WaratekVRT Sign in
Reset
More filters (2)
Columns
Including CVEs outside Waratek scope✕CWE CWE-917✕Has a public PoC✕
Overview 18 matches · 13 in Waratek scope · 8 protected · 13 exploited · 9 CISA KEV · 10 EPSS ≥ 0.5
18matches 13in Waratek scope72.2% 8protected44.4% 13exploited72.2% 9CISA KEV50.0% 10EPSS ≥ 0.555.6%
Protected by Waratek 8 44.4% Rule in development 0 0.0% Mitigation candidate 5 27.8% No exploit published 0 0.0% Outside Waratek scope 0 0.0% Not applicable 5 27.8% Withdrawn CVE 0 0.0%
Critical 13 72.2% High 5 27.8% Medium 0 0.0% Low 0 0.0% None 0 0.0% Unknown 0 0.0%
blocked by ARMR today 8 44.4% partly blocked 0 0.0% not blocked 10 55.6% not established 0 0.0% unrecorded 0 0.0%
Exploited 13 72.2% Working exploit published 2 11.1% Proof of concept only 3 16.7% Forecast only 0 0.0% No public exploit 0 0.0%
split by peak 5 / year
Not applicable: 5Mitigation candidate: 5Protected by Waratek: 8 High: 5Critical: 13 not blocked: 10blocked by ARMR today: 8 Proof of concept only: 3Working exploit published: 2Exploited: 13
20101 Protected by Waratek1 High1 blocked by ARMR today1 Exploited1 20110 20120 20130 20140 20150 20160 20170 20181 Mitigation candidate1 Critical1 not blocked1 Proof of concept only1 20191 Not applicable1 High1 not blocked1 Exploited1 20204 Protected by Waratek2 Not applicable2 Critical1 High3 blocked by ARMR today2 not blocked2 Exploited2 Working exploit published2 20214 Protected by Waratek3 Not applicable1 Critical4 blocked by ARMR today3 not blocked1 Exploited4 20225 Protected by Waratek2 Mitigation candidate2 Not applicable1 Critical5 blocked by ARMR today2 not blocked3 Exploited4 Proof of concept only1 20230 20240 20251 Mitigation candidate1 Critical1 not blocked1 Exploited1 20261 Mitigation candidate1 Critical1 not blocked1 Proof of concept only1
201020122014201620182020202220242026
18 matches Sign in to download these CVEs as CSV or JSON, or to follow them in a feed.
CVE Severity Published▾ Status Exploitation Description
CVE-2026-22738 Critical 2026-03-27 Mitigation candidate Proof of concept only In Spring AI, a SpEL injection vulnerability exists in SimpleVectorStore when a user-supplied value is used as a filter expression key. A malicious actor could exploit this to execute arbitrary code. Only applications that use SimpleVectorStore and pass user-supplied input as a filter expression key are affected. This issue affects Spring AI: from 1.0.0 before 1.0.5, from 1.1.0 before 1.1.4.
CVE-2025-41243 Critical 2025-09-16 Mitigation candidate Exploited Spring Cloud Gateway Server Webflux may be vulnerable to Spring Environment property modification. An application should be considered vulnerable when all the following are true: * The application is using Spring Cloud Gateway Server Webflux (Spring Cloud Gateway Server WebMVC is not vulnerable). * Spring Boot actuator is a dependency. * The Spring Cloud Gateway Server Webflux actuator web endpoint is enabled via management.endpoints.web.exposure.include=gateway. * The actuator endpoints are available to attackers. * The actuator endpoints are unsecured.
CVE-2022-22980 Critical 2022-06-23 Mitigation candidate Proof of concept only A Spring Data MongoDB application is vulnerable to SpEL Injection when using @Query or @Aggregation-annotated query methods with SpEL expressions that contain query parameter placeholders for value binding if the input is not sanitized.
CVE-2022-26134 Critical 2022-06-03 Not applicable Exploited In affected versions of Confluence Server and Data Center, an OGNL injection vulnerability exists that would allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code on a Confluence Server or Data Center instance. The affected versions are from 1.3.0 before 7.4.17, from 7.13.0 before 7.13.7, from 7.14.0 before 7.14.3, from 7.15.0 before 7.15.2, from 7.16.0 before 7.16.4, from 7.17.0 before 7.17.4, and from 7.18.0 before 7.18.1.
CVE-2021-31805 Critical 2022-04-12 Protected by Waratek Exploited The fix issued for CVE-2020-17530 was incomplete. So from Apache Struts 2.0.0 to 2.5.29, still some of the tag’s attributes could perform a double evaluation if a developer applied forced OGNL evaluation by using the %{...} syntax. Using forced OGNL evaluation on untrusted user input can lead to a Remote Code Execution and security degradation.
