WaratekVRT Sign in
Reset
More filters (1)
Columns
Including CVEs outside Waratek scope✕Product communications cloud native core network slice selection function✕
Overview 30 matches · 19 in Waratek scope · 4 protected · 4 exploited · 3 CISA KEV · 5 public PoC · 5 EPSS ≥ 0.5
30matches 19in Waratek scope63.3% 4protected13.3% 4exploited13.3% 3CISA KEV10.0% 5public PoC16.7% 5EPSS ≥ 0.516.7%
Protected by Waratek 4 13.3% Rule in development 0 0.0% Mitigation candidate 2 6.7% No exploit published 13 43.3% Outside Waratek scope 7 23.3% Not applicable 4 13.3% Withdrawn CVE 0 0.0%
Critical 9 30.0% High 10 33.3% Medium 9 30.0% Low 2 6.7% None 0 0.0% Unknown 0 0.0%
blocked by ARMR today 4 13.3% partly blocked 0 0.0% not blocked 26 86.7% not established 0 0.0% unrecorded 0 0.0%
Exploited 4 13.3% Working exploit published 0 0.0% Proof of concept only 5 16.7% Forecast only 1 3.3% No public exploit 20 66.7%
split by peak 5 / quarter
Not applicable: 4Outside Waratek scope: 7No exploit published: 13Mitigation candidate: 2Protected by Waratek: 4 Low: 2Medium: 9High: 10Critical: 9 not blocked: 26blocked by ARMR today: 4 No public exploit: 20Forecast only: 1Proof of concept only: 5Exploited: 4
Q4 195 No exploit published5 Critical3 High2 not blocked5 No public exploit5 Q1 201 No exploit published1 Critical1 not blocked1 No public exploit1 Q2 200 Q3 200 Q4 202 No exploit published2 High1 Low1 not blocked2 No public exploit2 Q1 214 No exploit published3 Outside Waratek scope1 High1 Medium3 not blocked4 No public exploit4 Q2 215 No exploit published1 Outside Waratek scope2 Not applicable2 Critical1 High2 Medium1 Low1 not blocked5 Proof of concept only2 Forecast only1 No public exploit2 Q3 213 Outside Waratek scope2 Not applicable1 High1 Medium2 not blocked3 Proof of concept only2 No public exploit1 Q4 215 Protected by Waratek2 Mitigation candidate1 Outside Waratek scope2 Critical1 High1 Medium3 blocked by ARMR today2 not blocked3 Exploited1 Proof of concept only1 No public exploit3 Q1 223 Mitigation candidate1 No exploit published1 Not applicable1 Critical1 High2 not blocked3 Exploited1 No public exploit2 Q2 222 Protected by Waratek2 Critical2 blocked by ARMR today2 Exploited2
Q4 19Q1 20Q2 20Q3 20Q4 20Q1 21Q2 21Q3 21Q4 21Q1 22Q2 22
30 matches Sign in to download these CVEs as CSV or JSON, or to follow them in a feed.
CVE Severity Published▾ Status Exploitation Description
CVE-2022-22965 Critical 2022-04-01 Protected by Waratek Exploited A Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux application running on JDK 9+ may be vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) via data binding. The specific exploit requires the application to run on Tomcat as a WAR deployment. If the application is deployed as a Spring Boot executable jar, i.e. the default, it is not vulnerable to the exploit. However, the nature of the vulnerability is more general, and there may be other ways to exploit it.
CVE-2022-22963 Critical 2022-04-01 Protected by Waratek Exploited In Spring Cloud Function versions 3.1.6, 3.2.2 and older unsupported versions, when using routing functionality it is possible for a user to provide a specially crafted SpEL as a routing-expression that may result in remote code execution and access to local resources.
CVE-2020-36518 High 2022-03-11 No exploit published No public exploit jackson-databind before 2.13.0 allows a Java StackOverflow exception and denial of service via a large depth of nested objects.
