Overview 79 matches · 16 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 5 public PoC · 0 EPSS ≥ 0.5
79matches
16in Waratek scope20.3%
0protected0.0%
0exploited0.0%
0CISA KEV0.0%
5public PoC6.3%
0EPSS ≥ 0.50.0%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
16
20.3%
Outside Waratek scope
1
1.3%
Not applicable
62
78.5%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
79
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
5
6.3%
Proof of concept only
1
1.3%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
73
92.4%
split by
peak 11 / year
20042
Not applicable2
Medium1
Low1
not blocked2
Working exploit published2
20050
20060
20070
20080
20090
20100
20110
20120
20130
20144
Not applicable4
High1
Medium2
Low1
not blocked4
No public exploit4
20151
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20166
No exploit published2
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable3
High3
Medium3
not blocked6
No public exploit6
20173
Not applicable3
Critical1
Medium2
not blocked3
Working exploit published2
No public exploit1
20185
Not applicable5
Critical1
High4
not blocked5
No public exploit5
20197
No exploit published1
Not applicable6
Critical2
Medium5
not blocked7
No public exploit7
20203
Not applicable3
High1
Medium2
not blocked3
No public exploit3
20217
No exploit published2
Not applicable5
Critical3
High2
Medium2
not blocked7
No public exploit7
202211
Not applicable11
High6
Medium5
not blocked11
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit9
20239
Not applicable9
High2
Medium7
not blocked9
No public exploit9
20244
No exploit published2
Not applicable2
High2
Medium2
not blocked4
No public exploit4
20257
Not applicable7
Critical1
High4
Medium2
not blocked7
No public exploit7
202610
No exploit published9
Not applicable1
Critical1
High4
Medium4
Low1
not blocked10
No public exploit10
200420062008201020122014201620182020202220242026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-70783 | High | 2026-08-18 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Service Contracts product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Service Contracts. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Service Contracts accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Service Contracts accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.4 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-62483 | Medium | 2026-07-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Project Contracts product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Project Contracts. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Project Contracts accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 4.3 (Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-61063 | High | 2026-07-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the PeopleSoft Enterprise SCM Supplier Contract Management product of Oracle PeopleSoft (component: Security). The supported version that is affected is 9.2. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where PeopleSoft Enterprise SCM Supplier Contract Management executes to compromise PeopleSoft Enterprise SCM Supplier Contract Management. While the vulnerability is in PeopleSoft Enterprise SCM Supplier Contract Management, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of PeopleSoft Enterprise SCM Supplier Contract Management. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2026-60940 | Medium | 2026-07-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Service Contracts product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Service Contracts. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Service Contracts accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Service Contracts accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.7 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-60939 | Low | 2026-07-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Project Contracts product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Project Contracts. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Project Contracts accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 3.1 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-60848 | High | 2026-07-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Project Contracts product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Project Contracts. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Project Contracts accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Project Contracts accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-60618 | High | 2026-07-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Procurement and Subcontract Management product of Oracle JD Edwards (component: Procurement). The supported version that is affected is 9.2. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Procurement and Subcontract Management. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Procurement and Subcontract Management. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2026-42555 | Critical | 2026-05-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Valtimo is an open-source business process automation platform. com.ritense.valtimo:document from 12.0.0 to before 12.32.0, com.ritense.valtimo:case from 13.0.0 to before 13.23.0, and com.ritense.valtimo:contract from 13.4.0 to before 13.23.0 evaluate Spring Expression Language (SpEL) expressions from user-supplied input using StandardEvaluationContext, which provides unrestricted access to Java types and methods. An authenticated user with the ADMIN role can achieve Remote Code Execution and credential exfiltration. This vulnerability is fixed in com.ritense.valtimo:document 2.32.0, com.ritense.valtimo:case 13.23.0, and com.ritense.valtimo:contract 13.23.0. |
