Overview 13,480 matches · 1,283 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 0 public PoC · 0 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
1,283
9.5%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
7
0.1%
No exploit published
12,190
90.4%
blocked by ARMR today
1,283
9.5%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
12,197
90.5%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
13,480
100.0%
split by
peak 3,276 / year
19961
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
19970
19980
19992
No exploit published2
High2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20006
No exploit published6
High3
Medium3
not blocked6
No public exploit6
200111
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published10
High7
Medium4
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked10
No public exploit11
200227
Protected by Waratek3
No exploit published24
High9
Medium16
Low2
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked24
No public exploit27
200331
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published30
High7
Medium19
Low5
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked30
No public exploit31
200426
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published24
High6
Medium17
Low3
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked24
No public exploit26
200577
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published75
Critical1
High30
Medium41
Low5
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked75
No public exploit77
2006127
Protected by Waratek6
No exploit published121
High65
Medium51
Low11
blocked by ARMR today6
not blocked121
No public exploit127
2007139
Protected by Waratek5
No exploit published134
High67
Medium62
Low10
blocked by ARMR today5
not blocked134
No public exploit139
2008122
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published120
High44
Medium71
Low7
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked120
No public exploit122
2009186
Protected by Waratek5
No exploit published181
High47
Medium118
Low21
blocked by ARMR today5
not blocked181
No public exploit186
2010165
Protected by Waratek4
No exploit published161
Critical1
High25
Medium119
Low20
blocked by ARMR today4
not blocked161
No public exploit165
2011181
Protected by Waratek3
No exploit published178
High15
Medium134
Low32
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked178
No public exploit181
2012284
Protected by Waratek6
No exploit published278
High27
Medium181
Low76
blocked by ARMR today6
not blocked278
No public exploit284
2013321
Protected by Waratek16
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published304
High37
Medium232
Low52
blocked by ARMR today16
not blocked305
No public exploit321
2014314
Protected by Waratek32
No exploit published282
High24
Medium241
Low49
blocked by ARMR today32
not blocked282
No public exploit314
2015310
Protected by Waratek25
No exploit published285
Critical1
High41
Medium221
Low47
blocked by ARMR today25
not blocked285
No public exploit310
2016503
Protected by Waratek39
No exploit published464
Critical39
High120
Medium311
Low33
blocked by ARMR today39
not blocked464
No public exploit503
2017760
Protected by Waratek79
No exploit published681
Critical65
High325
Medium345
Low25
blocked by ARMR today79
not blocked681
No public exploit760
2018851
Protected by Waratek154
No exploit published697
Critical69
High291
Medium477
Low14
blocked by ARMR today154
not blocked697
No public exploit851
2019848
Protected by Waratek94
No exploit published754
Critical72
High314
Medium431
Low31
blocked by ARMR today94
not blocked754
No public exploit848
20201,013
Protected by Waratek124
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published888
Critical84
High362
Medium527
Low40
blocked by ARMR today124
not blocked889
No public exploit1,013
2021718
Protected by Waratek95
No exploit published623
Critical80
High322
Medium299
Low17
blocked by ARMR today95
not blocked623
No public exploit718
2022999
Protected by Waratek167
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published831
Critical104
High277
Medium599
Low19
blocked by ARMR today167
not blocked832
No public exploit999
2023840
Protected by Waratek113
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published726
Critical120
High280
Medium424
Low16
blocked by ARMR today113
not blocked727
No public exploit840
2024628
Protected by Waratek72
No exploit published556
Critical79
High213
Medium310
Low26
blocked by ARMR today72
not blocked556
No public exploit628
2025714
Protected by Waratek68
No exploit published646
Critical45
High174
Medium465
Low29
None1
blocked by ARMR today68
not blocked646
No public exploit714
20263,276
Protected by Waratek165
Mitigation candidate3
No exploit published3,108
Critical641
High1,582
Medium917
Low134
None2
blocked by ARMR today165
not blocked3,111
No public exploit3,276
19961999200220052008201120142017202020232026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-81624 | High | 2026-08-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Undertow is a flexible performant web server used in JBoss EAP and WildFly. A flaw was found in how Undertow handles WebSocket connections. Specifically, certain configuration limits like message buffer sizes and session timeouts cannot be adjusted and default to being unlimited. This allows a remote attacker to send large amounts of data or maintain connections indefinitely, potentially crashing the server by exhausting its memory or other resources. |
| CVE-2026-76986 | Medium | 2026-08-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Improper neutralization of input during web page generation in Apache Wicket. org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.AbstractSingleSelectChoice, the base class of DropDownChoice, writes the body of the default option — the entry shown when no choice is selected — into the markup as it is, while every other option body in the same select is escaped according to the escape-model-strings setting. The body comes from getNullValidDisplayValue() or getNullKeyDisplayValue(), both of which are protected, so what they return is not necessarily the plain text the default implementation reads from a resource bundle. An application is affected where it overrides one of those methods and returns a value holding data an attacker can influence, or where its own nullValid or null bundle entry holds such a value. The bundles shipped with Wicket contain plain text. RadioChoice overrides getDefaultChoice to emit no default option and is not affected. As a workaround, escape the value in the override. This issue affects Apache Wicket: from 8.0.0 through 8.18.0, from 9.0.0 through 9.23.0, from 10.0.0 through 10.10.0. Older, unsupported releases from 1.5.0 onwards are also affected. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 8.19.0, 9.24.0 or 10.11.0, which fix the issue. |
| CVE-2026-76985 | Medium | 2026-08-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Improper neutralization of input during web page generation in Apache Wicket. org.apache.wicket.extensions.markup.html.form.palette.component.AbstractOptions, which renders the two option lists of a Palette, escapes the id and the display value of each option according to the escape-model-strings setting, and wrote the attribute names and values returned by getAdditionalAttributes into the <option> tag as they came. An application is affected where it overrides Palette.getAdditionalAttributesForChoices, Palette.getAdditionalAttributesForSelection or AbstractOptions.getAdditionalAttributes and returns a value holding data an attacker can influence. These methods return null by default, so an application that does not override them is not affected. As a workaround, escape the values in the override. This issue affects Apache Wicket: from 8.0.0 through 8.18.0, from 9.0.0 through 9.23.0, from 10.0.0 through 10.10.0. Older, unsupported releases from 1.4.0 onwards are also affected. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 8.19.0, 9.24.0 or 10.11.0, which fix the issue. |