CVE-2022-22947 Critical 2022-03-03 Mitigation candidate Exploited In spring cloud gateway versions prior to 3.1.1+ and 3.0.7+ , applications are vulnerable to a code injection attack when the Gateway Actuator endpoint is enabled, exposed and unsecured. A remote attacker could make a maliciously crafted request that could allow arbitrary remote execution on the remote host.
CVE-2022-23308 High 2022-02-26 Not applicable No public exploit valid.c in libxml2 before 2.9.13 has a use-after-free of ID and IDREF attributes.
CVE-2021-45105 Medium 2021-12-18 Protected by Waratek Exploited Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-alpha1 through 2.16.0 (excluding 2.12.3 and 2.3.1) did not protect from uncontrolled recursion from self-referential lookups. This allows an attacker with control over Thread Context Map data to cause a denial of service when a crafted string is interpreted. This issue was fixed in Log4j 2.17.0, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1.
CVE-2021-43797 Medium 2021-12-09 Outside Waratek scope No public exploit Netty is an asynchronous event-driven network application framework for rapid development of maintainable high performance protocol servers & clients. Netty prior to version 4.1.71.Final skips control chars when they are present at the beginning / end of the header name. It should instead fail fast as these are not allowed by the spec and could lead to HTTP request smuggling. Failing to do the validation might cause netty to "sanitize" header names before it forward these to another remote system when used as proxy. This remote system can't see the invalid usage anymore, and therefore does not do the validation itself. Users should upgrade to version 4.1.71.Final.
CVE-2021-43527 Critical 2021-12-08 Outside Waratek scope No public exploit NSS (Network Security Services) versions prior to 3.73 or 3.68.1 ESR are vulnerable to a heap overflow when handling DER-encoded DSA or RSA-PSS signatures. Applications using NSS for handling signatures encoded within CMS, S/MIME, PKCS \#7, or PKCS \#12 are likely to be impacted. Applications using NSS for certificate validation or other TLS, X.509, OCSP or CRL functionality may be impacted, depending on how they configure NSS. *Note: This vulnerability does NOT impact Mozilla Firefox.* However, email clients and PDF viewers that use NSS for signature verification, such as Thunderbird, LibreOffice, Evolution and Evince are believed to be impacted. This vulnerability affects NSS < 3.73 and NSS < 3.68.1.
CVE-2021-2471 Medium 2021-10-20 Mitigation candidate Proof of concept only Vulnerability in the MySQL Connectors product of Oracle MySQL (component: Connector/J). Supported versions that are affected are 8.0.26 and prior. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise MySQL Connectors. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all MySQL Connectors accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of MySQL Connectors. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.9 (Confidentiality and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H).
CVE-2021-37136 High 2021-10-19 Protected by Waratek No public exploit The Bzip2 decompression decoder function doesn't allow setting size restrictions on the decompressed output data (which affects the allocation size used during decompression). All users of Bzip2Decoder are affected. The malicious input can trigger an OOME and so a DoS attack
CVE-2021-22947 Medium 2021-09-29 Not applicable Proof of concept only When curl >= 7.20.0 and <= 7.78.0 connects to an IMAP or POP3 server to retrieve data using STARTTLS to upgrade to TLS security, the server can respond and send back multiple responses at once that curl caches. curl would then upgrade to TLS but not flush the in-queue of cached responses but instead continue using and trustingthe responses it got *before* the TLS handshake as if they were authenticated.Using this flaw, it allows a Man-In-The-Middle attacker to first inject the fake responses, then pass-through the TLS traffic from the legitimate server and trick curl into sending data back to the user thinking the attacker's injected data comes from the TLS-protected server.
