Overview 23 matches · 21 in Waratek scope · 1 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 0 public PoC · 0 EPSS ≥ 0.5
23matches
21in Waratek scope91.3%
1protected4.3%
0exploited0.0%
0CISA KEV0.0%
0public PoC0.0%
0EPSS ≥ 0.50.0%
Protected by Waratek
1
4.3%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
20
87.0%
Outside Waratek scope
2
8.7%
Not applicable
0
0.0%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
1
4.3%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
22
95.7%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
2
8.7%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
21
91.3%
split by
peak 8 / year
20181
Protected by Waratek1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
No public exploit1
20198
No exploit published8
Critical5
High3
not blocked8
No public exploit8
20201
No exploit published1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20213
No exploit published1
Outside Waratek scope2
Critical2
Medium1
not blocked3
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit2
20222
No exploit published2
Medium2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20232
No exploit published2
Critical1
Medium1
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20242
No exploit published2
High1
Medium1
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20251
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20263
No exploit published3
High1
Medium2
not blocked3
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit2
201820192020202120222023202420252026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-16441 | Medium | 2026-07-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Eclipse OpenJ9 versions up to 0.60, when executing class files where a previously concrete superclass method has been recompiled as abstract, execution is incorrectly delegated to an interface default method. |
| CVE-2026-16439 | Medium | 2026-07-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Eclipse OpenJ9 versions up to 0.60, using -Xtrace to trace method arguments can lead to buffer underflow. |
| CVE-2026-6918 | High | 2026-05-05 | No exploit published | Proof of concept only | In Eclipse Open9J versions 0.21 to 0.58, a pre-authentication remote attacker can crash JITServer by sending a 32-byte crafted TCP message. |
| CVE-2025-4447 | High | 2025-05-09 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Eclipse OpenJ9 versions up to 0.51, when used with OpenJDK version 8 a stack based buffer overflow can be caused by modifying a file on disk that is read when the JVM starts. |
| CVE-2024-10917 | Medium | 2024-11-11 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Eclipse OpenJ9 versions up to 0.47, the JNI function GetStringUTFLength may return an incorrect value which has wrapped around. From 0.48 the value is correct but may be truncated to include a smaller number of characters. |
| CVE-2024-3933 | High | 2024-05-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Eclipse OpenJ9 release versions prior to 0.44.0 and after 0.13.0, when running with JVM option -Xgc:concurrentScavenge, the sequence generated for System.arrayCopy on the IBM Z platform with hardware and software support for guarded storage [1], could allow access to a buffer with an incorrect length value when executing an arraycopy sequence while the Concurrent Scavenge Garbage Collection cycle is active and the source and destination memory regions for arraycopy overlap. This allows read and write to addresses beyond the end of the array range. |
| CVE-2023-5676 | Medium | 2023-11-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Eclipse OpenJ9 before version 0.41.0, the JVM can be forced into an infinite busy hang on a spinlock or a segmentation fault if a shutdown signal (SIGTERM, SIGINT or SIGHUP) is received before the JVM has finished initializing. |
| CVE-2023-2597 | Critical | 2023-05-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Eclipse Openj9 before version 0.38.0, in the implementation of the shared cache (which is enabled by default in OpenJ9 builds) the size of a string is not properly checked against the size of the buffer. |
| CVE-2022-3676 | Medium | 2022-10-24 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Eclipse Openj9 before version 0.35.0, interface calls can be inlined without a runtime type check. Malicious bytecode could make use of this inlining to access or modify memory via an incompatible type. |
| CVE-2021-41041 | Medium | 2022-04-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Eclipse Openj9 before version 0.32.0, Java 8 & 11 fail to throw the exception captured during bytecode verification when verification is triggered by a MethodHandle invocation, allowing unverified methods to be invoked using MethodHandles. |
