Overview 1,536 matches · 183 in Waratek scope · 99 protected · 48 exploited · 26 CISA KEV · 103 public PoC · 100 EPSS ≥ 0.5
1,536matches
183in Waratek scope11.9%
99protected6.4%
48exploited3.1%
26CISA KEV1.7%
103public PoC6.7%
100EPSS ≥ 0.56.5%
Protected by Waratek
99
6.4%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
4
0.3%
No exploit published
80
5.2%
Outside Waratek scope
370
24.1%
Not applicable
983
64.0%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
99
6.4%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
1,437
93.6%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 205 / year
20014
Not applicable4
High1
Medium3
not blocked4
No public exploit4
20025
Not applicable5
High1
Medium4
not blocked5
No public exploit5
20030
200415
Not applicable15
High10
Medium4
Low1
not blocked15
Exploited3
Working exploit published3
No public exploit9
20058
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable7
High3
Medium4
Low1
not blocked8
Working exploit published3
No public exploit5
20068
Not applicable8
High5
Medium3
not blocked8
Working exploit published1
No public exploit7
200717
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable16
High8
Medium9
not blocked17
Working exploit published4
No public exploit13
200816
Not applicable16
High10
Medium6
not blocked16
Working exploit published1
No public exploit15
200923
Not applicable23
High18
Medium4
Low1
not blocked23
Working exploit published3
No public exploit20
201022
Not applicable22
High15
Medium7
not blocked22
Working exploit published3
No public exploit19
201121
No exploit published1
Not applicable20
High18
Medium3
not blocked21
Working exploit published2
No public exploit19
201220
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable18
Critical2
High8
Medium10
not blocked20
Exploited1
Working exploit published4
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit14
201322
Not applicable22
High15
Medium4
Low3
not blocked22
Exploited2
Working exploit published1
Forecast only9
No public exploit10
201432
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable31
Critical2
High15
Medium9
Low6
not blocked32
Exploited5
Working exploit published3
Forecast only2
No public exploit22
201551
Protected by Waratek1
Not applicable50
Critical2
High37
Medium6
Low6
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked50
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
No public exploit49
201634
Protected by Waratek1
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable31
Critical10
High10
Medium11
Low3
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked33
Exploited2
Forecast only1
No public exploit31
2017116
Protected by Waratek16
No exploit published3
Outside Waratek scope33
Not applicable64
Critical32
High44
Medium36
Low4
blocked by ARMR today16
not blocked100
Exploited3
Working exploit published6
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit106
2018157
Protected by Waratek3
No exploit published4
Outside Waratek scope75
Not applicable75
Critical22
High48
Medium80
Low7
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked154
Exploited3
Working exploit published5
Proof of concept only3
No public exploit146
2019163
Protected by Waratek16
No exploit published12
Outside Waratek scope88
Not applicable47
Critical27
High54
Medium70
Low12
blocked by ARMR today16
not blocked147
Exploited9
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit152
2020205
Protected by Waratek25
Mitigation candidate2
No exploit published23
Outside Waratek scope78
Not applicable77
Critical15
High81
Medium84
Low25
blocked by ARMR today25
not blocked180
Exploited5
Working exploit published2
Proof of concept only9
Forecast only4
No public exploit185
2021147
Protected by Waratek10
No exploit published6
Outside Waratek scope38
Not applicable93
Critical32
High47
Medium62
Low6
blocked by ARMR today10
not blocked137
Exploited3
Working exploit published2
Proof of concept only8
Forecast only13
No public exploit121
2022148
Protected by Waratek14
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published13
Outside Waratek scope15
Not applicable105
Critical24
High51
Medium66
Low7
blocked by ARMR today14
not blocked134
Exploited3
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only22
Forecast only2
No public exploit120
202394
Protected by Waratek8
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published3
Outside Waratek scope11
Not applicable71
Critical13
High39
Medium34
Low8
blocked by ARMR today8
not blocked86
Exploited5
Proof of concept only6
No public exploit83
202495
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published12
Outside Waratek scope17
Not applicable64
Critical8
High29
Medium45
Low13
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked93
Proof of concept only8
No public exploit87
202556
No exploit published3
Outside Waratek scope7
Not applicable46
Critical8
High20
Medium25
Low3
not blocked56
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only3
Forecast only1
No public exploit51
202657
Protected by Waratek3
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable53
Critical23
High20
Medium11
Low3
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked54
Exploited3
Proof of concept only2
Forecast only1
No public exploit51
200220052008201120142017202020232026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-88094 | High | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper neutralization of special elements in output used by a downstream component ('injection') in Azure Storage Library allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. |
| CVE-2026-76105 | High | 2026-10-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Container Storage Modules, versions prior to 1.18.0 contain(s) an Use of Insufficiently Random Values vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information tampering. |
| CVE-2026-70411 | High | 2026-10-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Container Storage Modules (CSM), versions prior to 1.18.0, contains a Missing Authentication for Critical Function vulnerability in the csm-authorization-tenant gRPC service (TenantService). An unauthenticated adjacent network attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to unauthorized creation of tenant entities, cross-tenant role injection, and modification of storage access control flags. |
| CVE-2026-67273 | Critical | 2026-10-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Container Storage Modules, versions prior to 1.18.0, contain(s) an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements Used in a Template Engine vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges. |