| CVE-2026-76984 | Medium | 2026-08-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Improper neutralization of input during web page generation in Apache Wicket. org.apache.wicket.markup.head.MetaDataHeaderItem generates <meta> and <link> header tags. It escaped the attribute names it wrote, but ran the attribute values through a replacement of " with \". A backslash before a double quote means nothing in HTML, so a value containing a double quote ends its own attribute and what follows is parsed as further attributes of the generated tag. An application is affected where it supplies an attribute value holding data an attacker can influence, through addTagAttribute or the forMetaTag and forLinkTag factory methods. A value may be given as an IModel, so it is not necessarily a literal. There is no setting to change; an application can only avoid supplying a value that contains a double quote. Note that these values have never been escaped effectively: before the change released in 6.24.0, 7.4.0 and 8.0.0 they were written with no escaping at all. This issue affects Apache Wicket: from 8.0.0 through 8.18.0, from 9.0.0 through 9.23.0, from 10.0.0 through 10.10.0. Older, unsupported releases from 6.17.0 onwards are also affected. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 8.19.0, 9.24.0 or 10.11.0, which fix the issue. |
| CVE-2026-76983 | Medium | 2026-08-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Improper neutralization of input during web page generation in Apache Wicket. The <wicket:label> tag is provided by org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.AutoLabelTextResolver, which is registered by default in every WebApplication. The resolver writes the label it finds into the markup as it is, and reads no escaping setting at all, so markup in a label is rendered as markup. When the label comes from the labelled component's label model, set through FormComponent#setLabel(IModel), it is written to the markup unescaped. An application is affected where the label of a form component holds data an attacker can influence. Wicket cannot determine where a model value comes from, so whether it reaches the page from a request or from storage is a property of the application. There is no workaround. Unlike every other rendering path in Wicket, the resolver never consulted the escape-model-strings setting, so an application had no way to ask for the label to be escaped. The body of a <wicket:label> tag is markup by design and is not affected; it remains the supported way to place markup in a label. This issue affects Apache Wicket: from 8.0.0 through 8.18.0, from 9.0.0 through 9.23.0, from 10.0.0 through 10.10.0. Older, unsupported releases from 1.5.0 onwards are also affected. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 8.19.0, 9.24.0 or 10.11.0, which fix the issue. |
| CVE-2026-76982 | Medium | 2026-08-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Improper neutralization of input during web page generation in Apache Wicket. org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Button clears the escape-model-strings flag in its constructor, so that the value attribute it writes is not encoded twice — ComponentTag already encodes attribute values when it writes the tag. That reasoning holds only for the attribute. When the component is attached to a <button> element rather than an <input>, it writes its model object into the element body instead, and nothing encodes an element body, so markup in the model is rendered as markup. An application is affected where it renders a Button on a <button> element and that button's model holds data an attacker can influence. Wicket cannot determine where a model value comes from, so whether it reaches the page from a request or from storage is a property of the application. The subclasses that inherit this constructor — AjaxButton, AjaxFallbackButton and WizardButton — are affected on the same terms. As a workaround, calling setEscapeModelStrings(true) on a button that renders as a <button> element escapes the body correctly, and does not cause double encoding, because the value attribute is written only for <input> elements. This issue affects Apache Wicket: from 8.0.0 through 8.18.0, from 9.0.0 through 9.23.0, from 10.0.0 through 10.10.0. Older, unsupported releases from 6.25.0 and 7.5.0 onwards are also affected. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 8.19.0, 9.24.0 or 10.11.0, which fix the issue. |
| CVE-2026-75802 | Medium | 2026-08-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | AjaxEditableChoiceLabel in wicket-extensions, when constructed with a non-null IChoiceRenderer, writes the display value obtained from that renderer into the label's markup without applying the HTML escaping Wicket performs by default for component model values. An attacker who can influence the choice or model data rendered by such a label can inject HTML or script that executes in the browser of any user who views the page. The same value is correctly escaped when the component's dropdown editor renders it as an option, so only the label rendering is affected. AjaxEditableLabel, AjaxEditableChoiceLabel and AjaxEditableMultiLineLabel write the value returned by the protected defaultNullLabel() method into the label's markup the same way when the component's model is empty, while the model value they show otherwise is escaped. The default implementation returns a constant, so an application is affected where it overrides that method and returns a value an attacker can influence. Neither value could be escaped by configuration, because escapeModelStrings had no effect on any of the three components: it is read by the label they render with rather than by the component itself, and nothing carried the setting across. This issue affects Apache Wicket: from 8.0.0 through 8.18.0, from 9.0.0 through 9.23.0, from 10.0.0 through 10.10.0. Older, unsupported releases are also affected; the display value from the renderer since 6.22.0 and the null label since 1.4.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 8.19.0, 9.24.0 or 10.11.0, which fix the issue. |
| CVE-2026-71378 | Medium | 2026-08-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | ResourceIsolationRequestCycleListener protects a Wicket application against cross-site request forgery by rejecting requests that a resource isolation policy judges to come from another origin. Its default policy, FetchMetadataResourceIsolationPolicy, was derived from a reference implementation written to guard static resources, and it inherited two allowances that are unsafe when the thing being guarded is an action on a page: * Every "simple top-level navigation" was allowed. Any GET request carrying Sec-Fetch-Mode: navigate whose Sec-Fetch-Dest was neither object nor embed was allowed, whatever Sec-Fetch-Site said — including cross-site. Wicket invokes component listeners (Link.onClick(), form submits, behaviour callbacks) through ordinary GET navigations, so a page under an attacker's control could navigate the victim's browser to a listener URL and have that listener run inside the victim's authenticated session. Browsers send SameSite=Lax cookies — the effective default when no SameSite attribute is set — on cross-site top-level GET navigations, so the victim's session cookie accompanied the request. * Sec-Fetch-Site: same-site was allowed unconditionally. That value means the same registrable domain and scheme but a different origin — another subdomain or another port. Any sibling origin could therefore invoke any listener by any method, POST form submits included, and cookies are always sent on same-site requests regardless of SameSite. A hostile sibling origin obtained through a subdomain takeover, through delegated user content, or through an XSS elsewhere on the site could act as the authenticated user. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 9.24.0 or 10.11.0, which fix the issue. Affected versions * Apache Wicket 9.1.0 through 9.23.0 * Apache Wicket 10.0.0 through 10.10.0 Not affected Any release older than 9.1.0: * Apache Wicket 8.x (8.0.0 through 8.17.0). The resource isolation classes do not exist in the 8.x line, which offers only the Origin/Referer-based CsrfPreventionRequestCycleListener. No 8.x release requires a fix. * Apache Wicket 9.0.0. ResourceIsolationRequestCycleListener and FetchMetadataResourceIsolationPolicy were introduced by WICKET-6786 and first shipped in 9.1.0 (released 2020-10-07). |
