Overview 4,241 matches · 186 in Waratek scope · 24 protected · 117 exploited · 26 CISA KEV · 211 public PoC · 49 EPSS ≥ 0.5
4,241matches
186in Waratek scope4.4%
24protected0.6%
117exploited2.8%
26CISA KEV0.6%
211public PoC5.0%
49EPSS ≥ 0.51.2%
Protected by Waratek
24
0.6%
Rule in development
7
0.2%
Mitigation candidate
8
0.2%
No exploit published
147
3.5%
Outside Waratek scope
25
0.6%
Not applicable
4,029
95.0%
Withdrawn CVE
1
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
24
0.6%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
4,217
99.4%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 2,316 / year
20031
Not applicable1
Critical1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20041
Not applicable1
Critical1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20050
20060
20070
20080
20090
20101
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20110
20120
20130
20140
20151
No exploit published1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20168
Not applicable8
High5
Medium3
not blocked8
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
No public exploit6
201745
Protected by Waratek3
No exploit published1
Not applicable41
Critical9
High22
Medium13
Low1
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked42
Exploited2
Working exploit published4
No public exploit39
201875
Protected by Waratek3
No exploit published8
Outside Waratek scope3
Not applicable61
Critical28
High29
Medium18
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked72
Exploited1
Working exploit published5
Proof of concept only1
Forecast only1
No public exploit67
201992
Protected by Waratek1
Rule in development1
No exploit published9
Outside Waratek scope3
Not applicable78
Critical32
High32
Medium28
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked91
Exploited6
Working exploit published6
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit79
2020119
Protected by Waratek2
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published5
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable110
Critical26
High39
Medium54
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked117
Exploited6
Working exploit published9
No public exploit104
2021187
Protected by Waratek1
Rule in development1
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published10
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable172
Critical42
High71
Medium69
Low5
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked186
Exploited18
Working exploit published8
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit160
2022217
Protected by Waratek2
Rule in development1
Mitigation candidate2
No exploit published14
Outside Waratek scope3
Not applicable195
Critical67
High83
Medium64
Low3
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked215
Exploited6
Working exploit published20
Proof of concept only23
Forecast only1
No public exploit167
2023237
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published12
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable221
Critical50
High83
Medium100
Low4
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked236
Exploited12
Working exploit published11
Proof of concept only51
Forecast only2
No public exploit161
2024375
Protected by Waratek3
No exploit published11
Outside Waratek scope4
Not applicable357
Critical76
High133
Medium159
Low7
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked372
Exploited16
Working exploit published13
Proof of concept only101
No public exploit245
2025566
Protected by Waratek3
Rule in development4
Mitigation candidate2
No exploit published14
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable541
Critical61
High145
Medium299
Low61
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked563
Exploited23
Working exploit published8
Proof of concept only200
No public exploit335
20262,316
Protected by Waratek5
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published62
Outside Waratek scope5
Not applicable2,242
Withdrawn CVE1
Critical210
High802
Medium1,048
Low253
Unknown3
blocked by ARMR today5
not blocked2,311
Exploited26
Working exploit published23
Proof of concept only896
No public exploit1,371
200420062008201020122014201620182020202220242026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-17329 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper validation of endpoint URLs. |
| CVE-2026-17328 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper input validation. Input checks are incomplete, which could allow them to be bypassed. |
| CVE-2026-17327 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-17325 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper validation of user-supplied URLs. |
| CVE-2026-17317 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to access internal resources and cause a denial of service due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-17316 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to perform server-side request forgery due to improper validation of user-supplied input. |
| CVE-2026-17315 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper validation of user-supplied URLs. |
| CVE-2026-17314 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-17306 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information from internal network resources due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-17305 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-17304 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper input validation. Locations supplied when service definitions are imported are not sufficiently validated, which could allow the server to retrieve content it should not access. |
| CVE-2026-17303 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to access internal network resources due to improper validation of a user-supplied URL. The address is not sufficiently restricted, which could allow the server to contact internal systems. |
| CVE-2026-17302 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to probe internal network services due to improper validation of a user-supplied URL. |
| CVE-2026-17299 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to perform arbitrary file reads and server-side request forgery due to unrestricted resolution of external references. Externally referenced content in submitted definitions is not sufficiently restricted when processed, and the retrieved content could be returned to the attacker. |
