Overview 1,444 matches · 65 in Waratek scope · 11 protected · 46 exploited · 8 CISA KEV · 90 public PoC · 17 EPSS ≥ 0.5
1,444matches
65in Waratek scope4.5%
11protected0.8%
46exploited3.2%
8CISA KEV0.6%
90public PoC6.2%
17EPSS ≥ 0.51.2%
Protected by Waratek
11
0.8%
Rule in development
3
0.2%
Mitigation candidate
4
0.3%
No exploit published
47
3.3%
Outside Waratek scope
12
0.8%
Not applicable
1,367
94.7%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
11
0.8%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
1,433
99.2%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 802 / year
20165
Not applicable5
High5
not blocked5
Working exploit published1
No public exploit4
201722
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published1
Not applicable19
High22
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked20
Exploited1
Working exploit published3
No public exploit18
201829
Protected by Waratek3
Not applicable26
High29
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked26
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
Forecast only1
No public exploit26
201932
No exploit published1
Outside Waratek scope3
Not applicable28
High32
not blocked32
Exploited2
Working exploit published6
No public exploit24
202039
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published2
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable34
High39
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked37
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
No public exploit37
202171
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published6
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable63
High71
not blocked71
Exploited5
Working exploit published3
No public exploit63
202283
Rule in development1
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published7
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable73
High83
not blocked83
Exploited4
Working exploit published9
Proof of concept only8
Forecast only1
No public exploit61
202383
No exploit published4
Not applicable79
High83
not blocked83
Exploited6
Working exploit published5
Proof of concept only17
Forecast only2
No public exploit53
2024133
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published4
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable126
High133
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked132
Exploited7
Working exploit published6
Proof of concept only42
No public exploit78
2025145
Rule in development2
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published3
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable138
High145
not blocked145
Exploited8
Working exploit published2
Proof of concept only56
No public exploit79
2026802
Protected by Waratek3
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published19
Outside Waratek scope3
Not applicable776
High802
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked799
Exploited11
Working exploit published12
Proof of concept only316
No public exploit463
20162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-126461 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | OpenEMR before 8.5.0 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in library/ajax/user_settings.php that lets any authenticated user persist arbitrary global configuration overrides. Attackers can POST global:-prefixed keys to re-point external service hosts like CouchDB, eRx, phiMail, or SMTP to attacker-controlled servers, exfiltrating system credentials and patient PHI. |
| CVE-2026-126379 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Vvveb 1.0.8.6 contains an incomplete server-side request forgery fix that allows authenticated admin users to bypass DNS pinning by requesting non-443 URLs. Attackers can supply a rebinding hostname to the editor oEmbedProxy url parameter to read loopback services, internal panels, and cloud metadata credentials. |
| CVE-2026-116411 | High | 2026-11-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell PowerStore contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. An authenticated user with limited privileges could potentially exploit this vulnerability, potentially leading to information disclosure via requests to internal services. |
| CVE-2026-117543 | High | 2026-11-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Joomla Extension - jdownloads.com - SSRF via external download URL field jDownloads < 4.1.8 - HTTP redirects when retrieving external download URLs could bypass validation of the original destination. This allowed server-side requests to internal or otherwise prohibited destinations and disclosure of their responses (SSRF). |
| CVE-2026-67545 | High | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Heym builds and runs agentic systems and business-process automations on self-hosted infrastructure. Prior to version 0.0.73, the HTTP workflow node in Heym makes outbound HTTP requests to user-supplied URLs without validation of the target host or IP address. If a workflow author has already configured an HTTP node that targets internal addresses such as cloud metadata endpoints or private network hosts, and exposed the workflow with anonymous execution, an unauthenticated attacker can trigger the preconfigured SSRF sink. The same project has comprehensive SSRF protection in its MCP integration, which is absent from the HTTP node. This issue has been patched in version 0.0.73. |
| CVE-2026-67542 | High | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Heym builds and runs agentic systems and business-process automations on self-hosted infrastructure. Prior to version 0.0.70, POST /api/mcp/fetch-tools is reachable by any authenticated user (lowest role; no admin/workflow association) and fetches an attacker-supplied URL through the sse and streamable_http transports with no scheme / private-IP / allowlist / redirect guard. The transport error is reflected in the HTTP 422 response, giving a semi-blind SSRF oracle, and the attacker also controls the outbound request headers. This issue has been patched in version 0.0.70. |
