Overview 27 matches · 12 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 4 exploited · 1 CISA KEV · 5 public PoC · 4 EPSS ≥ 0.5
27matches
12in Waratek scope44.4%
0protected0.0%
4exploited14.8%
1CISA KEV3.7%
5public PoC18.5%
4EPSS ≥ 0.514.8%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
1
3.7%
No exploit published
11
40.7%
Outside Waratek scope
14
51.9%
Not applicable
1
3.7%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
27
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
4
14.8%
Working exploit published
1
3.7%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
22
81.5%
split by
peak 26 / month
Nov 09Dec 09Jan 10Feb 10Mar 10Apr 10
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2010-0850 | High | 2010-04-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Java 2D component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 1.3.1_27 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2010-0849 | High | 2010-04-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Java 2D component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 18, 5.0 Update 23, 1.4.2_25, and 1.3.1_27 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. NOTE: the previous information was obtained from the March 2010 CPU. Oracle has not commented on claims from a reliable researcher that this is a heap-based buffer overflow in a decoding routine used by the JPEGImageDecoderImpl interface, which allows code execution via a crafted JPEG image. |
| CVE-2010-0848 | High | 2010-04-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Java 2D component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 18, 5.0 Update 23, 1.4.2_25, and 1.3.1_27 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2010-0847 | High | 2010-04-01 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Java 2D component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 18, 5.0 Update 23, 1.4.2_25, and 1.3.1_27 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. NOTE: the previous information was obtained from the March 2010 CPU. Oracle has not commented on claims from a reliable researcher that this is a heap-based buffer overflow that allows arbitrary code execution via a crafted image. |
| CVE-2010-0846 | High | 2010-04-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the ImageIO component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 18, 5.0 Update 23, 1.4.2_25, and 1.3.1_27 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. NOTE: the previous information was obtained from the March 2010 CPU. Oracle has not commented on claims from a reliable researcher that this is a heap-based buffer overflow that allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code, related to an "invalid assignment" and inconsistent length values in a JPEG image encoder (JPEGImageEncoderImpl). |
| CVE-2010-0845 | Medium | 2010-04-01 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the HotSpot Server component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 18, 5.0, Update, and 23 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2010-0844 | High | 2010-04-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Sound component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 18, 5.0 Update 23, 1.4.2_25, and 1.3.1_27 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. NOTE: the previous information was obtained from the March 2010 CPU. Oracle has not commented on claims from a reliable researcher that this is for improper parsing of a crafted MIDI stream when creating a MixerSequencer object, which causes a pointer to be corrupted and allows a NULL byte to be written to arbitrary memory. |
| CVE-2010-0843 | High | 2010-04-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Sound component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 18, 5.0 Update 23, 1.4.2_25, and 1.3.1_27 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. NOTE: the previous information was obtained from the March 2010 CPU. Oracle has not commented on claims from a reliable researcher that this is related to XNewPtr and improper handling of an integer parameter when allocating heap memory in the com.sun.media.sound libraries, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code. |
| CVE-2010-0842 | High | 2010-04-01 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | Unspecified vulnerability in the Sound component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 18, 5.0 Update 23, 1.4.2_25, and 1.3.1_27 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. NOTE: the previous information was obtained from the March 2010 CPU. Oracle has not commented on claims from a reliable researcher that this is an uncontrolled array index that allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a MIDI file with a crafted MixerSequencer object, related to the GM_Song structure. |
| CVE-2010-0841 | High | 2010-04-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the ImageIO component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 18, 5.0 Update 23, and 1.4.2_25 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. NOTE: the previous information was obtained from the March 2010 CPU. Oracle has not commented on claims from a reliable researcher that this is an integer overflow in the Java Runtime Environment that allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a JPEG image that contains subsample dimensions with large values, related to JPEGImageReader and "stepX". |
| CVE-2010-0840 | Critical | 2010-04-01 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 18, 5.0 Update 23, and 1.4.2_25 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. NOTE: the previous information was obtained from the March 2010 CPU. Oracle has not commented on claims from a reliable researcher that this is related to improper checks when executing privileged methods in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE), which allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) an untrusted object that extends the trusted class but has not modified a certain method, or (2) "a similar trust issue with interfaces," aka "Trusted Methods Chaining Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." |
| CVE-2010-0839 | High | 2010-04-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Sound component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 18, 5.0 Update 23, 1.4.2_25, and 1.3.1_27 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2010-0838 | High | 2010-04-01 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Unspecified vulnerability in the Java 2D component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 18, 5.0, Update, and 23 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. NOTE: the previous information was obtained from the March 2010 CPU. Oracle has not commented on claims from a reliable researcher that this is a stack-based buffer overflow using an untrusted size value in the readMabCurveData function in the CMM module in the JVM. |
| CVE-2010-0837 | High | 2010-04-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Pack200 component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 18, 5.0, Update, and 23 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2010-0095 | Medium | 2010-04-01 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 18, 5.0 Update 23, and 1.4.2_25 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-0093. |
| CVE-2010-0094 | High | 2010-04-01 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 18 and 5.0 Update 23 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. NOTE: the previous information was obtained from the March 2010 CPU. Oracle has not commented on claims from a reliable researcher that this is due to missing privilege checks during deserialization of RMIConnectionImpl objects, which allows remote attackers to call system-level Java functions via the ClassLoader of a constructor that is being deserialized. |
| CVE-2010-0093 | Medium | 2010-04-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 18, 5.0 Update 23, and 1.4.2_25 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-0095. |
| CVE-2010-0092 | Medium | 2010-04-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 18, and 5.0 Update 23 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2010-0091 | Medium | 2010-04-01 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 18, 5.0 Update 23, and 1.4.2_25 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-0084. |
| CVE-2010-0090 | Medium | 2010-04-01 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Web Start, Java Plug-in component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 18 allows remote attackers to affect integrity and availability via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2010-0089 | Medium | 2010-04-01 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Web Start, Java Plug-in component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 18, 5.0 Update 23, and 1.4.2_25 allows remote attackers to affect availability via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2010-0088 | Medium | 2010-04-01 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 18, 5.0 Update 23, 1.4.2_25, and 1.3.1_27 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-0085. |
| CVE-2010-0087 | High | 2010-04-01 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Web Start, Java Plug-in component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 18, 5.0 Update 23, 1.4.2_25, and 1.3.1_27 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2010-0085 | Medium | 2010-04-01 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 18, 5.0 Update 23, 1.4.2_25, and 1.3.1_27 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-0088. |
| CVE-2010-0084 | Medium | 2010-04-01 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 18, 5.0 Update 23, and 1.4.2_25 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-0091. |
| CVE-2010-0082 | Medium | 2010-04-01 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the HotSpot Server component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 18, 5.0 Update 23, 1.4.2_25, and 1.3.1_27 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2009-3555 | Critical | 2009-11-09 | Not applicable | Exploited | The TLS protocol, and the SSL protocol 3.0 and possibly earlier, as used in Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.0, mod_ssl in the Apache HTTP Server 2.2.14 and earlier, OpenSSL before 0.9.8l, GnuTLS 2.8.5 and earlier, Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) 3.12.4 and earlier, multiple Cisco products, and other products, does not properly associate renegotiation handshakes with an existing connection, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to insert data into HTTPS sessions, and possibly other types of sessions protected by TLS or SSL, by sending an unauthenticated request that is processed retroactively by a server in a post-renegotiation context, related to a "plaintext injection" attack, aka the "Project Mogul" issue. |