Overview 16 matches · 6 in Waratek scope · 1 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 1 public PoC · 1 EPSS ≥ 0.5
16matches
6in Waratek scope37.5%
1protected6.2%
0exploited0.0%
0CISA KEV0.0%
1public PoC6.2%
1EPSS ≥ 0.56.2%
Protected by Waratek
1
6.2%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
5
31.2%
Outside Waratek scope
3
18.8%
Not applicable
7
43.8%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
1
6.2%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
15
93.8%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
1
6.2%
Proof of concept only
4
25.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
11
68.8%
split by
peak 7 / year
20171
Protected by Waratek1
Critical1
blocked by ARMR today1
Working exploit published1
20182
Outside Waratek scope2
Critical2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20190
20200
20210
20226
No exploit published2
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable3
Critical6
not blocked6
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit5
20230
20240
20250
20267
No exploit published3
Not applicable4
Critical7
not blocked7
Proof of concept only3
No public exploit4
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-60402 | Critical | 2026-07-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the TimesTen In-Memory Database product of Oracle TimesTen In-Memory Database (component: Kubernetes Operator). The supported version that is affected is 26.1.1.1.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTPS to compromise TimesTen In-Memory Database. While the vulnerability is in TimesTen In-Memory Database, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of TimesTen In-Memory Database. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 9.9 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2026-42584 | Critical | 2026-05-13 | No exploit published | Proof of concept only | Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to 4.2.13.Final and 4.1.133.Final, HttpClientCodec pairs each inbound response with an outbound request by queue.poll() once per response, including for 1xx. If the client pipelines GET then HEAD and the server sends 103, then 200 with GET body, then 200 for HEAD, the queue pairs HEAD with the first 200. The HEAD rule then skips reading that message’s body, so the GET entity bytes stay on the stream and the following 200 is parsed from the wrong offset. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.2.13.Final and 4.1.133.Final. |
| CVE-2026-42581 | Critical | 2026-05-13 | No exploit published | Proof of concept only | Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to 4.2.13.Final and 4.1.133.Final, HttpObjectDecoder strips a conflicting Content-Length header when a request carries both Transfer-Encoding: chunked and Content-Length, but only for HTTP/1.1 messages. The guard is absent for HTTP/1.0. An attacker that sends an HTTP/1.0 request with both headers causes Netty to decode the body as chunked while leaving Content-Length intact in the forwarded HttpMessage. Any downstream proxy or handler that trusts Content-Length over Transfer-Encoding will disagree on message boundaries, enabling request smuggling. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.2.13.Final and 4.1.133.Final. |
| CVE-2026-42579 | Critical | 2026-05-13 | No exploit published | Proof of concept only | Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to 4.2.13.Final and 4.1.133.Final, Netty's DNS codec does not enforce RFC 1035 domain name constraints during either encoding or decoding. This creates a bidirectional attack surface: malicious DNS responses can exploit the decoder, and user-influenced hostnames can exploit the encoder. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.2.13.Final and 4.1.133.Final. |
| CVE-2026-4176 | Critical | 2026-03-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Perl versions from 5.9.4 before 5.40.4-RC1, from 5.41.0 before 5.42.2-RC1, from 5.43.0 before 5.43.9 contain a vulnerable version of Compress::Raw::Zlib. Compress::Raw::Zlib is included in the Perl package as a dual-life core module, and is vulnerable to CVE-2026-3381 due to a vendored version of zlib which has several vulnerabilities, including CVE-2026-27171. The bundled Compress::Raw::Zlib was updated to version 2.221 in Perl blead commit c75ae9cc164205e1b6d6dbd57bd2c65c8593fe94. |
| CVE-2026-3381 | Critical | 2026-03-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Compress::Raw::Zlib versions through 2.219 for Perl use potentially insecure versions of zlib. Compress::Raw::Zlib includes a copy of the zlib library. Compress::Raw::Zlib version 2.220 includes zlib 1.3.2, which addresses findings fron the 7ASecurity audit of zlib. The includes fixs for CVE-2026-27171. |
| CVE-2025-68121 | Critical | 2026-02-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | During session resumption in crypto/tls, if the underlying Config has its ClientCAs or RootCAs fields mutated between the initial handshake and the resumed handshake, the resumed handshake may succeed when it should have failed. This may happen when a user calls Config.Clone and mutates the returned Config, or uses Config.GetConfigForClient. This can cause a client to resume a session with a server that it would not have resumed with during the initial handshake, or cause a server to resume a session with a client that it would not have resumed with during the initial handshake. |
| CVE-2022-37434 | Critical | 2022-08-05 | Outside Waratek scope | Proof of concept only | zlib through 1.2.12 has a heap-based buffer over-read or buffer overflow in inflate in inflate.c via a large gzip header extra field. NOTE: only applications that call inflateGetHeader are affected. Some common applications bundle the affected zlib source code but may be unable to call inflateGetHeader (e.g., see the nodejs/node reference). |
| CVE-2020-35168 | Critical | 2022-07-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell BSAFE Crypto-C Micro Edition, versions before 4.1.5, and Dell BSAFE Micro Edition Suite, versions before 4.6, contain an Observable Timing Discrepancy Vulnerability. |
| CVE-2020-35167 | Critical | 2022-07-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell BSAFE Crypto-C Micro Edition, versions before 4.1.5, and Dell BSAFE Micro Edition Suite, versions before 4.6, contain an Observable Timing Discrepancy Vulnerability. |
| CVE-2020-35166 | Critical | 2022-07-11 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Dell BSAFE Crypto-C Micro Edition, versions before 4.1.5, and Dell BSAFE Micro Edition Suite, versions before 4.6, contain an Observable Timing Discrepancy Vulnerability. |
| CVE-2020-35163 | Critical | 2022-07-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell BSAFE Crypto-C Micro Edition, versions before 4.1.5, and Dell BSAFE Micro Edition Suite, versions before 4.6, contain a Use of Insufficiently Random Values Vulnerability. |
| CVE-2020-29508 | Critical | 2022-07-11 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Dell BSAFE Crypto-C Micro Edition, versions before 4.1.5, and Dell BSAFE Micro Edition Suite, versions before 4.6, contain an Improper Input Validation Vulnerability. |
| CVE-2018-18314 | Critical | 2018-12-07 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Perl before 5.26.3 has a buffer overflow via a crafted regular expression that triggers invalid write operations. |
| CVE-2018-11058 | Critical | 2018-09-14 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | RSA BSAFE Micro Edition Suite, versions prior to 4.0.11 (in 4.0.x) and prior to 4.1.6 (in 4.1.x), and RSA BSAFE Crypto-C Micro Edition, version prior to 4.0.5.3 (in 4.0.x) contain a Buffer Over-Read vulnerability when parsing ASN.1 data. A remote attacker could use maliciously constructed ASN.1 data that would result in such issue. |
| CVE-2017-5645 | Critical | 2017-04-17 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | In Apache Log4j 2.x before 2.8.2, when using the TCP socket server or UDP socket server to receive serialized log events from another application, a specially crafted binary payload can be sent that, when deserialized, can execute arbitrary code. |