Overview 32 matches · 3 in Waratek scope · 3 protected · 4 exploited · 4 CISA KEV · 27 public PoC
Protected by Waratek
3
9.4%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
8
25.0%
Not applicable
21
65.6%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
3
9.4%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
29
90.6%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
4
12.5%
Working exploit published
21
65.6%
Proof of concept only
3
9.4%
Forecast only
4
12.5%
No public exploit
0
0.0%
split by
peak 6 / year
20056
Not applicable6
High6
not blocked6
Working exploit published6
20062
Not applicable2
High2
not blocked2
Working exploit published2
20076
Not applicable6
High6
not blocked6
Working exploit published6
20082
Not applicable2
High2
not blocked2
Working exploit published2
20090
20101
Outside Waratek scope1
High1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20111
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20120
20130
20141
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
Exploited1
20150
20160
20171
Not applicable1
Critical1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20181
Protected by Waratek1
Critical1
blocked by ARMR today1
Exploited1
20190
20204
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable2
Critical2
High1
Medium1
not blocked4
Working exploit published2
Proof of concept only1
Forecast only1
20214
Outside Waratek scope4
Critical1
High3
not blocked4
Exploited2
Forecast only2
20223
Protected by Waratek2
Outside Waratek scope1
Critical2
High1
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked1
Proof of concept only2
Forecast only1
200620082010201220142016201820202022
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-2068 | Critical | 2022-06-21 | Outside Waratek scope | Proof of concept only | In addition to the c_rehash shell command injection identified in CVE-2022-1292, further circumstances where the c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection were found by code review. When the CVE-2022-1292 was fixed it was not discovered that there are other places in the script where the file names of certificates being hashed were possibly passed to a command executed through the shell. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the script. Use of the c_rehash script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the OpenSSL rehash command line tool. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.4 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2,3.0.3). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1p (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1o). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2zf (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2ze). |
| CVE-2022-23305 | Critical | 2022-01-18 | Protected by Waratek | Proof of concept only | By design, the JDBCAppender in Log4j 1.2.x accepts an SQL statement as a configuration parameter where the values to be inserted are converters from PatternLayout. The message converter, %m, is likely to always be included. This allows attackers to manipulate the SQL by entering crafted strings into input fields or headers of an application that are logged allowing unintended SQL queries to be executed. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.x when specifically configured to use the JDBCAppender, which is not the default. Beginning in version 2.0-beta8, the JDBCAppender was re-introduced with proper support for parameterized SQL queries and further customization over the columns written to in logs. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions. |
| CVE-2022-23302 | High | 2022-01-18 | Protected by Waratek | Forecast only | JMSSink in all versions of Log4j 1.x is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data when the attacker has write access to the Log4j configuration or if the configuration references an LDAP service the attacker has access to. The attacker can provide a TopicConnectionFactoryBindingName configuration causing JMSSink to perform JNDI requests that result in remote code execution in a similar fashion to CVE-2021-4104. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.x when specifically configured to use JMSSink, which is not the default. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions. |
| CVE-2021-40438 | Critical | 2021-09-16 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | A crafted request uri-path can cause mod_proxy to forward the request to an origin server choosen by the remote user. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 and earlier. |
| CVE-2021-36160 | High | 2021-09-16 | Outside Waratek scope | Forecast only | A carefully crafted request uri-path can cause mod_proxy_uwsgi to read above the allocated memory and crash (DoS). This issue affects Apache HTTP Server versions 2.4.30 to 2.4.48 (inclusive). |
| CVE-2021-34798 | High | 2021-09-16 | Outside Waratek scope | Forecast only | Malformed requests may cause the server to dereference a NULL pointer. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 and earlier. |
| CVE-2021-22555 | High | 2021-07-07 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | A heap out-of-bounds write affecting Linux since v2.6.19-rc1 was discovered in net/netfilter/x_tables.c. This allows an attacker to gain privileges or cause a DoS (via heap memory corruption) through user name space |