| CVE-2026-34300 | Medium | 2026-04-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the PeopleSoft Enterprise FIN Contracts product of Oracle PeopleSoft (component: Contracts). The supported version that is affected is 9.2. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise PeopleSoft Enterprise FIN Contracts. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all PeopleSoft Enterprise FIN Contracts accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.5 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-28410 | Medium | 2026-03-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Graph is an indexing protocol for querying networks like Ethereum, IPFS, Polygon, and other blockchains. Prior to version 3.0.0, a flaw in the token vesting contracts allows users to access tokens that should still be locked according to their vesting schedule. This issue has been patched in version 3.0.0. |
| CVE-2025-64067 | Medium | 2025-11-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Primakon Pi Portal 1.0.18 API endpoints responsible for retrieving object-specific or filtered data (e.g., user profiles, project records) fail to implement sufficient server-side validation to confirm that the requesting user is authorized to access the requested object or dataset. This vulnerability can be exploited in two ways: Direct ID manipulation and IDOR, by changing an ID parameter (e.g., user_id, project_id) in the request, an attacker can access the object and data belonging to another user; and filter Omission, by omitting the filtering parameter entirely, an attacker can cause the endpoint to return an entire unfiltered dataset of all stored records for all users. This flaw leads to the unauthorized exposure of sensitive personal and organizational information. |
| CVE-2025-64066 | High | 2025-11-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Primakon Pi Portal 1.0.18 REST /api/v2/user/register endpoint suffers from a Broken Access Control vulnerability. The endpoint fails to implement any authorization checks, allowing unauthenticated attackers to perform POST requests to register new user accounts in the application's local database. This bypasses the intended security architecture, which relies on an external Identity Provider for initial user registration and assumes that internal user creation is an administrative-only function. This vector can also be chained with other vulnerabilities for privilege escalation and complete compromise of application. This specific request can be used to also enumerate already registered user accounts, aiding in social engineering or further targeted attacks. |
| CVE-2025-64065 | High | 2025-11-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Primakon Pi Portal 1.0.18 API /api/V2/pp_udfv_admin endpoint, fails to perform necessary server-side validation. The administrative LoginAs or user impersonation feature is vulnerable to a access control failure. This flaw allows any authenticated low-privileged user to execute a direct PATCH request, enabling them to impersonate any other arbitrary user, including application Administrators. This is due to a Broken Function Level Authorization failure (the function doesn't check the caller's privilege) compounded by an Insecure Design that permits a session switch without requiring the target user's password or an administrative token and only needs email of user. |
| CVE-2025-64064 | High | 2025-11-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Primakon Pi Portal 1.0.18 /api/v2/pp_users endpoint fails to adequately check user permissions before processing a PATCH request to modify the PP_SECURITY_PROFILE_ID. Because of weak access controls any low level user can use this API and change their permission to Administrator by using PP_SECURITY_PROFILE_ID=2 inside body of request and escalate privileges. |
| CVE-2025-64063 | Critical | 2025-11-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Primakon Pi Portal 1.0.18 API endpoints fail to enforce sufficient authorization checks when processing requests. Specifically, a standard user can exploit this flaw by sending direct HTTP requests to administrative endpoints, bypassing the UI restrictions. This allows the attacker to manipulate data outside their assigned scope, including: Unauthorized Account modification, modifying/deleting arbitrary user accounts and changing passwords by sending a direct request to the user management API endpoint; Confidential Data Access, accessing and downloading sensitive organizational documents via a direct request to the document retrieval API; Privilege escalation, This vulnerability can lead to complete compromise of data integrity and confidentiality, and Privilege Escalation by manipulating core system functions. |
| CVE-2025-64062 | High | 2025-11-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Primakon Pi Portal 1.0.18 /api/V2/pp_users?email endpoint is used for user data filtering but lacks proper server-side validation against the authenticated session. By manipulating the email parameter to an arbitrary value (e.g., otheruser@user.com), an attacker can assume the session and gain full access to the target user's data and privileges. Also, if the email parameter is left blank, the application defaults to the first user in the list, who is typically the application administrator, resulting in an immediate Privilege Escalation to the highest level. |
