Overview 6 matches · 2 exploited · 1 CISA KEV · 2 public PoC · 2 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
6
100.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
6
100.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
0
0.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
2
33.3%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
4
66.7%
split by
peak 2 / quarter
Q2 201
Protected by Waratek1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
No public exploit1
Q3 200
Q4 200
Q1 211
Protected by Waratek1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
No public exploit1
Q2 210
Q3 210
Q4 212
Protected by Waratek2
Critical1
High1
blocked by ARMR today2
Exploited2
Q1 220
Q2 220
Q3 221
Protected by Waratek1
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today1
No public exploit1
Q4 220
Q1 230
Q2 230
Q3 231
Protected by Waratek1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
No public exploit1
Q3 20Q1 21Q3 21Q1 22Q3 22Q1 23Q3 23
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-1415 | High | 2023-09-11 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | A flaw was found where some utility classes in Drools core did not use proper safeguards when deserializing data. This flaw allows an authenticated attacker to construct malicious serialized objects (usually called gadgets) and achieve code execution on the server. |
| CVE-2021-4178 | Medium | 2022-08-24 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | A arbitrary code execution flaw was found in the Fabric 8 Kubernetes client affecting versions 5.0.0-beta-1 and above. Due to an improperly configured YAML parsing, this will allow a local and privileged attacker to supply malicious YAML. |
| CVE-2021-4104 | High | 2021-12-14 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | JMSAppender in Log4j 1.2 is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data when the attacker has write access to the Log4j configuration. The attacker can provide TopicBindingName and TopicConnectionFactoryBindingName configurations causing JMSAppender to perform JNDI requests that result in remote code execution in a similar fashion to CVE-2021-44228. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.2 when specifically configured to use JMSAppender, which is not the default. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions. |
| CVE-2021-44228 | Critical | 2021-12-10 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Apache Log4j2 2.0-beta9 through 2.15.0 (excluding security releases 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1) JNDI features used in configuration, log messages, and parameters do not protect against attacker controlled LDAP and other JNDI related endpoints. An attacker who can control log messages or log message parameters can execute arbitrary code loaded from LDAP servers when message lookup substitution is enabled. From log4j 2.15.0, this behavior has been disabled by default. From version 2.16.0 (along with 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1), this functionality has been completely removed. Note that this vulnerability is specific to log4j-core and does not affect log4net, log4cxx, or other Apache Logging Services projects. |
| CVE-2021-20218 | High | 2021-03-16 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | A flaw was found in the fabric8 kubernetes-client in version 4.2.0 and after. This flaw allows a malicious pod/container to cause applications using the fabric8 kubernetes-client `copy` command to extract files outside the working path. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to integrity and system availability. This has been fixed in kubernetes-client-4.13.2 kubernetes-client-5.0.2 kubernetes-client-4.11.2 kubernetes-client-4.7.2 |
| CVE-2020-1714 | High | 2020-05-13 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | A flaw was found in Keycloak before version 11.0.0, where the code base contains usages of ObjectInputStream without type checks. This flaw allows an attacker to inject arbitrarily serialized Java Objects, which would then get deserialized in a privileged context and potentially lead to remote code execution. |