| CVE-2026-17298 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-17296 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-17294 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-17289 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-17288 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-17287 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. User-supplied addresses are not sufficiently validated, so the server could be made to send requests to unintended destinations and return the results. |
| CVE-2026-17285 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper validation of external references. When schemas are validated, references to external resources are not sufficiently restricted, which could allow the server to retrieve content it should not access. |
| CVE-2026-17281 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-17238 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information from other tenants due to path parameter injection. Values in the request path are not sufficiently validated, which could allow access to data belonging to other tenants. |
| CVE-2026-17237 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-17233 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain information about internal network services due to improper validation of user-supplied URLs. Addresses supplied by users are not sufficiently restricted, so the server could be made to contact internal systems. |
| CVE-2026-17232 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper neutralization of special elements in a request. Specially formed request parameters are not handled safely, which could allow protections to be circumvented. |
| CVE-2026-17228 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. Destination restrictions on outbound requests can be bypassed, which could allow the server to retrieve content from unintended resources. |
| CVE-2026-17188 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. When service definitions are imported, references to external resources are not sufficiently restricted, so the server could be made to request resources it should not access. |
| CVE-2026-17187 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper validation of user-supplied URLs. |
| CVE-2026-17131 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. Restrictions on outbound requests can be bypassed, so the server could be made to contact unintended destinations and return the response. |
| CVE-2026-17108 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-17067 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to access internal network resources due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-16918 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to access internal network resources due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-16912 | High | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-16710 | Medium | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to a server-side request forgery vulnerability. |
| CVE-2026-85743 | High | 2026-11-06 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | FreeScout is a self-hosted help desk and shared mailbox. Prior to 1.8.230, multiple outbound paths in Helper::downloadRemoteFile(), Helper::checkPort(), Helper::sanitizeRemoteUrl(), MailboxesController.php, and ModulesController.php do not consistently enforce a sink-level restricted-host policy. An authenticated administrator, or another authenticated user permitted to change mailbox connection settings or trigger module update or installation paths, can supply attacker-controlled URLs or hosts. The independent download and port-test sinks can reach encoded or otherwise uncovered loopback and internal addresses. The redirect-validation bypass additionally requires a configured whitelist that permits the original and final hosts while a restricted internal host appears only as an intermediate redirect hop. No unauthenticated SSRF path is established. The server can consequently contact loopback and internal services, provide a blind internal port oracle, and retrieve internal HTTP responses into application-controlled download sinks. This issue is fixed in version 1.8.230. |
| CVE-2026-76171 | Critical | 2026-11-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Apache James server prior version 3.9.1 improper validation in JMAP webPush SSRF validation did lead to the possibility to reach internal addresses. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.9.1 which fixes this issue. |
| CVE-2026-71495 | Critical | 2026-11-06 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Wanderer is a self-hosted trail database for saving and sharing adventures. Prior to 0.20.0, when PUBLIC_PRIVATE_INSTANCE is not set to true, the unauthenticated POST /api/v1/trail/download handler passes the attacker-controlled JSON url field directly to event.fetch() and returns the fetched response. This allows requests to internal services such as db:8090 and search:7700, cloud metadata addresses, and other network destinations, exposing returned data and permitting internal network reconnaissance or denial of service. This issue is fixed in version 0.20.0. |
| CVE-2026-68935 | Critical | 2026-11-06 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Chartbrew is an open-source web application for creating charts from databases and APIs. In versions 4.8.5 through 5.2.2, API connection creation and update operations accept the internal allowPrivateHost field from user input. An authenticated user with permission to manage API connections can enable this field to bypass private and reserved-network destination restrictions. An upgrade migration also enables the override on pre-existing API connections. The per-connection setting takes precedence over CB_ALLOW_PRIVATE_NETWORK_CALLS , so disabling that instance option does not protect connections with the override enabled. Successful exploitation allows requests to internal HTTP services reachable from the Chartbrew server, potentially disclosing information or triggering unauthorized actions depending on the target service. Recognized cloud metadata endpoints remain separately blocked. This issue is fixed in version 5.2.3. |