| CVE-2025-64061 | Medium | 2025-11-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Primakon Pi Portal 1.0.18 /api/v2/users endpoint is vulnerable to unauthorized data exposure due to deficient access control mechanisms. Any authenticated user, regardless of their privilege level (including standard or low-privileged users), can make a GET request to this endpoint and retrieve a complete, unfiltered list of all registered application users. Crucially, the API response body for this endpoint includes password hashes. |
| CVE-2024-21280 | High | 2024-10-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Service Contracts product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Authoring). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.5-12.2.13. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Service Contracts. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Service Contracts accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Service Contracts accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N). |
| CVE-2024-45304 | Medium | 2024-08-31 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cairo-Contracts are OpenZeppelin Contracts written in Cairo for Starknet, a decentralized ZK Rollup. This vulnerability can lead to unauthorized ownership transfer, contrary to the original owner's intention of leaving the contract without an owner. It introduces a security risk where an unintended party (pending owner) can gain control of the contract after the original owner has renounced ownership. This could also be used by a malicious owner to simulate leaving a contract without an owner, to later regain ownership by previously having proposed himself as a pending owner. This issue has been addressed in release version 0.16.0. All users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2024-27094 | High | 2024-03-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for secure smart contract development. The `Base64.encode` function encodes a `bytes` input by iterating over it in chunks of 3 bytes. When this input is not a multiple of 3, the last iteration may read parts of the memory that are beyond the input buffer. The vulnerability is fixed in 5.0.2 and 4.9.6. |
| CVE-2024-22236 | Medium | 2024-01-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Spring Cloud Contract, versions 4.1.x prior to 4.1.1, versions 4.0.x prior to 4.0.5, and versions 3.1.x prior to 3.1.10, test execution is vulnerable to local information disclosure via temporary directory created with unsafe permissions through the shaded com.google.guava:guava dependency in the org.springframework.cloud:spring-cloud-contract-shade dependency. |
| CVE-2019-25157 | Medium | 2023-12-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability was found in Ethex Contracts. It has been classified as critical. This affects an unknown part of the file EthexJackpot.sol of the component Monthly Jackpot Handler. The manipulation leads to improper access controls. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The patch is named 6b8664b698d3d953e16c284fadc6caeb9e58e3db. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-248271. |
| CVE-2023-49798 | High | 2023-12-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. A merge issue when porting the 5.0.1 patch to the 4.9 branch caused a line duplication. In the version of `Multicall.sol` released in `@openzeppelin/contracts@4.9.4` and `@openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable@4.9.4`, all subcalls are executed twice. Concretely, this exposes a user to unintentionally duplicate operations like asset transfers. The duplicated delegatecall was removed in version 4.9.5. The 4.9.4 version is marked as deprecated. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this issue. |
| CVE-2023-40014 | Medium | 2023-08-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for secure smart contract development. Starting in version 4.0.0 and prior to version 4.9.3, contracts using `ERC2771Context` along with a custom trusted forwarder may see `_msgSender` return `address(0)` in calls that originate from the forwarder with calldata shorter than 20 bytes. This combination of circumstances does not appear to be common, in particular it is not the case for `MinimalForwarder` from OpenZeppelin Contracts, or any deployed forwarder the team is aware of, given that the signer address is appended to all calls that originate from these forwarders. The problem has been patched in v4.9.3. |
| CVE-2023-34459 | Medium | 2023-06-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. Starting in version 4.7.0 and prior to version 4.9.2, when the `verifyMultiProof`, `verifyMultiProofCalldata`, `procesprocessMultiProof`, or `processMultiProofCalldat` functions are in use, it is possible to construct merkle trees that allow forging a valid multiproof for an arbitrary set of leaves. A contract may be vulnerable if it uses multiproofs for verification and the merkle tree that is processed includes a node with value 0 at depth 1 (just under the root). This could happen inadvertedly for balanced trees with 3 leaves or less, if the leaves are not hashed. This could happen deliberately if a malicious tree builder includes such a node in the tree. A contract is not vulnerable if it uses single-leaf proving (`verify`, `verifyCalldata`, `processProof`, or `processProofCalldata`), or if it uses multiproofs with a known tree that has hashed leaves. Standard merkle trees produced or validated with the @openzeppelin/merkle-tree library are safe. The problem has been patched in version 4.9.2. Some workarounds are available. For those using multiproofs: When constructing merkle trees hash the leaves and do not insert empty nodes in your trees. Using the @openzeppelin/merkle-tree package eliminates this issue. Do not accept user-provided merkle roots without reconstructing at least the first level of the tree. Verify the merkle tree structure by reconstructing it from the leaves. |