| CVE-2026-71257 | High | 2026-08-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Apache Wicket enforces the upload limits configured on a form or upload field while parsing a multipart request with Apache Commons FileUpload. If the request body has already been consumed by another component, Commons FileUpload returns no items and Wicket falls back to reading the upload through HttpServletRequest#getParts(). The per-file size limit (for example Form#setFileMaxSize) and the file count limit (Form#setFileCountMax) are not applied to the parts obtained that way, and no exception is raised, so the upload is processed as though those limits had been satisfied. A remote uploader can therefore submit files that are larger, or more numerous, than the application permits, up to whatever the component that parsed the request allows. A part carrying no Content-Type header is additionally read into memory in full during parsing, so the size of that allocation is determined by the request and bounded only by those same external limits. The total upload size limit (Form#setMaxSize) is not affected. Commons FileUpload compares the declared Content-Length against it before reading the body, so a request declaring an oversized length is rejected before the fallback is reached. The fallback is reached in deployments where a servlet or filter has already parsed the request body — for example a servlet annotated with @MultipartConfig, Spring Boot's multipart resolver, or any filter that calls HttpServletRequest#getParameter() on a multipart request. It applies to the Wicket components that accept uploads on that path, including Form with FileUploadField, FileUploadToResourceField and AjaxFileDropBehavior. Applications that configure neither a per-file nor a file-count limit are not affected, as Wicket applies neither by default. This issue affects Apache Wicket: from 8.0.0 through 8.18.0, from 9.0.0 through 9.23.0, from 10.0.0 through 10.10.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 8.19.0, 9.24.0 or 10.11.0, which fix the issue. Users of Apache Wicket 7.x or older, which are no longer supported, should upgrade to a supported version. As a workaround, configure equivalent limits in the component that parses the request — for example spring.servlet.multipart.max-file-size and max-request-size, or maxFileSize and maxRequestSize in @MultipartConfig or in the web.xml <multipart-config> element. |
| CVE-2026-70449 | Medium | 2026-08-31 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Improper validation of resource URL attributes in Apache Wicket allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to read files from the web application, including files under WEB-INF that the servlet container would not otherwise serve. The locale, style and variation attributes decoded from a package resource URL are spliced into the resource lookup path without being checked for path separators. The IPackageResourceGuard — whose rejection of .. is one of the two intended controls — is applied to the resource name before those attributes are appended, and WebApplicationPath rejects only paths literally beginning with WEB-INF/. Neither control ever inspects the attacker-controlled portion of the path. On servlet containers that normalize .. in ServletContext.getResource(), a crafted request therefore escapes the intended package directory. The set of readable files is limited to the file extensions permitted by the configured IPackageResourceGuard. The default SecurePackageResourceGuard permits only js, css, png, jpg, jpeg, gif, ico, cur, map, html, txt, swf, bmp, svg, avif, eot, ttf, woff and woff2, which excludes configuration formats. Applications that have added patterns to the guard, or replaced it with the blocklist-based PackageResourceGuard, can additionally disclose configuration files such as web.xml. Independently of the extension, the lookup performed before the guard runs acts as an existence oracle for arbitrary paths. This issue affects Apache Wicket 8.18.0 and before, 9.23.0 and before and 10.10.0 and before. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 8.19.0, 9.24.0 or 10.11.0, which fix the issue. Users of Apache Wicket 7.x or older, which are no longer supported, should upgrade to a supported version. |
| CVE-2026-58301 | Medium | 2026-08-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | When Apache Shiro is used with the Jakarta EE integration module, a low-privileged user can craft an HTTP request that causes the server to initiate a connection to an attacker-controlled URL and transmit attacker-controlled data. This vulnerability affects Apache Shiro versions 2.x through 3.0.0 only in deployments that use the Jakarta EE integration module. Mitigation: Upgrade to version 3.0.1 or later, which fixes the issue. + Alternatively, you can set the `org.apache.shiro.form-resubmit-host` (String) and `org.apache.shiro.form-resubmit-port` (Integer) system properties to restrict the host and port that Shiro will connect to when resubmitting a form. |
| CVE-2026-17615 | High | 2026-08-31 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | A flaw was found in RESTEasy's SourceProvider. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to perform an unauthenticated remote file read. By sending a specially crafted XML body with a DOCTYPE declaration referencing external entities to an endpoint that accepts application/xml and returns Source or StreamSource, the server can be tricked into resolving the entity and including sensitive file contents in the HTTP response. This is due to the SourceProvider.writeTo() method creating a SAXParser without disabling external entity resolution, leading to an XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability. |
| CVE-2026-12894 | High | 2026-08-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in the Qute template engine, which is used by Quarkus to generate dynamic content like HTML pages or emails. The issue exists in the component responsible for looking up data values (ReflectionValueResolver), which fails to properly block access to sensitive Java internal functions when processing certain data types like Enums. An attacker who can provide or influence the template text can exploit this bypass to take control of the server by executing unauthorized commands. |
| CVE-2026-55867 | Medium | 2026-08-28 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Graylog is a free and open log management platform. From 6.2.0 until 6.3.12, 7.0.7, and 7.1.2, the DELETE /users/{userId}/tokens/{idOrToken} endpoint implemented by UsersResource.revokeToken() in graylog2-server/src/main/java/org/graylog2/rest/resources/users/UsersResource.java checks USERS_TOKENREMOVE permission against the attacker-controlled userId path parameter before resolving the token selected by idOrToken. An authenticated user can provide an authorized userId while accessTokenService.loadById() or accessTokenService.load() resolves a token belonging to another user, including a service account or administrator, after which accessTokenService.destroy() deletes that token without checking AccessToken.getUserName(). The issue does not expose token contents, but unauthorized deletion causes integrity impact and can disrupt access-token-based integrations. This issue is fixed in versions 6.3.12, 7.0.7, and 7.1.2. |
| CVE-2026-55860 | Medium | 2026-08-28 | No exploit published | No public exploit | MariaDB Connector/R2DBC is a non-blocking MariaDB and MySQL client implemented in Java. Prior to 1.4.1, org.mariadb:r2dbc-mariadb does not gate clear-text password authentication plugins on transport encryption because the AuthenticationPlugin interface has no capability for a plugin to require a secure connection. A hostile or man-in-the-middle MariaDB server can send an AuthSwitchRequest naming mysql_clear_password or dialog (PAM) over a plain-TCP unencrypted connection, and AuthenticationFlow permits ClearPasswordPluginFlow or PamPluginFlow to return the user's password as cleartext bytes on the wire. The disclosed credentials can subsequently be used to authenticate directly to the database server. This issue is fixed in version 1.4.1. |