| CVE-2026-67270 | High | 2026-10-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Container Storage Modules (CSM) versions prior to 1.18.0, contains an Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in the proxy-server component. An unauthenticated adjacent network attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to information exposure of storage backend administrator credentials. |
| CVE-2026-67269 | Critical | 2026-10-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Container Storage Modules (CSM) Operator, versions prior to 1.18.0 contains an Improper Privilege Management vulnerability in the ContainerStorageModule Custom Resource reconciler. A low privileged remote attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to escalation of privileges and gaining root-level access on cluster nodes. |
| CVE-2026-63692 | Critical | 2026-10-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Container Storage Modules, versions prior to 1.18.0, contain(s) a Missing Authentication for Critical Function vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges. |
| CVE-2026-63691 | Critical | 2026-10-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Container Storage Modules, versions prior to 1.18.0, contain(s) a Missing Authorization vulnerability in the Dell CSI Driver for PowerMax - csireverseproxy . An unauthenticated attacker with adjacent network access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Unauthorized access. |
| CVE-2026-63690 | High | 2026-10-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Container Storage Modules, versions prior to 1.18.0, contain(s) a Missing Authentication for Critical Function vulnerability in the csi-powerflex; csi-powermax; csi-powerstore. An unauthenticated attacker with adjacent network access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure. |
| CVE-2026-63689 | Medium | 2026-10-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Container Storage Modules, versions prior to 1.18.0, contain(s) an Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure. |
| CVE-2026-63688 | Critical | 2026-10-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Container Storage Modules (CSM), versions prior to v1.18.0, contains a Missing Authentication for Critical Function vulnerability in the csm-authorization-storage gRPC server. An unauthenticated remote attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to unauthorized access to storage backend administrator credentials for all registered storage arrays. |
| CVE-2026-61421 | Critical | 2026-10-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Container Storage Modules, versions prior to 1.18.0, contain(s) an Use of Hard-coded Credentials vulnerability in the CSM Authorization. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges. |
| CVE-2026-61411 | High | 2026-10-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Container Storage Modules, versions prior to 1.18.0, contain(s) an Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure. |
| CVE-2026-54472 | Critical | 2026-10-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Container Storage Modules, versions prior to 1.18.0, contain(s) an Use of Hard-coded Credentials vulnerability in the csm-docs. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure.9.8 |
| CVE-2026-66907 | High | 2026-08-24 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Relative path traversal vulnerability in Apache Camel Google Storage component. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.14.9, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.4, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.0. The camel-google-storage consumer downloads Google Cloud Storage objects to the local filesystem when the downloadFileName option is set. That option is documented as a folder or a filename, and when its value contains no expression token the consumer builds the local destination by appending the object name to it: evaluateFileExpression sets the Exchange file-name header to the remote object name and evaluates downloadFileName + "/${file:name}". The ${file:name} token returns the file-name header verbatim, unlike ${file:onlyname}, which applies FileUtil.stripPath to it. The resulting string was passed directly to new File(result) and blob.downloadTo(file.toPath()) with no lexical normalization and no check that the destination stayed inside the configured directory. The object name is not route-controlled data: the consumer lists the bucket, iterates every returned blob and creates one exchange per object from blob.getBlobId().getName() verbatim, and the filter option that could restrict those names is not applied at all unless it has been explicitly set. Google Cloud Storage object names are opaque UTF-8 keys that the service stores and lists exactly as written, with no server-side canonicalization, and a forward slash is only a display convention for pseudo-directories, so a key containing parent-directory segments survives round-tripping intact. An object name containing such segments therefore resolved to a location outside the configured downloadFileName directory, letting anyone able to influence the names present in the consumed bucket cause Camel to create or overwrite a file at a location of their choosing, with the privileges of the Camel process. Depending on what the process can write to, overwriting a file outside the download directory can escalate beyond the loss of integrity of that file. The downloadFileName option is an ordinary consumer parameter and carries no security marker, so nothing signalled to users that its value was not being enforced as a containment boundary. The defect is consumer-only; the producer has no download-to-file sink. Camel's other file-download consumers - camel-file, camel-ftp, camel-smb, camel-mina-sftp, camel-azure-files and the Azure Storage download paths - already constrained their local downloads to the configured directory using a path-segment boundary check; camel-google-storage was the remaining object-store download sink not covered by that work. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.22.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.14.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.14.9. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.4. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, set the filter option to a regular expression that accepts only simple single-segment object names, so that any name carrying a path separator or a parent-directory segment is excluded before an exchange is created; note that no filtering whatsoever is applied when the option is left unset, and that the expression is matched against the whole object name. Alternatively, give downloadFileName an explicit expression that does not carry the remote path through, for example one built on ${file:onlyname} rather than the implicit ${file:name}, keeping in mind that a downloadFileName containing an expression is treated as route-author-controlled and is not covered by the containment check added in the fix. As defence in depth, treat the object names in any externally writable bucket as untrusted input and do not derive local filesystem paths from them. |