| CVE-2026-65967 | High | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Fider is a feedback portal for feature requests and suggestions. Prior to version 0.34.0, a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in Fider due to insufficient validation of webhook URLs. The application allows user-controlled URLs to be fetched by the server without restricting access to internal or external network resources. This enables attackers with administrative privileges to make arbitrary HTTP requests from the server, potentially accessing internal services or cloud metadata endpoints. This issue has been patched in version 0.34.0. |
| CVE-2026-103980 | High | 2026-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | ideon is a self-hosted visual workspace. Prior to version 0.9.6, the SSRF protection in safeFetch is bypassed by IPv6 transition addresses that embed private IPv4 addresses. The isPrivateIP function in src/app/lib/ssrf.ts checks only a narrow set of IPv6 ranges (loopback ::1, ULA fc/fd, link-local fe80) but does not recognize IPv4-mapped (::ffff:), NAT64 well-known (64:ff9b::/96, RFC 6052), NAT64 local-use (64:ff9b:1::/48, RFC 8215), 6to4 (2002::/16, RFC 3056), or Teredo (2001::/32, RFC 4380) encodings. An authenticated user can supply these addresses in link URLs to reach cloud metadata endpoints (169.254.169.254), localhost services, and RFC 1918 internal networks through the link preview metadata fetcher. This issue has been patched in version 0.9.6. |
| CVE-2026-63651 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | LiveDocs is a primary-source-first documentation for AI agents. Prior to version 0.7.0, fetch_docs and introspect (kinds openapi/graphql, and resolve_source's docs_url) pass a client-supplied URL straight to URLSession with no scheme or host allowlist, and redirects are followed unconditionally. A prompt-injection payload embedded in fetched documentation can steer the model to call fetch_docs against internal or metadata endpoints and stream the response back into the conversation. This issue has been patched in version 0.7.0. |
| CVE-2026-12964 | High | 2026-11-10 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A vulnerability allowing for privileged escalation of the viewer account to gain administrator privileges. |
| CVE-2026-119983 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Visual Studio Code allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network. |
| CVE-2026-111296 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Microsoft Office SharePoint allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. |
| CVE-2026-109502 | High | 2026-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Microsoft Office SharePoint allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. |
| CVE-2026-56712 | High | 2026-11-09 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Replicate Cog through 0.23.1 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to cause the Cog process to make server-side HTTP requests by submitting prediction inputs with attacker-controlled URLs that are not validated against the resolved destination host or IP before fetching. Attackers can supply malicious URLs or exploit HTTP redirects in cog.File and cog.Path predictor inputs to force requests to internal addresses, potentially exposing sensitive internal services or credentials. |
| CVE-2026-125114 | High | 2026-11-09 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Novu provides an API for sending notifications through multiple channels. Prior to 3.15.0, the conditions filter webhook in libs/application-generic/src/usecases/conditions-filter/conditions-filter.usecase.ts passes the user-configured child.webhookUrl directly to axios.post without calling validateUrlSsrf. Evaluating a workflow condition can therefore make the worker send a POST request to a private or link-local service and return the response data for condition evaluation. The response is stored in execution details and exposed through GET /execution-details, which can disclose credentials from POST-capable metadata services or data from internal services, although metadata endpoints that require GET are not reachable through this path. This issue is fixed in version 3.15.0. |
| CVE-2026-123818 | High | 2026-11-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | LMDeploy is a toolkit for compressing, deploying, and serving large language models. From 0.12.3 until 0.15.0, _is_safe_url validates remote media URLs with urlparse while requests.Session().get interprets backslashes differently when sending the request. An attacker can provide a URL whose validation hostname appears globally routable but whose request destination resolves to an internal host, bypassing non-global address checks. Applications that accept attacker-controlled remote media URLs can therefore be induced to access internal HTTP services and expose data available from those services. This issue is fixed in version 0.15.0. |
| CVE-2026-124442 | High | 2026-11-08 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | AzuraCast before 0.24.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows users with station WebHooks permission to bypass the UserUrlFilter SSRF guard through HTTP redirects. Attackers can configure Mastodon, Telegram, GroupMe, or RadioReg webhooks pointing to a redirecting URL, causing the Guzzle client to reach internal services and expose responses via test logs. |
| CVE-2026-107330 | High | 2026-11-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. |
| CVE-2026-75590 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to access internal network resources and obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. A protection that blocks requests to internal addresses can be bypassed, so the server could be made to contact internal services and return part of their responses. |
| CVE-2026-19128 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system due to server-side request forgery. This could be used to enumerate network resources or to support further attacks. |
