Siebel Ui Framework CVEs with a working exploit
3 CVEs, 2 protected by Waratek
Overview 3 matches · 2 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV
Protected by Waratek
2
66.7%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
1
33.3%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
2
66.7%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
1
33.3%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
3
100.0%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
0
0.0%
split by
peak 1 / quarter
Q2 171
Protected by Waratek1
Critical1
blocked by ARMR today1
Working exploit published1
Q3 170
Q4 170
Q1 180
Q2 180
Q3 180
Q4 180
Q1 190
Q2 190
Q3 190
Q4 190
Q1 200
Q2 201
Protected by Waratek1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
Working exploit published1
Q3 201
Mitigation candidate1
High1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
Q3 17Q1 18Q3 18Q1 19Q3 19Q1 20Q3 20
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-13935 | High | 2020-07-14 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | The payload length in a WebSocket frame was not correctly validated in Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M6, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.36, 8.5.0 to 8.5.56 and 7.0.27 to 7.0.104. Invalid payload lengths could trigger an infinite loop. Multiple requests with invalid payload lengths could lead to a denial of service. |
| CVE-2020-9484 | High | 2020-05-20 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | When using Apache Tomcat versions 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M4, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.34, 8.5.0 to 8.5.54 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.103 if a) an attacker is able to control the contents and name of a file on the server; and b) the server is configured to use the PersistenceManager with a FileStore; and c) the PersistenceManager is configured with sessionAttributeValueClassNameFilter="null" (the default unless a SecurityManager is used) or a sufficiently lax filter to allow the attacker provided object to be deserialized; and d) the attacker knows the relative file path from the storage location used by FileStore to the file the attacker has control over; then, using a specifically crafted request, the attacker will be able to trigger remote code execution via deserialization of the file under their control. Note that all of conditions a) to d) must be true for the attack to succeed. |
| CVE-2017-5645 | Critical | 2017-04-17 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | In Apache Log4j 2.x before 2.8.2, when using the TCP socket server or UDP socket server to receive serialized log events from another application, a specially crafted binary payload can be sent that, when deserialized, can execute arbitrary code. |