| CVE-2020-1967 | High | 2020-04-21 | Outside Waratek scope | Proof of concept only | Server or client applications that call the SSL_check_chain() function during or after a TLS 1.3 handshake may crash due to a NULL pointer dereference as a result of incorrect handling of the "signature_algorithms_cert" TLS extension. The crash occurs if an invalid or unrecognised signature algorithm is received from the peer. This could be exploited by a malicious peer in a Denial of Service attack. OpenSSL version 1.1.1d, 1.1.1e, and 1.1.1f are affected by this issue. This issue did not affect OpenSSL versions prior to 1.1.1d. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1g (Affected 1.1.1d-1.1.1f). |
| CVE-2020-1927 | Medium | 2020-04-02 | Outside Waratek scope | Forecast only | In Apache HTTP Server 2.4.0 to 2.4.41, redirects configured with mod_rewrite that were intended to be self-referential might be fooled by encoded newlines and redirect instead to an an unexpected URL within the request URL. |
| CVE-2020-8012 | Critical | 2020-02-18 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | CA Unified Infrastructure Management (Nimsoft/UIM) 20.1, 20.3.x, and 9.20 and below contains a buffer overflow vulnerability in the robot (controller) component. A remote attacker can execute arbitrary code. |
| CVE-2020-8010 | Critical | 2020-02-18 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | CA Unified Infrastructure Management (Nimsoft/UIM) 20.1, 20.3.x, and 9.20 and below contains an improper ACL handling vulnerability in the robot (controller) component. A remote attacker can execute commands, read from, or write to the target system. |
| CVE-2018-1273 | Critical | 2018-04-11 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Spring Data Commons, versions prior to 1.13 to 1.13.10, 2.0 to 2.0.5, and older unsupported versions, contain a property binder vulnerability caused by improper neutralization of special elements. An unauthenticated remote malicious user (or attacker) can supply specially crafted request parameters against Spring Data REST backed HTTP resources or using Spring Data's projection-based request payload binding hat can lead to a remote code execution attack. |
| CVE-2017-9417 | Critical | 2017-06-04 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Broadcom BCM43xx Wi-Fi chips allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors, aka the "Broadpwn" issue. |
| CVE-2014-0160 | High | 2014-04-07 | Not applicable | Exploited | The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packets, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory via crafted packets that trigger a buffer over-read, as demonstrated by reading private keys, related to d1_both.c and t1_lib.c, aka the Heartbleed bug. |
| CVE-2011-1653 | High | 2011-04-18 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in the Unified Network Control (UNC) Server in CA Total Defense (TD) r12 before SE2 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via vectors involving the (1) UnAssignFunctionalRoles, (2) UnassignAdminRoles, (3) DeleteFilter, (4) NonAssignedUserList, (5) DeleteReportLayout, (6) DeleteReports, and (7) RegenerateReport stored procedures. |
| CVE-2010-0425 | High | 2010-03-05 | Outside Waratek scope | Working exploit published | modules/arch/win32/mod_isapi.c in mod_isapi in the Apache HTTP Server 2.0.37 through 2.0.63, 2.2.0 through 2.2.14, and 2.3.x before 2.3.7, when running on Windows, does not ensure that request processing is complete before calling isapi_unload for an ISAPI .dll module, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors related to a crafted request, a reset packet, and "orphaned callback pointers." |
| CVE-2008-4397 | High | 2008-10-14 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Directory traversal vulnerability in the RPC interface (asdbapi.dll) in CA ARCserve Backup (formerly BrightStor ARCserve Backup) r11.1 through r12.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a .. (dot dot) in an RPC call with opnum 0x10A. |
| CVE-2007-4620 | High | 2008-04-07 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in Computer Associates (CA) Alert Notification Service (Alert.exe) 8.1.586.0, 8.0.450.0, and 7.1.758.0, as used in multiple CA products including Anti-Virus for the Enterprise 7.1 through r11.1 and Threat Manager for the Enterprise 8.1 and r8, allow remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via crafted RPC requests. |
| CVE-2007-5082 | High | 2007-10-01 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in Computer Associates (CA) BrightStor Hierarchical Storage Manager (HSM) before r11.6 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified CsAgent service commands with certain opcodes, related to missing validation of a length parameter. |
| CVE-2007-5003 | High | 2007-10-01 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in CA (Computer Associates) BrightStor ARCserve Backup for Laptops and Desktops r11.0 through r11.5 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long (1) username or (2) password to the rxrLogin command in rxRPC.dll, or a long (3) username argument to the GetUserInfo function. |
