WaratekVRT Sign in
Reset
More filters (1)
Columns
Including CVEs outside Waratek scope✕Product decision manager✕
Overview 29 matches · 17 in Waratek scope · 9 protected · 3 exploited · 1 CISA KEV · 4 public PoC · 3 EPSS ≥ 0.5
29matches 17in Waratek scope58.6% 9protected31.0% 3exploited10.3% 1CISA KEV3.4% 4public PoC13.8% 3EPSS ≥ 0.510.3%
Protected by Waratek 9 31.0% Rule in development 0 0.0% Mitigation candidate 1 3.4% No exploit published 7 24.1% Outside Waratek scope 2 6.9% Not applicable 10 34.5% Withdrawn CVE 0 0.0%
Critical 7 24.1% High 11 37.9% Medium 10 34.5% Low 1 3.4% None 0 0.0% Unknown 0 0.0%
blocked by ARMR today 9 31.0% partly blocked 0 0.0% not blocked 20 69.0% not established 0 0.0% unrecorded 0 0.0%
Exploited 3 10.3% Working exploit published 1 3.4% Proof of concept only 1 3.4% Forecast only 0 0.0% No public exploit 24 82.8%
split by peak 8 / year
Not applicable: 10Outside Waratek scope: 2No exploit published: 7Mitigation candidate: 1Protected by Waratek: 9 Low: 1Medium: 10High: 11Critical: 7 not blocked: 20blocked by ARMR today: 9 No public exploit: 24Proof of concept only: 1Working exploit published: 1Exploited: 3
20144 Not applicable4 Medium3 Low1 not blocked4 No public exploit4 20150 20160 20170 20182 Protected by Waratek1 Not applicable1 Critical1 Medium1 blocked by ARMR today1 not blocked1 Working exploit published1 No public exploit1 20195 Protected by Waratek5 Critical3 High2 blocked by ARMR today5 No public exploit5 20208 Protected by Waratek2 No exploit published3 Outside Waratek scope2 Not applicable1 Critical1 High2 Medium5 blocked by ARMR today2 not blocked6 No public exploit8 20210 20222 No exploit published2 High2 not blocked2 Proof of concept only1 No public exploit1 20234 Protected by Waratek1 Mitigation candidate1 No exploit published2 High4 blocked by ARMR today1 not blocked3 Exploited1 No public exploit3 20242 Not applicable2 Critical2 not blocked2 Exploited2 20252 Not applicable2 High1 Medium1 not blocked2 No public exploit2
201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
29 matches Sign in to download these CVEs as CSV or JSON, or to follow them in a feed.
CVE Severity Published▾ Status Exploitation Description
CVE-2025-2824 High 2025-08-01 Not applicable No public exploit IBM Operational Decision Manager 8.11.0.1, 8.11.1.0, 8.12.0.1, 9.0.0.1, and 9.5.0 could allow a remote attacker to conduct phishing attacks, using an open redirect attack. By persuading a victim to visit a specially crafted Web site, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to spoof the URL displayed to redirect a user to a malicious Web site that would appear to be trusted. This could allow the attacker to obtain highly sensitive information or conduct further attacks against the victim.
CVE-2025-1551 Medium 2025-04-29 Not applicable No public exploit IBM Operational Decision Manager 8.11.0.1, 8.11.1.0, 8.12.0.1, and 9.0.0.1 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session.
CVE-2024-22320 Critical 2024-02-02 Not applicable Exploited IBM Operational Decision Manager 8.10.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system, caused by an unsafe deserialization. By sending specially crafted request, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of SYSTEM. IBM X-Force ID: 279146.
CVE-2024-22319 Critical 2024-02-02 Not applicable Exploited IBM Operational Decision Manager 8.10.3, 8.10.4, 8.10.5.1, 8.11, 8.11.0.1, 8.11.1 and 8.12.0.1 is susceptible to remote code execution attack via JNDI injection when passing an unchecked argument to a certain API. IBM X-Force ID: 279145.