| CVE-2026-55859 | Medium | 2026-08-28 | No exploit published | No public exploit | MariaDB Connector/R2DBC is a non-blocking MariaDB and MySQL client implemented in Java. Prior to 1.4.1, org.mariadb:r2dbc-mariadb encodes and decodes all character data under the assumption that the connection character set is UTF-8. A server can announce a mid-session change to character_set_client through the OK-packet session-state-tracking mechanism, including through SET NAMES executed by a stored routine or trigger, server configuration, or a hostile or man-in-the-middle server. If the new character set is not UTF-8, the driver continues to exchange UTF-8 while the server interprets the same bytes under a different encoding, causing silent data corruption and a client/server charset-confusion mismatch that can defeat byte-wise quoting or escaping. The fix accepts only utf8, utf8mb3, or utf8mb4 after initialization; any other value raises R2dbcNonTransientResourceException with SQLState 08000 and closes the connection. This issue is fixed in version 1.4.1. |
| CVE-2026-55858 | Medium | 2026-08-28 | No exploit published | No public exploit | MariaDB Connector/J is used to connect applications developed in Java to MariaDB and MySQL databases. Prior to 2.7.14, 3.3.5, 3.4.3, and 3.5.9, the connector encodes and decodes protocol text and performs client-side escaping under the assumption that the connection character set is UTF-8. The server can report a mid-session change to character_set_client through OK-packet session-state tracking, including a change caused by SET NAMES, a stored routine or trigger, server configuration, or a hostile server. If character_set_client changes to a non-UTF-8 value, the driver continues to read and write UTF-8 while the server interprets the same bytes under another encoding, causing silent data corruption and a client/server charset-confusion mismatch that can defeat byte-wise quoting or escaping. The fix accepts only utf8, utf8mb3, or utf8mb4 after initialization; any other value causes SQLException with SQLState 08000 and closes the connection. This issue is fixed in versions 2.7.14, 3.3.5, 3.4.3, and 3.5.9. |
| CVE-2026-55857 | Medium | 2026-08-28 | No exploit published | No public exploit | MariaDB Connector/J is used to connect applications developed in Java to MariaDB and MySQL databases. Prior to 2.7.14, 3.3.5, 3.4.3, and 3.5.9, PAM dialog authentication can be coerced into transmitting the account password over an insecure connection. The mysql_clear_password plugin is gated behind a secure transport, but the sibling PAM handler SendPamAuthPacketFactory, named dialog by the server, does not declare that requirement and inherits the default secure-required value false; older branches implement the same affected behavior in SendPamAuthPacket. A hostile or man-in-the-middle server can send an Authentication Switch Request for dialog over plain TCP, causing the driver to return the user's password in cleartext when sslMode=DISABLE and restrictedAuth=null, which is the default configuration. Properly verified TLS and local Unix sockets are not exposed to this transport vector. This issue is fixed in versions 2.7.14, 3.3.5, 3.4.3, and 3.5.9. |
| CVE-2026-55856 | Medium | 2026-08-28 | No exploit published | No public exploit | MariaDB Connector/J is used to connect applications developed in Java to MariaDB and MySQL databases. Prior to 2.7.14, 3.3.5, 3.4.3, and 3.5.9, when a Java application connects with sslMode=verify-full or sslMode=verify-ca, supplies a password, and does not configure serverSslCert or trustStore, Connector/J can accept an untrusted self-signed certificate through the fallbackToSystemTrustStore=true ephemeral trust manager and record its certFingerprint for later identity binding. The OK-packet and authentication-switch paths enforce the certificate fingerprint, but the initial-handshake path does not. HandshakeResponse.encode() can therefore build and send a mysql_clear_password response before checking certFingerprint != null && !isMitMProof(), sslMode, or whether the authentication plugin is resistant to a man-in-the-middle, and the initial path also bypasses restrictedAuth. An active man-in-the-middle or hostile server can present a self-signed certificate, claim to be MariaDB, select mysql_clear_password as the initial authentication plugin, and receive the full database password before the connection is rejected. This issue is fixed in versions 2.7.14, 3.3.5, 3.4.3, and 3.5.9. |
| CVE-2026-55841 | High | 2026-08-28 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Graylog is a free and open log management platform. Prior to Graylog Server versions 6.3.12, 7.0.7, and 7.1.2 and Graylog Forwarder version 7.3, the FortiGate key-value syslog parser in graylog2-server/src/main/java/org/graylog2/inputs/codecs/GLFortiGateSyslogEvent.java and graylog2-server/src/main/java/org/graylog2/inputs/codecs/SyslogCodec.java mishandles field-like text inside quoted values. GLFortiGateSyslogEvent.getFields() uses KV_PATTERN and QUOTED_KV_PATTERN, while SyslogCodec.parse() invokes the FortiGateSyslogEvent parser; crafted values containing = or backslash-escaped quotes can cause embedded keys such as srcip, dstip, date, time, and tz to remove or overwrite original top-level fields or produce an invalid message that Graylog discards. An unauthenticated network sender who can submit syslog messages can therefore manipulate security-log fields or evade logging to obscure malicious activity. This issue is fixed in Graylog Server versions 6.3.12, 7.0.7, and 7.1.2 and Graylog Forwarder version 7.3. |
| CVE-2026-55673 | High | 2026-08-28 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | PowSyBl (Power System Blocks) is a framework to build power system oriented software. Prior to 7.2.2, UnixLocalCommandExecutor and WindowsLocalCommandExecutor concatenate command arguments and environment variables into strings interpreted through bash -c or cmd /c without sufficient escaping. Attacker-controlled values reaching UnixLocalCommandExecutor.execute, WindowsLocalCommandExecutor.execute, LocalComputationManager.execute, ParallelLoadFlowActionSimulator.run, ActionSimulatorTool.run, AmplModelRunner.run, or AmplModelRunner.runAsync can break out of the intended command and execute arbitrary shell commands as the JVM user. The affected itools paths include action-simulator with task-count, security-analysis with external, and dynamic-security-analysis. Downstream CLI tools, libraries, REST front ends, and multi-tenant grid-analysis services that forward less-trusted contingency identifiers or computation parameters into these APIs can expose the injection remotely. This issue is fixed in version 7.2.2. |
| CVE-2026-55545 | Medium | 2026-08-28 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Yamcs is a mission control framework. Prior to 5.12.8 and 5.13.2, Yamcs WebSocket subscription handlers fail to enforce the privileges required by equivalent REST endpoints. PacketsApi.subscribePackets exposes the packets WebSocket topic without ObjectPrivilegeType.ReadPacket, ProcessingApi.subscribeAlgorithmStatus exposes the algorithm-status WebSocket topic without ObjectPrivilegeType.ReadAlgorithm, and MdbOverrideApi.subscribeMdbChanges exposes the mdb-changes WebSocket topic without SystemPrivilege.GetMissionDatabase. A low-privilege authenticated user can receive telemetry packets, algorithm status, and mission database change information outside the assigned authorization scope. This issue is fixed in versions 5.12.8 and 5.13.2. |
| CVE-2026-55425 | Medium | 2026-08-28 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Graylog is a free and open log management platform. From 7.1.0 until 7.1.4 and 7.2.0-alpha.2, the System Catalog entity titles endpoint in graylog2-server/src/main/java/org/graylog2/rest/resources/system/contentpacks/titles/EntityTitleServiceImpl.java allows an authenticated user to request composite display fields without verifying that every selected field is readable. A user can retrieve protected values, including the password hash on a readable user record; ordinary users are limited to their own permitted records, while administrators can retrieve hashes for all users. This issue is fixed in versions 7.1.4 and 7.2.0-alpha.2. |