| CVE-2026-17406 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. Address checks can be bypassed, which could allow the server to reach destinations that should be blocked. |
| CVE-2026-17404 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-17398 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-17397 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-17385 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-17384 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to a server-side request forgery vulnerability. |
| CVE-2026-17365 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-17361 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-17357 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to access internal network services due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-17355 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information from internal network resources due to server-side request forgery. Destination checks on outbound requests can be bypassed, which could allow the server to reach internal systems that should be blocked. |
| CVE-2026-17352 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-17341 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to perform server-side request forgery and relay unauthorized email messages due to improper neutralization of user-supplied input. |
| CVE-2026-17330 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-17328 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper input validation. Input checks are incomplete, which could allow them to be bypassed. |
| CVE-2026-17327 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-17325 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper validation of user-supplied URLs. |
| CVE-2026-17316 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to perform server-side request forgery due to improper validation of user-supplied input. |
| CVE-2026-17306 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information from internal network resources due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-17294 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-17289 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-17288 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-17287 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. User-supplied addresses are not sufficiently validated, so the server could be made to send requests to unintended destinations and return the results. |
| CVE-2026-17285 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper validation of external references. When schemas are validated, references to external resources are not sufficiently restricted, which could allow the server to retrieve content it should not access. |
| CVE-2026-17281 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-17228 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. Destination restrictions on outbound requests can be bypassed, which could allow the server to retrieve content from unintended resources. |
| CVE-2026-17188 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. When service definitions are imported, references to external resources are not sufficiently restricted, so the server could be made to request resources it should not access. |
| CVE-2026-17187 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper validation of user-supplied URLs. |
| CVE-2026-17108 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-16912 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-85743 | High | 2026-11-06 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | FreeScout is a self-hosted help desk and shared mailbox. Prior to 1.8.230, multiple outbound paths in Helper::downloadRemoteFile(), Helper::checkPort(), Helper::sanitizeRemoteUrl(), MailboxesController.php, and ModulesController.php do not consistently enforce a sink-level restricted-host policy. An authenticated administrator, or another authenticated user permitted to change mailbox connection settings or trigger module update or installation paths, can supply attacker-controlled URLs or hosts. The independent download and port-test sinks can reach encoded or otherwise uncovered loopback and internal addresses. The redirect-validation bypass additionally requires a configured whitelist that permits the original and final hosts while a restricted internal host appears only as an intermediate redirect hop. No unauthenticated SSRF path is established. The server can consequently contact loopback and internal services, provide a blind internal port oracle, and retrieve internal HTTP responses into application-controlled download sinks. This issue is fixed in version 1.8.230. |
| CVE-2026-58141 | High | 2026-11-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dify before 1.15.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows any authenticated console user to bypass SSRF protections and issue arbitrary HTTP requests to internal services and cloud metadata endpoints due to the Squid proxy configuration only defining source ACLs without destination deny rules and the make_request() helper performing no independent destination IP validation. Attackers can use endpoints such as GET /console/api/remote-files/<url>, POST /console/api/remote-files/upload, the HTTP Request workflow node, website crawl, or document import from URL to reach internal components like the sandbox, internal APIs, and PostgreSQL, and on AWS deployments read IAM credentials from the instance metadata service, with the HTTP Request node further enabling POST, PUT, and DELETE writes to internal services relying on network isolation for authorization. |
