Overview 255 matches · 226 in Waratek scope · 49 protected · 16 exploited · 6 CISA KEV · 22 public PoC · 21 EPSS ≥ 0.5
255matches
226in Waratek scope88.6%
49protected19.2%
16exploited6.3%
6CISA KEV2.4%
22public PoC8.6%
21EPSS ≥ 0.58.2%
Protected by Waratek
50
19.6%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
4
1.6%
No exploit published
172
67.5%
Outside Waratek scope
25
9.8%
Not applicable
4
1.6%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
49
19.2%
partly blocked
1
0.4%
not blocked
205
80.4%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 37 / year
20082
No exploit published1
Outside Waratek scope1
Medium2
not blocked2
Working exploit published1
No public exploit1
20094
No exploit published4
Medium3
Low1
not blocked4
No public exploit4
20108
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published4
Outside Waratek scope2
High3
Medium3
Low2
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked6
Exploited3
Working exploit published1
No public exploit4
20112
No exploit published2
Medium2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20127
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published6
High2
Medium4
Low1
not blocked7
Exploited1
No public exploit6
201323
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published19
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable1
High2
Medium17
Low4
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked22
Exploited2
No public exploit21
201419
Protected by Waratek4
No exploit published12
Outside Waratek scope3
High4
Medium12
Low3
blocked by ARMR today4
not blocked15
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
No public exploit17
20159
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published8
Medium5
Low4
not blocked9
Exploited1
No public exploit8
20168
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published4
Outside Waratek scope2
Critical1
High5
Medium2
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked6
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit6
201714
Protected by Waratek6
No exploit published6
Outside Waratek scope2
Critical8
High4
Medium2
blocked by ARMR today5
partly blocked1
not blocked8
Exploited5
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit7
201836
Protected by Waratek16
No exploit published18
Outside Waratek scope2
Critical7
High16
Medium13
blocked by ARMR today16
not blocked20
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit34
201937
Protected by Waratek12
No exploit published17
Outside Waratek scope7
Not applicable1
Critical12
High17
Medium8
blocked by ARMR today12
not blocked25
Proof of concept only1
Forecast only5
No public exploit31
202026
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published22
Outside Waratek scope2
Critical4
High8
Medium14
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked24
No public exploit26
202112
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published7
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable2
High5
Medium7
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked10
Exploited1
No public exploit11
202210
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published9
High6
Medium4
not blocked10
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit9
202311
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published8
Outside Waratek scope1
High7
Medium4
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked10
Exploited2
No public exploit9
20246
No exploit published6
High4
Medium2
not blocked6
No public exploit6
20254
No exploit published4
High2
Medium2
not blocked4
No public exploit4
202617
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published15
Critical5
High7
Medium4
Low1
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked15
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit16
2008201020122014201620182020202220242026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2014-0035 | Medium | 2014-07-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The SymmetricBinding in Apache CXF before 2.6.13 and 2.7.x before 2.7.10, when EncryptBeforeSigning is enabled and the UsernameToken policy is set to an EncryptedSupportingToken, transmits the UsernameToken in cleartext, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information by sniffing the network. |
| CVE-2014-0034 | Medium | 2014-07-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The SecurityTokenService (STS) in Apache CXF before 2.6.12 and 2.7.x before 2.7.9 does not properly validate SAML tokens when caching is enabled, which allows remote attackers to gain access via an invalid SAML token. |
| CVE-2014-0224 | High | 2014-06-05 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly restrict processing of ChangeCipherSpec messages, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to trigger use of a zero-length master key in certain OpenSSL-to-OpenSSL communications, and consequently hijack sessions or obtain sensitive information, via a crafted TLS handshake, aka the "CCS Injection" vulnerability. |
| CVE-2014-0093 | Medium | 2014-04-03 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (JBEAP) 6.2.2, when using a Java Security Manager (JSM), does not properly apply permissions defined by a policy file, which causes applications to be granted the java.security.AllPermission permission and allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions. |
| CVE-2014-0058 | Low | 2014-02-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The security audit functionality in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) 6.x before 6.2.1 logs request parameters in plaintext, which might allow local users to obtain passwords by reading the log files. |