| CVE-2026-59355 | Medium | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In versions of Spring Authorization Server 1.5.0 through 1.5.7, the authorization endpoint performs insufficient validation of the request_uri parameter. An attacker can craft a request containing an invalid request_uri paired with an unvalidated redirect_uri, which can result in an open redirect to an attacker-controlled site. |
| CVE-2026-59354 | Critical | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In versions of Spring Security's OAuth2 Authorization Server module 7.0.0 through 7.0.4, when Dynamic Client Registration is explicitly enabled, the registration endpoint performs insufficient validation of certain client metadata fields supplied by the registering client. An attacker who possesses a valid Initial Access Token can register a malicious client with crafted metadata, which, depending on server configuration and how the metadata is later rendered or used, may result in Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), Privilege Escalation, or Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). |
| CVE-2026-59324 | High | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | When an IntegrationFlow uses .fluxTransform() with an asynchronous/reordering fluxFunction that emits raw payloads, concurrent requests on the same FluxMessageChannel subscription have their reply headers (replyChannel, errorChannel, correlationId, any propagated security/tenant headers) copied from whichever message was most recently consumed upstream. Spring Integration 7.1.0 Spring Integration 7.0.0 - 7.0.5 Spring Integration 6.5.0 - 6.5.10 Spring Integration 6.4.0 - 6.4.12 Spring Integration 5.5.21 and earlier |
| CVE-2026-59322 | Medium | 2026-08-27 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | The EmbeddedHeadersJsonMessageMapper defaults to an overly permissive header parsing posture in its constructor. When decodeNativeFormat processes raw byte payloads, it deserializes embedded JSON headers into a plain Map and constructs a GenericMessage with MutableMessageHeaders without sanitizing or filtering untrusted header names by default. Spring Integration 7.1.0 Spring Integration 7.0.0 - 7.0.5 Spring Integration 6.5.0 - 6.5.10 Spring Integration 6.4.0 - 6.4.12 Spring Integration 5.5.21 and earlier |
| CVE-2026-59321 | Medium | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A single ScriptEngine instance is reused for every message on a script-backed channel. For JSR-223 engines that report THREADING=null (not thread-safe, e.g. the Kotlin kts engine), concurrent message processing can corrupt engine-internal state, potentially leaking one message's payload/headers bindings into another message's script evaluation or throwing spurious exceptions. Spring Integration 7.1.0 Spring Integration 7.0.0 - 7.0.5 Spring Integration 6.5.0 - 6.5.10 Spring Integration 6.4.0 - 6.4.12 Spring Integration 5.5.21 and earlier |
| CVE-2026-59320 | Medium | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | When a container-level ErrorHandler is configured (the mitigation for finding 221000), each delivery whose processing throws still permanently consumes one link credit. After initialCredits (default 100) failing messages the receiver's credit reaches zero and the broker stops delivering, leaving the listener silently stalled while isRunning() remains true. Spring AMQP 4.1.0 |
| CVE-2026-59319 | Medium | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | RedisChatMemoryRepository.findByMetadata() builds RediSearch tag and text queries from caller-supplied metadata values without applying RediSearchUtil.escape(), unlike get(), clear(), and findByTimeRange() in the same class which do escape their inputs. An application that passes user-controlled values to findByMetadata() on a tag-typed metadata field allows an attacker to inject RediSearch syntax (e.g. x} | *) that breaks out of the tag clause and matches all indexed chat messages across every conversation in the index. Spring AI 2.0.0 |
| CVE-2026-59317 | Medium | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | DeadLetterPublishingRecovererFactory reads the retry_topic-original-timestamp header from an inbound ConsumerRecord and passes its raw bytes directly to new BigInteger(header.value()) with no length or format validation. Spring for Apache Kafka 4.1.0 Spring for Apache Kafka 4.0.0 - 4.0.6 Spring for Apache Kafka 3.0.0 - 3.3.16 Spring for Apache Kafka 2.9.0 - 2.9.14 Spring for Apache Kafka 2.8.12 and earlier |
| CVE-2026-59316 | High | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Spring Authorization Server's default consent page renders user-controlled values without HTML entity encoding. When using the DefaultConsentPage, an attacker can craft an OAuth2 authorization request containing a malicious value that is stored server-side and later rendered unencoded in the default consent page presented to the end user. Spring Authorization Server 1.5.0 - 1.5.8 Spring Authorization Server 1.4.0 - 1.4.11 |
| CVE-2026-59315 | Medium | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The Spring Cloud Config Monitor is susceptible to Denial of Service attacks via malicious payloads. Spring Cloud Config 5.0.0 - 5.0.4 Spring Cloud Config 4.3.0 - 4.3.4 Spring Cloud Config 4.0.0 - 4.2.8 Spring Cloud Config 3.1.14 and earlier |
| CVE-2026-59314 | Low | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Applications that build a Content-Disposition header value from untrusted input may be vulnerable to HTTP response splitting when the input is a malicious file name. Spring Framework 7.0.0 - 7.0.8 Spring Framework 6.2.0 - 6.2.19 Spring Framework 6.1.0 - 6.1.28 Spring Framework 6.0.0 - 6.0.30 Spring Framework 5.3.0 - 5.3.49 Spring Framework 5.2.25.RELEASE and earlier |
| CVE-2026-59313 | Critical | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Spring MVC applications using the functional web framework are vulnerable to stream corruption when using Server-Sent Events (SSE). Spring Framework 7.0.0 - 7.0.8 Spring Framework 6.2.0 - 6.2.19 Spring Framework 6.1.0 - 6.1.28 Spring Framework 6.0.0 - 6.0.30 Spring Framework 5.3.0 - 5.3.49 |
| CVE-2026-59311 | Medium | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A local unprivileged user on the same host can redirect all Zip/UnZip transformer output into a directory of their choosing by pre-creating /tmp/ziptransformer as a symlink before the application starts. Spring Integration 7.1.0 Spring Integration 7.0.0 - 7.0.5 Spring Integration 6.5.0 - 6.5.10 Spring Integration 6.4.0 - 6.4.12 |
| CVE-2026-59307 | High | 2026-08-27 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | An operator who calls JdbcMessageStore.addAllowedPatterns(...) to restrict deserialization receives no protection at all when the store is a Spring-managed bean. Spring Integration 7.1.0 Spring Integration 7.0.0 - 7.0.5 Spring Integration 6.5.0 - 6.5.10 Spring Integration 6.4.0 - 6.4.12 |
| CVE-2026-59306 | Low | 2026-08-27 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Potential for deserialization of untrusted types in Spring Cloud Stream. Spring Cloud Stream 5.0.0 - 5.0.2 Spring Cloud Stream 4.3.0 - 4.3.3 Spring Cloud Stream 4.2.0 - 4.2.6 |
| CVE-2026-59305 | Low | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Partition interceptor may be improperly added while sending message. Spring Cloud Stream 5.0.0 - 5.0.2 Spring Cloud Stream 4.3.0 - 4.3.3 Spring Cloud Stream 4.2.0 - 4.2.6 |
| CVE-2026-59304 | Low | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Improper caching of the original content type in Spring Cloud Stream Avro. Spring Cloud Stream 5.0.0 - 5.0.2 Spring Cloud Stream 4.3.0 - 4.3.3 Spring Cloud Stream 4.2.0 - 4.2.6 |
| CVE-2026-59303 | Low | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Dynamic destination cache size is not properly bound in Spring Cloud Stream. Spring Cloud Stream 5.0.0 - 5.0.2 Spring Cloud Stream 4.3.0 - 4.3.3 Spring Cloud Stream 4.2.0 - 4.2.6 |
| CVE-2026-59302 | Medium | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Potential for logging sensitive data in Spring Cloud Stream. Spring Cloud Stream 5.0.0 - 5.0.2 Spring Cloud Stream 4.3.0 - 4.3.3 Spring Cloud Stream 4.2.0 - 4.2.6 |