| CVE-2026-63441 | Medium | 2026-11-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | 2FAuth is a web app to manage Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) accounts and generate their security codes. From 6.1.0 until 8.0.0, App\Services\Traits\ValidatesUrls::isPublicIp() does not recognize the 64:ff9b::/96 and 64:ff9b:1::/48 NAT64 prefixes, so an otpauth URI image parameter can pass an IPv6 literal or DNS64-synthesized address whose embedded IPv4 target is private, link-local, loopback, or cloud metadata. In a deployment with image fetching enabled and a NAT64 translation path to the internal IPv4 target, an account holder can submit the crafted URI directly, or an external attacker can induce a victim to import a crafted URI or migration payload. IconService::buildFromRemoteImage() then issues an HTTP GET to the embedded target, allowing image-shaped responses to be recovered or other endpoints to be probed blindly. This issue is fixed in version 8.0.0. |
| CVE-2026-63440 | Medium | 2026-11-06 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | 2FAuth is a web app to manage Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) accounts and generate their security codes. Prior to 8.0.0, the otpauth image-fetch path validates a hostname through ValidatesUrls::isExternalHost() and then lets IconService::storeRemoteImage() resolve the same hostname again for the HTTP request. When external otpauth image fetching is enabled, an authenticated user controlling low-TTL authoritative DNS can return a public address during validation and an internal address during the later connection, bypassing the private-address deny list to reach loopback, private-network, link-local, or cloud metadata endpoints. This issue is fixed in version 8.0.0. |
| CVE-2026-58141 | High | 2026-11-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dify before 1.15.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows any authenticated console user to bypass SSRF protections and issue arbitrary HTTP requests to internal services and cloud metadata endpoints due to the Squid proxy configuration only defining source ACLs without destination deny rules and the make_request() helper performing no independent destination IP validation. Attackers can use endpoints such as GET /console/api/remote-files/<url>, POST /console/api/remote-files/upload, the HTTP Request workflow node, website crawl, or document import from URL to reach internal components like the sandbox, internal APIs, and PostgreSQL, and on AWS deployments read IAM credentials from the instance metadata service, with the HTTP Request node further enabling POST, PUT, and DELETE writes to internal services relying on network isolation for authorization. |
| CVE-2026-54589 | High | 2026-11-06 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Chartbrew is an open-source web application that can connect directly to databases and APIs and use the data to create charts. Prior to 5.2.1, the outbound URL guard recognized ordinary IPv4, IPv6, and IPv4-mapped IPv6 destinations but did not recognize IPv4 addresses embedded in NAT64 prefixes. The vulnerable surface is aPI Data Connection outbound requests routed through server/modules/outboundTargetPolicy.js. An authenticated user with permission to create or edit an API connection supplies an attacker-controlled hostname or redirect whose DNS answer is a NAT64 address embedding a private or link-local IPv4 destination. The policy treated the NAT64 address as public; a NAT64 gateway then translated it to the embedded private IPv4 address after validation. The bypass requires a NAT64/DNS64 deployment path and connection-management privileges. IPv4-only deployments are not affected by this specific bypass. The attacker can read responses from 169.254.169.254 cloud metadata and arbitrary internal IPv4 hosts and ports reachable through the NAT64 gateway. This issue is fixed in version 5.2.1. |
| CVE-2026-49951 | Medium | 2026-11-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | RAGFlow before 0.27.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers to force the server to issue requests to arbitrary internal or external endpoints by supplying an unvalidated base_url to the POST /v1/llm/set_api_key endpoint handled by set_api_key() in api/apps/llm_app.py. Attackers can exploit this flaw to probe shared-network services such as MySQL, Elasticsearch, Redis, MinIO, the Infinity vector database, and cloud metadata endpoints, with raw upstream exception text returned in the response leaking internal service details, open ports, and configuration fingerprints. |
| CVE-2026-123846 | Medium | 2026-11-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.3 blind SSRF was possible via remote references in JSON Schema validation |
| CVE-2026-123844 | Medium | 2026-11-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.3 sSRF was possible via custom plugin repositories |
| CVE-2026-123786 | High | 2026-11-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Agenta before 0.122.5 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows workspace members with workflow edit rights to redirect workflow invocations by setting arbitrary revision URLs. Attackers can capture the attached secret-resolve Authorization token to read provider secrets from the vault API, or reach internal and cloud metadata addresses. |
| CVE-2026-123310 | Medium | 2026-11-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.3 kotlin scripts could trigger dependency downloads from arbitrary repositories in untrusted projects |
| CVE-2026-123307 | Medium | 2026-11-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.3, 2026.2.4 unauthenticated connection to an arbitrary host via run configurations was possible |
| CVE-2026-119758 | High | 2026-11-06 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | ERPNext OCR app for Frappe/ERPNext through 1.1.1 contains a missing authorization and path traversal vulnerability that allows any authenticated user to read arbitrary server files by passing a fully client-controlled path argument to the whitelisted read_document method. Attackers can supply local file paths to bypass Frappe's File doctype permission model and access other users' private uploads, or supply arbitrary URLs to trigger server-side requests reaching internal services and cloud metadata endpoints. |