CVE-2021-22946 High 2021-09-29 Outside Waratek scope Proof of concept only A user can tell curl >= 7.20.0 and <= 7.78.0 to require a successful upgrade to TLS when speaking to an IMAP, POP3 or FTP server (`--ssl-reqd` on the command line or`CURLOPT_USE_SSL` set to `CURLUSESSL_CONTROL` or `CURLUSESSL_ALL` withlibcurl). This requirement could be bypassed if the server would return a properly crafted but perfectly legitimate response.This flaw would then make curl silently continue its operations **withoutTLS** contrary to the instructions and expectations, exposing possibly sensitive data in clear text over the network.
CVE-2021-37750 Medium 2021-08-23 Outside Waratek scope No public exploit The Key Distribution Center (KDC) in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) before 1.18.5 and 1.19.x before 1.19.3 has a NULL pointer dereference in kdc/do_tgs_req.c via a FAST inner body that lacks a server field.
CVE-2021-22901 High 2021-06-11 Outside Waratek scope Forecast only curl 7.75.0 through 7.76.1 suffers from a use-after-free vulnerability resulting in already freed memory being used when a TLS 1.3 session ticket arrives over a connection. A malicious server can use this in rare unfortunate circumstances to potentially reach remote code execution in the client. When libcurl at run-time sets up support for TLS 1.3 session tickets on a connection using OpenSSL, it stores pointers to the transfer in-memory object for later retrieval when a session ticket arrives. If the connection is used by multiple transfers (like with a reused HTTP/1.1 connection or multiplexed HTTP/2 connection) that first transfer object might be freed before the new session is established on that connection and then the function will access a memory buffer that might be freed. When using that memory, libcurl might even call a function pointer in the object, making it possible for a remote code execution if the server could somehow manage to get crafted memory content into the correct place in memory.
CVE-2021-22898 Low 2021-06-11 Not applicable Proof of concept only curl 7.7 through 7.76.1 suffers from an information disclosure when the `-t` command line option, known as `CURLOPT_TELNETOPTIONS` in libcurl, is used to send variable=content pairs to TELNET servers. Due to a flaw in the option parser for sending NEW_ENV variables, libcurl could be made to pass on uninitialized data from a stack based buffer to the server, resulting in potentially revealing sensitive internal information to the server using a clear-text network protocol.
CVE-2021-22897 Medium 2021-06-11 Not applicable Proof of concept only curl 7.61.0 through 7.76.1 suffers from exposure of data element to wrong session due to a mistake in the code for CURLOPT_SSL_CIPHER_LIST when libcurl is built to use the Schannel TLS library. The selected cipher set was stored in a single "static" variable in the library, which has the surprising side-effect that if an application sets up multiple concurrent transfers, the last one that sets the ciphers will accidentally control the set used by all transfers. In a worst-case scenario, this weakens transport security significantly.
CVE-2021-33560 High 2021-06-08 No exploit published No public exploit Libgcrypt before 1.8.8 and 1.9.x before 1.9.3 mishandles ElGamal encryption because it lacks exponent blinding to address a side-channel attack against mpi_powm, and the window size is not chosen appropriately. This, for example, affects use of ElGamal in OpenPGP.
CVE-2021-29921 Critical 2021-05-06 Outside Waratek scope No public exploit In Python before 3,9,5, the ipaddress library mishandles leading zero characters in the octets of an IP address string. This (in some situations) allows attackers to bypass access control that is based on IP addresses.
CVE-2020-13949 High 2021-02-12 No exploit published No public exploit In Apache Thrift 0.9.3 to 0.13.0, malicious RPC clients could send short messages which would result in a large memory allocation, potentially leading to denial of service.
CVE-2020-29582 Medium 2021-02-03 No exploit published No public exploit In JetBrains Kotlin before 1.4.21, a vulnerable Java API was used for temporary file and folder creation. An attacker was able to read data from such files and list directories due to insecure permissions.