| CVE-2026-59301 | Medium | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Potential for logging sensitive data in Spring Cloud Function Azure. Spring Cloud Function 5.0.0 - 5.0.3 Spring Cloud Function 4.3.0 - 4.3.4 Spring Cloud Function 4.2.0 - 4.2.7 |
| CVE-2026-59300 | Low | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Potential for logging sensitive data in Spring Cloud Function AWS. Spring Cloud Function 5.0.0 - 5.0.3 Spring Cloud Function 4.3.0 - 4.3.4 Spring Cloud Function 4.2.0 - 4.2.7 Spring Cloud Function 3.2.16 and earlier |
| CVE-2026-59299 | Low | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Composition lookup can potentially poison base function in Spring Cloud Function. Spring Cloud Function 5.0.0 - 5.0.3 Spring Cloud Function 4.3.0 - 4.3.4 Spring Cloud Function 4.2.0 - 4.2.7 Spring Cloud Function 3.2.16 and earlier |
| CVE-2026-59298 | Low | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Potential for improper filtering of HTTP headers in Spring Cloud Function. Spring Cloud Function 5.0.0 - 5.0.3 Spring Cloud Function 4.3.0 - 4.3.4 Spring Cloud Function 4.2.0 - 4.2.7 Spring Cloud Function 3.2.16 and earlier |
| CVE-2026-59297 | Low | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Implementation of isSecure() call of ServerlessHttpServletRequest does not verify the actual scheme. Spring Cloud Function 5.0.0 - 5.0.3 Spring Cloud Function 4.3.0 - 4.3.4 Spring Cloud Function 4.2.0 - 4.2.7 |
| CVE-2026-59294 | Medium | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | ResourceCacheService.getCacheName() builds the on-disk filename by appending the URI fragment verbatim, without stripping path separators or .. sequences, and passes the result to new File(resourceParentFolder, newFileName) before writing the downloaded bytes there. Spring AI 2.0.0 Spring AI 1.1.0 - 1.1.8 Spring AI 1.0.9 and earlier |
| CVE-2026-59293 | Medium | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Unless the application explicitly raises smbMinVersion, the jCIFS client will negotiate down to SMB1/CIFS, which lacks mandatory signing/encryption and is vulnerable to NTLM relay and content-tampering MITM. Spring Integration 7.1.0 Spring Integration 7.0.0 - 7.0.5 Spring Integration 6.5.0 - 6.5.10 Spring Integration 6.4.0 - 6.4.12 |
| CVE-2026-59292 | Low | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | PropertiesPersistingMetadataStore, the default file-based ConcurrentMetadataStore, persists its state to ${java.io.tmpdir}/spring-integration/metadata-store.properties with world-readable permissions. Spring Integration 7.1.0 Spring Integration 7.0.0 - 7.0.5 Spring Integration 6.5.0 - 6.5.10 Spring Integration 6.4.0 - 6.4.12 Spring Integration 5.5.21 and earlier |
| CVE-2026-59291 | Medium | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Potential arbitrary file read and SSRF vulnerability in Spring Cloud Function. Spring Cloud Function 5.0.0 - 5.0.3 Spring Cloud Function 4.3.0 - 4.3.4 Spring Cloud Function 4.2.0 - 4.2.7 |
| CVE-2026-59289 | High | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Spring for GraphQL's Spring Data pagination support resolves arguments of a scrollable query and forwards the client-supplied values to the underlying repository. An attacker can forge a malicious query for a Connection field that can exhaust application memory or place significant, prolonged load on the underlying datastore, resulting in a Denial of Service. Spring for GraphQL 2.0.0 - 2.0.4 Spring for GraphQL 1.4.0 - 1.4.6 Spring for GraphQL 1.2.0 - 1.3.9 |
| CVE-2026-59288 | High | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The GraphiQL page bundled with Spring for GraphQL sends requests to the GraphQL endpoints of the application. An attacker can share a malicious URL so that the victim's browser might leak confidential information to the attacker's website. Spring for GraphQL 2.0.0 - 2.0.4 Spring for GraphQL 1.4.0 - 1.4.6 Spring for GraphQL 1.1.0 - 1.3.9 Spring for GraphQL 1.0.0 - 1.0.7 |
| CVE-2026-59287 | Medium | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Spring for GraphQL is vulnerable to Denial of Service attacks when using the WebSocket client with keepAlive enabled. Spring for GraphQL 2.0.0 - 2.0.4 Spring for GraphQL 1.4.0 - 1.4.6 Spring for GraphQL 1.3.0 - 1.3.9 |
| CVE-2026-59286 | High | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The GraphiQL page bundled with Spring for GraphQL loads JavaScript libraries from a public CDN, without Subresource Integrity checks. An attacker can inject malicious code in those scripts and execute arbitrary code on the browser loading the GraphiQL page. Spring for GraphQL 2.0.0 - 2.0.4 Spring for GraphQL 1.4.0 - 1.4.6 Spring for GraphQL 1.1.0 - 1.3.9 Spring for GraphQL 1.0.0 - 1.0.7 |
| CVE-2026-59285 | High | 2026-08-27 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Spring for GraphQL applications are vulnerable to Unsafe Deserialization when processing paginated GraphQL queries. Spring for GraphQL 2.0.0 - 2.0.4 |
| CVE-2026-59284 | High | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | There is no allow list for property keys when Spring Cloud Commons writable /actuator/env is enabled. Spring Cloud Commons 5.0.0 - 5.0.2 Spring Cloud Commons 4.3.0 - 4.3.3 Spring Cloud Commons 4.0.0 - 4.2.6 Spring Cloud Commons 3.1.10 and earlier |
| CVE-2026-59283 | Critical | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Applications that evaluate Spring Expression Language (SpEL) expressions using SimpleEvaluationContext may be vulnerable to a safety guard bypass when the SpEL expression compiler is active. Spring Framework 7.0.0 - 7.0.8 Spring Framework 6.2.0 - 6.2.19 Spring Framework 6.1.0 - 6.1.28 Spring Framework 6.0.0 - 6.0.30 Spring Framework 5.3.0 - 5.3.49 Spring Framework 5.2.25.RELEASE and earlier |
| CVE-2026-59282 | High | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Spring Framework applications that use Spring's data binding infrastructure to apply user-supplied property paths onto a target object may be vulnerable to a Denial of Service (DoS) attack. Spring Framework 7.0.0 - 7.0.8 Spring Framework 6.2.0 - 6.2.19 Spring Framework 6.1.0 - 6.1.28 Spring Framework 6.0.0 - 6.0.30 Spring Framework 5.3.0 - 5.3.49 Spring Framework 5.2.25.RELEASE and earlier |
| CVE-2026-59281 | Medium | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Spring MVC and WebFlux applications that obtain a data-binding Errors instance with HTML escaping enabled and then render field errors using the no-argument Errors.getFieldErrors() or Errors.getFieldError() accessors are vulnerable to arbitrary HTML/JavaScript code injection, potentially resulting in a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability. Spring Framework 7.0.0 - 7.0.8 Spring Framework 6.2.0 - 6.2.19 Spring Framework 6.1.0 - 6.1.28 Spring Framework 6.0.0 - 6.0.30 Spring Framework 5.3.0 - 5.3.49 Spring Framework 5.2.25.RELEASE and earlier |
| CVE-2026-59280 | Medium | 2026-08-27 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Applications using Spring Framework's FreeMarker integration may be vulnerable to a path traversal attack when a controller returns a view name derived from untrusted input and FreeMarker is configured to resolve templates through SpringTemplateLoader. Spring Framework 7.0.0 - 7.0.8 Spring Framework 6.2.0 - 6.2.19 Spring Framework 6.1.0 - 6.1.28 Spring Framework 6.0.0 - 6.0.30 Spring Framework 5.3.0 - 5.3.49 Spring Framework 5.2.25.RELEASE and earlier |
| CVE-2026-59278 | Medium | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | JsonKafkaHeaderMapper and DefaultKafkaHeaderMapper include java.net in their default trusted packages list. When these mappers are used — which is the default configuration for all @KafkaListener consumers — an external Kafka producer can inject a java.net.InetAddress type via the spring_json_header_types message header. Spring for Apache Kafka 4.1.0 Spring for Apache Kafka 4.0.0 - 4.0.6 Spring for Apache Kafka 3.0.0 - 3.3.16 Spring for Apache Kafka 2.9.0 - 2.9.14 Spring for Apache Kafka 2.8.12 and earlier |
| CVE-2026-59277 | Medium | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Spring Security's InetAddressMatchers utility provides matchInternal() and matchExternal() builders for constructing an InetAddressMatcher that classifies a given IP address as belonging to an internal (private) or external (public) network. Spring Security 7.1.0 |