| CVE-2023-34234 | Medium | 2023-06-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. By frontrunning the creation of a proposal, an attacker can become the proposer and gain the ability to cancel it. The attacker can do this repeatedly to try to prevent a proposal from being proposed at all. This impacts the `Governor` contract in v4.9.0 only, and the `GovernorCompatibilityBravo` contract since v4.3.0. This problem has been patched in 4.9.1 by introducing opt-in frontrunning protection. Users are advised to upgrade. Users unable to upgrade may submit the proposal creation transaction to an endpoint with frontrunning protection as a workaround. |
| CVE-2023-30541 | Medium | 2023-04-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for secure smart contract development. A function in the implementation contract may be inaccessible if its selector clashes with one of the proxy's own selectors. Specifically, if the clashing function has a different signature with incompatible ABI encoding, the proxy could revert while attempting to decode the arguments from calldata. The probability of an accidental clash is negligible, but one could be caused deliberately and could cause a reduction in availability. The issue has been fixed in version 4.8.3. As a workaround if a function appears to be inaccessible for this reason, it may be possible to craft the calldata such that ABI decoding does not fail at the proxy and the function is properly proxied through. |
| CVE-2023-30542 | High | 2023-04-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for secure smart contract development. The proposal creation entrypoint (`propose`) in `GovernorCompatibilityBravo` allows the creation of proposals with a `signatures` array shorter than the `calldatas` array. This causes the additional elements of the latter to be ignored, and if the proposal succeeds the corresponding actions would eventually execute without any calldata. The `ProposalCreated` event correctly represents what will eventually execute, but the proposal parameters as queried through `getActions` appear to respect the original intended calldata. This issue has been patched in 4.8.3. As a workaround, ensure that all proposals that pass through governance have equal length `signatures` and `calldatas` parameters. |
| CVE-2023-26488 | Medium | 2023-03-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for secure smart contract development. The ERC721Consecutive contract designed for minting NFTs in batches does not update balances when a batch has size 1 and consists of a single token. Subsequent transfers from the receiver of that token may overflow the balance as reported by `balanceOf`. The issue exclusively presents with batches of size 1. The issue has been patched in 4.8.2. |
| CVE-2023-23940 | Medium | 2023-02-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OpenZeppelin Contracts for Cairo is a library for secure smart contract development written in Cairo for StarkNet, a decentralized ZK Rollup. `is_valid_eth_signature` is missing a call to `finalize_keccak` after calling `verify_eth_signature`. As a result, any contract using `is_valid_eth_signature` from the account library (such as the `EthAccount` preset) is vulnerable to a malicious sequencer. Specifically, the malicious sequencer would be able to bypass signature validation to impersonate an instance of these accounts. The issue has been patched in 0.6.1. |
| CVE-2022-41273 | Medium | 2022-12-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Due to improper input sanitization in SAP Sourcing and SAP Contract Lifecycle Management - version 1100, an attacker can redirect a user to a malicious website. In order to perform this attack, the attacker sends an email to the victim with a manipulated link that appears to be a legitimate SAP Sourcing URL, since the victim doesn’t suspect the threat, they click on the link, log in to SAP Sourcing and CLM and at this point, they get redirected to a malicious website. |
| CVE-2022-3768 | High | 2022-11-28 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | The WPSmartContracts WordPress plugin before 1.3.12 does not properly sanitise and escape a parameter before using it in a SQL statement, leading to a SQL injection exploitable by users with a role as low as author |
| CVE-2022-39384 | Medium | 2022-11-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for secure smart contract development. Before version 4.4.1 but after 3.2.0, initializer functions that are invoked separate from contract creation (the most prominent example being minimal proxies) may be reentered if they make an untrusted non-view external call. Once an initializer has finished running it can never be re-executed. However, an exception put in place to support multiple inheritance made reentrancy possible in the scenario described above, breaking the expectation that there is a single execution. Note that upgradeable proxies are commonly initialized together with contract creation, where reentrancy is not feasible, so the impact of this issue is believed to be minor. This issue has been patched, please upgrade to version 4.4.1. As a workaround, avoid untrusted external calls during initialization. |