| CVE-2026-66906 | Critical | 2026-08-24 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Relative path traversal vulnerability in Apache Camel Azure Storage Blob component. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.14.9, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.4, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.0. The camel-azure-storage-blob component can download an Azure Storage blob to the local filesystem through its downloadBlobToFile operation, writing into the directory named by the fileDir endpoint option, which is documented as usable from both the producer and the consumer. BlobOperations.downloadBlobToFile built the local target by joining fileDir with the remote blob name exactly as the Azure SDK reported it (new File(fileDir, client.getBlobName())) and passed the result straight to the SDK download call, with no lexical normalization and no check that the resolved location stayed inside fileDir. The blob name is not route-controlled data: the consumer enumerates the container in BlobConsumer.createBatchExchangesFromContainer, which lists blobs and creates one exchange per entry from BlobItem.getName() verbatim, applying no name filtering by default. A blob name containing parent-directory segments therefore resolved to a location outside the configured fileDir, letting anyone able to influence the names present in the consumed container cause Camel to create or overwrite a file at a location of their choosing, with the privileges of the Camel process. Depending on what the process can write to, overwriting a file outside the download directory can escalate beyond the loss of integrity of that file. Azure Storage blob containers use a flat namespace in which the blob name is an opaque key, so a name carrying such segments is stored and listed as given. The fileDir option is an ordinary common-group configuration parameter and carries no security marker, so nothing signalled to users that its value was not being enforced as a containment boundary. Camel's other file-download consumers - camel-file, camel-ftp, camel-smb, camel-mina-sftp and camel-azure-files - already constrained their local downloads to the configured directory using a path-segment boundary check; the camel-azure-storage-blob download path was not covered by that work. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.22.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.14.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.14.9. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.4. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, constrain the names the consumer will act on using the regex endpoint option, which is applied to each listed blob name as a full-string match, so that only simple single-segment names are accepted and any name carrying a path separator or a parent-directory segment is filtered out before an exchange is created; the prefix option can additionally narrow the listing server-side, noting that when both are set regex takes priority and prefix is ignored. Alternatively, avoid the downloadBlobToFile operation on untrusted containers and write the payload from the route under a file name the route itself controls, rather than one taken from the remote listing. As defence in depth, treat the blob names in any externally writable container as untrusted input and do not derive local filesystem paths from them. |
| CVE-2026-60093 | Medium | 2026-08-24 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Relative path traversal vulnerability in Apache Camel Azure-Storage Datalake component This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.14.9, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.4, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.0. The camel-azure-storage-datalake component can download an Azure Data Lake Storage Gen2 file to the local filesystem through its downloadToFile operation, writing into the directory named by the fileDir endpoint option. DataLakeFileOperations.downloadToFile built the local target by joining fileDir with the remote path name exactly as the Azure SDK reported it (new File(fileDir, fileClientWrapper.getFileName())) and passed the result straight to the SDK download call, with no lexical normalization and no check that the resolved location stayed inside fileDir. The remote name is not route-controlled data: the consumer enumerates the filesystem in DataLakeConsumer.createBatchExchangesFromPath, which lists paths and creates one exchange per entry from PathItem.getName() verbatim, applying no name filtering by default. A path name containing parent-directory segments therefore resolved to a location outside the configured fileDir, letting anyone able to influence the names present in the consumed Data Lake filesystem cause Camel to create or overwrite a file at a location of their choosing, with the privileges of the Camel process. Depending on what the process can write to, overwriting a file outside the download directory can escalate beyond the loss of integrity of that file. The fileDir option is an ordinary common-group configuration parameter and carries no security marker, so nothing signalled to users that its value was not being enforced as a containment boundary. Camel's other file-download consumers - camel-file, camel-ftp, camel-smb, camel-mina-sftp and camel-azure-files - already constrained their local downloads to the configured directory using a path-segment boundary check; the camel-azure-storage-datalake download path was not covered by that work. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.22.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.14.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.14.9. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.4. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, constrain the names the consumer will act on using the regex endpoint option, which is applied to each listed path name as a full-string match, so that only simple single-segment names are accepted and any name carrying a path separator or a parent-directory segment is filtered out before an exchange is created. Alternatively, avoid the downloadToFile operation on untrusted filesystems and write the payload from the route under a file name the route itself controls, rather than one taken from the remote listing. As defence in depth, treat the object names in any externally writable Data Lake filesystem as untrusted input and do not derive local filesystem paths from them. |
