Overview 114 matches · 85 in Waratek scope · 49 protected · 2 exploited · 1 CISA KEV · 3 public PoC · 2 EPSS ≥ 0.5
114matches
85in Waratek scope74.6%
49protected43.0%
2exploited1.8%
1CISA KEV0.9%
3public PoC2.6%
2EPSS ≥ 0.51.8%
Protected by Waratek
49
43.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
36
31.6%
Outside Waratek scope
26
22.8%
Not applicable
3
2.6%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
49
43.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
65
57.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
2
1.8%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
5
4.4%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
107
93.9%
split by
peak 36 / year
200917
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published11
Outside Waratek scope5
High10
Medium7
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked16
No public exploit17
20100
20110
20122
No exploit published2
Medium2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20133
Protected by Waratek1
Outside Waratek scope2
High1
Low2
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked2
Exploited2
No public exploit1
20144
No exploit published3
Outside Waratek scope1
High3
Medium1
not blocked4
No public exploit4
20151
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20160
20170
20180
20191
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
202036
Protected by Waratek23
No exploit published4
Outside Waratek scope9
High6
Medium10
Low20
blocked by ARMR today23
not blocked13
No public exploit36
202122
Protected by Waratek9
No exploit published4
Outside Waratek scope7
Not applicable2
High5
Medium14
Low3
blocked by ARMR today9
not blocked13
Proof of concept only2
No public exploit20
202220
Protected by Waratek10
No exploit published8
Outside Waratek scope2
High2
Medium17
Low1
blocked by ARMR today10
not blocked10
Proof of concept only2
No public exploit18
20237
Protected by Waratek5
No exploit published2
High1
Medium3
Low3
blocked by ARMR today5
not blocked2
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit6
20241
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20102012201420162018202020222024
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2009-3881 | High | 2009-11-09 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Sun Java SE 5.0 before Update 22 and 6 before Update 17, and OpenJDK, does not prevent the existence of children of a resurrected ClassLoader, which allows remote attackers to gain privileges via unspecified vectors, related to an "information leak vulnerability," aka Bug Id 6636650. |
| CVE-2009-3880 | Medium | 2009-11-09 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The Abstract Window Toolkit (AWT) in Java Runtime Environment (JRE) in Sun Java SE 5.0 before Update 22 and 6 before Update 17, and OpenJDK, does not properly restrict the objects that may be sent to loggers, which allows attackers to obtain sensitive information via vectors related to the implementation of Component, KeyboardFocusManager, and DefaultKeyboardFocusManager, aka Bug Id 6664512. |
| CVE-2009-3879 | High | 2009-11-09 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in the (1) X11 and (2) Win32GraphicsDevice subsystems in Sun Java SE 5.0 before Update 22 and 6 before Update 17, and OpenJDK, have unknown impact and attack vectors, related to failure to clone arrays that are returned by the getConfigurations function, aka Bug Id 6822057. |
| CVE-2009-3728 | Medium | 2009-11-09 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Directory traversal vulnerability in the ICC_Profile.getInstance method in Java Runtime Environment (JRE) in Sun Java SE 5.0 before Update 22 and 6 before Update 17, and OpenJDK, allows remote attackers to determine the existence of local International Color Consortium (ICC) profile files via a .. (dot dot) in a pathname, aka Bug Id 6631533. |
| CVE-2009-2690 | Medium | 2009-08-10 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The encoder in Sun Java SE 6 before Update 15, and OpenJDK, grants read access to private variables with unspecified names, which allows context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information via an untrusted (1) applet or (2) application. |
| CVE-2009-2689 | High | 2009-08-10 | No exploit published | No public exploit | JDK13Services.getProviders in Sun Java SE 5.0 before Update 20 and 6 before Update 15, and OpenJDK, grants full privileges to instances of unspecified object types, which allows context-dependent attackers to bypass intended access restrictions via an untrusted (1) applet or (2) application. |
| CVE-2009-2476 | High | 2009-08-10 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The Java Management Extensions (JMX) implementation in Sun Java SE 6 before Update 15, and OpenJDK, does not properly enforce OpenType checks, which allows context-dependent attackers to bypass intended access restrictions by leveraging finalizer resurrection to obtain a reference to a privileged object. |
| CVE-2009-2475 | High | 2009-08-10 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Sun Java SE 5.0 before Update 20 and 6 before Update 15, and OpenJDK, might allow context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information via vectors involving static variables that are declared without the final keyword, related to (1) LayoutQueue, (2) Cursor.predefined, (3) AccessibleResourceBundle.getContents, (4) ImageReaderSpi.STANDARD_INPUT_TYPE, (5) ImageWriterSpi.STANDARD_OUTPUT_TYPE, (6) the imageio plugins, (7) DnsContext.debug, (8) RmfFileReader/StandardMidiFileWriter.types, (9) AbstractSaslImpl.logger, (10) Synth.Region.uiToRegionMap/lowerCaseNameMap, (11) the Introspector class and a cache of BeanInfo, and (12) JAX-WS, a different vulnerability than CVE-2009-2673. |
| CVE-2009-1896 | High | 2009-08-10 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The Java Web Start framework in IcedTea in OpenJDK before 1.6.0.0-20.b16.fc10 on Fedora 10, and before 1.6.0.0-27.b16.fc11 on Fedora 11, trusts an entire application when at least one of the listed jar files is trusted, which allows context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary code without the untrusted-code restrictions via a crafted application, related to NetX. |
| CVE-2009-0794 | Medium | 2009-04-13 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Integer overflow in the PulseAudioTargetDataL class in src/java/org/classpath/icedtea/pulseaudio/PulseAudioTargetDataLine.java in Pulse-Java, as used in OpenJDK 1.6.0.0 and other products, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (applet crash) via a crafted Pulse Audio source data line. |
| CVE-2009-0793 | Medium | 2009-04-09 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | cmsxform.c in LittleCMS (aka lcms or liblcms) 1.18, as used in OpenJDK and other products, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and application crash) via a crafted image that triggers execution of incorrect code for "transformations of monochrome profiles." |
| CVE-2009-0733 | High | 2009-03-23 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in the ReadSetOfCurves function in LittleCMS (aka lcms or liblcms) before 1.18beta2, as used in Firefox 3.1beta, OpenJDK, and GIMP, allow context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted image file associated with a large integer value for the (1) input or (2) output channel, related to the ReadLUT_A2B and ReadLUT_B2A functions. |
| CVE-2009-0723 | High | 2009-03-23 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Multiple integer overflows in LittleCMS (aka lcms or liblcms) before 1.18beta2, as used in Firefox 3.1beta, OpenJDK, and GIMP, allow context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted image file that triggers a heap-based buffer overflow. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information. |
| CVE-2009-0581 | Medium | 2009-03-23 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Memory leak in LittleCMS (aka lcms or liblcms) before 1.18beta2, as used in Firefox 3.1beta, OpenJDK, and GIMP, allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption and application crash) via a crafted image file. |