| CVE-2026-54589 | High | 2026-11-06 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Chartbrew is an open-source web application that can connect directly to databases and APIs and use the data to create charts. Prior to 5.2.1, the outbound URL guard recognized ordinary IPv4, IPv6, and IPv4-mapped IPv6 destinations but did not recognize IPv4 addresses embedded in NAT64 prefixes. The vulnerable surface is aPI Data Connection outbound requests routed through server/modules/outboundTargetPolicy.js. An authenticated user with permission to create or edit an API connection supplies an attacker-controlled hostname or redirect whose DNS answer is a NAT64 address embedding a private or link-local IPv4 destination. The policy treated the NAT64 address as public; a NAT64 gateway then translated it to the embedded private IPv4 address after validation. The bypass requires a NAT64/DNS64 deployment path and connection-management privileges. IPv4-only deployments are not affected by this specific bypass. The attacker can read responses from 169.254.169.254 cloud metadata and arbitrary internal IPv4 hosts and ports reachable through the NAT64 gateway. This issue is fixed in version 5.2.1. |
| CVE-2026-123786 | High | 2026-11-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Agenta before 0.122.5 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows workspace members with workflow edit rights to redirect workflow invocations by setting arbitrary revision URLs. Attackers can capture the attached secret-resolve Authorization token to read provider secrets from the vault API, or reach internal and cloud metadata addresses. |
| CVE-2026-119758 | High | 2026-11-06 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | ERPNext OCR app for Frappe/ERPNext through 1.1.1 contains a missing authorization and path traversal vulnerability that allows any authenticated user to read arbitrary server files by passing a fully client-controlled path argument to the whitelisted read_document method. Attackers can supply local file paths to bypass Frappe's File doctype permission model and access other users' private uploads, or supply arbitrary URLs to trigger server-side requests reaching internal services and cloud metadata endpoints. |
| CVE-2026-119433 | High | 2026-11-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in an undocumented API endpoint of Foxit Workspace due to insufficient validation of user-supplied URL and network parameters. A remote attacker could exploit this issue to induce the server to send requests to arbitrary internal or external resources, potentially enabling unauthorized access to internal services, network reconnaissance, and sensitive information disclosure. |
| CVE-2026-119431 | High | 2026-11-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in Foxit Workspace's file-upload functionality. Insufficient validation of user-supplied links may allow a remote attacker to induce the server to access internal resources and return their contents, potentially resulting in sensitive information disclosure and unauthorized access to internal services. |
| CVE-2026-112338 | High | 2026-11-06 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Wazuh from 4.3.0 before 4.14.9 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the GitHub module (wm_github.c) that trusts unvalidated Link rel="next" pagination URLs. Attackers controlling the next-page URL can make the manager send requests with the GitHub API token to attacker hosts, exposing organization repositories and settings. |
| CVE-2026-88981 | High | 2026-11-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Kubeflow Pipelines enables users to build and deploy portable, scalable machine learning workflows. Prior to 2.18.0, the frontend artifact download path for source=s3 or source=minio accepts providerInfo.Params.endpoint, and the archived pod-log path accepts S3-compatible endpoint metadata from workflow status, without requiring those endpoints to match operator-controlled storage configuration. In the shipped authorization-disabled standalone configuration, an unauthenticated caller can make the shared ml-pipeline-ui pod connect to arbitrary reachable hosts and return response data; requests may also reveal an access-key identifier when signed with configured object-store credentials. Multi-user secret-backed metadata remains restricted to the server namespace. This issue is fixed in version 2.18.0. |
| CVE-2026-88980 | High | 2026-11-05 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Kubeflow Pipelines enables users to build and deploy portable, scalable machine learning workflows. Prior to 2.18.0, the frontend GET /artifacts/get route accepts source=http or source=https with caller-controlled bucket and key values, and isAllowedResourceName permits an all-digit decimal host that the URL parser converts to an IPv4 address. The default ALLOWED_ARTIFACT_DOMAIN_REGEX and authorization-disabled standalone configuration allow an unauthenticated caller to fetch internal HTTP resources and receive their response body. In the authenticated multi-user configuration, the same destination-validation defect is reachable by a low-privilege tenant with a valid identity and authorized namespace. Cloud credential disclosure depends on reachable metadata services and attached roles, and the issue does not establish IMDSv2 bypass or credential access when metadata is blocked. This issue is fixed in version 2.18.0. |
| CVE-2026-81828 | High | 2026-11-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Server-Side Request Forgery in SurveyWrapper in Apache OFBiz 24.09 before 24.09.08 on all platforms allows an authenticated back-office user holding catalog permission to cause the server to fetch and render attacker-controlled URLs — including internal network and cloud-metadata endpoints and local files via file:// — by setting an arbitrary URL as a product-store survey's template location, causing SurveyWrapper.getTemplate to call URL.openStream() on the resolved location and compile the fetched content as a FreeMarker template with no scheme or host validation, unlike the sibling widget location-loaders (ScreenFactory, FormFactory, GridFactory, MenuFactory, TreeFactory, ThemeFactory) which validate the resolved location before loading it. The fetched content is rendered into the HTTP response of any shopper who subsequently loads the affected product-store survey, making the disclosure non-blind. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 24.09.08, which fixes this issue. |
