WaratekVRT Sign in
Reset
More filters (2)
Columns
Product: Spring✕Has a public PoC✕
Overview 18 matches · 6 exploited · 4 CISA KEV · 10 EPSS ≥ 0.5
18matches 6exploited33.3% 4CISA KEV22.2% 10EPSS ≥ 0.555.6%
Protected by Waratek 18 100.0% Rule in development 0 0.0% Mitigation candidate 0 0.0% No exploit published 0 0.0%
Critical 6 33.3% High 4 22.2% Medium 8 44.4% Low 0 0.0% None 0 0.0% Unknown 0 0.0%
blocked by ARMR today 18 100.0% partly blocked 0 0.0% not blocked 0 0.0% not established 0 0.0% unrecorded 0 0.0%
Exploited 6 33.3% Working exploit published 6 33.3% Proof of concept only 6 33.3% Forecast only 0 0.0% No public exploit 0 0.0%
split by peak 4 / year
Protected by Waratek: 18 Medium: 8High: 4Critical: 6 blocked by ARMR today: 18 Proof of concept only: 6Working exploit published: 6Exploited: 6
20101 Protected by Waratek1 Medium1 blocked by ARMR today1 Working exploit published1 20111 Protected by Waratek1 Medium1 blocked by ARMR today1 Proof of concept only1 20120 20130 20141 Protected by Waratek1 Medium1 blocked by ARMR today1 Proof of concept only1 20150 20160 20170 20184 Protected by Waratek4 Critical3 Medium1 blocked by ARMR today4 Exploited2 Working exploit published1 Proof of concept only1 20191 Protected by Waratek1 Medium1 blocked by ARMR today1 Working exploit published1 20203 Protected by Waratek3 Critical1 High1 Medium1 blocked by ARMR today3 Exploited1 Working exploit published1 Proof of concept only1 20210 20222 Protected by Waratek2 Critical2 blocked by ARMR today2 Exploited2 20232 Protected by Waratek2 High1 Medium1 blocked by ARMR today2 Proof of concept only2 20242 Protected by Waratek2 High2 blocked by ARMR today2 Exploited1 Working exploit published1 20251 Protected by Waratek1 Medium1 blocked by ARMR today1 Working exploit published1
20112013201520172019202120232025
18 matches Sign in to download these CVEs as CSV or JSON, or to follow them in a feed.
CVE Severity Published▾ Status Exploitation Description
CVE-2025-41242 Medium 2025-08-18 Protected by Waratek Working exploit published Spring Framework MVC applications can be vulnerable to a “Path Traversal Vulnerability” when deployed on a non-compliant Servlet container. An application can be vulnerable when all the following are true: * the application is deployed as a WAR or with an embedded Servlet container * the Servlet container does not reject suspicious sequences https://jakarta.ee/specifications/servlet/6.1/jakarta-servlet-spec-6.1.html#uri-path-canonicalization * the application serves static resources https://docs.spring.io/spring-framework/reference/web/webmvc/mvc-config/static-resources.html#page-title  with Spring resource handling We have verified that applications deployed on Apache Tomcat or Eclipse Jetty are not vulnerable, as long as default security features are not disabled in the configuration. Because we cannot check exploits against all Servlet containers and configuration variants, we strongly recommend upgrading your application.
CVE-2024-38819 High 2024-12-19 Protected by Waratek Working exploit published Applications serving static resources through the functional web frameworks WebMvc.fn or WebFlux.fn are vulnerable to path traversal attacks. An attacker can craft malicious HTTP requests and obtain any file on the file system that is also accessible to the process in which the Spring application is running.
CVE-2024-38816 High 2024-09-13 Protected by Waratek Exploited Applications serving static resources through the functional web frameworks WebMvc.fn or WebFlux.fn are vulnerable to path traversal attacks. An attacker can craft malicious HTTP requests and obtain any file on the file system that is also accessible to the process in which the Spring application is running. Specifically, an application is vulnerable when both of the following are true: * the web application uses RouterFunctions to serve static resources * resource handling is explicitly configured with a FileSystemResource location However, malicious requests are blocked and rejected when any of the following is true: * the Spring Security HTTP Firewall https://docs.spring.io/spring-security/reference/servlet/exploits/firewall.html  is in use * the application runs on Tomcat or Jetty
CVE-2023-34050 Medium 2023-10-19 Protected by Waratek Proof of concept only In spring AMQP versions 1.0.0 to 2.4.16 and 3.0.0 to 3.0.9 , allowed list patterns for deserializable class names were added to Spring AMQP, allowing users to lock down deserialization of data in messages from untrusted sources; however by default, when no allowed list was provided, all classes could be deserialized. Specifically, an application is vulnerable if * the SimpleMessageConverter or SerializerMessageConverter is used * the user does not configure allowed list patterns * untrusted message originators gain permissions to write messages to the RabbitMQ broker to send malicious content
CVE-2023-34040 High 2023-08-24 Protected by Waratek Proof of concept only In Spring for Apache Kafka 3.0.9 and earlier and versions 2.9.10 and earlier, a possible deserialization attack vector existed, but only if unusual configuration was applied. An attacker would have to construct a malicious serialized object in one of the deserialization exception record headers. Specifically, an application is vulnerable when all of the following are true: * The user does not configure an ErrorHandlingDeserializer for the key and/or value of the record * The user explicitly sets container properties checkDeserExWhenKeyNull and/or checkDeserExWhenValueNull container properties to true. * The user allows untrusted sources to publish to a Kafka topic By default, these properties are false, and the container only attempts to deserialize the headers if an ErrorHandlingDeserializer is configured. The ErrorHandlingDeserializer prevents the vulnerability by removing any such malicious headers before processing the record.