| CVE-2022-35198 | High | 2022-08-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Contract Management System v2.0 contains a weak default password which gives attackers to access database connection information. |
| CVE-2022-35961 | High | 2022-08-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for secure smart contract development. The functions `ECDSA.recover` and `ECDSA.tryRecover` are vulnerable to a kind of signature malleability due to accepting EIP-2098 compact signatures in addition to the traditional 65 byte signature format. This is only an issue for the functions that take a single `bytes` argument, and not the functions that take `r, v, s` or `r, vs` as separate arguments. The potentially affected contracts are those that implement signature reuse or replay protection by marking the signature itself as used rather than the signed message or a nonce included in it. A user may take a signature that has already been submitted, submit it again in a different form, and bypass this protection. The issue has been patched in 4.7.3. |
| CVE-2022-35916 | Medium | 2022-08-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for secure smart contract development. Contracts using the cross chain utilities for Arbitrum L2, `CrossChainEnabledArbitrumL2` or `LibArbitrumL2`, will classify direct interactions of externally owned accounts (EOAs) as cross chain calls, even though they are not started on L1. This issue has been patched in v4.7.2. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this issue. |
| CVE-2022-35915 | Medium | 2022-08-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for secure smart contract development. The target contract of an EIP-165 `supportsInterface` query can cause unbounded gas consumption by returning a lot of data, while it is generally assumed that this operation has a bounded cost. The issue has been fixed in v4.7.2. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this issue. |
| CVE-2022-31198 | High | 2022-08-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for secure smart contract development. This issue concerns instances of Governor that use the module `GovernorVotesQuorumFraction`, a mechanism that determines quorum requirements as a percentage of the voting token's total supply. In affected instances, when a proposal is passed to lower the quorum requirements, past proposals may become executable if they had been defeated only due to lack of quorum, and the number of votes it received meets the new quorum requirement. Analysis of instances on chain found only one proposal that met this condition, and we are actively monitoring for new occurrences of this particular issue. This issue has been patched in v4.7.2. Users are advised to upgrade. Users unable to upgrade should consider avoiding lowering quorum requirements if a past proposal was defeated for lack of quorum. |
| CVE-2022-31172 | High | 2022-07-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. Versions 4.1.0 until 4.7.1 are vulnerable to the SignatureChecker reverting. `SignatureChecker.isValidSignatureNow` is not expected to revert. However, an incorrect assumption about Solidity 0.8's `abi.decode` allows some cases to revert, given a target contract that doesn't implement EIP-1271 as expected. The contracts that may be affected are those that use `SignatureChecker` to check the validity of a signature and handle invalid signatures in a way other than reverting. The issue was patched in version 4.7.1. |
| CVE-2022-31170 | High | 2022-07-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. Versions 4.0.0 until 4.7.1 are vulnerable to ERC165Checker reverting instead of returning `false`. `ERC165Checker.supportsInterface` is designed to always successfully return a boolean, and under no circumstance revert. However, an incorrect assumption about Solidity 0.8's `abi.decode` allows some cases to revert, given a target contract that doesn't implement EIP-165 as expected, specifically if it returns a value other than 0 or 1. The contracts that may be affected are those that use `ERC165Checker` to check for support for an interface and then handle the lack of support in a way other than reverting. The issue was patched in version 4.7.1. |
| CVE-2022-31153 | Medium | 2022-07-15 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | OpenZeppelin Contracts for Cairo is a library for contract development written in Cairo for StarkNet, a decentralized ZK Rollup. Version 0.2.0 is vulnerable to an error that renders account contracts unusable on live networks. This issue affects all accounts (vanilla and ethereum flavors) in the v0.2.0 release of OpenZeppelin Contracts for Cairo, which are not whitelisted on StarkNet mainnet. Only goerli deployments of v0.2.0 accounts are affected. This faulty behavior is not observed in StarkNet's testing framework. This bug has been patched in v0.2.1. |