| CVE-2026-16139 | High | 2026-08-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Progress ShareFile Storage Zones Controller versions <= 5.12.5 and <= 6.0.2, an authenticated zone administrator can exploit improper validation in the download preparation flow, enabling attacker-controlled files to be written outside the intended preparation directory. This can lead to remote code execution in v5 versions. Remote code execution is not confirmed on v6 versions. |
| CVE-2026-16138 | High | 2026-08-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Progress ShareFile Storage Zones Controller v5.12.5 and below versions, unsafe deserialization of untrusted file metadata can allow a user with write access to a Network share to execute arbitrary code on the Storage Zones Controller host. |
| CVE-2026-16137 | High | 2026-08-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Progress ShareFile Storage Zones Controller v5.12.5 and below, a party with valid zone credentials can perform path traversal using resumable upload initiation endpoint, allowing the party to write arbitrary content to any location writable by the application's service account. This may result in the execution of attacker-supplied code. |
| CVE-2026-19483 | High | 2026-08-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Storage Scale 5.2.3.0 through 5.2.3.8, and 6.0.0.0 through 6.0.1.0 Secrets may be disclosed in log files in IBM Storage Scale Management GUI The admin password is logged into the GUI log of IBM Storage Scale Systems Deploy and Upgrade from GUI. Secrets may be disclosed in information related to exceptions in IBM Storage Scale Management GUI. |
| CVE-2026-13460 | High | 2026-08-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Storage Scale 5.2.3.0 through 5.2.3.8, and 6.0.0.0 through 6.0.1.0 GUI contains a hardcoded token in the source code, which was used for inter-node cluster communication and REST API authentication between GUI. |
| CVE-2026-57104 | Critical | 2026-08-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Azure Storage Explorer allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. |
| CVE-2026-67261 | Critical | 2026-08-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Virtual Storage Integrator for VMware vSphere Client, versions prior to 10.11.1.0, contain(s) an OS Command Injection vulnerability in the IAPI component. A remote unauthenticated attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to the execution of arbitrary OS commands on the application's underlying operating system with root privileges. Exploitation may lead to a complete system takeover by an attacker. This vulnerability is considered critical as it allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution as root, potentially compromising the entire VSI deployment and underlying infrastructure. Dell recommends customers to upgrade at the earliest opportunity. |
| CVE-2026-54489 | Critical | 2026-08-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Virtual Storage Integrator for VMware vSphere Client, versions prior to 10.11.1.0, contain(s) a Sensitive Information Disclosure vulnerability. An unauthenticated remote attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to information disclosure and session hijacking. This vulnerability is considered critical as it allows an unauthenticated attacker to obtain active session credentials and fully impersonate authenticated users, including administrators. Dell recommends customers to upgrade at the earliest opportunity. |
| CVE-2026-15724 | High | 2026-07-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Progress ShareFile Storage Zones Controller versions prior to 5.12.5 and 6.0.2, an authenticated administrative user can exploit a path traversal vulnerability to read arbitrary files from the server filesystem, write files to arbitrary directories, or determine whether specific files exist on the server. |
| CVE-2026-51080 | Critical | 2026-07-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | libpvestorage-perl v9.1.1 and libpve-storage-perl v8.3.7 were discovered to contain an XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability. |
| CVE-2026-13473 | Critical | 2026-07-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Storage Protect Client 8.1.0.0 through 8.1.27.0, 8.1.27.1, and 8.2.0.0 through 8.2.1.0 IBM Storage Protect is vulnerable to a heap-based buffer overflow, caused by improper bounds checking. A remote attacker could overflow a buffer and execute arbitrary code on the system or cause the server to crash. |
| CVE-2026-58192 | Critical | 2026-07-08 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Appium is a cross-platform automation framework for all kinds of apps, built on top of the W3C WebDriver protocol. Prior to 1.1.6, the Appium storage plugin exposes POST /storage/delete, whose handler passes the user-supplied name value directly into path.join(storageRoot, name) and fs.rimraf() without path sanitization, allowing an unauthenticated remote client to escape the storage root with ../ sequences and recursively delete arbitrary writable files or directories. This issue is fixed in version 1.1.6. |
| CVE-2026-12628 | Critical | 2026-06-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Storage Protect Client 8.1.0.0 through 8.2.1.0 and IBM Storage Protect Snapshot For Windows 8.1.0.0 through 8.2.1.0 could allow a remote attacker to bypass authentication due to the use of a hardcoded credential in the FlashCopy Manager (FCM) authentication mechanism. The application contains a static credential embedded in multiple authentication code paths, and does not properly validate authentication responses, which may allow an unauthenticated attacker to establish a trusted session and access protected services. This vulnerability affects client components across multiple versions and may allow an attacker to impersonate legitimate clients, potentially leading to unauthorized access to system resources. |
| CVE-2026-2237 | Medium | 2026-05-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A use of get request method with sensitive query strings vulnerability in volume encryption of Synology Storage Manager package before 1.0.1-1100 allows local users on Windows to obtain sensitive information. |
