WaratekVRT Sign in
Reset
More filters (2)
Columns
Protection: Full✕Product rack✕
Overview 11 matches · 2 exploited · 1 CISA KEV · 4 public PoC · 4 EPSS ≥ 0.5
11matches 2exploited18.2% 1CISA KEV9.1% 4public PoC36.4% 4EPSS ≥ 0.536.4%
Protected by Waratek 11 100.0% Rule in development 0 0.0% Mitigation candidate 0 0.0% No exploit published 0 0.0%
Critical 3 27.3% High 5 45.5% Medium 3 27.3% Low 0 0.0% None 0 0.0% Unknown 0 0.0%
blocked by ARMR today 11 100.0% partly blocked 0 0.0% not blocked 0 0.0% not established 0 0.0% unrecorded 0 0.0%
Exploited 2 18.2% Working exploit published 2 18.2% Proof of concept only 0 0.0% Forecast only 0 0.0% No public exploit 7 63.6%
split by peak 3 / quarter
Protected by Waratek: 11 Medium: 3High: 5Critical: 3 blocked by ARMR today: 11 No public exploit: 7Working exploit published: 2Exploited: 2
Q2 171 Protected by Waratek1 Critical1 blocked by ARMR today1 Working exploit published1 Q3 170 Q4 170 Q1 180 Q2 181 Protected by Waratek1 Critical1 blocked by ARMR today1 No public exploit1 Q3 180 Q4 180 Q1 190 Q2 190 Q3 190 Q4 193 Protected by Waratek3 High1 Medium2 blocked by ARMR today3 No public exploit3 Q1 201 Protected by Waratek1 Critical1 blocked by ARMR today1 Exploited1 Q2 201 Protected by Waratek1 High1 blocked by ARMR today1 Working exploit published1 Q3 200 Q4 201 Protected by Waratek1 High1 blocked by ARMR today1 No public exploit1 Q1 212 Protected by Waratek2 High2 blocked by ARMR today2 No public exploit2 Q2 210 Q3 210 Q4 211 Protected by Waratek1 Medium1 blocked by ARMR today1 Exploited1
Q2 17Q4 17Q2 18Q4 18Q2 19Q4 19Q2 20Q4 20Q2 21Q4 21
11 matches Sign in to download these CVEs as CSV or JSON, or to follow them in a feed.
CVE Severity Published▾ Status Exploitation Description
CVE-2021-45105 Medium 2021-12-18 Protected by Waratek Exploited Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-alpha1 through 2.16.0 (excluding 2.12.3 and 2.3.1) did not protect from uncontrolled recursion from self-referential lookups. This allows an attacker with control over Thread Context Map data to cause a denial of service when a crafted string is interpreted. This issue was fixed in Log4j 2.17.0, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1.
CVE-2021-25329 High 2021-03-01 Protected by Waratek No public exploit The fix for CVE-2020-9484 was incomplete. When using Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.41, 8.5.0 to 8.5.61 or 7.0.0. to 7.0.107 with a configuration edge case that was highly unlikely to be used, the Tomcat instance was still vulnerable to CVE-2020-9494. Note that both the previously published prerequisites for CVE-2020-9484 and the previously published mitigations for CVE-2020-9484 also apply to this issue.
CVE-2021-25122 High 2021-03-01 Protected by Waratek No public exploit When responding to new h2c connection requests, Apache Tomcat versions 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.41 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.61 could duplicate request headers and a limited amount of request body from one request to another meaning user A and user B could both see the results of user A's request.
CVE-2019-17566 High 2020-11-12 Protected by Waratek No public exploit Apache Batik is vulnerable to server-side request forgery, caused by improper input validation by the "xlink:href" attributes. By using a specially-crafted argument, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause the underlying server to make arbitrary GET requests.
CVE-2020-9484 High 2020-05-20 Protected by Waratek Working exploit published When using Apache Tomcat versions 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M4, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.34, 8.5.0 to 8.5.54 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.103 if a) an attacker is able to control the contents and name of a file on the server; and b) the server is configured to use the PersistenceManager with a FileStore; and c) the PersistenceManager is configured with sessionAttributeValueClassNameFilter="null" (the default unless a SecurityManager is used) or a sufficiently lax filter to allow the attacker provided object to be deserialized; and d) the attacker knows the relative file path from the storage location used by FileStore to the file the attacker has control over; then, using a specifically crafted request, the attacker will be able to trigger remote code execution via deserialization of the file under their control. Note that all of conditions a) to d) must be true for the attack to succeed.
CVE-2020-1938 Critical 2020-02-24 Protected by Waratek Exploited When using the Apache JServ Protocol (AJP), care must be taken when trusting incoming connections to Apache Tomcat. Tomcat treats AJP connections as having higher trust than, for example, a similar HTTP connection. If such connections are available to an attacker, they can be exploited in ways that may be surprising. In Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.30, 8.5.0 to 8.5.50 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.99, Tomcat shipped with an AJP Connector enabled by default that listened on all configured IP addresses. It was expected (and recommended in the security guide) that this Connector would be disabled if not required. This vulnerability report identified a mechanism that allowed: - returning arbitrary files from anywhere in the web application - processing any file in the web application as a JSP Further, if the web application allowed file upload and stored those files within the web application (or the attacker was able to control the content of the web application by some other means) then this, along with the ability to process a file as a JSP, made remote code execution possible. It is important to note that mitigation is only required if an AJP port is accessible to untrusted users. Users wishing to take a defence-in-depth approach and block the vector that permits returning arbitrary files and execution as JSP may upgrade to Apache Tomcat 9.0.31, 8.5.51 or 7.0.100 or later. A number of changes were made to the default AJP Connector configuration in 9.0.31 to harden the default configuration. It is likely that users upgrading to 9.0.31, 8.5.51 or 7.0.100 or later will need to make small changes to their configurations.
CVE-2019-17563 High 2019-12-23 Protected by Waratek No public exploit When using FORM authentication with Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.29, 8.5.0 to 8.5.49 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.98 there was a narrow window where an attacker could perform a session fixation attack. The window was considered too narrow for an exploit to be practical but, erring on the side of caution, this issue has been treated as a security vulnerability.
CVE-2019-10219 Medium 2019-11-08 Protected by Waratek No public exploit A vulnerability was found in Hibernate-Validator. The SafeHtml validator annotation fails to properly sanitize payloads consisting of potentially malicious code in HTML comments and instructions. This vulnerability can result in an XSS attack.
CVE-2019-12415 Medium 2019-10-23 Protected by Waratek No public exploit In Apache POI up to 4.1.0, when using the tool XSSFExportToXml to convert user-provided Microsoft Excel documents, a specially crafted document can allow an attacker to read files from the local filesystem or from internal network resources via XML External Entity (XXE) Processing.
CVE-2018-8013 Critical 2018-05-24 Protected by Waratek No public exploit In Apache Batik 1.x before 1.10, when deserializing subclass of `AbstractDocument`, the class takes a string from the inputStream as the class name which then use it to call the no-arg constructor of the class. Fix was to check the class type before calling newInstance in deserialization.
CVE-2017-5645 Critical 2017-04-17 Protected by Waratek Working exploit published In Apache Log4j 2.x before 2.8.2, when using the TCP socket server or UDP socket server to receive serialized log events from another application, a specially crafted binary payload can be sent that, when deserialized, can execute arbitrary code.