| CVE-2021-41264 | Critical | 2021-11-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. In affected versions upgradeable contracts using `UUPSUpgradeable` may be vulnerable to an attack affecting uninitialized implementation contracts. A fix is included in version 4.3.2 of `@openzeppelin/contracts` and `@openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable`. For users unable to upgrade; initialize implementation contracts using `UUPSUpgradeable` by invoking the initializer function (usually called `initialize`). An example is provided [in the forum](https://forum.openzeppelin.com/t/security-advisory-initialize-uups-implementation-contracts/15301). |
| CVE-2021-39168 | Critical | 2021-08-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OpenZepplin is a library for smart contract development. In affected versions a vulnerability in TimelockController allowed an actor with the executor role to escalate privileges. Further details about the vulnerability will be disclosed at a later date. As a workaround revoke the executor role from accounts not strictly under the team's control. We recommend revoking all executors that are not also proposers. When applying this mitigation, ensure there is at least one proposer and executor remaining. |
| CVE-2021-39167 | Critical | 2021-08-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OpenZepplin is a library for smart contract development. In affected versions a vulnerability in TimelockController allowed an actor with the executor role to escalate privileges. Further details about the vulnerability will be disclosed at a later date. As a workaround revoke the executor role from accounts not strictly under the team's control. We recommend revoking all executors that are not also proposers. When applying this mitigation, ensure there is at least one proposer and executor remaining. |
| CVE-2021-2255 | High | 2021-04-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Service Contracts product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Authoring). Supported versions that are affected are 12.1.1-12.1.3. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Service Contracts. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Service Contracts accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Service Contracts accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N). |
| CVE-2021-2254 | High | 2021-04-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Project Contracts product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Hold Management). Supported versions that are affected are 12.1.1-12.1.3. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Project Contracts. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Project Contracts accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Project Contracts accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N). |
| CVE-2020-4897 | Medium | 2021-01-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Emptoris Contract Management and IBM Emptoris Spend Analysis 10.1.0, 10.1.1, and 10.1.3 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information when a detailed technical error message is returned in the browser. This information could be used in further attacks against the system. IBM X-Force ID: 190988. |
| CVE-2020-4892 | Medium | 2021-01-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Emptoris Contract Management 10.1.3 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 190979. |
| CVE-2019-20155 | High | 2020-01-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in report_edit.jsp in Determine (formerly Selectica) Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) v5.4. Any authenticated user may execute Groovy code when generating a report, resulting in arbitrary code execution on the underlying server. |
| CVE-2019-20154 | Medium | 2020-01-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in Determine (formerly Selectica) Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) v5.4. A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in multiple getchart.jsp parameters allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML. |
| CVE-2019-20153 | Medium | 2020-01-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in Determine (formerly Selectica) Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) in v5.4. An XML external entity (XXE) vulnerability in the upload definition feature in definition_upload_attach.jsp allows authenticated remote attackers to read arbitrary files (including configuration files containing administrative credentials). |
| CVE-2019-4485 | Medium | 2019-08-20 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Emptoris Sourcing 10.1.0 through 10.1.3, IBM Contract Management 10.1.0 through 10.1.3, and IBM Emptoris Spend Analysis 10.1.0 through 10.1.3 generates an error message that includes sensitive information that could be used in further attacks against the system. IBM X-Force ID: 164069. |
| CVE-2019-4484 | Medium | 2019-08-20 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Emptoris Sourcing 10.1.0 through 10.1.3, IBM Contract Management 10.1.0 through 10.1.3, and IBM Emptoris Spend Analysis 10.1.0 through 10.1.3 generates an error message that includes sensitive information that could be used in further attacks against the system. IBM X-Force ID: 164068. |
| CVE-2019-4483 | Critical | 2019-08-20 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Contract Management 10.1.0 through 10.1.3 and IBM Emptoris Spend Analysis 10.1.0 through 10.1.3 is vulnerable to SQL injection. A remote attacker could send specially-crafted SQL statements, which could allow the attacker to view, add, modify or delete information in the back-end database. IBM X-Force ID: 164067. |