CVE-2022-22963 Critical 2022-04-01 Protected by Waratek Exploited In Spring Cloud Function versions 3.1.6, 3.2.2 and older unsupported versions, when using routing functionality it is possible for a user to provide a specially crafted SpEL as a routing-expression that may result in remote code execution and access to local resources.
CVE-2022-22947 Critical 2022-03-03 Mitigation candidate Exploited In spring cloud gateway versions prior to 3.1.1+ and 3.0.7+ , applications are vulnerable to a code injection attack when the Gateway Actuator endpoint is enabled, exposed and unsecured. A remote attacker could make a maliciously crafted request that could allow arbitrary remote execution on the remote host.
CVE-2021-45046 Critical 2021-12-14 Protected by Waratek Exploited It was found that the fix to address CVE-2021-44228 in Apache Log4j 2.15.0 was incomplete in certain non-default configurations. This could allows attackers with control over Thread Context Map (MDC) input data when the logging configuration uses a non-default Pattern Layout with either a Context Lookup (for example, $${ctx:loginId}) or a Thread Context Map pattern (%X, %mdc, or %MDC) to craft malicious input data using a JNDI Lookup pattern resulting in an information leak and remote code execution in some environments and local code execution in all environments. Log4j 2.16.0 (Java 8) and 2.12.2 (Java 7) fix this issue by removing support for message lookup patterns and disabling JNDI functionality by default.
CVE-2021-44228 Critical 2021-12-10 Protected by Waratek Exploited Apache Log4j2 2.0-beta9 through 2.15.0 (excluding security releases 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1) JNDI features used in configuration, log messages, and parameters do not protect against attacker controlled LDAP and other JNDI related endpoints. An attacker who can control log messages or log message parameters can execute arbitrary code loaded from LDAP servers when message lookup substitution is enabled. From log4j 2.15.0, this behavior has been disabled by default. From version 2.16.0 (along with 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1), this functionality has been completely removed. Note that this vulnerability is specific to log4j-core and does not affect log4net, log4cxx, or other Apache Logging Services projects.
CVE-2021-26084 Critical 2021-08-30 Not applicable Exploited In affected versions of Confluence Server and Data Center, an OGNL injection vulnerability exists that would allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code on a Confluence Server or Data Center instance. The affected versions are before version 6.13.23, from version 6.14.0 before 7.4.11, from version 7.5.0 before 7.11.6, and from version 7.12.0 before 7.12.5.
CVE-2021-21479 Critical 2021-02-09 Protected by Waratek Exploited In SCIMono before 0.0.19, it is possible for an attacker to inject and execute java expression compromising the availability and integrity of the system.
CVE-2020-17530 Critical 2020-12-11 Protected by Waratek Exploited Forced OGNL evaluation, when evaluated on raw user input in tag attributes, may lead to remote code execution. Affected software : Apache Struts 2.0.0 - Struts 2.5.25.
CVE-2020-3956 High 2020-05-20 Not applicable Working exploit published VMware Cloud Director 10.0.x before 10.0.0.2, 9.7.0.x before 9.7.0.5, 9.5.0.x before 9.5.0.6, and 9.1.0.x before 9.1.0.4 do not properly handle input leading to a code injection vulnerability. An authenticated actor may be able to send malicious traffic to VMware Cloud Director which may lead to arbitrary remote code execution. This vulnerability can be exploited through the HTML5- and Flex-based UIs, the API Explorer interface and API access.
CVE-2020-10199 High 2020-04-01 Protected by Waratek Exploited Sonatype Nexus Repository before 3.21.2 allows JavaEL Injection (issue 1 of 2).
CVE-2019-16469 High 2020-01-15 Not applicable Working exploit published Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5, 6.4, 6.3, 6.2, 6.1, and 6.0 have an expression language injection vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to sensitive information disclosure.
CVE-2019-9041 High 2019-02-23 Not applicable Exploited An issue was discovered in ZZZCMS zzzphp V1.6.1. In the inc/zzz_template.php file, the parserIfLabel() function's filtering is not strict, resulting in PHP code execution, as demonstrated by the if:assert substring.
CVE-2018-12533 Critical 2018-06-18 Mitigation candidate Proof of concept only JBoss RichFaces 3.1.0 through 3.3.4 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject expression language (EL) expressions and execute arbitrary Java code via a /DATA/ substring in a path with an org.richfaces.renderkit.html.Paint2DResource$ImageData object, aka RF-14310.
CVE-2010-1871 High 2010-08-05 Protected by Waratek Exploited JBoss Seam 2 (jboss-seam2), as used in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 4.3.0 for Red Hat Linux, does not properly sanitize inputs for JBoss Expression Language (EL) expressions, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted URL. NOTE: this is only a vulnerability when the Java Security Manager is not properly configured.