| CVE-2022-31231 | High | 2026-05-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell ECS, versions 3.5 and 3.6, contain an Improper Access Control in the Identity and Access Management (IAM) module. A remote unauthenticated attacker may potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to gaining read access to unauthorized data. |
| CVE-2026-35070 | Medium | 2026-05-20 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell SmartFabric Storage Software, versions prior to 1.4.5, contains an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Filesystem access for attacker. |
| CVE-2026-45321 | Critical | 2026-05-12 | Not applicable | Exploited | On 2026-05-11, between approximately 19:20 and 19:26 UTC, 84 malicious versions across 42 @tanstack/* packages were published to the npm registry. The publishes were authenticated via the legitimate GitHub Actions OIDC trusted-publisher binding for TanStack/router, but the publish workflow itself was not modified. The attacker chained three known vulnerability classes — a pull_request_target "Pwn Request" misconfiguration, GitHub Actions cache poisoning across the fork↔base trust boundary, and runtime memory extraction of the OIDC token from the Actions runner process — to publish credential-stealing malware under a trusted identity. Each affected package received exactly two malicious versions, published a few minutes apart. |
| CVE-2026-40636 | Critical | 2026-05-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell ECS versions 3.8.1.0 through 3.8.1.7 and Dell ObjectScale versions prior to 4.3.0.0, contains a use of hard-coded credentials vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to filesystem access for attacker. |
| CVE-2026-35157 | Critical | 2026-05-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell ECS versions 3.8.1.0 through 3.8.1.7 and Dell ObjectScale versions prior to 4.3.0.0, contains an improper neutralization of formula elements in a CSV File vulnerability in the UI. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to remote execution. |
| CVE-2026-26946 | Medium | 2026-05-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell ECS versions 3.8.1.0 through 3.8.1.7 and Dell ObjectScale versions prior to 4.3.0.0, contains an improper privilege management vulnerability in the OS. A high privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to elevation of privileges. |
| CVE-2025-43992 | Medium | 2026-05-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell ECS versions 3.8.1.0 through 3.8.1.7 and Dell ObjectScale versions prior to 4.3.0.0, contains an authentication bypass by assumed-immutable data vulnerability in Geo replication. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to unauthorized access to data in transit. |
| CVE-2025-9661 | Critical | 2026-05-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OS command injection vulneravility in the management gui (maintenance utility) of Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform One Block 23, 24, 26 and 28. This issue affects Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform One Block 23/24/26/28: before DKCMAIN A3-04-21-40/00, ESM A3-04-21/00. |
| CVE-2025-2514 | Medium | 2026-05-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper restriction of excessive authentication attempts vulnerability in Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform G130, G150, G350, G370, G700, G900, F350, F370, F700, F900, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform E390, E590, E790, E990, E1090, E390H, E590H, E790H, E1090H, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform One Block 23, One Block 24, One Block 26, One Block 28. This issue affects Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform G130, G150, G350, G370, G700, G900, F350, F370, F700, F900, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform E390, E590, E790, E990, E1090, E390H, E590H, E790H, E1090H, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform One Block 23, One Block 24, One Block 26, One Block 28 : before DKCMAIN Ver 88-08-16-xx/00, GUM Ver. 88-08-20/00, before DKCMAIN Ver 93-07-26-xx/00, GUM Ver. 93-07-26/00, before DKCMAIN Ver A3-04-02-xx/00, EMS Ver. A3-04-02/00, before DKCMAIN Ver A3-03-41-xx/00, EMS Ver. A3-03-41/00, before DKCMAIN Ver A3-03-03-xx/00, EMS Ver. A3-03-02/00. |
| CVE-2025-1978 | Critical | 2026-05-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Remote Code Execution Vulnerability in Hitachi Storage Navigator and the maintenance console in Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform G130, G150, G350, G370, G700, G900, F350, F370, F700, F900, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform E390, E590, E790, E990, E1090, E390H, E590H, E790H, E1090H, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform One Block 23, One Block 24, One Block 26, One Block 28. This issue affects Virtual Storage Platform G130, G150, G350, G370, G700, G900, F350, F370, F700, F900, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform E390, E590, E790, E990, E1090, E390H, E590H, E790H, E1090H, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform One Block 23, One Block 24, One Block 26, One Block 28 : before DKCMAIN Ver. 88-08-16-xx/00, SVP Ver. 88-08-18-xx/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 93-07-26-xx/00, SVP Ver. 93-07-26-xx/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. A3-04-02-xx/00, MPC Ver. A3-04-02-xx/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. A3-03-41-xx/00, MPC Ver. A3-03-41-xx/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. A3-03-03-xx/00, MPC Ver. A3-03-03-xx/00. |
| CVE-2026-5935 | Critical | 2026-04-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Total Storage Service Console (TSSC) / TS4500 IMC 9.2, 9.3, 9.4, 9.5, 9.6 TSSC/IMC could allow an unauthenticated user to execute arbitrary commands with normal user privileges on the system due to improper validation of user supplied input. |
| CVE-2026-31431 | High | 2026-04-22 | Not applicable | Exploited | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: algif_aead - Revert to operating out-of-place This mostly reverts commit 72548b093ee3 except for the copying of the associated data. There is no benefit in operating in-place in algif_aead since the source and destination come from different mappings. Get rid of all the complexity added for in-place operation and just copy the AD directly. |
| CVE-2026-22051 | Low | 2026-04-20 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | StorageGRID (formerly StorageGRID Webscale) versions prior to 11.9.0.13 and 12.0.0.6 are susceptible to a Information Disclosure vulnerability. Successful exploit could allow an authenticated attacker with low privileges to run arbitrary metrics queries, revealing metric results that they do not have access to. |