| CVE-2014-0018 | Low | 2014-02-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (JBEAP) 6.2.0 and JBoss WildFly Application Server, when run under a security manager, do not properly restrict access to the Modular Service Container (MSC) service registry, which allows local users to modify the server via a crafted deployment. |
| CVE-2011-4610 | Medium | 2014-02-10 | No exploit published | No public exploit | JBoss Web, as used in Red Hat JBoss Communications Platform before 5.1.3, Enterprise Web Platform before 5.1.2, Enterprise Application Platform before 5.1.2, and other products, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop) via vectors related to a crafted UTF-8 and a "surrogate pair character" that is "at the boundary of an internal buffer." |
| CVE-2012-3427 | Medium | 2014-02-02 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) and EC2 Amazon Machine Image (AMI). Incorrect permissions (755) for the /var/cache/jboss-ec2-eap/ directory allow a local user to read sensitive files. This vulnerability can lead to information disclosure, specifically exposing Amazon Web Services (AWS) credentials. |
| CVE-2013-2185 | High | 2014-01-19 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | The readObject method in the DiskFileItem class in Apache Tomcat and JBoss Web, as used in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6.1.0 and Red Hat JBoss Portal 6.0.0, allows remote attackers to write to arbitrary files via a NULL byte in a file name in a serialized instance, a similar issue to CVE-2013-2186. NOTE: this issue is reportedly disputed by the Apache Tomcat team, although Red Hat considers it a vulnerability. The dispute appears to regard whether it is the responsibility of applications to avoid providing untrusted data to be deserialized, or whether this class should inherently protect against this issue |
| CVE-2013-2133 | Medium | 2013-12-06 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The EJB invocation handler implementation in Red Hat JBossWS, as used in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) before 6.2.0, does not properly enforce the method level restrictions for JAX-WS Service endpoints, which allows remote authenticated users to access otherwise restricted JAX-WS handlers by leveraging permissions to the EJB class. |
| CVE-2012-4572 | Low | 2013-10-28 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) before 6.1.0 and JBoss Portal before 6.1.0 does not load the implementation of a custom authorization module for a new application when an implementation is already loaded and the modules share class names, which allows local users to control certain applications' authorization decisions via a crafted application. |
| CVE-2012-4529 | Medium | 2013-10-28 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The org.apache.catalina.connector.Response.encodeURL method in Red Hat JBoss Web 7.1.x and earlier, when the tracking mode is set to COOKIE, sends the jsessionid in the URL of the first response of a session, which allows remote attackers to obtain the session id (1) via a man-in-the-middle attack or (2) by reading a log. |
| CVE-2013-4210 | Medium | 2013-10-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The org.jboss.remoting.transport.socket.ServerThread class in Red Hat JBoss Remoting for Red Hat JBoss SOA Platform 5.3.1 GA, Web Platform 5.2.0, Enterprise Application Platform 5.2.0, and other products allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (file descriptor consumption) via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2013-4112 | Medium | 2013-09-28 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The DiagnosticsHandler in JGroup 3.0.x, 3.1.x, 3.2.x before 3.2.9, and 3.3.x before 3.3.3 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information (diagnostic information) and execute arbitrary code by reusing valid credentials. |
| CVE-2013-1921 | Low | 2013-09-28 | No exploit published | No public exploit | PicketBox, as used in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform before 6.1.1, allows local users to obtain the admin encryption key by reading the Vault data file. |
| CVE-2012-5575 | Medium | 2013-08-19 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache CXF 2.5.x before 2.5.10, 2.6.x before CXF 2.6.7, and 2.7.x before CXF 2.7.4 does not verify that a specified cryptographic algorithm is allowed by the WS-SecurityPolicy AlgorithmSuite definition before decrypting, which allows remote attackers to force CXF to use weaker cryptographic algorithms than intended and makes it easier to decrypt communications, aka "XML Encryption backwards compatibility attack." |
| CVE-2013-4213 | Medium | 2013-08-16 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) 6.1.0 does not properly cache EJB invocations by the EJB client API, which allows remote attackers to hijack sessions by using an EJB client. |
| CVE-2013-4128 | Medium | 2013-08-16 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) 6.1.0 does not properly cache EJB invocations by remote-naming, which allows remote attackers to hijack sessions by using a remoting client. |
| CVE-2011-1483 | Medium | 2013-07-29 | No exploit published | No public exploit | wsf/common/DOMUtils.java in JBossWS Native in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 4.2.0.CP09, 4.3, and 5.1.1; JBoss Enterprise Portal Platform 4.3.CP06 and 5.1.1; JBoss Enterprise SOA Platform 4.2.CP05, 4.3.CP05, and 5.1.0; JBoss Communications Platform 1.2.11 and 5.1.1; JBoss Enterprise BRMS Platform 5.1.0; and JBoss Enterprise Web Platform 5.1.1 does not properly handle recursion during entity expansion, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory and CPU consumption) via a crafted request containing an XML document with a DOCTYPE declaration and a large number of nested entity references, a similar issue to CVE-2003-1564. |