CVE-2022-22965 Critical 2022-04-01 Protected by Waratek Exploited A Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux application running on JDK 9+ may be vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) via data binding. The specific exploit requires the application to run on Tomcat as a WAR deployment. If the application is deployed as a Spring Boot executable jar, i.e. the default, it is not vulnerable to the exploit. However, the nature of the vulnerability is more general, and there may be other ways to exploit it.
CVE-2022-22963 Critical 2022-04-01 Protected by Waratek Exploited In Spring Cloud Function versions 3.1.6, 3.2.2 and older unsupported versions, when using routing functionality it is possible for a user to provide a specially crafted SpEL as a routing-expression that may result in remote code execution and access to local resources.
CVE-2020-5410 High 2020-06-02 Protected by Waratek Exploited Spring Cloud Config, versions 2.2.x prior to 2.2.3, versions 2.1.x prior to 2.1.9, and older unsupported versions allow applications to serve arbitrary configuration files through the spring-cloud-config-server module. A malicious user, or attacker, can send a request using a specially crafted URL that can lead to a directory traversal attack.
CVE-2020-5405 Medium 2020-03-05 Protected by Waratek Working exploit published Spring Cloud Config, versions 2.2.x prior to 2.2.2, versions 2.1.x prior to 2.1.7, and older unsupported versions allow applications to serve arbitrary configuration files through the spring-cloud-config-server module. A malicious user, or attacker, can send a request using a specially crafted URL that can lead a directory traversal attack.
CVE-2016-1000027 Critical 2020-01-02 Protected by Waratek Proof of concept only Pivotal Spring Framework through 5.3.16 suffers from a potential remote code execution (RCE) issue if used for Java deserialization of untrusted data. Depending on how the library is implemented within a product, this issue may or not occur, and authentication may be required. NOTE: the vendor's position is that untrusted data is not an intended use case. The product's behavior will not be changed because some users rely on deserialization of trusted data.
CVE-2019-3799 Medium 2019-05-06 Protected by Waratek Working exploit published Spring Cloud Config, versions 2.1.x prior to 2.1.2, versions 2.0.x prior to 2.0.4, and versions 1.4.x prior to 1.4.6, and older unsupported versions allow applications to serve arbitrary configuration files through the spring-cloud-config-server module. A malicious user, or attacker, can send a request using a specially crafted URL that can lead a directory traversal attack.
CVE-2018-1273 Critical 2018-04-11 Protected by Waratek Exploited Spring Data Commons, versions prior to 1.13 to 1.13.10, 2.0 to 2.0.5, and older unsupported versions, contain a property binder vulnerability caused by improper neutralization of special elements. An unauthenticated remote malicious user (or attacker) can supply specially crafted request parameters against Spring Data REST backed HTTP resources or using Spring Data's projection-based request payload binding hat can lead to a remote code execution attack.
CVE-2018-1271 Medium 2018-04-06 Protected by Waratek Working exploit published Spring Framework, versions 5.0 prior to 5.0.5 and versions 4.3 prior to 4.3.15 and older unsupported versions, allow applications to configure Spring MVC to serve static resources (e.g. CSS, JS, images). When static resources are served from a file system on Windows (as opposed to the classpath, or the ServletContext), a malicious user can send a request using a specially crafted URL that can lead a directory traversal attack.
CVE-2018-1270 Critical 2018-04-06 Protected by Waratek Proof of concept only Spring Framework, versions 5.0 prior to 5.0.5 and versions 4.3 prior to 4.3.15 and older unsupported versions, allow applications to expose STOMP over WebSocket endpoints with a simple, in-memory STOMP broker through the spring-messaging module. A malicious user (or attacker) can craft a message to the broker that can lead to a remote code execution attack.
CVE-2017-8046 Critical 2018-01-04 Protected by Waratek Exploited Malicious PATCH requests submitted to servers using Spring Data REST versions prior to 2.6.9 (Ingalls SR9), versions prior to 3.0.1 (Kay SR1) and Spring Boot versions prior to 1.5.9, 2.0 M6 can use specially crafted JSON data to run arbitrary Java code.
CVE-2014-3625 Medium 2014-11-20 Protected by Waratek Proof of concept only Directory traversal vulnerability in Pivotal Spring Framework 3.0.4 through 3.2.x before 3.2.12, 4.0.x before 4.0.8, and 4.1.x before 4.1.2 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via unspecified vectors, related to static resource handling.
CVE-2011-2894 Medium 2011-10-04 Protected by Waratek Proof of concept only Spring Framework 3.0.0 through 3.0.5, Spring Security 3.0.0 through 3.0.5 and 2.0.0 through 2.0.6, and possibly other versions deserialize objects from untrusted sources, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended security restrictions and execute untrusted code by (1) serializing a java.lang.Proxy instance and using InvocationHandler, or (2) accessing internal AOP interfaces, as demonstrated using deserialization of a DefaultListableBeanFactory instance to execute arbitrary commands via the java.lang.Runtime class.
CVE-2010-1622 Medium 2010-06-21 Protected by Waratek Working exploit published SpringSource Spring Framework 2.5.x before 2.5.6.SEC02, 2.5.7 before 2.5.7.SR01, and 3.0.x before 3.0.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an HTTP request containing class.classLoader.URLs[0]=jar: followed by a URL of a crafted .jar file.