| CVE-2026-39979 | Medium | 2026-04-13 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | jq is a command-line JSON processor. In commits before 2f09060afab23fe9390cce7cb860b10416e1bf5f, the jv_parse_sized() API in libjq accepts a counted buffer with an explicit length parameter, but its error-handling path formats the input buffer using %s in jv_string_fmt(), which reads until a NUL terminator is found rather than respecting the caller-supplied length. This means that when malformed JSON is passed in a non-NUL-terminated buffer, the error construction logic performs an out-of-bounds read past the end of the buffer. The vulnerability is reachable by any libjq consumer calling jv_parse_sized() with untrusted input, and depending on memory layout, can result in memory disclosure or process termination. The issue has been patched in commit 2f09060afab23fe9390cce7cb860b10416e1bf5f. |
| CVE-2026-28261 | High | 2026-04-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Elastic Cloud Storage, version 3.8.1.7 and prior, and Dell ObjectScale, versions prior to 4.1.0.3 and version 4.2.0.0, contains an Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to secret exposure. The attacker may be able to use the exposed secret to access the vulnerable system with privileges of the compromised account. |
| CVE-2026-2701 | Critical | 2026-04-02 | Not applicable | Forecast only | Authenticated user can upload a malicious file to the server and execute it, which leads to remote code execution. |
| CVE-2026-2699 | Critical | 2026-04-02 | Not applicable | Exploited | Customer Managed ShareFile Storage Zones Controller (SZC) allows an unauthenticated attacker to access restricted configuration pages. This leads to changing system configuration and potential remote code execution. |
| CVE-2025-13855 | High | 2026-04-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Storage Protect Server 8.2.0 IBM Storage Protect Plus Server is vulnerable to SQL injection. A remote attacker could send specially crafted SQL statements, which could allow the attacker to view, add, modify, or delete information in the back-end database. |
| CVE-2026-33221 | Low | 2026-03-20 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Nhost is an open source Firebase alternative with GraphQL. Prior to version 0.12.0, the storage service's file upload handler trusts the client-provided Content-Type header without performing server-side MIME type detection. This allows an attacker to upload files with an arbitrary MIME type, bypassing any MIME-type-based restrictions configured on storage buckets. This issue has been patched in version 0.12.0. |
| CVE-2025-14604 | High | 2026-03-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Storage Scale IBM S through rage Scale 5.2.3.0 - 5.2.3.5, and IBM S through rage Scale 6.0.0.0 - 6.0.0.1 could allow a local user to unintentionally trigger additional permissions for resources in a way that allows that resource to be executed by unintended actors. |
| CVE-2026-22276 | Medium | 2026-01-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell ECS, versions 3.8.1.0 through 3.8.1.7, and Dell ObjectScale versions prior to 4.2.0.0, contains a Cleartext Storage of Sensitive Information vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure. |
| CVE-2026-22275 | Medium | 2026-01-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell ECS, versions 3.8.1.0 through 3.8.1.7, and Dell ObjectScale versions prior to 4.2.0.0, contains an Inclusion of Sensitive Information in Source Code vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information exposure. |
| CVE-2026-22274 | Medium | 2026-01-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell ECS, versions 3.8.1.0 through 3.8.1.7, and Dell ObjectScale versions prior to 4.2.0.0, contains a Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information vulnerability in the Fabric Syslog. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability to intercept and modify information in transit. |
| CVE-2026-22273 | High | 2026-01-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell ECS, versions 3.8.1.0 through 3.8.1.7, and Dell ObjectScale versions prior to 4.2.0.0, contains an Use of Default Credentials vulnerability in the OS. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges. |
| CVE-2026-22271 | High | 2026-01-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell ECS, versions 3.8.1.0 through 3.8.1.7, and Dell ObjectScale versions prior to 4.2.0.0, contains a Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to information exposure. |
| CVE-2026-21930 | Low | 2026-01-20 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance Kit product of Oracle Systems (component: Filesystems). The supported version that is affected is 8.8. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance Kit executes to compromise Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance Kit. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance Kit accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 2.3 (Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N). |
| CVE-2025-14874 | High | 2025-12-18 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A flaw was found in Nodemailer. This vulnerability allows a denial of service (DoS) via a crafted email address header that triggers infinite recursion in the address parser. |
| CVE-2025-64650 | Medium | 2025-12-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Storage Defender - Resiliency Service 2.0.0 through 2.0.18 could disclose sensitive user credentials in log files. |
| CVE-2025-13601 | High | 2025-11-26 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A heap-based buffer overflow problem was found in glib through an incorrect calculation of buffer size in the g_escape_uri_string() function. If the string to escape contains a very large number of unacceptable characters (which would need escaping), the calculation of the length of the escaped string could overflow, leading to a potential write off the end of the newly allocated string. |
| CVE-2025-64655 | Critical | 2025-11-20 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper authorization in Dynamics OmniChannel SDK Storage Containers allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. |
| CVE-2025-36118 | High | 2025-11-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Storage Virtualize 8.4, 8.5, 8.7, and 9.1 IKEv1 implementation allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from device memory via a Security Association (SA) negotiation request. |
| CVE-2025-46425 | Medium | 2025-10-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Storage Center - Dell Storage Manager, version(s) 20.1.20, contain(s) an Improper Restriction of XML External Entity Reference vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Unauthorized access. |
| CVE-2025-43995 | Critical | 2025-10-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Storage Center - Dell Storage Manager, version(s) 20.1.21, contain(s) an Improper Authentication vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Protection mechanism bypass. Authentication Bypass in DSM Data Collector. An unauthenticated remote attacker can access APIs exposed by ApiProxy.war in DataCollectorEar.ear by using a special SessionKey and UserId. These userid are special users created in compellentservicesapi for special purposes. |
| CVE-2025-43994 | High | 2025-10-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Storage Center - Dell Storage Manager, version(s) DSM 20.1.21, contain(s) a Missing Authentication for Critical Function vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure. |
| CVE-2025-62480 | Low | 2025-10-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance Kit product of Oracle Systems (component: Naming Subsystem). The supported version that is affected is 8.8. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance Kit. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance Kit. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 2.7 (Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L). |
| CVE-2025-62479 | Low | 2025-10-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance Kit product of Oracle Systems (component: Block Storage). The supported version that is affected is 8.8. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance Kit. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance Kit. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 2.7 (Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L). |
| CVE-2025-62478 | Medium | 2025-10-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance Kit product of Oracle Systems (component: Object Store). The supported version that is affected is 8.8. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance Kit. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance Kit. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 4.9 (Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H). |
| CVE-2025-62477 | Medium | 2025-10-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance Kit product of Oracle Systems (component: Remote Replication). The supported version that is affected is 8.8. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance Kit. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance Kit. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 4.9 (Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H). |
| CVE-2025-62476 | Medium | 2025-10-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance Kit product of Oracle Systems (component: Remote Replication). The supported version that is affected is 8.8. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance Kit. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance Kit. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 4.9 (Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H). |
| CVE-2025-62475 | Medium | 2025-10-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance Kit product of Oracle Systems (component: Core). The supported version that is affected is 8.8. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance Kit. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance Kit. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 4.9 (Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H). |
| CVE-2025-62290 | High | 2025-10-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance Kit product of Oracle Systems (component: Block Storage). The supported version that is affected is 8.8. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance Kit. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance Kit. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2025-62289 | Medium | 2025-10-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance Kit product of Oracle Systems (component: Filesystems). The supported version that is affected is 8.8. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance Kit. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance Kit. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 4.9 (Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H). |
| CVE-2025-53046 | Medium | 2025-10-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance Kit product of Oracle Systems (component: Analytics). The supported version that is affected is 8.8. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance Kit. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance Kit. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 4.9 (Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H). |
| CVE-2025-43827 | Medium | 2025-09-30 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability with audit events in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.117, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2024.Q1.1 through 2024.Q1.5, 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.10, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.10, 7.4 GA through update 92, and older unsupported versions allows remote authenticated users to from one virtual instance to view the audit events from a different virtual instance via the _com_liferay_portal_security_audit_web_portlet_AuditPortlet_auditEventId parameter. |
| CVE-2025-36239 | Medium | 2025-09-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Storage TS4500 Library 1.11.0.0 and 2.11.0.0 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. |
| CVE-2024-43192 | High | 2025-09-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Storage TS4500 Library 1.11.0.0 and 2.11.0.0 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. |
| CVE-2025-26482 | Medium | 2025-09-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell PowerEdge Server BIOS and Dell iDRAC9, all versions, contains an Information Disclosure vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information Disclosure. |
| CVE-2025-26517 | Medium | 2025-09-19 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | StorageGRID (formerly StorageGRID Webscale) versions prior to 11.8.0.15 and 11.9.0.8 are susceptible to a privilege escalation vulnerability. Successful exploit could allow an unauthorized authenticated attacker to discover Grid node names and IP addresses or modify Storage Grades. |