| CVE-2013-2165 | High | 2013-07-23 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | ResourceBuilderImpl.java in the RichFaces 3.x through 5.x implementation in Red Hat JBoss Web Framework Kit before 2.3.0, Red Hat JBoss Web Platform through 5.2.0, Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform through 4.3.0 CP10 and 5.x through 5.2.0, Red Hat JBoss BRMS through 5.3.1, Red Hat JBoss SOA Platform through 4.3.0 CP05 and 5.x through 5.3.1, Red Hat JBoss Portal through 4.3 CP07 and 5.x through 5.2.2, and Red Hat JBoss Operations Network through 2.4.2 and 3.x through 3.1.2 does not restrict the classes for which deserialization methods can be called, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted serialized data. |
| CVE-2013-1896 | Medium | 2013-07-10 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | mod_dav.c in the Apache HTTP Server before 2.2.25 does not properly determine whether DAV is enabled for a URI, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault) via a MERGE request in which the URI is configured for handling by the mod_dav_svn module, but a certain href attribute in XML data refers to a non-DAV URI. |
| CVE-2013-1862 | Medium | 2013-06-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | mod_rewrite.c in the mod_rewrite module in the Apache HTTP Server 2.2.x before 2.2.25 writes data to a log file without sanitizing non-printable characters, which might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via an HTTP request containing an escape sequence for a terminal emulator. |
| CVE-2012-5629 | High | 2013-03-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The default configuration of the (1) LdapLoginModule and (2) LdapExtLoginModule modules in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) 4.3.0 CP10, 5.2.0, and 6.0.1, and Enterprise Web Platform (EWP) 5.2.0 allow remote attackers to bypass authentication via an empty password. |
| CVE-2013-0218 | Low | 2013-02-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The GUI installer in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) and Enterprise Web Platform (EWP) 5.2.0 and possibly 5.1.2 uses world-readable permissions for the auto-install XML file, which allows local users to obtain the administrator password and the sucker password by reading this file. |
| CVE-2012-5478 | Medium | 2013-02-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The AuthorizationInterceptor in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) before 5.2.0, Web Platform (EWP) before 5.2.0, BRMS Platform before 5.3.1, and SOA Platform before 5.3.1 does not properly restrict access, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended role restrictions and perform arbitrary JMX operations via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2012-3370 | Medium | 2013-02-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The SecurityAssociation.getCredential method in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) before 5.2.0, Web Platform (EWP) before 5.2.0, BRMS Platform before 5.3.1, and SOA Platform before 5.3.1 returns the credentials of the previous user when a security context is not provided, which allows remote attackers to gain privileges as other users. |
| CVE-2012-3369 | Medium | 2013-02-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The CallerIdentityLoginModule in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) before 5.2.0, Web Platform (EWP) before 5.2.0, BRMS Platform before 5.3.1, and SOA Platform before 5.3.1 allows remote attackers to gain privileges of the previous user via a null password, which causes the previous user's password to be used. |
| CVE-2012-0874 | Medium | 2013-02-05 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | The (1) JMXInvokerHAServlet and (2) EJBInvokerHAServlet invoker servlets in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) before 5.2.0, Web Platform (EWP) before 5.2.0, BRMS Platform before 5.3.1, and SOA Platform before 5.3.1 do not require authentication by default in certain profiles, which might allow remote attackers to invoke MBean methods and execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors. NOTE: this issue can only be exploited when the interceptor is not properly configured with a "second layer of authentication," or when used in conjunction with other vulnerabilities that bypass this second layer. |
| CVE-2012-0034 | Low | 2013-02-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The NonManagedConnectionFactory in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) 5.1.2 and 5.2.0, Web Platform (EWP) 5.1.2 and 5.2.0, and BRMS Platform before 5.3.1 logs the username and password in cleartext when an exception is thrown, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading the log file. |
| CVE-2011-4575 | Medium | 2013-02-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the JMX console in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) before 5.2.0, Web Platform (EWP) before 5.2.0, BRMS Platform before 5.3.1, and SOA Platform before 5.3.1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2012-4550 | Medium | 2013-01-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform. When role-based authorization is used for Enterprise Java Beans (EJB) access, the system does not correctly call the necessary authorization modules. This prevents Java Authorization Contract for Containers (JACC) permissions from being applied, allowing remote attackers to gain unauthorized access to EJBs. |
