Overview 2 matches · 0 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 0 public PoC · 0 EPSS ≥ 0.5
2matches
0in Waratek scope0.0%
0protected0.0%
0exploited0.0%
0CISA KEV0.0%
0public PoC0.0%
0EPSS ≥ 0.50.0%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
0
0.0%
Not applicable
0
0.0%
Withdrawn CVE
2
100.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
2
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
2
100.0%
split by
peak 1 / year
201820192020202120222023202420252026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-1518 | Unknown | 2026-02-02 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. After further review by the Keycloak project and Red Hat, the reported SSRF via client registration/backchannel notification URIs was determined not to constitute a security vulnerability. The reported behavior is expected administrator-controlled functionality, and Keycloak provides documented mitigations through Client Policies, including the Secure Client URIs Pattern executor. Therefore, this CVE has been rejected. |
| CVE-2017-1000500 | Unknown | 2018-01-03 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-12161. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2017-12161. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-12161 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |