Overview 11 matches · 0 protected · 1 exploited · 1 CISA KEV · 1 public PoC · 1 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
1
9.1%
No exploit published
10
90.9%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
11
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
1
9.1%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
10
90.9%
split by
peak 4 / year
20161
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20170
20181
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20191
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20201
No exploit published1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20210
20224
No exploit published4
Medium4
not blocked4
No public exploit4
20232
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published1
High2
not blocked2
Exploited1
No public exploit1
20241
No exploit published1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
201620172018201920202021202220232024
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-1932 | Medium | 2024-11-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in hibernate-validator's 'isValid' method in the org.hibernate.validator.internal.constraintvalidators.hv.SafeHtmlValidator class, which can be bypassed by omitting the tag ending in a less-than character. Browsers may render an invalid html, allowing HTML injection or Cross-Site-Scripting (XSS) attacks. |
| CVE-2023-44487 | High | 2023-10-10 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023. |
| CVE-2023-1108 | High | 2023-09-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in undertow. This issue makes achieving a denial of service possible due to an unexpected handshake status updated in SslConduit, where the loop never terminates. |
| CVE-2022-36913 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Openstack Heat Plugin 1.5 and earlier does not perform permission checks in methods implementing form validation, allowing attackers with Overall/Read permission to check for the existence of an attacker-specified file path on the Jenkins controller file system. |
| CVE-2022-36912 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A missing permission check in Jenkins Openstack Heat Plugin 1.5 and earlier allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to connect to an attacker-specified URL. |
| CVE-2022-36911 | Medium | 2022-07-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Openstack Heat Plugin 1.5 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL. |
| CVE-2022-0866 | Medium | 2022-05-10 | No exploit published | No public exploit | This is a concurrency issue that can result in the wrong caller principal being returned from the session context of an EJB that is configured with a RunAs principal. In particular, the org.jboss.as.ejb3.component.EJBComponent class has an incomingRunAsIdentity field. This field is used by the org.jboss.as.ejb3.security.RunAsPrincipalInterceptor to keep track of the current identity prior to switching to a new identity created using the RunAs principal. The exploit consist that the EJBComponent#incomingRunAsIdentity field is currently just a SecurityIdentity. This means in a concurrent environment, where multiple users are repeatedly invoking an EJB that is configured with a RunAs principal, it's possible for the wrong the caller principal to be returned from EJBComponent#getCallerPrincipal. Similarly, it's also possible for EJBComponent#isCallerInRole to return the wrong value. Both of these methods rely on incomingRunAsIdentity. Affects all versions of JBoss EAP from 7.1.0 and all versions of WildFly 11+ when Elytron is enabled. |
| CVE-2020-1758 | Medium | 2020-05-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in Keycloak in versions before 10.0.0, where it does not perform the TLS hostname verification while sending emails using the SMTP server. This flaw allows an attacker to perform a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack. |
| CVE-2018-10899 | High | 2019-08-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in Jolokia versions from 1.2 to before 1.6.1. Affected versions are vulnerable to a system-wide CSRF. This holds true for properly configured instances with strict checking for origin and referrer headers. This could result in a Remote Code Execution attack. |
| CVE-2018-1000603 | High | 2018-06-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A exposure of sensitive information vulnerability exists in Jenkins Openstack Cloud Plugin 2.35 and earlier in BootSource.java, InstancesToRun.java, JCloudsCleanupThread.java, JCloudsCloud.java, JCloudsComputer.java, JCloudsPreCreationThread.java, JCloudsRetentionStrategy.java, JCloudsSlave.java, JCloudsSlaveTemplate.java, LauncherFactory.java, OpenstackCredentials.java, OpenStackMachineStep.java, SlaveOptions.java, SlaveOptionsDescriptor.java that allows attackers with Overall/Read access to Jenkins to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials stored in Jenkins, and to cause Jenkins to submit HTTP requests to attacker-specified URLs. |
| CVE-2016-0363 | High | 2016-06-03 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The com.ibm.CORBA.iiop.ClientDelegate class in IBM SDK, Java Technology Edition 6 before SR16 FP25 (6.0.16.25), 6 R1 before SR8 FP25 (6.1.8.25), 7 before SR9 FP40 (7.0.9.40), 7 R1 before SR3 FP40 (7.1.3.40), and 8 before SR3 (8.0.3.0) uses the invoke method of the java.lang.reflect.Method class in an AccessController doPrivileged block, which allows remote attackers to call setSecurityManager and bypass a sandbox protection mechanism via vectors related to a Proxy object instance implementing the java.lang.reflect.InvocationHandler interface. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2013-3009. |