| CVE-2012-4549 | Medium | 2013-01-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform. The `processInvocation` function within the `org.jboss.as.ejb3.security.AuthorizationInterceptor` component incorrectly authorizes all requests when no roles are defined for an Enterprise Java Beans (EJB) method invocation. This allows attackers to bypass intended access restrictions for EJB methods, leading to unauthorized access to sensitive functionalities. |
| CVE-2012-1167 | Medium | 2012-11-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The JBoss Server in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 5.1.x before 5.1.2 and 5.2.x before 5.2.2, Web Platform before 5.1.2, BRMS Platform before 5.3.0, and SOA Platform before 5.3.0, when the server is configured to use the JaccAuthorizationRealm and the ignoreBaseDecision property is set to true on the JBossWebRealm, does not properly check the permissions created by the WebPermissionMapping class, which allows remote authenticated users to access arbitrary applications. |
| CVE-2011-4605 | High | 2012-11-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The (1) JNDI service, (2) HA-JNDI service, and (3) HAJNDIFactory invoker servlet in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 4.3.0 CP10 and 5.1.2, Web Platform 5.1.2, SOA Platform 4.2.0.CP05 and 4.3.0.CP05, Portal Platform 4.3 CP07 and 5.2.x before 5.2.2, and BRMS Platform before 5.3.0 do not properly restrict write access, which allows remote attackers to add, delete, or modify items in a JNDI tree via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2011-4085 | Medium | 2012-11-23 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | The servlets invoked by httpha-invoker in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform before 5.1.2, SOA Platform before 5.2.0, BRMS Platform before 5.3.0, and Portal Platform before 4.3 CP07 perform access control only for the GET and POST methods, which allow remote attackers to bypass authentication by sending a request with a different method. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of a CVE-2010-0738 regression. |
| CVE-2012-1154 | Medium | 2012-10-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | mod_cluster 1.0.10 before 1.0.10 CP03 and 1.1.x before 1.1.4, as used in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 5.1.2, when "ROOT" is set to excludedContexts, exposes the root context of the server, which allows remote attackers to bypass access restrictions and gain access to applications deployed on the root context via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2009-5066 | Low | 2012-08-13 | No exploit published | No public exploit | twiddle.sh in JBoss AS 5.0 and EAP 5.0 and earlier accepts credentials as command-line arguments, which allows local users to read the credentials by listing the process and its arguments. |
| CVE-2011-4608 | High | 2012-01-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | mod_cluster in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 5.1.2 for Red Hat Linux allows worker nodes to register with arbitrary virtual hosts, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions and provide malicious content, hijack sessions, and steal credentials by registering from an external vhost that does not enforce security constraints. |
| CVE-2011-4314 | Medium | 2012-01-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | message/ax/AxMessage.java in OpenID4Java before 0.9.6 final, as used in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 5.1 before 5.1.2, Step2, Kay Framework before 1.0.2, and possibly other products does not verify that Attribute Exchange (AX) information is signed, which allows remote attackers to modify potentially sensitive AX information without detection via a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack. |
| CVE-2011-2196 | Medium | 2011-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | jboss-seam.jar in the JBoss Seam 2 framework 2.2.x and earlier, as distributed in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise SOA Platform 4.3.0.CP05 and 5.1.0; JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.3.0, 4.3.0.CP09, and 5.1.1; and JBoss Enterprise Web Platform 5.1.1, does not properly restrict use of Expression Language (EL) statements in FacesMessages during page exception handling, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary Java code via a crafted URL to an application. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2011-1484. |
| CVE-2011-1484 | Medium | 2011-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | jboss-seam.jar in the JBoss Seam 2 framework 2.2.x and earlier, as distributed in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise SOA Platform 4.3.0.CP04 and 5.1.0 and JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.3.0.CP09 and 5.1.0, does not properly restrict use of Expression Language (EL) statements in FacesMessages during page exception handling, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary Java code via a crafted URL to an application. |
| CVE-2010-4265 | Low | 2010-12-30 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The org.jboss.remoting.transport.bisocket.BisocketServerInvoker$SecondaryServerSocketThread.run method in JBoss Remoting 2.2.x before 2.2.3.SP4 and 2.5.x before 2.5.3.SP2 in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.3 through 4.3.0.CP09 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon outage) by establishing a bisocket control connection TCP session, and then not sending any application data, related to a missing CVE-2010-3862 patch. NOTE: this can be considered a duplicate of CVE-2010-3862 because a missing patch should not be assigned a separate CVE identifier. |