CVE-2023-44487 High 2023-10-10 Mitigation candidate Exploited The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023.
CVE-2023-4853 High 2023-09-20 No exploit published No public exploit A flaw was found in Quarkus where HTTP security policies are not sanitizing certain character permutations correctly when accepting requests, resulting in incorrect evaluation of permissions. This issue could allow an attacker to bypass the security policy altogether, resulting in unauthorized endpoint access and possibly a denial of service.
CVE-2023-1108 High 2023-09-14 No exploit published No public exploit A flaw was found in undertow. This issue makes achieving a denial of service possible due to an unexpected handshake status updated in SslConduit, where the loop never terminates.
CVE-2022-1415 High 2023-09-11 Protected by Waratek No public exploit A flaw was found where some utility classes in Drools core did not use proper safeguards when deserializing data. This flaw allows an authenticated attacker to construct malicious serialized objects (usually called gadgets) and achieve code execution on the server.
CVE-2019-14841 High 2022-10-17 No exploit published No public exploit A flaw was found in the RHDM, where an authenticated attacker can change their assigned role in the response header. This flaw allows an attacker to gain admin privileges in the Business Central Console.
CVE-2019-14840 High 2022-10-17 No exploit published Proof of concept only A flaw was found in the RHDM, where sensitive HTML form fields like Password has auto-complete enabled which may lead to leak of credentials.
CVE-2020-1748 High 2020-09-16 No exploit published No public exploit A flaw was found in all supported versions before wildfly-elytron-1.6.8.Final-redhat-00001, where the WildFlySecurityManager checks were bypassed when using custom security managers, resulting in an improper authorization. This flaw leads to information exposure by unauthenticated access to secure resources.
CVE-2019-14900 Medium 2020-07-06 Protected by Waratek No public exploit A flaw was found in Hibernate ORM in versions before 5.3.18, 5.4.18 and 5.5.0.Beta1. A SQL injection in the implementation of the JPA Criteria API can permit unsanitized literals when a literal is used in the SELECT or GROUP BY parts of the query. This flaw could allow an attacker to access unauthorized information or possibly conduct further attacks.
CVE-2020-1714 High 2020-05-13 Protected by Waratek No public exploit A flaw was found in Keycloak before version 11.0.0, where the code base contains usages of ObjectInputStream without type checks. This flaw allows an attacker to inject arbitrarily serialized Java Objects, which would then get deserialized in a privileged context and potentially lead to remote code execution.
CVE-2020-1720 Medium 2020-03-17 Outside Waratek scope No public exploit A flaw was found in PostgreSQL's "ALTER ... DEPENDS ON EXTENSION", where sub-commands did not perform authorization checks. An authenticated attacker could use this flaw in certain configurations to perform drop objects such as function, triggers, et al., leading to database corruption. This issue affects PostgreSQL versions before 12.2, before 11.7, before 10.12 and before 9.6.17.
CVE-2019-14886 Medium 2020-03-05 No exploit published No public exploit A vulnerability was found in business-central, as shipped in rhdm-7.5.1 and rhpam-7.5.1, where encoded passwords are stored in errai_security_context. The encoding used for storing the passwords is Base64, not an encryption algorithm, and any recovery of these passwords could lead to user passwords being exposed.
CVE-2019-14892 Critical 2020-03-02 No exploit published No public exploit A flaw was discovered in jackson-databind in versions before 2.9.10, 2.8.11.5 and 2.6.7.3, where it would permit polymorphic deserialization of a malicious object using commons-configuration 1 and 2 JNDI classes. An attacker could use this flaw to execute arbitrary code.
CVE-2019-14863 Medium 2020-01-02 Not applicable No public exploit There is a vulnerability in all angular versions before 1.5.0-beta.0, where after escaping the context of the web application, the web application delivers data to its users along with other trusted dynamic content, without validating it.
