Overview 7 matches · 4 in Waratek scope · 3 protected · 4 exploited · 3 CISA KEV · 4 public PoC
Protected by Waratek
3
42.9%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
1
14.3%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
3
42.9%
Not applicable
0
0.0%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
3
42.9%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
4
57.1%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
4
57.1%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
3
42.9%
No public exploit
0
0.0%
split by
peak 2 / month
Jun 211
Outside Waratek scope1
High1
not blocked1
Forecast only1
Jul 210
Aug 210
Sep 212
Outside Waratek scope2
High2
not blocked2
Forecast only2
Oct 210
Nov 210
Dec 211
Protected by Waratek1
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today1
Exploited1
Jan 220
Feb 220
Mar 221
Mitigation candidate1
Critical1
not blocked1
Exploited1
Apr 222
Protected by Waratek2
Critical2
blocked by ARMR today2
Exploited2
Jun 21Jul 21Aug 21Sep 21Oct 21Nov 21Dec 21Jan 22Feb 22Mar 22Apr 22
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-22965 | Critical | 2022-04-01 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | A Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux application running on JDK 9+ may be vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) via data binding. The specific exploit requires the application to run on Tomcat as a WAR deployment. If the application is deployed as a Spring Boot executable jar, i.e. the default, it is not vulnerable to the exploit. However, the nature of the vulnerability is more general, and there may be other ways to exploit it. |
| CVE-2022-22963 | Critical | 2022-04-01 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | In Spring Cloud Function versions 3.1.6, 3.2.2 and older unsupported versions, when using routing functionality it is possible for a user to provide a specially crafted SpEL as a routing-expression that may result in remote code execution and access to local resources. |
| CVE-2022-22947 | Critical | 2022-03-03 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | In spring cloud gateway versions prior to 3.1.1+ and 3.0.7+ , applications are vulnerable to a code injection attack when the Gateway Actuator endpoint is enabled, exposed and unsecured. A remote attacker could make a maliciously crafted request that could allow arbitrary remote execution on the remote host. |
| CVE-2021-45105 | Medium | 2021-12-18 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-alpha1 through 2.16.0 (excluding 2.12.3 and 2.3.1) did not protect from uncontrolled recursion from self-referential lookups. This allows an attacker with control over Thread Context Map data to cause a denial of service when a crafted string is interpreted. This issue was fixed in Log4j 2.17.0, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1. |
| CVE-2021-36160 | High | 2021-09-16 | Outside Waratek scope | Forecast only | A carefully crafted request uri-path can cause mod_proxy_uwsgi to read above the allocated memory and crash (DoS). This issue affects Apache HTTP Server versions 2.4.30 to 2.4.48 (inclusive). |
| CVE-2021-34798 | High | 2021-09-16 | Outside Waratek scope | Forecast only | Malformed requests may cause the server to dereference a NULL pointer. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 and earlier. |
| CVE-2021-22901 | High | 2021-06-11 | Outside Waratek scope | Forecast only | curl 7.75.0 through 7.76.1 suffers from a use-after-free vulnerability resulting in already freed memory being used when a TLS 1.3 session ticket arrives over a connection. A malicious server can use this in rare unfortunate circumstances to potentially reach remote code execution in the client. When libcurl at run-time sets up support for TLS 1.3 session tickets on a connection using OpenSSL, it stores pointers to the transfer in-memory object for later retrieval when a session ticket arrives. If the connection is used by multiple transfers (like with a reused HTTP/1.1 connection or multiplexed HTTP/2 connection) that first transfer object might be freed before the new session is established on that connection and then the function will access a memory buffer that might be freed. When using that memory, libcurl might even call a function pointer in the object, making it possible for a remote code execution if the server could somehow manage to get crafted memory content into the correct place in memory. |