| CVE-2026-69137 | High | 2026-11-05 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | SuiteCRM is an open-source, enterprise-ready Customer Relationship Management (CRM) software application. Prior to 7.15.2 and 8.10.2, the CalendarAccount testConnection action passes an authenticated caller's server_url directly to curl without host, address, or scheme validation. The affected flow begins at CalendarAccount::action_testConnection and uses server_url, CalDAVProvider::makeCalDAVRequest(), and PROPFIND to carry attacker-controlled data or authorization state into the security-sensitive operation. The server sends a PROPFIND request from its network context and returns non-success response bodies, enabling internal-service access, partial response disclosure, service enumeration, and possible cloud metadata access. This issue is fixed in versions 7.15.2 and 8.10.2. |
| CVE-2026-63111 | High | 2026-11-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | SuiteCRM is an open-source, enterprise-ready Customer Relationship Management (CRM) software application. Prior to 7.15.2 and 8.10.2, the V8 module API lacks module-level authorization and permits a low-privileged user to create SchedulersJobs records with attacker-controlled target values. The affected flow begins at /Api/V8/module and uses SchedulersJobs, target, cron.php, and url:: to carry attacker-controlled data or authorization state into the security-sensitive operation. Cron.php later executes the queued job with system privileges, and the url:: target makes server-side requests to internal or external hosts, can follow redirects, can persist as a recurring job, and may expose internal services. This issue is fixed in versions 7.15.2 and 8.10.2. |
| CVE-2026-61649 | High | 2026-11-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | SuiteCRM is an open-source, enterprise-ready Customer Relationship Management (CRM) software application. Prior to 7.15.2 and 8.10.2, the SSRF protection added in 7.15.1 uses a substring comparison in isSelfRequest() rather than hostname equality. The affected flow begins at validate_external_host() and uses isSelfRequest(), and stripos() to carry attacker-controlled data or authorization state into the security-sensitive operation. An authenticated attacker can place the server hostname in a URL path to bypass IP validation and direct server-side requests to internal services. This issue is fixed in versions 7.15.2 and 8.10.2. |
| CVE-2026-118628 | High | 2026-11-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | MLflow get-artifacts Server-Side Request Forgery Information Disclosure Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on affected installations of MLflow. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the get-artifacts function. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a URI prior to accessing resources. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to disclose information in the context of the server. Was ZDI-CAN-28192. |
| CVE-2026-118422 | High | 2026-11-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Stape Conversion Tracking WordPress plugin before 2.3.11 does not validate the sub-path appended to its same-origin proxy's upstream endpoint, allowing unauthenticated visitors to redirect the server-side request to an arbitrary host and have the response body and its content type returned from the site's own origin with security response headers stripped, leading to Server-Side Request Forgery, including loopback and internal hosts, and Cross-Site Scripting. |
| CVE-2026-111036 | High | 2026-11-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the Coupa Supplier Portal SaaS platform, specifically in the document conversion functionality available in the ‘Contracts > Templates’ section. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of references to external resources processed by the Aspose.Words for Java library during DOCX-to-PDF conversion. An authenticated attacker with permissions to modify templates could upload a specially crafted DOCX document containing references to external resources, which would cause the server-side application to access URLs controlled by the attacker, resources on the internal network, or local files. A successful exploit could lead to the disclosure of sensitive information, such as configuration files, system files, credentials, environment variables and endpoints for internal services. |
| CVE-2026-121580 | High | 2026-11-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Server-side request forgery in the Jira ticketing filter lookup in Devolutions Server 2026.2.22.0 and earlier allows an authenticated low-privileged user to obtain the stored Jira service account credentials via an attacker-controlled server address in the request. |
| CVE-2026-120715 | High | 2026-11-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Server-side request forgery in the Active Directory credential validation in Devolutions Server 2026.3.12.0 and earlier allows an authenticated low-privileged user to capture the NetNTLMv2 hash of the DVLS service account via an attacker-controlled domain name in the request. |
| CVE-2026-105822 | High | 2026-11-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Tapo Cloud MQTT proxy contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability because it accepts a user-controlled host value without sufficient input validation. An attacker may exploit this vulnerability to cause the Tapo Cloud service to send requests to an attacker-controlled server. Successful exploitation may cause the Tapo Cloud service to send a request to an attacker-controlled server, exposing the internal information and causing potential Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS). |
