.0.0 to 5.0.30, 4.1.0 to 4.1.36, and 3.3 to 3.3.2 treats single quotes ("'") as delimiters in cookies, which might cause sensitive information such as session IDs to be leaked and allow remote attackers to conduct session hijacking attacks. |
| CVE-2007-3384 | Medium | 2007-08-08 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in examples/servlet/CookieExample in Apache Tomcat 3.3 through 3.3.2 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) Name or (2) Value field, related to error messages. |
| CVE-2007-3383 | Medium | 2007-07-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in SendMailServlet in the examples web application (examples/jsp/mail/sendmail.jsp) in Apache Tomcat 4.0.0 through 4.0.6 and 4.1.0 through 4.1.36 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the From field and possibly other fields, related to generation of error messages. |
| CVE-2007-2450 | Low | 2007-06-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the (1) Manager and (2) Host Manager web applications in Apache Tomcat 4.0.0 through 4.0.6, 4.1.0 through 4.1.36, 5.0.0 through 5.0.30, 5.5.0 through 5.5.24, and 6.0.0 through 6.0.13 allow remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a parameter name to manager/html/upload, and other unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2007-2449 | Medium | 2007-06-14 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in certain JSP files in the examples web application in Apache Tomcat 4.0.0 through 4.0.6, 4.1.0 through 4.1.36, 5.0.0 through 5.0.30, 5.5.0 through 5.5.24, and 6.0.0 through 6.0.13 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the portion of the URI after the ';' character, as demonstrated by a URI containing a "snp/snoop.jsp;" sequence. |
| CVE-2007-1355 | Medium | 2007-05-21 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the appdev/sample/web/hello.jsp example application in Tomcat 4.0.0 through 4.0.6, 4.1.0 through 4.1.36, 5.0.0 through 5.0.30, 5.5.0 through 5.5.23, and 6.0.0 through 6.0.10 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the test parameter and unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2007-1858 | Low | 2007-05-10 | Outside Waratek scope | Proof of concept only | The default SSL cipher configuration in Apache Tomcat 4.1.28 through 4.1.31, 5.0.0 through 5.0.30, and 5.5.0 through 5.5.17 uses certain insecure ciphers, including the anonymous cipher, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information or have other, unspecified impacts. |
| CVE-2007-1358 | Low | 2007-05-10 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in certain applications using Apache Tomcat 4.0.0 through 4.0.6 and 4.1.0 through 4.1.34 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via crafted "Accept-Language headers that do not conform to RFC 2616". |
| CVE-2006-7196 | Medium | 2007-05-10 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the calendar application example in Apache Tomcat 4.0.0 through 4.0.6, 4.1.0 through 4.1.31, 5.0.0 through 5.0.30, and 5.5.0 through 5.5.15 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the time parameter to cal2.jsp and possibly unspecified other vectors. NOTE: this may be related to CVE-2006-0254.1. |
| CVE-2006-7195 | Medium | 2007-05-10 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in implicit-objects.jsp in Apache Tomcat 5.0.0 through 5.0.30 and 5.5.0 through 5.5.17 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via certain header values. |
| CVE-2006-7197 | High | 2007-04-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The AJP connector in Apache Tomcat 5.5.15 uses an incorrect length for chunks, which can cause a buffer over-read in the ajp_process_callback in mod_jk, which allows remote attackers to read portions of sensitive memory. |
| CVE-2007-0450 | Medium | 2007-03-16 | Outside Waratek scope | Working exploit published | Directory traversal vulnerability in Apache HTTP Server and Tomcat 5.x before 5.5.22 and 6.x before 6.0.10, when using certain proxy modules (mod_proxy, mod_rewrite, mod_jk), allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) sequence with combinations of (1) "/" (slash), (2) "\" (backslash), and (3) URL-encoded backslash (%5C) characters in the URL, which are valid separators in Tomcat but not in Apache. |
| CVE-2006-3835 | Medium | 2006-07-25 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Apache Tomcat 5 before 5.5.17 allows remote attackers to list directories via a semicolon (;) preceding a filename with a mapped extension, as demonstrated by URLs ending with /;index.jsp and /;help.do. |
| CVE-2005-4838 | Medium | 2005-12-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the example web applications for Jakarta Tomcat 5.5.6 and earlier allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via (1) el/functions.jsp, (2) el/implicit-objects.jsp, and (3) jspx/textRotate.jspx in examples/jsp2/, as demonstrated via script in a request to snp/snoop.jsp. NOTE: other XSS issues in the manager were simultaneously reported, but these require admin access and do not cross privilege boundaries. |