| CVE-2007-3216 | High | 2007-06-14 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Multiple buffer overflows in the LGServer component of CA (Computer Associates) BrightStor ARCserve Backup for Laptops and Desktops r11.1 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted arguments to the (1) rxsAddNewUser, (2) rxsSetUserInfo, (3) rxsRenameUser, (4) rxsSetMessageLogSettings, (5) rxsExportData, (6) rxsSetServerOptions, (7) rxsRenameFile, (8) rxsACIManageSend, (9) rxsExportUser, (10) rxsImportUser, (11) rxsMoveUserData, (12) rxsUseLicenseIni, (13) rxsLicGetSiteId, (14) rxsGetLogFileNames, (15) rxsGetBackupLog, (16) rxsBackupComplete, (17) rxsSetDataProtectionSecurityData, (18) rxsSetDefaultConfigName, (19) rxsGetMessageLogSettings, (20) rxsHWDiskGetTotal, (21) rxsHWDiskGetFree, (22) rxsGetSubDirs, (23) rxsGetServerDBPathName, (24) rxsSetServerOptions, (25) rxsDeleteFile, (26) rxsACIManageSend, (27) rxcReadBackupSetList, (28) rxcWriteConfigInfo, (29) rxcSetAssetManagement, (30) rxcWriteFileListForRestore, (31) rxcReadSaveSetProfile, (32) rxcInitSaveSetProfile, (33) rxcAddSaveSetNextAppList, (34) rxcAddSaveSetNextFilesPathList, (35) rxcAddNextBackupSetIncWildCard, (36) rxcGetRevisions, (37) rxrAddMovedUser, (38) rxrSetClientVersion, or (39) rxsSetDataGrowthScheduleAndFilter commands. |
| CVE-2007-2139 | High | 2007-04-25 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in the SUN RPC service in CA (formerly Computer Associates) BrightStor ARCserve Media Server, as used in BrightStor ARCserve Backup 9.01 through 11.5 SP2, BrightStor Enterprise Backup 10.5, Server Protection Suite 2, and Business Protection Suite 2, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via malformed RPC strings, a different vulnerability than CVE-2006-5171, CVE-2006-5172, and CVE-2007-1785. |
| CVE-2007-0449 | High | 2007-01-23 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Multiple buffer overflows in LGSERVER.EXE in CA BrightStor ARCserve Backup for Laptops and Desktops r11.0 through r11.1 SP1, Mobile Backup r4.0, Desktop and Business Protection Suite r2, and Desktop Management Suite (DMS) r11.0 and r11.1 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted packets to TCP port (1) 1900 or (2) 2200. |
| CVE-2007-0169 | High | 2007-01-11 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Multiple buffer overflows in Computer Associates (CA) BrightStor ARCserve Backup 9.01 through 11.5, Enterprise Backup 10.5, and CA Server/Business Protection Suite r2 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via RPC requests with crafted data for opnums (1) 0x2F and (2) 0x75 in the (a) Message Engine RPC service, or opnum (3) 0xCF in the Tape Engine service. |
| CVE-2006-6076 | High | 2006-11-24 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Buffer overflow in the Tape Engine (tapeeng.exe) in CA (formerly Computer Associates) BrightStor ARCserve Backup 11.5 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via certain RPC requests to TCP port 6502. |
| CVE-2006-5143 | High | 2006-10-10 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Multiple buffer overflows in CA BrightStor ARCserve Backup r11.5 SP1 and earlier, r11.1, and 9.01; BrightStor ARCserve Backup for Windows r11; BrightStor Enterprise Backup 10.5; Server Protection Suite r2; and Business Protection Suite r2 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted data on TCP port 6071 to the Backup Agent RPC Server (DBASVR.exe) using the RPC routines with opcode (1) 0x01, (2) 0x02, or (3) 0x18; invalid stub data on TCP port 6503 to the RPC routines with opcode (4) 0x2b or (5) 0x2d in ASCORE.dll in the Message Engine RPC Server (msgeng.exe); (6) a long hostname on TCP port 41523 to ASBRDCST.DLL in the Discovery Service (casdscsvc.exe); or unspecified vectors related to the (7) Job Engine Service. |
| CVE-2005-3190 | High | 2005-10-13 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Buffer overflow in Computer Associates (CA) iGateway 3.0 and 4.0 before 4.0.050623, when running in debug mode, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via HTTP GET requests. |
| CVE-2005-2668 | High | 2005-08-23 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Multiple buffer overflows in Computer Associates (CA) Message Queuing (CAM / CAFT) 1.05, 1.07 before Build 220_13, and 1.11 before Build 29_13 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2005-2535 | High | 2005-08-10 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Buffer overflow in the Discovery Service in BrightStor ARCserve Backup 9.0 through 11.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a large packet to TCP port 41523, a different vulnerability than CVE-2005-0260. |
| CVE-2005-1272 | High | 2005-08-05 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Stack-based buffer overflow in the Backup Agent for Microsoft SQL Server in BrightStor ARCserve Backup Agent for SQL Server 11.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long string sent to port (1) 6070 or (2) 6050. |
| CVE-2005-0260 | High | 2005-05-02 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Stack-based buffer overflow in the Discovery Service for BrightStor ARCserve Backup 11.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long packet to UDP port 41524, which is not properly handled in a recvfrom call. |
| CVE-2004-0932 | High | 2005-01-27 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | McAfee Anti-Virus Engine DATS drivers before 4398 released on Oct 13th 2004 and DATS Driver before 4397 October 6th 2004 allows remote attackers to bypass antivirus protection via a compressed file with both local and global headers set to zero, which does not prevent the compressed file from being opened on a target system. |