Overview 9 matches · 1 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 2 public PoC · 1 EPSS ≥ 0.5
9matches
1in Waratek scope11.1%
0protected0.0%
0exploited0.0%
0CISA KEV0.0%
2public PoC22.2%
1EPSS ≥ 0.511.1%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
1
11.1%
Outside Waratek scope
0
0.0%
Not applicable
8
88.9%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
9
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
1
11.1%
Proof of concept only
1
11.1%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
7
77.8%
split by
peak 3 / month
Jun 181
No exploit published1
Critical1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Jul 181
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Aug 180
Sep 180
Oct 180
Nov 180
Dec 180
Jan 192
Not applicable2
High1
Medium1
not blocked2
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit1
Feb 190
Mar 193
Not applicable3
High1
Medium2
not blocked3
No public exploit3
Apr 191
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
May 190
Jun 190
Jul 190
Aug 190
Sep 190
Oct 191
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
Jun 18Aug 18Oct 18Dec 18Feb 19Apr 19Jun 19Aug 19Oct 19
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-14287 | High | 2019-10-17 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | In Sudo before 1.8.28, an attacker with access to a Runas ALL sudoer account can bypass certain policy blacklists and session PAM modules, and can cause incorrect logging, by invoking sudo with a crafted user ID. For example, this allows bypass of !root configuration, and USER= logging, for a "sudo -u \#$((0xffffffff))" command. |
| CVE-2018-20449 | Medium | 2019-04-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The hidma_chan_stats function in drivers/dma/qcom/hidma_dbg.c in the Linux kernel 4.14.90 allows local users to obtain sensitive address information by reading "callback=" lines in a debugfs file. |
| CVE-2019-7222 | Medium | 2019-03-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The KVM implementation in the Linux kernel through 4.20.5 has an Information Leak. |
| CVE-2019-7221 | High | 2019-03-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The KVM implementation in the Linux kernel through 4.20.5 has a Use-after-Free. |
| CVE-2018-19985 | Medium | 2019-03-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The function hso_get_config_data in drivers/net/usb/hso.c in the Linux kernel through 4.19.8 reads if_num from the USB device (as a u8) and uses it to index a small array, resulting in an object out-of-bounds (OOB) read that potentially allows arbitrary read in the kernel address space. |
| CVE-2017-3135 | High | 2019-01-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Under some conditions when using both DNS64 and RPZ to rewrite query responses, query processing can resume in an inconsistent state leading to either an INSIST assertion failure or an attempt to read through a NULL pointer. Affects BIND 9.8.8, 9.9.3-S1 -> 9.9.9-S7, 9.9.3 -> 9.9.9-P5, 9.9.10b1, 9.10.0 -> 9.10.4-P5, 9.10.5b1, 9.11.0 -> 9.11.0-P2, 9.11.1b1. |
| CVE-2019-5489 | Medium | 2019-01-07 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | The mincore() implementation in mm/mincore.c in the Linux kernel through 4.19.13 allowed local attackers to observe page cache access patterns of other processes on the same system, potentially allowing sniffing of secret information. (Fixing this affects the output of the fincore program.) Limited remote exploitation may be possible, as demonstrated by latency differences in accessing public files from an Apache HTTP Server. |
| CVE-2018-3627 | High | 2018-07-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Logic bug in Intel Converged Security Management Engine 11.x may allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code via local privileged access. |
| CVE-2017-7657 | Critical | 2018-06-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Eclipse Jetty, versions 9.2.x and older, 9.3.x (all configurations), and 9.4.x (non-default configuration with RFC2616 compliance enabled), transfer-encoding chunks are handled poorly. The chunk length parsing was vulnerable to an integer overflow. Thus a large chunk size could be interpreted as a smaller chunk size and content sent as chunk body could be interpreted as a pipelined request. If Jetty was deployed behind an intermediary that imposed some authorization and that intermediary allowed arbitrarily large chunks to be passed on unchanged, then this flaw could be used to bypass the authorization imposed by the intermediary as the fake pipelined request would not be interpreted by the intermediary as a request. |