| CVE-2005-4836 | High | 2005-12-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The HTTP/1.1 connector in Apache Tomcat 4.1.15 through 4.1.40 does not reject NULL bytes in a URL when allowLinking is configured, which allows remote attackers to read JSP source files and obtain sensitive information. |
| CVE-2005-4703 | Medium | 2005-12-31 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Apache Tomcat 4.0.3, when running on Windows, allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via a request for a file that contains an MS-DOS device name such as lpt9, which leaks the pathname in an error message, as demonstrated by lpt9.xtp using Nikto. |
| CVE-2005-3510 | Medium | 2005-11-06 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Tomcat 5.5.0 to 5.5.11 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via a large number of simultaneous requests to list a web directory that has a large number of files. |
| CVE-2005-3164 | Low | 2005-10-06 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The AJP connector in Apache Tomcat 4.0.1 through 4.0.6 and 4.1.0 through 4.1.36, as used in Hitachi Cosminexus Application Server and standalone, does not properly handle when a connection is broken before request body data is sent in a POST request, which can lead to an information leak when "unsuitable request body data" is used for a different request, possibly related to Java Servlet pages. |
| CVE-2005-2090 | Medium | 2005-07-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jakarta Tomcat 5.0.19 (Coyote/1.1) and Tomcat 4.1.24 (Coyote/1.0) allows remote attackers to poison the web cache, bypass web application firewall protection, and conduct XSS attacks via an HTTP request with both a "Transfer-Encoding: chunked" header and a Content-Length header, which causes Tomcat to incorrectly handle and forward the body of the request in a way that causes the receiving server to process it as a separate HTTP request, aka "HTTP Request Smuggling." |
| CVE-2005-0808 | Medium | 2005-05-02 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Tomcat before 5.x allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a crafted AJP12 packet to TCP port 8007. |
| CVE-2003-0866 | Medium | 2003-11-17 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | The Catalina org.apache.catalina.connector.http package in Tomcat 4.0.x up to 4.0.3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via several requests that do not follow the HTTP protocol, which causes Tomcat to reject later requests. |
| CVE-2002-1567 | Medium | 2003-10-06 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Apache Tomcat 4.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary web script and steal cookies via a URL with encoded newlines followed by a request to a .jsp file whose name contains the script. |
| CVE-2003-0045 | Medium | 2003-02-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jakarta Tomcat before 3.3.1a on certain Windows systems may allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (thread hang and resource consumption) via a request for a JSP page containing an MS-DOS device name, such as aux.jsp. |
| CVE-2003-0044 | Medium | 2003-02-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the (1) examples and (2) ROOT web applications for Jakarta Tomcat 3.x through 3.3.1a allow remote attackers to insert arbitrary web script or HTML. |
| CVE-2003-0043 | Medium | 2003-02-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jakarta Tomcat before 3.3.1a, when used with JDK 1.3.1 or earlier, uses trusted privileges when processing the web.xml file, which could allow remote attackers to read portions of some files through the web.xml file. |
| CVE-2003-0042 | Medium | 2003-02-07 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | Jakarta Tomcat before 3.3.1a, when used with JDK 1.3.1 or earlier, allows remote attackers to list directories even with an index.html or other file present, or obtain unprocessed source code for a JSP file, via a URL containing a null character. |
| CVE-2002-1394 | High | 2003-01-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Tomcat 4.0.5 and earlier, when using both the invoker servlet and the default servlet, allows remote attackers to read source code for server files or bypass certain protections, a variant of CAN-2002-1148. |
| CVE-2002-2272 | High | 2002-12-31 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Tomcat 4.0 through 4.1.12, using mod_jk 1.2.1 module on Apache 1.3 through 1.3.27, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (desynchronized communications) via an HTTP GET request with a Transfer-Encoding chunked field with invalid values. |
| CVE-2002-2009 | Medium | 2002-12-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Tomcat 4.0.1 allows remote attackers to obtain the web root path via HTTP requests for JSP files preceded by (1) +/, (2) >/, (3) </, and (4) %20/, which leaks the pathname in an error message. |
| CVE-2002-2008 | Medium | 2002-12-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Tomcat 4.0.3 for Windows allows remote attackers to obtain the web root path via an HTTP request for a resource that does not exist, such as lpt9, which leaks the information in an error message. |