| CVE-2026-119433 | High | 2026-11-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in an undocumented API endpoint of Foxit Workspace due to insufficient validation of user-supplied URL and network parameters. A remote attacker could exploit this issue to induce the server to send requests to arbitrary internal or external resources, potentially enabling unauthorized access to internal services, network reconnaissance, and sensitive information disclosure. |
| CVE-2026-119431 | High | 2026-11-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in Foxit Workspace's file-upload functionality. Insufficient validation of user-supplied links may allow a remote attacker to induce the server to access internal resources and return their contents, potentially resulting in sensitive information disclosure and unauthorized access to internal services. |
| CVE-2026-112338 | High | 2026-11-06 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Wazuh from 4.3.0 before 4.14.9 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the GitHub module (wm_github.c) that trusts unvalidated Link rel="next" pagination URLs. Attackers controlling the next-page URL can make the manager send requests with the GitHub API token to attacker hosts, exposing organization repositories and settings. |
| CVE-2026-112337 | Medium | 2026-11-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Wazuh from 3.7.0 before 4.14.9 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the Azure wodle get_graph_events() function that follows @odata.nextLink without host or HTTPS validation. Attackers who influence the nextLink value can redirect manager requests to attacker-controlled endpoints, capturing the reused Microsoft Graph bearer token and reaching internal services. |
| CVE-2026-102356 | Medium | 2026-11-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Kroki creates diagrams from textual descriptions. From 0.26.0 until 0.31.2, the optional Mermaid companion's mermaid/src/worker.js renders attacker-controlled flowchart image nodes in headless Chromium without a network request policy, even when KROKI_SAFE_MODE is set to secure. An actor who can submit Mermaid source and satisfy any authentication or authorization configured by the deployment can cause the companion to issue HTTP or HTTPS GET requests when requesting PNG output. Exploitation requires the Mermaid companion, PNG rendering through its headless Chromium process, a diagram-submission path available to the actor, and network reachability from the companion to the target. The demonstrated impact is limited to blind request reachability and possible state-changing GET endpoints; response exfiltration, cloud metadata access, port scanning, and access beyond the companion's network reachability are not established. This issue is fixed in version 0.31.2. |
| CVE-2026-88983 | Medium | 2026-11-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Kubeflow Pipelines enables users to build and deploy portable, scalable machine learning workflows. Prior to 2.17.0, the API server's pipeline and pipeline-version creation paths fetch a caller-supplied pipelineURL without restricting the destination. An authenticated caller with permission to create a pipeline or pipeline version can make requests from the API server to internal services and observe a limited status-code oracle. Arbitrary response-body disclosure, credential theft, and integrity or availability impact are not established. This issue is fixed in version 2.17.0. |
| CVE-2026-88981 | High | 2026-11-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Kubeflow Pipelines enables users to build and deploy portable, scalable machine learning workflows. Prior to 2.18.0, the frontend artifact download path for source=s3 or source=minio accepts providerInfo.Params.endpoint, and the archived pod-log path accepts S3-compatible endpoint metadata from workflow status, without requiring those endpoints to match operator-controlled storage configuration. In the shipped authorization-disabled standalone configuration, an unauthenticated caller can make the shared ml-pipeline-ui pod connect to arbitrary reachable hosts and return response data; requests may also reveal an access-key identifier when signed with configured object-store credentials. Multi-user secret-backed metadata remains restricted to the server namespace. This issue is fixed in version 2.18.0. |
| CVE-2026-88980 | High | 2026-11-05 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Kubeflow Pipelines enables users to build and deploy portable, scalable machine learning workflows. Prior to 2.18.0, the frontend GET /artifacts/get route accepts source=http or source=https with caller-controlled bucket and key values, and isAllowedResourceName permits an all-digit decimal host that the URL parser converts to an IPv4 address. The default ALLOWED_ARTIFACT_DOMAIN_REGEX and authorization-disabled standalone configuration allow an unauthenticated caller to fetch internal HTTP resources and receive their response body. In the authenticated multi-user configuration, the same destination-validation defect is reachable by a low-privilege tenant with a valid identity and authorized namespace. Cloud credential disclosure depends on reachable metadata services and attached roles, and the issue does not establish IMDSv2 bypass or credential access when metadata is blocked. This issue is fixed in version 2.18.0. |
| CVE-2026-88979 | Medium | 2026-11-05 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Kubeflow Pipelines enables users to build and deploy portable, scalable machine learning workflows. From 2.17.0 until 2.18.0, the TensorBoard proxy token introduced by the incomplete remediation for CVE-2026-54745 uses MINIO_SECRET_KEY as its HMAC secret, whose bundled default is publicly known. In an authorization-disabled deployment using that default, an unauthenticated attacker can forge a token containing a chosen viewerName and namespace; the proxy constructs the destination from the viewerName plus the -service suffix, the namespace, and the configured cluster domain, then reads responses on port 80 under the /tensorboard/<viewer>/ path. Resource-name validation and path-traversal rejection remain enforced, authorization-enabled deployments still check access to the selected namespace, and unrestricted metadata access, writes, or service disruption are not established. This issue is fixed in version 2.18.0. |