| CVE-2010-3878 | Medium | 2010-12-30 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the JMX Console in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.3 before 4.3.0.CP09 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that deploy WAR files. |
| CVE-2010-3862 | Low | 2010-12-30 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The org.jboss.remoting.transport.bisocket.BisocketServerInvoker$SecondaryServerSocketThread.run method in JBoss Remoting 2.2.x before 2.2.3.SP4 and 2.5.x before 2.5.3.SP2 in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.3 through 4.3.0.CP09, and 5.1.0; and JBoss Enterprise Web Platform (aka JBEWP) 5.1.0; allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon outage) by establishing a bisocket control connection TCP session, and then not sending any application data. |
| CVE-2010-3708 | High | 2010-12-30 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The serialization implementation in JBoss Drools in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.3 before 4.3.0.CP09 and JBoss Enterprise SOA Platform 4.2 and 4.3 supports the embedding of class files, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted static initializer. |
| CVE-2010-1871 | High | 2010-08-05 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | JBoss Seam 2 (jboss-seam2), as used in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 4.3.0 for Red Hat Linux, does not properly sanitize inputs for JBoss Expression Language (EL) expressions, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted URL. NOTE: this is only a vulnerability when the Java Security Manager is not properly configured. |
| CVE-2010-1429 | Medium | 2010-04-28 | Outside Waratek scope | Working exploit published | Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.2 before 4.2.0.CP09 and 4.3 before 4.3.0.CP08 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information about "deployed web contexts" via a request to the status servlet, as demonstrated by a full=true query string. NOTE: this issue exists because of a CVE-2008-3273 regression. |
| CVE-2010-1428 | High | 2010-04-28 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | The Web Console (aka web-console) in JBossAs in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.2 before 4.2.0.CP09 and 4.3 before 4.3.0.CP08 performs access control only for the GET and POST methods, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via an unspecified request that uses a different method. |
| CVE-2010-0738 | Medium | 2010-04-28 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | The JMX-Console web application in JBossAs in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.2 before 4.2.0.CP09 and 4.3 before 4.3.0.CP08 performs access control only for the GET and POST methods, which allows remote attackers to send requests to this application's GET handler by using a different method. |
| CVE-2009-3554 | Low | 2009-12-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Twiddle in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.2 before 4.2.0.CP08 and 4.3 before 4.3.0.CP07 writes the JMX password, and other command-line arguments, to the twiddle.log file, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading this file. |
| CVE-2009-2405 | Medium | 2009-12-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the Web Console in the Application Server in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.2.0 before 4.2.0.CP08, 4.2.2GA, 4.3 before 4.3.0.CP07, and 5.1.0GA allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) monitorName, (2) objectName, (3) attribute, or (4) period parameter to createSnapshot.jsp, or the (5) monitorName, (6) objectName, (7) attribute, (8) threshold, (9) period, or (10) enabled parameter to createThresholdMonitor.jsp. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information. |
| CVE-2009-1380 | Medium | 2009-12-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in JMX-Console in JBossAs in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.2 before 4.2.0.CP08 and 4.3 before 4.3.0.CP07 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the filter parameter, related to the key property and the position of quote and colon characters. |
| CVE-2009-0027 | Medium | 2009-03-09 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The request handler in JBossWS in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.2 before 4.2.0.CP06 and 4.3 before 4.3.0.CP04 does not properly validate the resource path during a request for a WSDL file with a custom web-service endpoint, which allows remote attackers to read arbitrary XML files via a crafted request. |
| CVE-2008-3519 | Medium | 2008-09-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The default configuration of the JBossAs component in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBossEAP or EAP), possibly 4.2 before CP04 and 4.3 before CP02, when a production environment is enabled, sets the DownloadServerClasses property to true, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information (non-EJB classes) via a download request, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-3273. |
| CVE-2008-0455 | Medium | 2008-01-25 | Outside Waratek scope | Working exploit published | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the mod_negotiation module in the Apache HTTP Server 2.2.6 and earlier in the 2.2.x series, 2.0.61 and earlier in the 2.0.x series, and 1.3.39 and earlier in the 1.3.x series allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML by uploading a file with a name containing XSS sequences and a file extension, which leads to injection within a (1) "406 Not Acceptable" or (2) "300 Multiple Choices" HTTP response when the extension is omitted in a request for the file. |