| CVE-2002-2007 | Medium | 2002-12-31 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | The default installations of Apache Tomcat 3.2.3 and 3.2.4 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive system information such as directory listings and web root path, via erroneous HTTP requests for Java Server Pages (JSP) in the (1) test/jsp, (2) samples/jsp and (3) examples/jsp directories, or the (4) test/realPath.jsp servlet, which leaks pathnames in error messages. |
| CVE-2002-2006 | Medium | 2002-12-31 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | The default installation of Apache Tomcat 4.0 through 4.1 and 3.0 through 3.3.1 allows remote attackers to obtain the installation path and other sensitive system information via the (1) SnoopServlet or (2) TroubleShooter example servlets. |
| CVE-2002-1895 | Medium | 2002-12-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The servlet engine in Jakarta Apache Tomcat 3.3 and 4.0.4, when using IIS and the ajp1.3 connector, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a large number of HTTP GET requests for an MS-DOS device such as AUX, LPT1, CON, or PRN. |
| CVE-2002-1148 | Medium | 2002-10-11 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | The default servlet (org.apache.catalina.servlets.DefaultServlet) in Tomcat 4.0.4 and 4.1.10 and earlier allows remote attackers to read source code for server files via a direct request to the servlet. |
| CVE-2002-0936 | Medium | 2002-10-04 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | The Java Server Pages (JSP) engine in Tomcat allows web page owners to cause a denial of service (engine crash) on the web server via a JSP page that calls WPrinterJob().pageSetup(null,null). |
| CVE-2002-0935 | Medium | 2002-10-04 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Tomcat 4.0.3, and possibly other versions before 4.1.3 beta, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (resource exhaustion) via a large number of requests to the server with null characters, which causes the working threads to hang. |
| CVE-2002-0493 | High | 2002-08-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Tomcat may be started without proper security settings if errors are encountered while reading the web.xml file, which could allow attackers to bypass intended restrictions. |
| CVE-2002-0682 | High | 2002-07-23 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Cross-site scripting vulnerability in Apache Tomcat 4.0.3 allows remote attackers to execute script as other web users via script in a URL with the /servlet/ mapping, which does not filter the script when an exception is thrown by the servlet. |
| CVE-2000-1210 | Medium | 2002-03-22 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Directory traversal vulnerability in source.jsp of Apache Tomcat before 3.1 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) in the argument to source.jsp. |
| CVE-2001-1563 | High | 2001-12-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unknown vulnerability in Tomcat 3.2.1 running on HP Secure OS for Linux 1.0 allows attackers to access servlet resources. NOTE: due to the vagueness of the vendor advisory, it is not clear whether this issue is already covered by other CVE identifiers. |
| CVE-2001-0829 | Medium | 2001-12-06 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A cross-site scripting vulnerability in Apache Tomcat 3.2.1 allows a malicious webmaster to embed Javascript in a request for a .JSP file, which causes the Javascript to be inserted into an error message. |
| CVE-2001-0917 | Medium | 2001-11-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jakarta Tomcat 4.0.1 allows remote attackers to reveal physical path information by requesting a long URL with a .JSP extension. |
| CVE-2001-0590 | Medium | 2001-08-02 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Apache Software Foundation Tomcat Servlet prior to 3.2.2 allows a remote attacker to read the source code to arbitrary 'jsp' files via a malformed URL request which does not end with an HTTP protocol specification (i.e. HTTP/1.0). |
| CVE-2000-0760 | Medium | 2000-10-20 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | The Snoop servlet in Jakarta Tomcat 3.1 and 3.0 under Apache reveals sensitive system information when a remote attacker requests a nonexistent URL with a .snp extension. |
| CVE-2000-0759 | Medium | 2000-10-20 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Jakarta Tomcat 3.1 under Apache reveals physical path information when a remote attacker requests a URL that does not exist, which generates an error message that includes the physical path. |
| CVE-2000-0672 | Medium | 2000-07-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The default configuration of Jakarta Tomcat does not restrict access to the /admin context, which allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files by directly calling the administrative servlets to add a context for the root directory. |