| CVE-2026-85351 | Medium | 2026-11-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The FV Flowplayer Video Player WordPress plugin before 7.5.56.7212 does not validate a user-supplied URL before performing a server-side fetch whose response body is stored and served publicly, allowing users with Contributor-level access and above to perform Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attacks and to read the response of an internal resource when it is returned with an image content type. |
| CVE-2026-82902 | Medium | 2026-11-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Server-Side Request Forgery in ViewDataFile in Apache OFBiz 24.09 before 24.09.08 on all platforms allows a remote authenticated attacker holding only the base webtools permissions (OFBTOOLS_VIEW, WEBTOOLS_VIEW) to cause the server to issue arbitrary outbound HTTP requests, and an attacker additionally holding ENTITY_MAINT and DATAFILE_MAINT to read arbitrary local files via a file: URL, by supplying the DEFINITION_LOCATION or DATAFILE_LOCATION request parameter to the viewdatafile screen, because ViewDataFile.groovy dereferences both parameters as java.net.URL objects with no scheme allow-list, host filter, or egress control inside a screen action that runs before the screen's and template's permission checks are evaluated, so the fetch executes regardless of whether the requesting account is authorized to view its result. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 24.09.08, which fixes this issue. |
| CVE-2026-81828 | High | 2026-11-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Server-Side Request Forgery in SurveyWrapper in Apache OFBiz 24.09 before 24.09.08 on all platforms allows an authenticated back-office user holding catalog permission to cause the server to fetch and render attacker-controlled URLs — including internal network and cloud-metadata endpoints and local files via file:// — by setting an arbitrary URL as a product-store survey's template location, causing SurveyWrapper.getTemplate to call URL.openStream() on the resolved location and compile the fetched content as a FreeMarker template with no scheme or host validation, unlike the sibling widget location-loaders (ScreenFactory, FormFactory, GridFactory, MenuFactory, TreeFactory, ThemeFactory) which validate the resolved location before loading it. The fetched content is rendered into the HTTP response of any shopper who subsequently loads the affected product-store survey, making the disclosure non-blind. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 24.09.08, which fixes this issue. |
| CVE-2026-81190 | Medium | 2026-11-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | KurrentDB is a database engineered for modern software applications and event-driven architectures. In version 26.1.0, a user authorized to read the $all stream can use Secondary Indexing query capabilities to read arbitrary files accessible to the database process, enumerate directories, and issue HTTP GET requests from that process. The default configuration limits this privilege to administrators. The flaw does not permit file writes and does not expose environment variables. This issue is fixed in version 26.1.1. |
| CVE-2026-69137 | High | 2026-11-05 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | SuiteCRM is an open-source, enterprise-ready Customer Relationship Management (CRM) software application. Prior to 7.15.2 and 8.10.2, the CalendarAccount testConnection action passes an authenticated caller's server_url directly to curl without host, address, or scheme validation. The affected flow begins at CalendarAccount::action_testConnection and uses server_url, CalDAVProvider::makeCalDAVRequest(), and PROPFIND to carry attacker-controlled data or authorization state into the security-sensitive operation. The server sends a PROPFIND request from its network context and returns non-success response bodies, enabling internal-service access, partial response disclosure, service enumeration, and possible cloud metadata access. This issue is fixed in versions 7.15.2 and 8.10.2. |
| CVE-2026-63111 | High | 2026-11-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | SuiteCRM is an open-source, enterprise-ready Customer Relationship Management (CRM) software application. Prior to 7.15.2 and 8.10.2, the V8 module API lacks module-level authorization and permits a low-privileged user to create SchedulersJobs records with attacker-controlled target values. The affected flow begins at /Api/V8/module and uses SchedulersJobs, target, cron.php, and url:: to carry attacker-controlled data or authorization state into the security-sensitive operation. Cron.php later executes the queued job with system privileges, and the url:: target makes server-side requests to internal or external hosts, can follow redirects, can persist as a recurring job, and may expose internal services. This issue is fixed in versions 7.15.2 and 8.10.2. |
| CVE-2026-61649 | High | 2026-11-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | SuiteCRM is an open-source, enterprise-ready Customer Relationship Management (CRM) software application. Prior to 7.15.2 and 8.10.2, the SSRF protection added in 7.15.1 uses a substring comparison in isSelfRequest() rather than hostname equality. The affected flow begins at validate_external_host() and uses isSelfRequest(), and stripos() to carry attacker-controlled data or authorization state into the security-sensitive operation. An authenticated attacker can place the server hostname in a URL path to bypass IP validation and direct server-side requests to internal services. This issue is fixed in versions 7.15.2 and 8.10.2. |
| CVE-2026-54442 | Medium | 2026-11-05 | No exploit published | Proof of concept only | Emissary is a P2P based data-driven workflow engine. Prior to 8.51.0, the VALID_LINK validation in src/main/java/emissary/server/mvc/NavAction.java accepts protocol-relative URLs when processing configured navigation links. Browser URL normalization can interpret these accepted strings as external origins. The authoritative advisory attributes open redirect, server-side request forgery, and cloud metadata access to this bypass, but it identifies neither the server-side dereference path nor how navigation-link processing reaches that path. This issue is fixed in version 8.51.0. |