| CVE-2026-88809 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A security vulnerability exists in the SUSE Rancher Manager meta proxy endpoint (/meta/proxy). This endpoint is intended to forward requests only to destinations that appear on a configured allowlist. The allowlist decision was evaluated in a place where it could not stop a request from being forwarded, so a rejected destination was logged but the request was still handed to the proxy's transport. This affects SUSE Rancher 2.15.0 up to 2.15.3, 2.14.0 up to 2.14.7, 2.13.0 up to 2.13.11, 2.12.0 up to 2.12.15, 2.11.0 up to 2.11.19 and potentially older EOL versions. |
| CVE-2026-63184 | High | 2026-10-30 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Refitter is a tool for generating a C# REST API client using the Refit library. Prior to 2.1.1, the `refitter` dotnet tool invokes `NJsonSchema` with unsafe defaults for `$ref` resolution when generating Refit interfaces and contracts from attacker-controlled or attacker-influenced OpenAPI descriptions. Remote `http(s)` references cause requests from the developer or CI host and inline untrusted remote schema content into generated output. Absolute local file paths and relative `../` traversal outside the input directory also resolve and inline local content, permitting arbitrary local-file disclosure. The demonstrated chain stops at server-side request forgery, remote file inclusion, and local file inclusion, not code execution: Refit sets the base URL at runtime, enum values use verbatim-string doubling, and string defaults are escaped. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.1. |
| CVE-2026-62284 | High | 2026-10-30 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OSAC operator is a Kubernetes operator. In the affected revision identified as 8220502, the `console-proxy` `RemoteConfigResolver` parses Kubernetes Secret kubeconfig data with `clientcmd.RESTConfigFromKubeConfig` without sanitizing the resulting `rest.Config`. An attacker who can create or modify a Secret labeled `osac.openshift.io/remote-cluster-kubeconfig`: "true" in a namespace where the proxy's RoleBinding grants Secret read access can supply `users[].user.exec`. When `rest.TransportFor` builds the HTTP transport for an upstream WebSocket connection, client-go invokes that exec credential plugin, spawning an arbitrary process as the osac-`console-proxy` service account inside the pod. Attacker-controlled `clusters[].server` also enables server-side request forgery from the proxy pod. Remote and auto VM cluster modes are affected, with auto the default; exclusively `local` mode does not read kubeconfig Secrets and is unaffected. The credential-plugin execution path is patched in commit 7e4222b; that patch does not address the described server-address SSRF path. |
| CVE-2026-119575 | High | 2026-10-30 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | ArcadeDB from 26.8.1 before 26.10.2 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows authenticated users with updateDatabaseSettings to disable the LOAD CSV IP block list via ALTER DATABASE. Attackers can set arcadedb.opencypher.loadCsv.blockedIpRanges to an empty string, then issue LOAD CSV requests to read cloud metadata and internal loopback or private services. |
| CVE-2026-119549 | High | 2026-10-30 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Jellyfin through 12.4 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that lets authenticated users bypass SvgSecurityValidator by embedding gzip-compressed SVG in non-SVG image data URIs. Attackers can upload such profile images via POST /UserImage, then trigger unauthenticated rendering via GET /UserImage to fetch internal URLs, read local image files, or exhaust memory. |
| CVE-2026-116252 | High | 2026-10-30 | Not applicable | No public exploit | pgAdmin 4's materialized view refresh passed the target database's name to psql's --dbname argument unchanged. libpq treats a --dbname value containing "=" (or a postgresql:// URI) as a full connection string, whose keywords override the host, port and other settings pgAdmin had supplied. A database whose name is such a string, which any role with CREATEDB can create, therefore redirected the psql process pgAdmin starts for the refresh to a host and port of the creator's choosing, and the connecting user's saved server password was presented to that endpoint. It also let the pgAdmin host be made to open connections to arbitrary addresses. The same weakness was fixed for Backup, Restore, Maintenance and Import/Export Data in earlier releases (CVE-2026-86862); the materialized view refresh was the remaining caller. The fix routes the name through the same database_conninfo() helper, so libpq treats it strictly as a database name. This issue affects pgAdmin 4: before 9.19. |
| CVE-2026-13303 | High | 2026-10-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | HashiCorp Boundary and Boundary Enterprise are vulnerable to a server-side request forgery in the Vault credential store integration that may allow an authenticated user with permission to manage credential stores and credential libraries within a project to cause the Boundary controller to issue outbound requests to a network destination of the requester's choosing and to receive the response. This may expose endpoints reachable only from the controller's host, such as a cloud instance metadata service. This vulnerability, CVE-2026-13303, is fixed in Boundary Enterprise 1.0.2 and 0.21.6. |
| CVE-2026-111418 | High | 2026-10-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the Foxit official website’s HTML-to-PDF conversion service. Support for ZIP-formatted input can bypass restrictions on requests to internal IP addresses, potentially allowing discovery of internal network resources. |
| CVE-2026-102590 | High | 2026-10-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to a server-side request forgery vulnerability. |
| CVE-2026-88967 | High | 2026-10-28 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A user with query access to an Azure Monitor data source in Grafana can cause server-side requests to an attacker-controlled endpoint that disclose the data source's Azure access token (server-side request forgery). |
