WaratekVRT Sign in
Reset
More filters (2)
Columns
Including CVEs outside Waratek scope✕EPSS ≥ 0.5✕Product software collection✕
Overview 15 matches · 1 in Waratek scope · 1 protected · 6 exploited · 5 CISA KEV · 7 public PoC
15matches 1in Waratek scope6.7% 1protected6.7% 6exploited40.0% 5CISA KEV33.3% 7public PoC46.7%
Protected by Waratek 1 6.7% Rule in development 0 0.0% Mitigation candidate 0 0.0% No exploit published 0 0.0% Outside Waratek scope 11 73.3% Not applicable 3 20.0% Withdrawn CVE 0 0.0%
Critical 3 20.0% High 10 66.7% Medium 2 13.3% Low 0 0.0% None 0 0.0% Unknown 0 0.0%
blocked by ARMR today 1 6.7% partly blocked 0 0.0% not blocked 14 93.3% not established 0 0.0% unrecorded 0 0.0%
Exploited 6 40.0% Working exploit published 1 6.7% Proof of concept only 0 0.0% Forecast only 8 53.3% No public exploit 0 0.0%
split by peak 6 / quarter
Not applicable: 3Outside Waratek scope: 11Protected by Waratek: 1 Medium: 2High: 10Critical: 3 not blocked: 14blocked by ARMR today: 1 Forecast only: 8Working exploit published: 1Exploited: 6
Q1 162 Not applicable2 High2 not blocked2 Exploited1 Forecast only1 Q2 160 Q3 160 Q4 160 Q1 170 Q2 170 Q3 170 Q4 170 Q1 180 Q2 180 Q3 180 Q4 180 Q1 191 Not applicable1 High1 not blocked1 Exploited1 Q2 191 Outside Waratek scope1 High1 not blocked1 Exploited1 Q3 196 Outside Waratek scope6 High4 Medium2 not blocked6 Working exploit published1 Forecast only5 Q4 191 Outside Waratek scope1 Critical1 not blocked1 Exploited1 Q1 201 Outside Waratek scope1 Critical1 not blocked1 Forecast only1 Q2 200 Q3 201 Outside Waratek scope1 High1 not blocked1 Forecast only1 Q4 200 Q1 210 Q2 210 Q3 211 Outside Waratek scope1 Critical1 not blocked1 Exploited1 Q4 211 Protected by Waratek1 High1 blocked by ARMR today1 Exploited1
Q2 16Q4 16Q2 17Q4 17Q2 18Q4 18Q2 19Q4 19Q2 20Q4 20Q2 21Q4 21
15 matches Sign in to download these CVEs as CSV or JSON, or to follow them in a feed.
CVE Severity Published▾ Status Exploitation Description
CVE-2021-4104 High 2021-12-14 Protected by Waratek Exploited JMSAppender in Log4j 1.2 is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data when the attacker has write access to the Log4j configuration. The attacker can provide TopicBindingName and TopicConnectionFactoryBindingName configurations causing JMSAppender to perform JNDI requests that result in remote code execution in a similar fashion to CVE-2021-44228. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.2 when specifically configured to use JMSAppender, which is not the default. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions.
CVE-2021-40438 Critical 2021-09-16 Outside Waratek scope Exploited A crafted request uri-path can cause mod_proxy to forward the request to an origin server choosen by the remote user. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 and earlier.
CVE-2020-9490 High 2020-08-07 Outside Waratek scope Forecast only Apache HTTP Server versions 2.4.20 to 2.4.43. A specially crafted value for the 'Cache-Digest' header in a HTTP/2 request would result in a crash when the server actually tries to HTTP/2 PUSH a resource afterwards. Configuring the HTTP/2 feature via "H2Push off" will mitigate this vulnerability for unpatched servers.
CVE-2019-15605 Critical 2020-02-07 Outside Waratek scope Forecast only HTTP request smuggling in Node.js 10, 12, and 13 causes malicious payload delivery when transfer-encoding is malformed
CVE-2019-11043 Critical 2019-10-28 Outside Waratek scope Exploited In PHP versions 7.1.x below 7.1.33, 7.2.x below 7.2.24 and 7.3.x below 7.3.11 in certain configurations of FPM setup it is possible to cause FPM module to write past allocated buffers into the space reserved for FCGI protocol data, thus opening the possibility of remote code execution.
CVE-2019-10092 Medium 2019-09-26 Outside Waratek scope Working exploit published In Apache HTTP Server 2.4.0-2.4.39, a limited cross-site scripting issue was reported affecting the mod_proxy error page. An attacker could cause the link on the error page to be malformed and instead point to a page of their choice. This would only be exploitable where a server was set up with proxying enabled but was misconfigured in such a way that the Proxy Error page was displayed.
CVE-2019-9516 Medium 2019-08-13 Outside Waratek scope Forecast only Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a header leak, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of headers with a 0-length header name and 0-length header value, optionally Huffman encoded into 1-byte or greater headers. Some implementations allocate memory for these headers and keep the allocation alive until the session dies. This can consume excess memory.
CVE-2019-9515 High 2019-08-13 Outside Waratek scope Forecast only Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one acknowledgement per SETTINGS frame, an empty SETTINGS frame is almost equivalent in behavior to a ping. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both.
CVE-2019-9514 High 2019-08-13 Outside Waratek scope Forecast only Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens a number of streams and sends an invalid request over each stream that should solicit a stream of RST_STREAM frames from the peer. Depending on how the peer queues the RST_STREAM frames, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both.
CVE-2019-9513 High 2019-08-13 Outside Waratek scope Forecast only Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to resource loops, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker creates multiple request streams and continually shuffles the priority of the streams in a way that causes substantial churn to the priority tree. This can consume excess CPU.
CVE-2019-9511 High 2019-08-13 Outside Waratek scope Forecast only Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to window size manipulation and stream prioritization manipulation, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker requests a large amount of data from a specified resource over multiple streams. They manipulate window size and stream priority to force the server to queue the data in 1-byte chunks. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both.
CVE-2019-0211 High 2019-04-08 Outside Waratek scope Exploited In Apache HTTP Server 2.4 releases 2.4.17 to 2.4.38, with MPM event, worker or prefork, code executing in less-privileged child processes or threads (including scripts executed by an in-process scripting interpreter) could execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the parent process (usually root) by manipulating the scoreboard. Non-Unix systems are not affected.
CVE-2019-5418 High 2019-03-27 Not applicable Exploited There is a File Content Disclosure vulnerability in Action View <5.2.2.1, <5.1.6.2, <5.0.7.2, <4.2.11.1 and v3 where specially crafted accept headers can cause contents of arbitrary files on the target system's filesystem to be exposed.
CVE-2016-0752 High 2016-02-16 Not applicable Exploited Directory traversal vulnerability in Action View in Ruby on Rails before 3.2.22.1, 4.0.x and 4.1.x before 4.1.14.1, 4.2.x before 4.2.5.1, and 5.x before 5.0.0.beta1.1 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files by leveraging an application's unrestricted use of the render method and providing a .. (dot dot) in a pathname.
CVE-2016-0742 High 2016-02-15 Not applicable Forecast only The resolver in nginx before 1.8.1 and 1.9.x before 1.9.10 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (invalid pointer dereference and worker process crash) via a crafted UDP DNS response.