| CVE-2026-123204 | Medium | 2026-11-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Posta before v0.18.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows authenticated users with edit rights to make the backend send POST requests to internal destinations by creating webhooks with arbitrary URLs. Attackers can target loopback, private-network or cloud metadata addresses and read delivery status codes and error strings to probe internal hosts and ports. |
| CVE-2026-123201 | Medium | 2026-11-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Buku (bukuserver) through 5.1.1 contains an unauthenticated server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows remote attackers to make the server request internal hosts by supplying a url parameter to /api/fetch_data or /api/network_handle. Attackers can target loopback, private, or cloud metadata IP addresses, which pass the weak is_bad_url() check and follow redirects, to discover internal services and read their page titles, descriptions, and keywords. |
| CVE-2026-123125 | Medium | 2026-11-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Symfony Validator component IpValidator incompletely classifies internal addresses in the filtered modes of the Ip constraint, so some internal addresses are accepted as public, which can lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Symfony versions prior to 5.4.56, 6.x prior to 6.4.50, 7.x prior to 7.4.23, and 8.x prior to 8.1.11. In these modes, IpValidator relies on the PHP flags FILTER_FLAG_NO_PRIV_RANGE and FILTER_FLAG_NO_RES_RANGE to classify addresses as public, private, or reserved. These flags do not cover shared address space (100.64.0.0/10) or IPv4-mapped, IPv4-compatible, and 6to4 IPv6 addresses, which can embed internal IPv4 addresses. A value such as ::ffff:127.0.0.1 can therefore pass validation even though it points to an internal host. Applications that rely on the Ip constraint to reject internal addresses, for example before making a server-side request to a user-supplied address, can be exposed to SSRF. |
| CVE-2026-123119 | Low | 2026-11-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Symfony HttpClient component NoPrivateNetworkHttpClient does not pin the checked IP address of cached hosts, allowing for DNS rebinding to bypass private network restrictions, resulting in enumeration of internal hosts and ports in Symfony versions prior to 5.4.56, 6.x prior to 6.4.50, 7.x prior to 7.4.23, and 8.x prior to 8.1.11. NoPrivateNetworkHttpClient resolves the host of each request and checks the IP before connecting. It caches the result per host, and passes the IP to the decorated client through the resolve option so that the client connects to the exact IP that was checked. The issue is that resolve was only passed on the first lookup of a host: on subsequent requests, the decorated client resolved the host again on its own. An attacker who controls a host's DNS can exploit this with DNS rebinding by answering the first lookup with a public IP, and subsequent lookups with a private IP, so when an application sends several requests to that host through the same client, the later requests connect to the private IP. This happens, for example, when an application fetches several URLs of a repository provided by a user. The check of the primary_ip in the on_progress callback still aborts the request before anything is sent, but the connection is made, and the error differs depending on whether the port is open or closed. This allows enumerating internal hosts and ports, as in CVE-2024-50342. |
| CVE-2026-115740 | Medium | 2026-11-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Server side request forgery vulnerability exists in the DLP on-prem extensions version 11.13.1 and earlier allows the file Prefix parameter in the OpenEventEvidenceFile.do endpoint accepts arbitrary UNC paths without validation. The server-side code attempts to open the specified file path, causing Windows to resolve the hostname and initiate SMB authentication to the attacker-controlled host. |
| CVE-2026-97373 | Medium | 2026-11-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | draw.io is a configurable diagramming and whiteboarding application. Prior to 30.3.8, the optional /proxy endpoint contains an incomplete server-side request forgery blocklist. When the endpoint is enabled, the URL validator does not reject the RFC 6598 shared address range 100.64.0.0/10. An unauthenticated remote attacker can cause the draw.io server to request internal services that are reachable in this range, potentially disclosing data from Carrier-Grade NAT, Kubernetes, cloud, or overlay-network addresses. This vulnerability is fixed in 30.3.8. |
| CVE-2026-57566 | Critical | 2026-11-04 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Readest is a modern, feature-rich ebook reader designed for seamless cross-platform access and an intuitive reading experience. Prior to 0.11.10, the unauthenticated /api/opds/proxy route in apps/readest-app/src/app/api/opds/proxy/route.ts accepted an attacker-controlled URL and fetched it server-side without restricting the scheme, blocking private, loopback, link-local, or metadata hosts, or revalidating destinations during automatic redirect following. The route also accepted caller-controlled outbound headers and Authorization values and reflected the upstream status and response body. A remote attacker could use the service as an open request proxy and, on Node, Docker, or other self-hosted deployments with internal-network access, retrieve cloud metadata or internal-service responses. Cloudflare Workers deployments restrict access to link-local and private destinations, which reduces the internal-network impact there, but the unauthenticated public fetch-and-reflect behavior remains. This issue is fixed in version 0.11.10. |
| CVE-2026-122140 | Medium | 2026-11-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Trawl 1.5.0 before 1.10.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to bypass the MCP outbound URL policy using IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses. Attackers can supply hex-normalized addresses like ::ffff:7f00:1 directly or via redirects to fetch loopback, private, and cloud metadata services and read responses. |