| CVE-2021-41035 | Critical | 2021-10-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Eclipse Openj9 before version 0.29.0, the JVM does not throw IllegalAccessError for MethodHandles that invoke inaccessible interface methods. |
| CVE-2021-28167 | Medium | 2021-04-21 | Outside Waratek scope | Proof of concept only | In Eclipse Openj9 to version 0.25.0, usage of the jdk.internal.reflect.ConstantPool API causes the JVM in some cases to pre-resolve certain constant pool entries. This allows a user to call static methods or access static members without running the class initialization method, and may allow a user to observe uninitialized values. |
| CVE-2020-27221 | Critical | 2021-01-21 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | In Eclipse OpenJ9 up to and including version 0.23, there is potential for a stack-based buffer overflow when the virtual machine or JNI natives are converting from UTF-8 characters to platform encoding. |
| CVE-2019-17639 | Medium | 2020-07-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Eclipse OpenJ9 prior to version 0.21 on Power platforms, calling the System.arraycopy method with a length longer than the length of the source or destination array can, in certain specially crafted code patterns, cause the current method to return prematurely with an undefined return value. This allows whatever value happens to be in the return register at that time to be used as if it matches the method's declared return type. |
| CVE-2019-17631 | Critical | 2019-10-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | From Eclipse OpenJ9 0.15 to 0.16, access to diagnostic operations such as causing a GC or creating a diagnostic file are permitted without any privilege checks. |
| CVE-2019-11775 | High | 2019-07-30 | No exploit published | No public exploit | All builds of Eclipse OpenJ9 prior to 0.15 contain a bug where the loop versioner may fail to privatize a value that is pulled out of the loop by versioning - for example if there is a condition that is moved out of the loop that reads a field we may not privatize the value of that field in the modified copy of the loop allowing the test to see one value of the field and subsequently the loop to see a modified field value without retesting the condition moved out of the loop. This can lead to a variety of different issues but read out of array bounds is one major consequence of these problems. |
| CVE-2019-11772 | Critical | 2019-07-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Eclipse OpenJ9 prior to 0.15, the String.getBytes(int, int, byte[], int) method does not verify that the provided byte array is non-null nor that the provided index is in bounds when compiled by the JIT. This allows arbitrary writes to any 32-bit address or beyond the end of a byte array within Java code run under a SecurityManager. |
| CVE-2019-11771 | High | 2019-07-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | AIX builds of Eclipse OpenJ9 before 0.15.0 contain unused RPATHs which may facilitate code injection and privilege elevation by local users. |
| CVE-2019-10245 | High | 2019-04-19 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Eclipse OpenJ9 prior to the 0.14.0 release, the Java bytecode verifier incorrectly allows a method to execute past the end of bytecode array causing crashes. Eclipse OpenJ9 v0.14.0 correctly detects this case and rejects the attempted class load. |
| CVE-2018-12549 | Critical | 2019-02-11 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Eclipse OpenJ9 version 0.11.0, the OpenJ9 JIT compiler may incorrectly omit a null check on the receiver object of an Unsafe call when accelerating it. |
| CVE-2018-12547 | Critical | 2019-02-11 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Eclipse OpenJ9, prior to the 0.12.0 release, the jio_snprintf() and jio_vsnprintf() native methods ignored the length parameter. This affects existing APIs that called the functions to exceed the allocated buffer. This functions were not directly callable by non-native user code. |
| CVE-2018-12548 | Critical | 2019-01-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In OpenJDK + Eclipse OpenJ9 version 0.11.0 builds, the public jdk.crypto.jniprovider.NativeCrypto class contains public static natives which accept pointer values that are dereferenced in the native code. |
| CVE-2018-12539 | High | 2018-08-14 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | In Eclipse OpenJ9 version 0.8, users other than the process owner may be able to use Java Attach API to connect to an Eclipse OpenJ9 or IBM JVM on the same machine and use Attach API operations, which includes the ability to execute untrusted native code. Attach API is enabled by default on Windows, Linux and AIX JVMs and can be disabled using the command line option -Dcom.ibm.tools.attach.enable=no. |