| CVE-2019-4481 | Critical | 2019-08-20 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Contract Management 10.1.0 through 10.1.3 and IBM Emptoris Spend Analysis 10.1.0 through 10.1.3 is vulnerable to SQL injection. A remote attacker could send specially-crafted SQL statements, which could allow the attacker to view, add, modify or delete information in the back-end database. IBM X-Force ID: 164064. |
| CVE-2019-4308 | Medium | 2019-08-20 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Emptoris Sourcing 10.1.0 through 10.1.3, IBM Contract Management 10.1.0 through 10.1.3, and IBM Emptoris Spend Analysis 10.1.0 through 10.1.3 could allow an authenticated user to obtain sensitive information from error messages IBM X-Force ID: 161034. |
| CVE-2018-1961 | Medium | 2019-04-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Emptoris Contract Management 10.0.0 and 10.1.3.0 could disclose sensitive information from detailed information from error messages. IBM X-Force ID: 153657. |
| CVE-2019-2622 | Medium | 2019-04-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Service Contracts component of Oracle E-Business Suite (subcomponent: Renewals). Supported versions that are affected are 12.1.1, 12.1.2, 12.1.3, 12.2.3, 12.2.4, 12.2.5, 12.2.6, 12.2.7 and 12.2.8. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Service Contracts. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Service Contracts, attacks may significantly impact additional products. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Service Contracts accessible data. CVSS 3.0 Base Score 4.7 (Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N). |
| CVE-2018-14576 | High | 2018-08-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The mintTokens function of a smart contract implementation for SunContract, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow via the _amount variable. |
| CVE-2018-13771 | High | 2018-07-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for ExacoreContract, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. |
| CVE-2018-13469 | High | 2018-07-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for IcoContract, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. |
| CVE-2018-5329 | High | 2018-01-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | ZUUSE BEIMS ContractorWeb .NET 5.18.0.0 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) on /CWEBNET/* authenticated pages. A successful CSRF attack can force the user to modify state: creating users, changing an email address, and so forth. If the victim is an administrative account, CSRF can compromise the entire web application. |
| CVE-2018-5328 | Critical | 2018-01-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | ZUUSE BEIMS ContractorWeb .NET 5.18.0.0 allows access to various /UserManagement/ privileged modules without authenticating the user; an attacker can misuse these functionalities to perform unauthorized actions, as demonstrated by Edit User Details. |
| CVE-2017-17721 | Critical | 2017-12-18 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | CWEBNET/WOSummary/List in ZUUSE BEIMS ContractorWeb .NET 5.18.0.0 allows SQL injection via the tradestatus, assetno, assignto, building, domain, jobtype, site, trade, woType, workorderno, or workorderstatus parameter. |
| CVE-2017-14841 | Medium | 2017-09-28 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Mojoomla Annual Maintenance Contract (AMC) Management System allows Arbitrary File Upload in profilesetting image handling. |
| CVE-2016-6018 | Medium | 2017-07-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Emptoris Contract Management 10.0 and 10.1 reveals detailed error messages in certain features that could cause an attacker to gain additional information to conduct further attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 116738. |
| CVE-2016-0635 | High | 2016-07-21 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Enterprise Manager Ops Center component in Oracle Enterprise Manager Grid Control 12.1.4, 12.2.2, and 12.3.2; the Oracle Health Sciences Information Manager component in Oracle Health Sciences Applications 1.2.8.3, 2.0.2.3, and 3.0.1.0; the Oracle Healthcare Master Person Index component in Oracle Health Sciences Applications 2.0.12, 3.0.0, and 4.0.1; the Oracle Documaker component in Oracle Insurance Applications before 12.5; the Oracle Insurance Calculation Engine component in Oracle Insurance Applications 9.7.1, 10.1.2, and 10.2.2; the Oracle Insurance Policy Administration J2EE and Oracle Insurance Rules Palette components in Oracle Insurance Applications 9.6.1, 9.7.1, 10.0.1, 10.1.2, 10.2.0, and 10.2.2; the Oracle Retail Integration Bus component in Oracle Retail Applications 15.0; the Oracle Retail Order Broker component in Oracle Retail Applications 5.1, 5.2, and 15.0; the Primavera Contract Management component in Oracle Primavera Products Suite 14.2; the Primavera P6 Enterprise Project Portfolio Management component in Oracle Primavera Products Suite 8.2, 8.3, 8.4, 15.1, 15.2, and 16.1; the Oracle Financial Services Analytical Applications Infrastructure component in Oracle Financial Services Applications 8.0.0, 8.0.1, 8.0.2, and 8.0.3; the Oracle Commerce Guided Search / Oracle Commerce Experience Manager component in Oracle Commerce 3.1.1, 3.1.2, 11.0, 11.1, and 11.2; the Oracle Agile PLM component in Oracle Supply Chain Products Suite 9.3.4 and 9.3.5; the Oracle Communications BRM - Elastic Charging Engine 11.2.0.0.0 and 11.3.0.0.0; the Oracle Enterprise Repository Enterprise Repository 12.1.3.0.0; the Oracle Financial Services Behavior Detection Platform 