High Pac4j CVEs
3 CVEs, 1 protected by Waratek
Overview 3 matches · 1 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 0 public PoC · 0 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
1
33.3%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
2
66.7%
blocked by ARMR today
1
33.3%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
2
66.7%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
3
100.0%
split by
peak 1 / quarter
Q1 221
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q2 220
Q3 220
Q4 220
Q1 230
Q2 230
Q3 230
Q4 230
Q1 240
Q2 240
Q3 240
Q4 240
Q1 251
Protected by Waratek1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
No public exploit1
Q2 250
Q3 250
Q4 250
Q1 260
Q2 261
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q2 22Q4 22Q2 23Q4 23Q2 24Q4 24Q2 25Q4 25Q2 26
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-40458 | High | 2026-04-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | PAC4J is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). A malicious attacker can craft a specially designed website which, when visited by a user, will automatically submit a forged cross-site request with a token whose hash collides with the victim's legitimate CSRF token. Importantly, the attacker does not need to know the victim’s CSRF token or its hash prior to the attack. Collisions in the deterministic String.hashCode() function can be computed directly, reducing the effective token's security space to 32 bits. This bypasses CSRF protection, allowing profile updates, password changes, account linking, and any other state-changing operations to be performed without the victim's consent. This issue was fixed in PAC4J versions 5.7.10 and 6.4.1 |
| CVE-2025-31129 | High | 2025-03-31 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Jooby is a web framework for Java and Kotlin. The pac4j io.jooby.internal.pac4j.SessionStoreImpl#get module deserializes untrusted data. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.17.0 (2.x) and 3.7.0 (3.x). |
| CVE-2021-44878 | High | 2022-01-06 | No exploit published | No public exploit | If an OpenID Connect provider supports the "none" algorithm (i.e., tokens with no signature), pac4j v5.3.0 (and prior) does not refuse it without an explicit configuration on its side or for the "idtoken" response type which is not secure and violates the OpenID Core Specification. The "none" algorithm does not require any signature verification when validating the ID tokens, which allows the attacker to bypass the token validation by injecting a malformed ID token using "none" as the value of "alg" key in the header with an empty signature value. |