| CVE-2026-61572 | High | 2026-10-28 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | AVideo is a video-sharing Platform. Before the initial remediation attempt in 8.1.0, `url_get_contents` in `objects/functions.php` accepts caller-controlled destinations after only `FILTER_VALIDATE_URL` syntax validation, without rejecting private, loopback, or link-local addresses, and disables TLS peer verification. `Login::isLogged` reauthenticates using the attacker-settable `encoder_aVideoURL` cookie together with arbitrary nonempty `encoder_user` and `encoder_pass` cookies, and `Login::run` stores the raw fetched body in `result`. The unauthenticated `objects/login.json.php` endpoint returns that session object, enabling full-response exfiltration through a supplied `siteURL`; its `Streamer::isURLAllowed` gate allows all sites when the operator allowlist is empty, the default. An unauthenticated remote attacker can read internal HTTP and HTTPS responses, including cloud instance-metadata credentials, and reach internal TCP services. A further pre-authentication FTP variant in `view/youtubeDl.json.php` routes an ftp `videoURL` into `FTPDownloader`; `parseFtpUrl` in `objects/FTPDownloader.php` accepts its host and port for `ftp_connect`. This also enables requests to internal FTP services. Untrusted self-signed HTTPS certificates are accepted, and no account or operator interaction is required. Version 8.1.0 contains an initial remediation attempt that removes raw-response reflection and adds destination checks, but private-network exemptions and login TLS-verification defaults leave complete remediation of the described internal-network and TLS variants unresolved. |
| CVE-2026-13451 | High | 2026-10-28 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in KServe. A namespace-scoped user with create/update permissions on InferenceService custom resources can exploit this vulnerability by providing a malicious `storageUri`. This Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability allows the `storage-initializer` init container to issue arbitrary outbound HTTP/HTTPS requests from inside the cluster. This can lead to information disclosure, including credential theft for the node's Identity and Access Management (IAM) role or access to internal cluster services. |
| CVE-2026-118660 | High | 2026-10-28 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Happy DOM is a JavaScript implementation of a web browser without its graphical user interface. Prior to 21.0.0, Happy DOM loads iframe src URLs and link rel="stylesheet" href URLs by default while parsing untrusted HTML on the server because disableIframePageLoading and disableCSSFileLoading default to false. An attacker who controls parsed HTML can therefore cause server-side requests to arbitrary internal or cloud endpoints without an application opt-in and may expose confidential responses or credentials returned by those endpoints. This issue is fixed in version 21.0.0. |
| CVE-2026-118659 | High | 2026-10-28 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Happy DOM is a JavaScript implementation of a web browser without its graphical user interface. Prior to 21.0.2, the Happy DOM server-renderer package's ServerRendererServer accepts unauthenticated HTTP/2 requests and resolves attacker-controlled :path values against server.targetOrigin in #onIncomingRequest in packages/@happy-dom/server-renderer/src/ServerRendererServer.ts without confirming that the resolved origin remains trusted before calling fetch. A protocol-relative path can change the destination to an arbitrary HTTP or HTTPS endpoint reachable by the server, including local and internal services, and the proxy relays the fetched response headers and body to the requester. This issue is fixed in version 21.0.2. |
| CVE-2025-14260 | High | 2026-10-28 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Due to the improper implementation of access control rules, malicious actors could perform a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attack on affected WSO2 Products. Exploiting this vulnerability allows a malicious actor to access both internal and external resources, available through the network or filesystem. This could potentially lead to unauthorized access to sensitive data and systems, regardless of whether these resources are located within a private network, as long as they are reachable by the WSO2 product. |
| CVE-2026-65120 | High | 2026-10-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | NVIDIA TensorRT-LLM contains a vulnerability where an attacker could cause a server-side request forgery. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to information disclosure. |
| CVE-2026-24269 | High | 2026-10-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | NVIDIA TensorRT-LLM contains a vulnerability where an attacker could cause a server-side request forgery. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to information disclosure and data tampering. |
| CVE-2026-116827 | High | 2026-10-27 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | YesWiki before 4.7.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the Bazar CSV import copyUrlToLocalFile() function that allows authenticated administrators to make arbitrary outbound requests by supplying crafted URLs in CSV file or image fields. Attackers can bypass the extension check with a query-string suffix or redirects to fetch cloud metadata credentials, internal services, or local files via file://, with responses stored in the web-accessible files/ directory. |
| CVE-2026-116826 | High | 2026-10-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | YesWiki before 4.7.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in DuplicationManager::downloadFile() that allows authenticated administrators to make arbitrary outbound requests via the files array. Attackers can POST file:// or internal URLs to /api/pages/{tag}/duplicate, storing local files, cloud metadata, or database credentials in the publicly accessible files/ directory. |