CVE-2021-21275 Medium 2021-01-25 No exploit published No public exploit The MediaWiki "Report" extension has a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. Before fixed version, there was no protection against CSRF checks on Special:Report, so requests to report a revision could be forged. The problem has been fixed in commit f828dc6 by making use of MediaWiki edit tokens.
CVE-2020-8554 Medium 2021-01-21 Outside Waratek scope No public exploit Kubernetes API server in all versions allow an attacker who is able to create a ClusterIP service and set the spec.externalIPs field, to intercept traffic to that IP address. Additionally, an attacker who is able to patch the status (which is considered a privileged operation and should not typically be granted to users) of a LoadBalancer service can set the status.loadBalancer.ingress.ip to similar effect.
CVE-2020-28052 High 2020-12-18 No exploit published No public exploit An issue was discovered in Legion of the Bouncy Castle BC Java 1.65 and 1.66. The OpenBSDBCrypt.checkPassword utility method compared incorrect data when checking the password, allowing incorrect passwords to indicate they were matching with previously hashed ones that were different.
CVE-2020-8908 Low 2020-12-10 No exploit published No public exploit A temp directory creation vulnerability exists in all versions of Guava, allowing an attacker with access to the machine to potentially access data in a temporary directory created by the Guava API com.google.common.io.Files.createTempDir(). By default, on unix-like systems, the created directory is world-readable (readable by an attacker with access to the system). The method in question has been marked @Deprecated in versions 30.0 and later and should not be used. For Android developers, we recommend choosing a temporary directory API provided by Android, such as context.getCacheDir(). For other Java developers, we recommend migrating to the Java 7 API java.nio.file.Files.createTempDirectory() which explicitly configures permissions of 700, or configuring the Java runtime's java.io.tmpdir system property to point to a location whose permissions are appropriately configured.
CVE-2019-20330 Critical 2020-01-03 No exploit published No public exploit FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.2 lacks certain net.sf.ehcache blocking.
CVE-2019-0210 High 2019-10-29 No exploit published No public exploit In Apache Thrift 0.9.3 to 0.12.0, a server implemented in Go using TJSONProtocol or TSimpleJSONProtocol may panic when feed with invalid input data.
CVE-2019-0205 High 2019-10-29 No exploit published No public exploit In Apache Thrift all versions up to and including 0.12.0, a server or client may run into an endless loop when feed with specific input data. Because the issue had already been partially fixed in version 0.11.0, depending on the installed version it affects only certain language bindings.
CVE-2019-17531 Critical 2019-10-12 No exploit published No public exploit A Polymorphic Typing issue was discovered in FasterXML jackson-databind 2.0.0 through 2.9.10. When Default Typing is enabled (either globally or for a specific property) for an externally exposed JSON endpoint and the service has the apache-log4j-extra (version 1.2.x) jar in the classpath, and an attacker can provide a JNDI service to access, it is possible to make the service execute a malicious payload.
CVE-2019-16943 Critical 2019-10-01 No exploit published No public exploit A Polymorphic Typing issue was discovered in FasterXML jackson-databind 2.0.0 through 2.9.10. When Default Typing is enabled (either globally or for a specific property) for an externally exposed JSON endpoint and the service has the p6spy (3.8.6) jar in the classpath, and an attacker can find an RMI service endpoint to access, it is possible to make the service execute a malicious payload. This issue exists because of com.p6spy.engine.spy.P6DataSource mishandling.
CVE-2019-16942 Critical 2019-10-01 No exploit published No public exploit A Polymorphic Typing issue was discovered in FasterXML jackson-databind 2.0.0 through 2.9.10. When Default Typing is enabled (either globally or for a specific property) for an externally exposed JSON endpoint and the service has the commons-dbcp (1.4) jar in the classpath, and an attacker can find an RMI service endpoint to access, it is possible to make the service execute a malicious payload. This issue exists because of org.apache.commons.dbcp.datasources.SharedPoolDataSource and org.apache.commons.dbcp.datasources.PerUserPoolDataSource mishandling.