| CVE-2026-122009 | Medium | 2026-11-04 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A flaw has been found in DataLinkDC Dinky up to 1.2.5. This vulnerability affects the function FlinkWebURITemplateProxyServlet.getNewTargetUri of the file dinky-admin/src/main/java/org/dinky/utils/FlinkWebURITemplateProxyServlet.java of the component flink_web Proxy Endpoint. This manipulation of the argument _authority causes server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The researcher claims to have submitted a GHSA on the repository of the project. |
| CVE-2026-122008 | Medium | 2026-11-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Oqtane Framework before 10.3.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the UploadFile endpoint of FileController.cs that allows authenticated registered users to make the server fetch arbitrary URLs by supplying a caller-controlled url parameter to HttpClient.GetStreamAsync without validating the scheme, host, or IP address. Attackers can request internal resources such as cloud instance metadata services or localhost-bound management interfaces, save the fetched response as a file in their own user folder, and retrieve it via the download endpoint to exfiltrate sensitive internal data or enumerate internal network hosts and ports. |
| CVE-2026-121936 | Medium | 2026-11-04 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | easyVoice before 0.0.23 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to make the server send POST requests by supplying openaiBaseUrl with useLLM enabled. Attackers can target loopback and internal services through /api/v1/tts endpoints, using reflected error messages in the x-generate-tts-warning header to probe internal hosts and ports. |
| CVE-2026-121927 | Low | 2026-11-04 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A vulnerability has been found in InfiniFlow RAGFlow up to 0.27.3. Affected by this issue is the function _account_get of the file common/data_source/seafile_connector.py of the component Seafile Connector. Such manipulation of the argument seafile_url leads to server-side request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| CVE-2026-118628 | High | 2026-11-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | MLflow get-artifacts Server-Side Request Forgery Information Disclosure Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on affected installations of MLflow. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the get-artifacts function. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a URI prior to accessing resources. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to disclose information in the context of the server. Was ZDI-CAN-28192. |
| CVE-2026-118422 | High | 2026-11-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Stape Conversion Tracking WordPress plugin before 2.3.11 does not validate the sub-path appended to its same-origin proxy's upstream endpoint, allowing unauthenticated visitors to redirect the server-side request to an arbitrary host and have the response body and its content type returned from the site's own origin with security response headers stripped, leading to Server-Side Request Forgery, including loopback and internal hosts, and Cross-Site Scripting. |
| CVE-2026-111036 | High | 2026-11-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the Coupa Supplier Portal SaaS platform, specifically in the document conversion functionality available in the ‘Contracts > Templates’ section. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of references to external resources processed by the Aspose.Words for Java library during DOCX-to-PDF conversion. An authenticated attacker with permissions to modify templates could upload a specially crafted DOCX document containing references to external resources, which would cause the server-side application to access URLs controlled by the attacker, resources on the internal network, or local files. A successful exploit could lead to the disclosure of sensitive information, such as configuration files, system files, credentials, environment variables and endpoints for internal services. |
| CVE-2026-110692 | Medium | 2026-11-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The PowerPack Addons for Elementor: Widgets, Form Styler and Templates WordPress plugin before 3.1.3 does not validate a user-supplied URL before using it in a server-side HTTP request, which could allow users with the contributor role and above to perform Server-Side Request Forgery attacks against internal and loopback resources and read the response back. |
| CVE-2026-102337 | Medium | 2026-11-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Webmin is a web-based system administration tool for Unix-like servers. Prior to 2.652, untrusted users with access to the File Manager or Upload and Download modules can direct Webmin's server-side URL download functionality to non-public network addresses because download destinations are not restricted by resolved IP address. This allows requests to unauthenticated intranet services or cloud-provider instance metadata endpoints that are inaccessible from the user's own system. This issue is fixed in 2.652. |
| CVE-2026-89292 | Critical | 2026-11-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Eclipse Mnestix Browser versions 1.6.0 up until but excluding 2.3.0 it was possible for an unauthenticated attacker to exfiltrate the MNESTIX_BACKEND_API_KEY for all configured Infrastructures. |
| CVE-2026-121581 | Low | 2026-11-03 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A vulnerability has been found in ArcReel 0.32.0/0.33.0/0.34.0. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /api/v1/providers/{id}/test of the component Provider Test-Connection Endpoint. The manipulation leads to server-side request forgery. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| CVE-2026-121580 | High | 2026-11-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Server-side request forgery in the Jira ticketing filter lookup in Devolutions Server 2026.2.22.0 and earlier allows an authenticated low-privileged user to obtain the stored Jira service account credentials via an attacker-controlled server address in the request. |