CVE-2019-14862 Medium 2020-01-02 Outside Waratek scope No public exploit There is a vulnerability in knockout before version 3.5.0-beta, where after escaping the context of the web application, the web application delivers data to its users along with other trusted dynamic content, without validating it.
CVE-2018-12023 High 2019-03-21 Protected by Waratek No public exploit An issue was discovered in FasterXML jackson-databind prior to 2.7.9.4, 2.8.11.2, and 2.9.6. When Default Typing is enabled (either globally or for a specific property), the service has the Oracle JDBC jar in the classpath, and an attacker can provide an LDAP service to access, it is possible to make the service execute a malicious payload.
CVE-2018-12022 High 2019-03-21 Protected by Waratek No public exploit An issue was discovered in FasterXML jackson-databind prior to 2.7.9.4, 2.8.11.2, and 2.9.6. When Default Typing is enabled (either globally or for a specific property), the service has the Jodd-db jar (for database access for the Jodd framework) in the classpath, and an attacker can provide an LDAP service to access, it is possible to make the service execute a malicious payload.
CVE-2018-19362 Critical 2019-01-02 Protected by Waratek No public exploit FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.8 might allow attackers to have unspecified impact by leveraging failure to block the jboss-common-core class from polymorphic deserialization.
CVE-2018-19361 Critical 2019-01-02 Protected by Waratek No public exploit FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.8 might allow attackers to have unspecified impact by leveraging failure to block the openjpa class from polymorphic deserialization.
CVE-2018-19360 Critical 2019-01-02 Protected by Waratek No public exploit FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.8 might allow attackers to have unspecified impact by leveraging failure to block the axis2-transport-jms class from polymorphic deserialization.
CVE-2018-1821 Critical 2018-12-13 Not applicable Working exploit published IBM Operational Decision Management 8.5, 8.6, 8.7, 8.8, and 8.9 is vulnerable to a XML External Entity Injection (XXE) attack when processing XML data. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to expose sensitive information or consume memory resources. IBM X-Force ID: 150170.
CVE-2017-7545 Medium 2018-07-26 Protected by Waratek No public exploit It was discovered that the XmlUtils class in jbpmmigration 6.5 performed expansion of external parameter entities while parsing XML files. A remote attacker could use this flaw to read files accessible to the user running the application server and, potentially, perform other more advanced XML eXternal Entity (XXE) attacks.
CVE-2014-6114 Medium 2014-12-11 Not applicable No public exploit The Hosted Transparent Decision Service in the Rule Execution Server in IBM WebSphere ILOG JRules 7.1 before MP1 FP5 IF43; WebSphere Operational Decision Management 7.5 before FP3 IF41; and Operational Decision Manager 8.0 before MP1 FP2 IF34, 8.5 before MP1 FP1 IF43, and 8.6 before IF8 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via an XML external entity declaration in conjunction with an entity reference, related to an XML External Entity (XXE) issue.
CVE-2014-0946 Medium 2014-05-09 Not applicable No public exploit The RES Console in Rule Execution Server in IBM Operational Decision Manager 7.5 before FP3 IF37, 8.0 before MP1 FP2, and 8.5 before MP1 IF26 does not send appropriate Cache-Control HTTP headers, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information by leveraging an unattended workstation.
CVE-2014-0945 Low 2014-05-09 Not applicable No public exploit Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the RES Console in Rule Execution Server in IBM Operational Decision Manager 7.5 before FP3 IF37, 8.0 before MP1 FP2, and 8.5 before MP1 IF26 allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted URL.
CVE-2014-0944 Medium 2014-05-09 Not applicable No public exploit Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the RES Console in Rule Execution Server in IBM Operational Decision Manager 7.5 before FP3 IF37, 8.0 before MP1 FP2, and 8.5 before MP1 IF26 allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that insert XSS sequences.