| CVE-2026-59276 | Medium | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Several components in Spring Security compare security-sensitive values using standard string equality (String.equals()) rather than a constant-time comparison. Because String.equals() returns as soon as it finds a differing character, the time taken to reject an incorrect value is proportional to the number of leading characters that match the expected value. Spring Security 7.1.0 Spring Security 7.0.0 - 7.0.6 Spring Security 6.5.0 - 6.5.11 Spring Security 6.4.0 - 6.4.18 Spring Security 5.8.0 - 5.8.27 Spring Security 5.7.0 - 5.7.25 |
| CVE-2026-59275 | Medium | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A single hostile AMQP message can terminate the entire consumer JVM (System.exit(99)), not just the listener thread — full availability loss for every workload co-located in that process. Spring AMQP 4.1.0 Spring AMQP 4.0.0 - 4.0.4 Spring AMQP 3.2.0 - 3.2.12 Spring AMQP 2.4.18 and earlier |
| CVE-2026-59274 | Medium | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The UnZipTransformer does not limit decompressed entry size or entry count when processing archives. Consequently, an attacker can send a zip archive that can exhaust JVM heap memory, causing a denial-of-service outage. Spring Integration 7.1.0 Spring Integration 7.0.0 - 7.0.5 Spring Integration 6.5.0 - 6.5.10 Spring Integration 6.4.0 - 6.4.12 |
| CVE-2026-59272 | Medium | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Any application shipping logs to RabbitMQ over TLS via the Log4j2 appender, relying on the documented default, is exposed to man-in-the-middle interception of every log event. Spring AMQP 4.1.0 Spring AMQP 4.0.0 - 4.0.4 Spring AMQP 3.2.0 - 3.2.12 Spring AMQP 2.4.18 and earlier |
| CVE-2026-59271 | Medium | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | When the RabbitMQ management aliveness check fails, the configured admin password is embedded in cleartext in the thrown exception message. Spring AMQP 4.1.0 Spring AMQP 4.0.0 - 4.0.4 Spring AMQP 3.2.0 - 3.2.12 Spring AMQP 2.4.18 and earlier |
| CVE-2026-59270 | Critical | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Spring Security's embedded UnboundID LDAP server (UnboundIdContainer) unconditionally registers an administrative credential and binds its listener to all available network interfaces. Spring Security 7.1.0 Spring Security 7.0.0 - 7.0.6 Spring Security 6.5.0 - 6.5.11 Spring Security 6.4.0 - 6.4.18 Spring Security 5.8.0 - 5.8.27 Spring Security 5.7.0 - 5.7.25 |
| CVE-2026-5680 | High | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in Undertow. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending specially crafted WebSocket messages with permessage-deflate negotiated. This could lead to excessive memory consumption due to the PerMessageDeflateFunction.largerBuffer() method using exponential doubling, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS) for the affected application. |
| CVE-2026-47894 | High | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Spring Cloud Config Server native environment repository allows exposure of configuration files outside of the configured repository path. Spring Cloud Config 5.0.0 - 5.0.4 Spring Cloud Config 4.3.0 - 4.3.4 Spring Cloud Config 4.0.0 - 4.2.8 Spring Cloud Config 3.1.14 and earlier |
| CVE-2026-47893 | High | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A Spring WebFlux application that supports WebSocket connections may expose indirectly sensitive user information by including request headers in an exception reason. Spring Framework 7.0.0 - 7.0.8 Spring Framework 6.2.0 - 6.2.19 Spring Framework 6.1.0 - 6.1.28 Spring Framework 6.0.0 - 6.0.30 Spring Framework 5.3.0 - 5.3.49 Spring Framework 5.2.25.RELEASE and earlier |
| CVE-2026-47892 | Critical | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A WebFlux application using functional endpoints and deployed with DispatcherServlet may be vulnerable to a header predicate bypass in a pre-flight request. Spring Framework 7.0.0 - 7.0.8 Spring Framework 6.2.0 - 6.2.19 Spring Framework 6.1.0 - 6.1.28 Spring Framework 6.0.0 - 6.0.30 Spring Framework 5.3.0 - 5.3.49 Spring Framework 5.2.5.RELEASE - 5.2.25.RELEASE |
| CVE-2026-47891 | Critical | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A Spring WebFlux application that relies on the Aalto XML processor to parse XML input does not correctly enforce the maxInMemorySize limit. Spring Framework 7.0.0 - 7.0.8 Spring Framework 6.2.0 - 6.2.19 Spring Framework 6.1.0 - 6.1.28 Spring Framework 6.0.0 - 6.0.30 Spring Framework 5.3.0 - 5.3.49 Spring Framework 5.2.25.RELEASE and earlier |
| CVE-2026-47890 | Critical | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Spring MVC and WebFlux applications are vulnerable to stream corruption when using Server-Sent Events (SSE) with view fragments. Spring Framework 7.0.0 - 7.0.8 Spring Framework 6.2.0 - 6.2.19 |
| CVE-2026-47889 | High | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A WebFlux application running on the Jetty 12 Core reactive adapter serializes response cookies without the sameSite attribute. Spring Framework 7.0.0 - 7.0.8 Spring Framework 6.2.0 - 6.2.19 |
| CVE-2026-47888 | High | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A Spring RSocket application is exposed to a memory leak via a malformed SETUP frame. Spring Framework 7.0.0 - 7.0.8 Spring Framework 6.2.0 - 6.2.19 Spring Framework 6.1.0 - 6.1.28 Spring Framework 6.0.0 - 6.0.30 Spring Framework 5.3.0 - 5.3.49 Spring Framework 5.2.0.RELEASE - 5.2.25.RELEASE |
| CVE-2026-47887 | Medium | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A Spring MVC application that uses UrlFileNameViewController that is mapped with an end-of-path, and does not have a configured prefix is vulnerable to an open redirect. Spring Framework 7.0.0 - 7.0.8 Spring Framework 6.2.0 - 6.2.19 Spring Framework 6.1.0 - 6.1.28 Spring Framework 6.0.0 - 6.0.30 Spring Framework 5.3.0 - 5.3.49 Spring Framework 5.2.25.RELEASE and earlier |
| CVE-2026-47886 | High | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Applications that evaluate user-supplied Spring Expression Language (SpEL) expressions may be vulnerable to a Denial of Service (DoS) attack when the power operator (^) is used with a BigDecimal or BigInteger operand and a large exponent value. Spring Framework 7.0.0 - 7.0.8 Spring Framework 6.2.0 - 6.2.19 Spring Framework 6.1.0 - 6.1.28 Spring Framework 6.0.0 - 6.0.30 Spring Framework 5.3.0 - 5.3.49 Spring Framework 5.2.25.RELEASE and earlier |
| CVE-2026-47885 | High | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The PartEventHttpMessageReader in Spring WebFlux does not enforce the maxPartSize limit when maxInMemorySize is set to -1. Spring Framework 7.0.0 - 7.0.8 Spring Framework 6.2.0 - 6.2.19 Spring Framework 6.1.0 - 6.1.28 |
| CVE-2026-47884 | Critical | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Use of XsltView in a Spring MVC application can result in SSRF and RCE attack if the application has an "/**" mapping that results in view rendering, and where the view name is not explicitly specified. Spring Framework 7.0.0 - 7.0.8 Spring Framework 6.2.0 - 6.2.19 Spring Framework 6.1.0 - 6.1.28 Spring Framework 6.0.0 - 6.0.30 Spring Framework 5.3.0 - 5.3.49 Spring Framework 5.2.25.RELEASE and earlier |
| CVE-2026-47883 | Medium | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | UrlHandlerFilter can be vulnerable to an open redirect when configured with very broadly matching patterns. The issue applies to the filter variants in both Spring MVC and Spring WebFlux. Spring Framework 7.0.0 - 7.0.8 Spring Framework 6.2.0 - 6.2.19 |
| CVE-2026-47881 | High | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Spring Batch's FlatFileItemReader supports files where a single logical record spans multiple physical lines — for example, a CSV field that contains embedded newlines wrapped in quotes. A specially crafted input file could exploit the way the reader assembles those multi-line records to consume excessive CPU time and memory, causing the batch job to stall or run out of memory. Spring Batch 6.0.0 - 6.0.4 Spring Batch 5.2.0 - 5.2.6 Spring Batch 4.3.0 - 4.3.13 |