| CVE-2026-116192 | High | 2026-10-25 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | rclone from 1.37 before 1.74.2 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to redirect http and netstorage backend requests by supplying a double-slash root on an existing named remote via --rc-serve. Attackers can make HEAD/GET requests to attacker-chosen hosts to read responses, capture configured custom headers, or obtain valid NetStorage request signatures. |
| CVE-2026-116176 | High | 2026-10-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | vLLM from 0.9.2 before 0.24.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows API callers to force outbound connections by embedding a decode address in the X-Request-Id header. Attackers can make a P2pNcclConnector prefill worker ZMQ-connect to an attacker host, leaking the NCCL unique_id and KV-cache tensors or blocking the worker. |
| CVE-2026-116066 | High | 2026-10-25 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Firecrawl before 2.11.586 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the Playwright service SSRF proxy that allows attackers to bypass isInternalHost checks via DNS rebinding. Attackers controlling DNS for a scrape target can return a public address during validation and a private address at connect time, retrieving cloud metadata and internal resources through the scrape API. |
| CVE-2026-57114 | High | 2026-10-23 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. From version 4.5.126 to before version 4.6.59, PraisonAI's Async Jobs API validates webhook_url when a job request is parsed and again when the internal Job object is constructed. That validation blocks direct loopback/private targets, but it is not bound to the later network request. When a job completes, _send_webhook() passes the original hostname to httpx.AsyncClient.post() with no send-time validation, IP pinning, or guarded transport. An attacker-controlled hostname can therefore resolve to a public IP during Pydantic validation and later resolve to loopback/private/cloud-metadata infrastructure during webhook delivery. This bypasses the intended SSRF guard in current supported releases. This appears to be an incomplete fix / patch bypass for GHSA-8frj-8q3m-xhgm. This issue has been patched in version 4.6.59. |
| CVE-2026-19678 | High | 2026-10-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the unauthenticated form service in version 11.0.14 in onPhase Forms allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to access sensitive internal Apache Solr data via an attacker-controlled URL supplied to a publicly accessible form. |
| CVE-2026-115729 | High | 2026-10-23 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | @pdfme/common from 5.5.10 before 6.2.6 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to bypass the isUrlSafeToFetch denylist in getB64BasePdf. Attackers can supply basePdf URLs using IPv4-mapped IPv6, [::], NAT64 or localhost alias hostnames to read loopback, internal or cloud metadata responses through generated documents. |
| CVE-2026-79880 | High | 2026-10-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the command line interface of AOS-8 could allow an authenticated remote attacker with high privileges to conduct a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system. |
| CVE-2026-114730 | High | 2026-10-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Roundcube Webmail 1.6.14 before 1.6.20 and 1.7.0 before 1.7.5 is affected by a server-side request forgery filter bypass. The network blocklist used by rcube_utils::is_local_url() omitted the RFC 6052 NAT64 prefix 64:ff9b::/96, the RFC 8215 local-use NAT64 prefix 64:ff9b:1::/48 and the unspecified address ::/128, so URLs such as http://[64:ff9b::7f00:1]/ passed the filter and reached loopback, link-local and cloud metadata addresses. Upstream fixed this in the commit “Fix SSRF filter (is_local_url()) bypass via NAT64 64:ff9b::/96”. |
| CVE-2026-108456 | High | 2026-10-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Azure AI Foundry allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. |
| CVE-2026-92210 | High | 2026-10-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | NoMachine nxhtd Server-Side Request Forgery Information Disclosure Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to initiate arbitrary server-side requests on affected installations of NoMachine. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the web service, which listens on UDP port 4443 by default. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a URI prior to accessing resources. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to initiate requests in the context of the service account. Was ZDI-CAN-31619. |
| CVE-2026-92204 | High | 2026-10-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Airbyte OneDrive Connector _get_shared_drive_object Server-Side Request Forgery Information Disclosure Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to initiate arbitrary server-side requests on affected installations of Airbyte. Authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the _get_shared_drive_object method. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a URI prior to accessing resources. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to disclose information in the context of the service account. Was ZDI-CAN-28216. |
| CVE-2026-92203 | High | 2026-10-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Airbyte SharePoint Connector _get_shared_drive_object Server-Side Request Forgery Information Disclosure Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to initiate arbitrary server-side requests on affected installations of Airbyte. Authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the implementation of the _get_shared_drive_object method. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a URI prior to accessing resources. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to disclose information in the context of the service account. Was ZDI-CAN-28215. |