Critical Communications Cloud Native Core Network Slice Selection Function CVEs
7 CVEs, 3 exploited, 2 protected by Waratek
Overview 7 matches · 2 protected · 3 exploited · 3 CISA KEV · 3 public PoC · 3 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
2
28.6%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
1
14.3%
No exploit published
4
57.1%
blocked by ARMR today
2
28.6%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
5
71.4%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
3
42.9%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
4
57.1%
split by
peak 3 / quarter
Q4 193
No exploit published3
Critical3
not blocked3
No public exploit3
Q1 201
No exploit published1
Critical1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q2 200
Q3 200
Q4 200
Q1 210
Q2 210
Q3 210
Q4 210
Q1 221
Mitigation candidate1
Critical1
not blocked1
Exploited1
Q2 222
Protected by Waratek2
Critical2
blocked by ARMR today2
Exploited2
Q4 19Q1 20Q2 20Q3 20Q4 20Q1 21Q2 21Q3 21Q4 21Q1 22Q2 22
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-22965 | Critical | 2022-04-01 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | A Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux application running on JDK 9+ may be vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) via data binding. The specific exploit requires the application to run on Tomcat as a WAR deployment. If the application is deployed as a Spring Boot executable jar, i.e. the default, it is not vulnerable to the exploit. However, the nature of the vulnerability is more general, and there may be other ways to exploit it. |
| CVE-2022-22963 | Critical | 2022-04-01 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | In Spring Cloud Function versions 3.1.6, 3.2.2 and older unsupported versions, when using routing functionality it is possible for a user to provide a specially crafted SpEL as a routing-expression that may result in remote code execution and access to local resources. |
| CVE-2022-22947 | Critical | 2022-03-03 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | In spring cloud gateway versions prior to 3.1.1+ and 3.0.7+ , applications are vulnerable to a code injection attack when the Gateway Actuator endpoint is enabled, exposed and unsecured. A remote attacker could make a maliciously crafted request that could allow arbitrary remote execution on the remote host. |
| CVE-2019-20330 | Critical | 2020-01-03 | No exploit published | No public exploit | FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.2 lacks certain net.sf.ehcache blocking. |
| CVE-2019-17531 | Critical | 2019-10-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A Polymorphic Typing issue was discovered in FasterXML jackson-databind 2.0.0 through 2.9.10. When Default Typing is enabled (either globally or for a specific property) for an externally exposed JSON endpoint and the service has the apache-log4j-extra (version 1.2.x) jar in the classpath, and an attacker can provide a JNDI service to access, it is possible to make the service execute a malicious payload. |
| CVE-2019-16943 | Critical | 2019-10-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A Polymorphic Typing issue was discovered in FasterXML jackson-databind 2.0.0 through 2.9.10. When Default Typing is enabled (either globally or for a specific property) for an externally exposed JSON endpoint and the service has the p6spy (3.8.6) jar in the classpath, and an attacker can find an RMI service endpoint to access, it is possible to make the service execute a malicious payload. This issue exists because of com.p6spy.engine.spy.P6DataSource mishandling. |
| CVE-2019-16942 | Critical | 2019-10-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A Polymorphic Typing issue was discovered in FasterXML jackson-databind 2.0.0 through 2.9.10. When Default Typing is enabled (either globally or for a specific property) for an externally exposed JSON endpoint and the service has the commons-dbcp (1.4) jar in the classpath, and an attacker can find an RMI service endpoint to access, it is possible to make the service execute a malicious payload. This issue exists because of org.apache.commons.dbcp.datasources.SharedPoolDataSource and org.apache.commons.dbcp.datasources.PerUserPoolDataSource mishandling. |