| CVE-2026-47880 | Medium | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A producer who can publish to a JMS destination consumed by any Spring Integration JMS inbound component can set String JMS properties named replyChannel, errorChannel, or json__TypeId__ which are copied verbatim into the Spring Integration MessageHeaders. Spring Integration 7.1.0 Spring Integration 7.0.0 - 7.0.5 Spring Integration 6.5.0 - 6.5.10 Spring Integration 6.4.0 - 6.4.12 Spring Integration 5.5.21 and earlier |
| CVE-2026-47879 | High | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Spring Cloud Gateway JsonToGrpcGatewayFilterFactory allows arbitrary Spring Resource locations for defining the proto descriptor. Spring Cloud Gateway 5.0.0 - 5.0.2 Spring Cloud Gateway 4.3.0 - 4.3.5 Spring Cloud Gateway 4.0.0 - 4.2.9 Spring Cloud Gateway 3.1.13 and earlier |
| CVE-2026-47878 | High | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | DefaultExecutionContextSerializer, used by default in Spring Batch's JDBC job repository, passes Base64-decoded bytes directly to ObjectInputStream.readObject() without an ObjectInputFilter that restricts types to a trusted class allowlist. Spring Batch 6.0.0 - 6.0.4 Spring Batch 5.2.6 and earlier |
| CVE-2026-47877 | High | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Spring Security Authorization Server's default consent page renders user-controlled values without HTML entity encoding. Spring Security 7.1.0 Spring Security 7.0.0 - 7.0.6 |
| CVE-2026-47875 | Critical | 2026-08-27 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Applications that deserialize execution contexts with Jackson2ExecutionContextStringSerializer are vulnerable to a deserialization attack if they use an untrusted data source for the job repository. The JobParameterDeserializer does not properly enforce the trusted-types allowlist, allowing an attacker to craft malicious input that can lead to arbitrary code execution, including known Jackson RCE gadgets. Spring Batch 6.0.0 - 6.0.4 Spring Batch 5.2.0 - 5.2.6 |
| CVE-2026-47864 | Critical | 2026-08-27 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | SerializingHttpMessageConverter deserializes the body of incoming HTTP requests with a raw java.io.ObjectInputStream and no class filtering. Any request with Content-Type application/x-java-serialized-object whose body resolves to a Serializable type is read directly via readObject(). If an application using this converter on an inbound HTTP endpoint has any known Java deserialization "gadget" on its classpath, a remote, unauthenticated attacker can achieve arbitrary code execution. Spring Integration 7.1.0 Spring Integration 7.0.0 - 7.0.5 Spring Integration 6.5.0 - 6.5.10 Spring Integration 6.4.0 - 6.4.12 Spring Integration 5.5.21 and earlier |
| CVE-2026-47862 | Medium | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An attacker who can set the file_name header on a message reaching a ZipTransformer with ZipResultType.FILE (the default) can cause the resulting .zip archive to be written to an arbitrary filesystem path outside the configured workDirectory. Spring Integration 7.1.0 Spring Integration 7.0.0 - 7.0.5 Spring Integration 6.5.0 - 6.5.10 Spring Integration 6.4.0 - 6.4.12 |
| CVE-2026-47861 | Medium | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An unauthenticated remote attacker who can send a single UDP packet to a Spring Integration UDP inbound adapter can cause the server to emit an outbound UDP datagram to an arbitrary internal or external host and port of the attacker's choosing. Spring Integration 7.1.0 Spring Integration 7.0.0 - 7.0.5 Spring Integration 6.5.0 - 6.5.10 Spring Integration 6.4.0 - 6.4.12 Spring Integration 5.5.21 and earlier |
| CVE-2026-47860 | Medium | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An attacker who can publish to a queue consumed by an application that has enabled message decompression can crash the consumer JVM with a single ~1 MB message. Spring AMQP 4.1.0 Spring AMQP 4.0.0 - 4.0.4 Spring AMQP 3.2.0 - 3.2.12 Spring AMQP 2.4.18 and earlier |
| CVE-2026-47859 | Medium | 2026-08-27 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | RFC6587SyslogDeserializer, used by the Spring Integration syslog TCP inbound adapter to decode RFC 6587 / RFC 5424 frames, trusts the sender-supplied octet count of an octet-counted frame and allocates a byte array of exactly that size with no upper bound. Spring Integration 7.1.0 Spring Integration 7.0.0 - 7.0.5 Spring Integration 6.5.0 - 6.5.10 Spring Integration 6.4.0 - 6.4.12 Spring Integration 5.5.21 and earlier |
| CVE-2026-47856 | Medium | 2026-08-27 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Spring Integration's JSON to object conversion uses the json__TypeId__ header to choose the deserialization target type, and resolves that header value to a class with ClassUtils.forName and no type/package allow-list. Spring Integration 7.1.0 Spring Integration 7.0.0 - 7.0.5 Spring Integration 6.5.0 - 6.5.10 Spring Integration 6.4.0 - 6.4.12 Spring Integration 5.5.21 and earlier |
| CVE-2026-47852 | High | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A local attacker on a multi-user host can pre-create the deterministic cache path and plant a malicious ONNX model file. Spring AI 2.0.0 Spring AI 1.1.0 - 1.1.8 Spring AI 1.0.0 - 1.0.9 |
| CVE-2026-47851 | High | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Analyzing a PDF with a deeply nested or cyclic table of contents can cause a StackOverflowError in the ingestion thread. Spring AI 2.0.0 Spring AI 1.1.0 - 1.1.8 Spring AI 1.0.0 - 1.0.9 |
| CVE-2026-47850 | Medium | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Spring Data REST does not preserve the persisted version (@Version) property of an aggregate root when handling an HTTP PUT against an immutable target type. Spring Data REST 5.1.0 Spring Data REST 5.0.0 - 5.0.6 Spring Data REST 4.5.0 - 4.5.12 Spring Data REST 4.0.0 - 4.4.15 Spring Data REST 3.7.20 and earlier |
| CVE-2026-47849 | High | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Spring Data REST does not guard identifier (@Id) and version (@Version) properties against mutation via RFC 6902 JSON Patch (application/json-patch+json) requests. Spring Data REST 5.1.0 Spring Data REST 5.0.0 - 5.0.6 Spring Data REST 4.5.0 - 4.5.12 Spring Data REST 4.0.0 - 4.4.15 Spring Data REST 3.7.20 and earlier |
| CVE-2026-71054 | Medium | 2026-08-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in Oracle Java SE (component: 2D). Supported versions that are affected are Oracle Java SE: 7u511. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Oracle Java SE. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of Oracle Java SE. Note: This vulnerability can be exploited by using APIs in the specified Component, e.g., through a web service which supplies data to the APIs. This vulnerability also applies to Java deployments, typically in clients running sandboxed Java Web Start applications or sandboxed Java applets, that load and run untrusted code (e.g., code that comes from the internet) and rely on the Java sandbox for security. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.5 (Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L). |
| CVE-2026-54556 | High | 2026-08-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Http4s is a Scala interface for HTTP services. Prior to 0.23.35 and 1.0.0-M47, an unauthenticated HTTP/2 peer can cause an out-of-memory denial of service in the Ember backend with HTTP/2 enabled. The Hpack wrapper in ember-core/shared/src/main/scala/org/http4s/ember/core/h2/Hpack.scala concatenates HEADERS and CONTINUATION frame fragments and decodes them into a single List, but maxHeaderSize accounting does not include indexed headers or HPACK per-header overhead. A small compressed header block can therefore expand into a much larger decoded representation that remains in memory for processing. Servers exposed to untrusted HTTP/2 traffic and clients directed to an untrusted HTTP/2 server are affected, and concurrent malicious connections can exhaust the process heap. This issue is fixed in versions 0.23.35 and 1.0.0-M47. |