8.0.1 and 8.0.2; the Oracle Hyperion Essbase 12.2.1.1; the Oracle Tuxedo System and Applications Monitor (TSAM) 11.1.1.2.0, 11.1.1.2.1, 11.1.1.2.1, 12.1.1.1.0, 12.1.3.0.0, and 12.2.2.0.0; the Oracle Communications WebRTC Session Controller component of Oracle Communications Applications (subcomponent: Security (Spring)) 7.0, 7.1 and 7.2; the Oracle Endeca Information Discovery Integrator 3.2; the Converged Commerce component of Oracle Retail Applications 16.0.1; the Oracle Identity Manager 11.1.2.3.0; Oracle Enterprise Manager for MySQL Database 12.1.0.4; Oracle Retail Invoice Matching 12.0, 13.0, 13.1, 13.2, 14.0, and 14.1; Oracle Communications Performance Intelligence Center (PIC) Software Prior to 10.2.1 and the Oracle Knowledge component of Oracle Siebel CRM (subcomponent: AnswerFlow (Spring Framework)) version 8.5.1.0 - 8.5.1.7 and 8.6.0 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2015-7398 | Medium | 2016-02-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM Emptoris Contract Management 9.5.0.x before 9.5.0.6 iFix15, 10.0.0.x and 10.0.1.x before 10.0.1.5 iFix5, 10.0.2.x before 10.0.2.7 iFix4, and 10.0.4.x before 10.0.4.0 iFix3 allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted URL. |
| CVE-2015-5050 | High | 2016-02-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM Emptoris Contract Management 9.5.0.x before 9.5.0.6 iFix15, 10.0.0.x and 10.0.1.x before 10.0.1.5 iFix5, 10.0.2.x before 10.0.2.7 iFix4, and 10.0.4.x before 10.0.4.0 iFix3 allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that insert XSS sequences. |
| CVE-2015-5042 | High | 2016-02-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Emptoris Contract Management 9.5.0.x before 9.5.0.6 iFix15, 10.0.0.x and 10.0.1.x before 10.0.1.5 iFix5, 10.0.2.x before 10.0.2.7 iFix4, and 10.0.4.x before 10.0.4.0 iFix3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by including a crafted Flash file. |
| CVE-2016-0558 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Service Contracts component in Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.10.2, 12.1.1, 12.1.2, and 12.1.3 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors related to Renewals. |
| CVE-2016-0534 | Medium | 2016-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Project Contracts component in Oracle E-Business Suite 12.1.1, 12.1.2, and 12.1.3 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors related to Printing. |
| CVE-2014-6212 | Medium | 2015-01-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Echo API in IBM Emptoris Contract Management 9.5.x before 9.5.0.6 iFix11, 10.0.0.x before 10.0.0.1 iFix12, 10.0.1.x before 10.0.1.5 iFix2, and 10.0.2.x before 10.0.2.2 iFix5; Emptoris Sourcing 9.5 before 9.5.1.3 iFix2, 10.0.0.x before 10.0.0.1 iFix1, 10.0.1.x before 10.0.1.3 iFix1, and 10.0.2.x before 10.0.2.5; and Emptoris Program Management (aka PGM) and Strategic Supply Management (aka SSMP) 10.0.0.x before 10.0.0.3 iFix6, 10.0.1.x before 10.0.1.4 iFix1, and 10.0.2.x before 10.0.2.5 allows remote authenticated users to read arbitrary files via an XML external entity declaration in conjunction with an entity reference, related to an XML External Entity (XXE) issue. |
| CVE-2014-8668 | High | 2014-11-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | SQL injection vulnerability in SAP Contract Accounting allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2014-3041 | Medium | 2014-08-26 | Not applicable | No public exploit | SQL injection vulnerability in IBM Emptoris Contract Management 9.5.x before 9.5.0.6 iFix 10, 10.0.0.x before 10.0.0.1 iFix 10, 10.0.1.x before 10.0.1.4, and 10.0.2.x before 10.0.2.2 iFix 2 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2014-3040 | Medium | 2014-08-26 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM Emptoris Contract Management 9.5.x before 9.5.0.6 iFix 10, 10.0.0.x before 10.0.0.1 iFix 10, 10.0.1.x before 10.0.1.4, and 10.0.2.x before 10.0.2.2 iFix 2; Emptoris Sourcing Portfolio 9.5.x before 9.5.1.3, 10.0.0.x before 10.0.0.1, 10.0.1.x before 10.0.1.3, and 10.0.2.x before 10.0.2.4; and Emptoris Spend Analysis 9.5.x before 9.5.0.4, 10.0.1.x before 10.0.1.3, and 10.0.2.x before 10.0.2.4 allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that insert XSS sequences. |
| CVE-2014-3034 | Low | 2014-08-26 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM Emptoris Contract Management 9.5.x before 9.5.0.6 iFix 10, 10.0.0.x before 10.0.0.1 iFix 10, 10.0.1.x before 10.0.1.4, and 10.0.2.x before 10.0.2.2 iFix 2 allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted URL. |
| CVE-2004-1500 | Low | 2004-12-31 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Format string vulnerability in the Lithtech engine, as used in multiple games, allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (application crash) via format string specifiers in (1) a nickname or (2) a message. |
| CVE-2004-1395 | Medium | 2004-12-31 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | The Lithtech engine, as used in (1) Contract Jack 1.1 and earlier, (2) No one lives forever 2 1.3 and earlier, (3) Tron 2.0 1.042 and earlier, (4) F.E.A.R. (First Encounter Assault and Recon), and possibly other games, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (connection refused) via a UDP packet that causes recvfrom to generate a return code that causes the listening loop to exit, as demonstrated using zero byte packets or packets between 8193 and 12280 bytes, which result in conditions that are not "Operation would block." |