| CVE-2025-26516 | Medium | 2025-09-19 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | StorageGRID (formerly StorageGRID Webscale) versions prior to 11.8.0.15 and 11.9.0.8 are susceptible to a Denial of Service vulnerability. Successful exploit could allow an unauthenticated attacker to cause a Denial of Service on the Admin node. |
| CVE-2025-26515 | High | 2025-09-19 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | StorageGRID (formerly StorageGRID Webscale) versions prior to 11.8.0.15 and 11.9.0.8 without Single Sign-on enabled are susceptible to a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. Successful exploit could allow an unauthenticated attacker to change the password of any Grid Manager or Tenant Manager non-federated user. |
| CVE-2025-26514 | Medium | 2025-09-19 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | StorageGRID (formerly StorageGRID Webscale) versions prior to 11.8.0.15 and 11.9.0.8 are susceptible to a Reflected Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability. Successful exploit could allow an attacker to view or modify configuration settings or add or modify user accounts but requires the attacker to know specific information about the target instance and then trick a privileged user into clicking a specially crafted link. |
| CVE-2025-36222 | Critical | 2025-09-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Fusion 2.2.0 through 2.10.1, IBM Fusion HCI 2.2.0 through 2.10.0, and IBM Fusion HCI for watsonx 2.8.2 through 2.10.0 uses insecure default configurations that could expose AMQStreams without client authentication that could allow an attacker to perform unauthorized actions. |
| CVE-2025-9162 | Medium | 2025-08-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in org.keycloak/keycloak-model-storage-service. The KeycloakRealmImport custom resource substitutes placeholders within imported realm documents, potentially referencing environment variables. This substitution process allows for injection attacks when crafted realm documents are processed. An attacker can leverage this to inject malicious content during the realm import procedure. This can lead to unintended consequences within the Keycloak environment. |
| CVE-2025-36120 | High | 2025-08-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Storage Virtualize 8.4, 8.5, 8.6, and 8.7 could allow an authenticated user to escalate their privileges in an SSH session due to incorrect authorization checks to access resources. |
| CVE-2025-36088 | Medium | 2025-08-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM TS4500 1.11.0.0-D00, 1.11.0.1-C00, 1.11.0.2-C00, and 1.10.00-F00 web GUI is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an authenticated user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. |
| CVE-2025-26476 | High | 2025-08-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell ECS versions prior to 3.8.1.5/ ObjectScale version 4.0.0.0, contain a Use of Hard-coded Cryptographic Key vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Unauthorized access. |
| CVE-2025-30483 | Medium | 2025-07-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell ECS versions prior to 3.8.1.5/ ObjectScale version 4.0.0.0 contains an Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure. |
| CVE-2025-36104 | Medium | 2025-07-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Storage Scale 5.2.3.0 and 5.2.3.1 could allow an authenticated user to obtain sensitive information from files due to the insecure permissions inherited through the SMB protocol. |
| CVE-2025-1351 | High | 2025-07-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Storage Virtualize 8.5, 8.6, and 8.7 products could allow a user to escalate their privileges to that of another user logging in at the same time due to a race condition in the login function. |
| CVE-2025-1137 | High | 2025-05-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Storage Scale 5.2.2.0 and 5.2.2.1, under certain configurations, could allow an authenticated user to execute privileged commands due to improper input neutralization. |
| CVE-2025-29972 | Critical | 2025-05-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Azure Storage Resource Provider allows an authorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network. |
| CVE-2025-23379 | Medium | 2025-05-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Storage Center - Dell Storage Manager, version(s) 21.0.20, contain(s) an Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with adjacent network access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Script injection. |
| CVE-2025-22479 | Medium | 2025-05-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Storage Center - Dell Storage Manager, version(s) 20.0.21, contain(s) an Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with adjacent network access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Script injection. |
| CVE-2025-22478 | High | 2025-05-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Storage Center - Dell Storage Manager, version(s) 20.1.20, contain(s) an Improper Restriction of XML External Entity Reference vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with adjacent network access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure and Information tampering. |
| CVE-2025-22477 | High | 2025-05-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Storage Center - Dell Storage Manager, version(s) 20.1.20, contain(s) an Improper Authentication vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with adjacent network access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges. |
| CVE-2025-22476 | High | 2025-05-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Storage Center - Dell Storage Manager, version(s) 20.1.20, contain(s) an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with adjacent network access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Remote execution. |
| CVE-2025-26478 | Medium | 2025-04-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell ECS version 3.8.1.4 and prior contain an Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with adjacent network access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure. |
| CVE-2025-26477 | High | 2025-04-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell ECS version 3.8.1.4 and prior contain an Improper Input Validation vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Code execution. |
| CVE-2024-22314 | High | 2025-04-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Storage Defender - Resiliency Service 2.0.0 through 2.0.12 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. |