| CVE-2026-121561 | Medium | 2026-11-03 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Label Studio before 1.23.2 (label-studio-sdk before 2.1.2) contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows authenticated users to read internal URLs through image-bearing export formats. Attackers can import tasks with data.image pointing at internal services, export as YOLO or COCO with images to read responses, and spoof Host to capture the organization owner's API token. |
| CVE-2026-121431 | Medium | 2026-11-03 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | AzuraCast before 0.24.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows station users with WebHooks permission to bypass the UserUrlFilter guard via the Mastodon, Telegram, GroupMe, and RadioReg connectors. Attackers can set instance_url, api, or webhookurl to internal addresses and trigger the webhook test endpoint to reach loopback, private-network, or cloud-metadata services. |
| CVE-2026-121422 | Medium | 2026-11-03 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | SurrealDB from 3.1.0 before 3.3.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows database Owners to bypass port-specific deny-net rules by using JWKS URLs with implicit default ports. Attackers can configure a JWT or record access method whose JWKS URL omits port 80 or 443, causing blind GET requests to explicitly denied internal services. |
| CVE-2026-121421 | Medium | 2026-11-03 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | SurrealDB 3.1.0 before 3.3.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in network-capability matching because port-specific --deny-net rules (HOST:PORT or IP:PORT) match only a literal host string, while the resolved-IP check discards the port. Authenticated users can call http::* functions with a hostname resolving to a denied IP, or the IP of a denied hostname, to reach blocked internal services. |
| CVE-2026-121420 | Medium | 2026-11-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | SurrealDB from 3.2.0 before 3.3.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the FilteringResolver is_private_ip check that fails to unwrap NAT64, 6to4, and Teredo IPv6 addresses. Authenticated users triggering outbound HTTP requests via SurrealQL http functions can use transition addresses embedding private IPv4 targets to reach localhost, internal services, or cloud metadata endpoints. |
| CVE-2026-120715 | High | 2026-11-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Server-side request forgery in the Active Directory credential validation in Devolutions Server 2026.3.12.0 and earlier allows an authenticated low-privileged user to capture the NetNTLMv2 hash of the DVLS service account via an attacker-controlled domain name in the request. |
| CVE-2026-120331 | Medium | 2026-11-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Content of external URL mails, their stylesheets and images to embed is fetched by the server without validating the target host. Backend users with access to the mail module can make the server send requests to hosts in the internal network. |
| CVE-2026-114582 | Medium | 2026-11-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in Django 6.1 before 6.1.3, 6.0 before 6.0.10, and 5.2 before 5.2.19. `django.contrib.gis.gdal.SpatialReference` (and related `transform()` methods and `srs`/`srid` setters) do not restrict GDAL’s file and network access when parsing string input, which allows attackers to trigger server-side requests or local file reads via crafted spatial reference strings. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.1.x, 5.0.x, and 4.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Adraca for reporting this issue. |
| CVE-2026-111362 | Medium | 2026-11-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in Django 6.1 before 6.1.3, 6.0 before 6.0.10, and 5.2 before 5.2.19. `django.contrib.gis.gdal.OGRGeometry` does not restrict external coordinate reference system definitions in GeoJSON input, which allows remote attackers to cause server-side requests to attacker-selected destinations via crafted crs members. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.1.x, 5.0.x, and 4.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Submersion Security Research Team for reporting this issue. |
| CVE-2026-105967 | Medium | 2026-11-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Gallery for Social Photo WordPress plugin through 1.0.0.41 does not validate a user-supplied URL before using it to perform a server-side request, allowing unauthenticated attackers to make the server issue requests to arbitrary internal hosts and read the responses. |
| CVE-2026-105822 | High | 2026-11-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Tapo Cloud MQTT proxy contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability because it accepts a user-controlled host value without sufficient input validation. An attacker may exploit this vulnerability to cause the Tapo Cloud service to send requests to an attacker-controlled server. Successful exploitation may cause the Tapo Cloud service to send a request to an attacker-controlled server, exposing the internal information and causing potential Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS). |
| CVE-2026-88809 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A security vulnerability exists in the SUSE Rancher Manager meta proxy endpoint (/meta/proxy). This endpoint is intended to forward requests only to destinations that appear on a configured allowlist. The allowlist decision was evaluated in a place where it could not stop a request from being forwarded, so a rejected destination was logged but the request was still handed to the proxy's transport. This affects SUSE Rancher 2.15.0 up to 2.15.3, 2.14.0 up to 2.14.7, 2.13.0 up to 2.13.11, 2.12.0 up to 2.12.15, 2.11.0 up to 2.11.19 and potentially older EOL versions. |
| CVE-2026-120630 | Critical | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | CrewAI contains an SSRF vulnerability caused by its SSRF guard and HTTP client, which both miss malicious content in URLs by checking opposite content passed to it, enabling any request that injects a malicious URL to perform SSRF, such as with the ScrapWebsiteTool. |